Abstract
Despite the growing number of studies examining consumers’ perceptions of unethical corporate and consumer practices, research examining the apparent double standard existing between what consumers perceive as acceptable corporate behaviour and what they believe are acceptable consumer practices remains scarce. Contradictory, double standards are often quoted by other researchers as a major stream in ethical literature. The few studies dealing with this topic as well as this study indicate that people rate corporate unethical actions as less admissible compared to similar consumer misactions. However, little is known about the processes underlying these double standards. This research investigates whether the techniques of neutralization could provide a meaningful way of approaching this phenomenon. Findings indicate that the higher the extent to which people agree with arguments explaining away the misbehaviour instigated by consumers or business, the more they tolerate these questionable consumer and corporate practices. Furthermore and more importantly, these techniques give an answer on the question why people judge business (representatives) more harshly than consumers. More specifically, results show that the same respondents who justify questionable consumer actions to a certain degree, condone the same misbehaviours instigated by business (representatives) to a much lesser extent. In this way, the techniques of neutralization concern a process explaining the double standard phenomenon.
References
Alexander, E.C.: 2002, ‘Consumer Reactions to Unethical Service Recovery’, Journal of Business Ethics 36(3), 223-237.
Al-Khatib, J.A., S.J. Vitell and M.Y.A. Rawwas: 1997, ‘Consumer Ethics: A Cross-Cultural Investigation’, European Journal of Marketing 31(11/12), 750-767.
Al-Khatib, J.A., S.J. Vitell, R. Rexeisen and M.Y.A. Rawwas: 2005, ‘Inter-Country Differences of Consumer Ethics in Arab Countries’, International Business Review 14(4), 495-516.
Barnett, J.H. and M.J. Karson: 1987, ‘Personal Values and Business Decisions: An Exploratory Investigation’, Journal of Business Ethics 6(5), 371-382.
Bersoff, D.M.: 1999, ‘Why Good People Sometimes Do Bad Things: Motivated Reasoning and Unethical Behavior’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25(1), 28-39.
Chan, A., S. Wong and P. Leung: 1998, ‘Ethical Beliefs of Chinese Consumers in Hong Kong’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(11), 1163-170.
Chiou, J. and L. Pan: 2008, ‘The Impact of Social Darwinism Perception, Status Anxiety, Perceived Trust of People, and Cultural Orientation on Consumer Ethical Beliefs’, Journal of Business Ethics 78(4), 487-502.
DePaulo, P.: 1985, The Ethics of Deception in Retail Bargaining: Do Consumers Accept the Game Analogy? Paper Presented at the 1985 Conference of the Southwestern Marketing Association, New Orleans.
DePaulo, P. (1987) Ethical Perceptions of Deceptive Bargaining Tactics Used by Salespersons and Customers: A Double Standard. In: J. Saegert (ed.) Proceedings of the Division of Consumer Psychology. American Psychological Association, Washington DC.
Drucker, P.: 1981, ‘What is Business Ethics?’, The Public Interest 63(2), 18-36.
Ferrell, O.C. and L.A. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 49(3), 87-96.
Heine, S.J., D.R. Lehman, H.R. Markus and S. Kitayama: 1999, ‘Is There a Universal Need for Positive Self-Regard?’, Psychological Review 106, 766-794.
Higgs-Kleyn, N.H.: 1998, ‘Unethical Consumer Behaviour: An Exploratory Investigation’, Management Dynamics 7(1), 35-52.
Hunt, S. and S.J. Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 6(1), 5-16.
Ingram, R., S.J. Skinner and V.A. Taylor: 2005, ‘Consumers’ Evaluations of Unethical Marketing Behaviors: The Role of Customer Commitment’, Journal of Business Ethics 62(3), 237-252.
Laczniak, G.R. and P.E. Murphy: 1991, ‘Fostering Ethical Marketing Decisions’, Journal of Business Ethics 10(4), 259-271.
Muncy, J.A. and J.K. Eastman: 1998, ‘Materialism and Consumer Ethics: An Exploratory Study’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(2), 137-145.
Muncy, J.A. and S.J. Vitell: 1992, ‘Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of the Final Consumer’, Journal of Business Research 24(4), 297-311.
Rallapalli, K.C., S.J. Vitell, F.A. Wiebe and J.H. Barnes: 1994, ‘Consumer Ethical Beliefs and Personality Traits: An Exploratory Analysis’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(7), 487-495.
Rawwas, M.Y.A., G. Patzer and M. Klassen: 1995, ‘Consumer Ethics in Cross-Cultural Settings’, European Journal of Marketing 29(7), 62-78.
Rawwas, M.Y.A., Z. Swaidan and M. Oyman: 2005, ‘Consumer Ethics: A Cross-Cultural Study of the Ethical Beliefs of Turkish and American Consumers’, Journal of Business Ethics 57(2), 183-195.
Rawwas, M.Y.A., S.J. Vitell and J.A. Al-Khatib: 1994, ‘Consumer Ethics: The Possible Effects of Terrorism and Civil Unrest on the Ethical Values of Consumers’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(3), 223-231.
Strutton, D., L.E. Pelton and O.C. Ferrell: 1997, ‘Ethical Behavior in Retail Settings: Is There a Generation Gap?’, Journal of Business Ethics 16(1), 87-105.
Strutton, D.S., S.J Vitell and L.E. Pelton: 1994, ‘How Consumers Justify Inappropriate Behavior in Marketing Settings: An Application of the Techniques of Neutralization’, Journal of Business Research 30(3), 253-260.
Swaidan, Z., S.J. Vitell and M.Y.A. Rawwas: 2003, ‘Consumer Ethics: Determinants of Ethical Beliefs of African Americans’, Journal of Business Ethics 46(2), 175-186.
Sykes, G.M. and D. Matza: 1957, ‘Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency’, American Sociological Review 22(December), 664-670.
Valdesolo, P. and D. DeSteno: 2007, ‘Moral Hypocrisy: Social Groups and the Flexibility of Virtue’, Psychological Science 18(8), 689-690.
Valdesolo, P. and D. DeSteno: 2008, ‘The Duality of Virtue: Deconstructing the Moral Hypocrite’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44(5), 1334-1338.
Vermeir, I. and P. Van Kenhove: 2008, ‘Gender Differences in Double Standards’, Journal of Business Ethics 81(2), 281-295.
Vitell, S.J.: 2003, ‘Consumer Ethics: Review, Synthesis and Suggestions for the Future’, Journal of Business Ethics 43(1-2), 33-47.
Vitell, S.J., J.R. Lumpkin and M.Y.A. Rawwas: 1991, ‘Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of Elderly Consumers’, Journal of Business Ethics 10(5), 365-375.
Vitell, S.J. and J.A. Muncy: 1992, ‘Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Ethical Judgments of the Final Consumer’, Journal of Business Ethics 11(8), 585-597.
Vitell, S.J. and J.A. Muncy: 2005, ‘The Muncy-Vitell Consumer Ethics Scale: A Modification and Application’, Journal of Business Ethics 62(3), 267-275.
Vitell, S.J., J.G.P. Paolillo and J.J. Singh: 2005, ‘Religiosity and Consumer Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 57(2), 175-181.
Vitell, S.J., J.J. Singh and J.G.P. Paolillo: 2007, ‘Consumers’ Ethical Beliefs: The Roles of Money, Religiosity and Attitude toward Business’, Journal of Business Ethics 73(4), 369-379.
Waller, D. and M.J. Polonsky: 1999, ‘Attitudes towards Political Advertising: Some Cross- Cultural Implications’, Journal of International Consumer Marketing 12(2), 79-98.
Whysall, P.: 2000, ‘Addressing Ethical Issues in Retailing: A stakeholder Perspective’, International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 10(3), 305-318.
Wilkes, R.E.: 1978, ‘Fraudulent Behaviour by Consumers’, Journal of Marketing 42(4), 67- 75.
Wood, G.: 1995, ‘Ethics at the Purchasing/Sales Interface: An International Perspective’; International Marketing Review 12(4), 7-19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Bock, T., Van Kenhove, P. Double Standards: The Role of Techniques of Neutralization. J Bus Ethics 99, 283–296 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0654-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0654-3