Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Political Interference: Evidence from China

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior research suggests that ownership structure is associated to corporate social responsibility (CSR) in developed countries. This article examines whether and how ownership structure affects CSR in emerging markets using Chinese firms’ social responsibility ranking. Our empirical evidences show that for non-state-owned firms, corporate ownership dispersion is positively associated to CSR. However, for state-owned firms, whose controlling shareholder is the state, this relation is reversed. We attribute the reversed relationship to political interferences and further test this hypothesis by demonstrating that regional economic development is negatively related to CSR for state-owned firms due to decreased political interference in more developed areas. This study is the first to directly examine the relationship between the dispersion of corporate ownership and CSR in emerging markets, and our results depict that it is important to consider ownership type in assessing CSR in emerging market where state ownership is still prevalent such as China. The results also reveal that firm size, profitability, employee power, leverage, and growth opportunity affect CSR in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abratt, R. and D. Sacks: 1988, ‘The Marketing Challenge: Towards Being Profitable and Socially Responsible’, Journal of Business Ethics 7(7), 497–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D. and S. Johnson: 2005, ‘Unbundling Institutions’, Journal of Political Economy 113(5), 949-995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A., C.K., Knoeber: 2001, ‘Do Some Outside Directors Play a Political Role?’, Journal of Law and Economics 44(1), 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R., D. Rupp, C. Williams and J. Ganapathi: 2007, ‘Putting the S back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations’, Academy of Management Review 32(3), 836-863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., J. Qian and M. Qian: 2005, ‘Law, Finance, and Economic Growth in China’. Journal of Financial Economics 77(1), 57–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, L. and C. Amato: 2007, ‘The Effects of Firm Size and Industry on Corporate Giving’, Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 229-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K., A. Carroll and J. Hatfield: 1985, ‘An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability’, Academy of Management Journal 28(2), 446–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C., J. Lu and Z. Tao: 2006, ‘The Multitask Theory of State Enterprise Reform: Empirical Evidence from China’, American Economic Review 96(2), 353-357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C. and L. C. Xu: 2005, ‘Incentives for CEOs with Multitasks: Evidence from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises’, Journal of Comparative Economics 33(3), 517–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beliveau, B., M. Cottrill and H. O’Neill: 1994, ‘Predicting Corporate Social Responsiveness’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(9), 731-738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J., S. Estrin and J. Maw: 2005, ‘Why did Transition Economies Choose Mass Privatization?’, Journal of the European Economic Association 3(2–3), 567–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boycko M., Shleifer A., Vishny R. W. (1996) ‘A theory of privatization’. Economic Journal 106 (435), 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, W. and J. Moon: 2005, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A Seven-Country Study of CSR Web Site Reporting’, Business & Society 44(4), 415-441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung Y. L., W. Tan, H. Ahn and Z. Zhang: 2010, ‘Does Corporate Social Responsibility Matter in Asian Emerging Markets?’, Journal of Business Ethics 92(3), 401-413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., S. Djankov and L. H. P. Lang: 2000, ‘The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations’, Journal of Financial Economics 58(1–2), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., E., Feijen, and L. Laeven: 2008, ‘Political Connections and Preferential Access to Finance: The Role of Campaign Contributions’, Journal of Financial Economics 88(3), 554-580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deniz-Deniz, M. and J. Garcia-Falcon: 2002, ‘Determinants of the Multinationals’ Social Response: Empirical Application to International Companies Operating in Spain’, Journal of Business Ethics 38(4), 339-370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, S. M. andR.H.McGuckin: 2008, ‘The Effects of Federalism on Productivity in Chinese Firms’, Management and Organization Review 4(1), 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S. and V. Perotin: 1991, ‘Does Ownership Always Matter?’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 9(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M.: 2006, ‘Politically Connected Firms’, American Economic Review 96(1), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M. and L. H. P. Lang: 2002, ‘The Ultimate Ownership of Western European corporations’, Journal of Financial Economics 65(3), 365–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. P. H., T. J. Wong and T. Zhang: 2007, ‘Politically Connected CEOs, Corporate Governance, and Post-IPO Performance of China’s Newly Partially Privatized Firms’, Journal of Financial Economics 84(2), 330-357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisman, R.: 2001, ‘Estimating the Value of Political Connections’, American Economic Review 91(4), 1095–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frye, T. and A. Shleifer: 1997, ‘The Invisible Hand and the Grabbing Hand’, American Economic Review 87(2), 354–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Y: 2009, ‘Corporate Social Performance in China: Evidence from Large Companies’, Journal of Business Ethics 89(1), 23-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, L. and S. Thomas: 2007, ‘A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Deliberative Reasoning of Canadian and Chinese Accounting Students’, Journal of Business Ethics 82(1), 189-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S. B. and S. A. Waddock: 1994, ‘Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 37(4), 1034-1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. J. and J. R Mahon: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research’, Business and Society 36(1), 5-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, G.: 1998, ‘Capital-market Imperfections and Investment’. Journal of Economic Literature 36(1), 193-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, G., C. M. C. Lee and H. Yue: 2010, ‘Tunneling Through Inter-Corporate Loans: The China Experience’, Journal of Financial Economics (forthcoming).

  • Johnson, R. A. and D. W Greening: 1999, ‘The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 564-576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., R. La Porta, A. Shleifer and F. Lopez-de-Silanes: 2000, ‘Tunneling’. American Economic Review 90(2), 22-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., and T., Mitton: 2003, ‘Cronyism and Capital Controls: Evidence from Malaysia’, Journal of Financial Economics 67(2), 351–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M.T.: 1999, ‘The institutional Determinants of Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 20(2), 163-179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keim, G: 1978, ‘Managerial Behavior and the Social Responsibilities Debate: Goals Versus Constraints’, Academy of Management Journal 21(1), 57-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khwaja, A., and A., Mian: 2005, ‘Do Lenders Favor Politically Connected Firms? Rent Provision in an Emerging Financial Market’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(4), 1371–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG: 2005, ‘KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005’, Amsterdam, the Netherlands: KPMG Global Sustainability Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K. C. and G. Shi: 2008, ‘Factors Affecting Ethical Attitudes in Mainland China and Hong Kong’, Journal of Business Ethics 77(4), 463-479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, L., E., Ofek, R. Stulz: 1996, ‘Leverage, Investment and Firm Growth’. Journal of Financial Economics 40(1), 3-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H., Meng L., Wang Q., Zhou L.: 2008, ‘Political Connections, Financing and Firm Performance: Evidence from Chinese Private Firms’, Journal of Development Economics 87(2), 283-299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. A., D. J. Webb and K. E. Harris: 2001, ‘Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsible? the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior’, Journal of Consumer Affairs 35(1), 45–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, A. and A. Kolk: 2010, ‘Extrinsic and Intrinsic Drivers of Corporate Social Performance: Evidence from Foreign and Domestic Firms in Mexico’, Journal of Management Studies 47(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, A. and G. Whiteman: 2009, ‘Exploring the Geography of Corporate Philanthropic Disaster Response: A Study of Fortune Global 500 Firms’, Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 589-603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M.: 2001, ‘Does Firm Size Confound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance?’, Journal of Business Ethics 33(2), 167-180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Y.: 2000, ‘The process of China’s market transition (1978–1998): The evolutionary, historical, and comparative perspectives’. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 156(1), 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramalho, R.: 2007, ‘The Persistence of Corruption: Evidence from the 1992 Presidential Impeachment in Brazil’, Working Paper. World Bank.

  • Roberts, R.W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an application of stakeholder theory’. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T. and S. Berman: 2000, ‘A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance’, Business and Society 39(4), 397-418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, Michael V. and Paul A. Fouts: 1997, ‘A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability’, Academy of Management Journal 40(3), 534–559.

  • Scholtens, B.: 2008, ‘A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance’. Ecological Economics 68(1), 46-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • See, G. K. H: 2009, ‘Harmonious Society and Chinese CSR: Is There Really a Link?’, Journal of Business Ethics 89(1), 1-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A, and R. W. Vishny: 1997, ‘A survey of corporate governance’, Journal of Finance 52(2), 737-783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanwick, P A. and S. D. Stanwick: 1998, ‘The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(2), 195-204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, L. and S. Estrin: 2008, ‘Retained State Shareholding in Chinese PLCs: Does Government Ownership Always Reduce Corporate Value?’, Journal of Comparative Economics 36(1), 74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J.: 1969, ‘A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 1(1), 15-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B. and D. W. Greening: 1997, ‘Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees’, Academy of Management Journal 40(3), 658–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann, A.: 1985, ‘Data in Search of a Theory a Critical Examination of the Relationship Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance’, Academy of Management Review 10(3), 540-577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A. and S. B. Graves: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link’, Strategic Management Journal 18(4), 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welfold, R.: 2004, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and Asia: Critical Elements and Best Practice’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 13(1), 31-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitcomb, L. L., C. B. Erdener and C. Li: 1998, ‘Business Ethical Values in China and the U.S’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(8), 839-852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R. and Z. Rezaee: 2009, ‘Do Credible Firms Perform Better in Emerging Markets? Evidence from China’, Journal of Business Ethics 90(2), 221-237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zu L. and L. Song: 2009, ‘Determinants of Managerial Values on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China’, Journal of Business Ethics 88(Supplement), 105-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ran Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, W., Zhang, R. Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Political Interference: Evidence from China. J Bus Ethics 96, 631–645 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0488-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0488-z

Keywords

Navigation