Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effects of Firm Size and Industry on Corporate Giving

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent downward trends in corporate giving have renewed interest in the factors that shape corporate philanthropy. This paper examines the relationships between charitable contributions, firm size and industry. Improvements over previous studies include an IRS data base that covers a much broader range of firm sizes and industries as compared to previous studies and estimation using an instrumental variable technique that explicitly addresses potential simultaneity between charitable contributions and profitability. Important findings provide evidence of a cubic relationship between charitable giving and firm size and evidence of strong industry effects. The plus-minus-plus regression coefficient sign pattern for the cubic firm size model suggests that small and large firms give more relative to total receipts with lower giving ratios among medium size firms. One interpretation for this finding is that small firms are close to the communities they serve while high visibility creates a need for large firm philanthropy. Strong industry effects provide evidence of inter-industry differences in giving culture and/or different public relations requirements across industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson L. and Glaskiewicz J. (1988). Stock Ownership and Company Contributions to Charity. Administrative Sciences Quarterly 33(1):82–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boatsman J. R. and Gupta S. (1996). Taxes and Corporate Charity: Empirical Evidence from Micro-Level Panel Data. National Tax Journal 49(2):193–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer S. and Millington A. (2005). Corporate Reputation and Philanthropy: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 61(1):29–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckholtz A. K., Amason A. C. and Rutherford M. A. (1999). Beyond Resources: The Mediating Effects of Top Management Discretion and Values on Corporate Philanthropy. Business & Society 38(2):167–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame D. F. and Frishkoff P. A. (1996). How Does Firm Size Affect Corporate Philanthropy? In: Burlingame D. F., Young D. R. (eds) Corporate Philanthropy at the Crossroads. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 86–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain J. S. (1956). Barriers to New Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston G. J. (1985). The Validity of Profits-Structure with Particular Reference to the FTC’s Line of Business. American Economic Review 75(1):67

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves R. E. and Pugel T. A. (1980). Intra Industry Differences in Conduct and Performance: Viable Strategies in U.S. Manufacturing. New York University Monograph Series in Finance and Economics Monograph, 1980–1982, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz H. (1973). Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy. Journal of Law and Economics 16(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher F. M. and McGowan J. J. (1983). On the Misuse of Accounting Rates of Return to Infer Monopoly Profits. American Economic Review 73(1):82–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry L. F., Keim G. D., Meiners R. E. (1982). Corporate Contributions: Altruistic or For-Profit? Academy of Management Journal 25(1):94–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene W. H. (2000). Econometric Analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin J. J. and Mahon J. F. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate. Business & Society 36(1):5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall M. and Weiss L. W. (1967). Average Concentration Ratios and Industrial Performance. Review of Economics and Statistics 49(3):319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess D., Rogovsky N., and Dunfee T. W. (2002). The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review 44(2):110–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson O. (1966). Corporate Philanthropy: An Analysis of Corporate Contributions. Journal of Business 39(4):489–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kedia B. L. and Kuntz E. C. (1981). The Context of Social Performance: An Empirical Study of Texas Banks. In: L. E. Preston (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 3rd edn. JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn., pp. 133–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I., Ferrell O. C., Hunt G. T. M. (1999). Corporate Citizenship: Cultural Antecedents and Business Benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27(4):455–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I. (2001). Consumers’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibilities: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of Business Ethics 30(1):57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin S. (1993). Advanced Industrial Economics. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin S. A. (1985). An Essential Grace. McClelland and Stewart, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy K. M. and Siegfried J. J. (1985). The Effect of Firm Size on Corporate Philanthropy. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 25(2):18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire J. B., Sundgren A. and Schneeweis T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal 31(4):854–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller D. C. (1990). The Dynamics of Company Profits: An International Comparison. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M. E. (1979). The Structure within Industries and Company Performance. Review of Economics and Statistics 61(2):214–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M. E. and Kramer M. R. (2002). The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review 80(12):57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell T. C. (1996). How Much Does Industry Matter? An Alternative Empirical Test. Strategic Management Journal 17(4):323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts R. W. (1992). Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(6):595–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt R. P. (1991). How Much Does Industry Matter. Strategic Management Journal 12(3):167–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiia D. H., Carroll A. B. and Buchholtz A. K. (2003). Philanthropy as Strategy: When Corporate Charity “Begins at Home”. Business & Society 42(2):162–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer F. M. and Ross D. (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee R. (1985). Do Markets Differ Much? American Economic Review 75(3):341–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert B., Morris S. A. and Bartkus B. R. (2003). Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers: Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics 45(3):195–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd W. G. (1972). The Elements of Market Structure. Review of Economics and Statistics 54(1):25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler G. J. (1963). Capital and Rates of Return in Manufacturing. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J. K., Smith H. L., Hood J. N. (1993). Charitable Contributions by Small Businesses. Journal of Small Business Management 31(3):35–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann A. A. (1985). Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms. Academy of Management Review 10(3):540–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Useem M. (1988). Market and Institutional Factors in Corporate Contributions. California Management Review 30(2):77–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidaver-Cohen D. and Altman B. W. (2000). Corporate Citizenship in the New Millennium: Foundation for an Architecture of Excellence. Business & Society Review 105(1):145–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock S. A. and Graves S. B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal 18(4):303–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B. and Montgomery C. (1988). Tobin’s Q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance. American Economic Review 78(1):246–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams R. J. and Barrett J. D. (2000). Corporate Philanthropy, Criminal Activity, and Firm Reputation: Is There A Link? Journal of Business Ethics 26(4):341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood D. J. and Jones R. E. (1995). Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3(3):229–267

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marketing, UNC Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA

    Louis H. Amato

  2. Economics, UNC Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA

    Christie H. Amato

Authors
  1. Louis H. Amato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christie H. Amato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christie H. Amato.

Additional information

Christie H. Amato (Ph.D., University of Alabama) is professor of marketing at the Belk College of Business Administration, University of North Carolina, Charlotte. Dr. Amato's research interests lie in the area of strategic marketing, productivity, quality of life and ethics. She has published articles in top marketing journals including: Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Retailing, Journal of Advertising and Journal of Business Research.

Louis H. Amato (Ph.D., University of South Carolina) is professor of economics at the Belk College of Business Administration, University of North Carolina-Charlotte. Dr.␣Amato's research interests lie in the areas of market structure and profitability, productivity, quality of life and ethics. He has published articles in top journals including Southern Economic Journal, Review of Industrial Organization, and Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amato, L.H., Amato, C.H. The Effects of Firm Size and Industry on Corporate Giving. J Bus Ethics 72, 229–241 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9167-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9167-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation