Abstract
Germany is considered to be a pioneer of social security systems; nonetheless, globalization and demographic changes have put enormous pressure on them. A solution is not yet in sight as the debate on the future of the German social security systems still lacks consensus. We argue that ideas matter and that the debate can benefit from a deeper reflection on the concept of social security. This objective is pursued along two lines. First, we take a historical perspective and reconstruct the development of Germany’s social security systems. Second, we scrutinize from a theoretical perspective how social security is conceptualized in public and theoretical debates. Behind the various positions, we identify four basic ideal types. We then analyze how these ideal types account for the benefits of social security systems and what role they assign to corporations in providing social security. While two ultimately reinforce potential conflicts between different groups in society, the other two ideal types reveal possible benefits for all. The last ideal type actually conceptualizes social security systems as insurance that fosters risky but overall productive investments in human and other forms of capital. Therefore, it can be shown that social security systems are not necessarily threatened by globalization and that incentives exist for corporations to invest in the provision of social security.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arentz, H. J.: 2004, Sozialstaat im Härtetest (Droste, Düsseldorf).
Ashford, N.: 1993, Dismantling the Welfare State: Why and How. http://www.libertarian.co.uk/lapubs/polin/polin086.pdf.
Backhaus-Maul, H.: 2004, ‘Corporate Citizenship im deutschen Sozialstaat’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschehen 14, 23–30.
Berthold, N.: 1997, Der Sozialstaat im Zeitalter der Globalisierung (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen).
Blair T, G. Schröder (2000) ‘Europe: The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte’. In: B. Hombach (eds) The Politics of the New Centre. (Polity Press, Cambridge), 157-177.
Buchanan, J.M.: 1975, The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
Buchanan J.M (1986) ‘Dismantling the Welfare State’. In: J.M. Buchanan (ed) Liberty, Market, and State: Political Economy in the 1980 s. (Wheatsheaf Books, Brighton), 178-185.
Buchanan, J. M.: 1992, ‘Markt, Staat und Freiheit: die politische Ökonomie des Wohlfahrtsstaates’, in Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung (ed.), Argumente der Freiheit: Markt, Freiheit und Demokratie. (COMDOK-Verl.-Abt., Sankt Augustin), pp. 39–52.
Buchanan, J.M. and G. Tullock: 1996, The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy (The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).
Bundesbank, D.: 2008, Währungsreform 1948. http://www.bundesbank.de/aufgaben/aufgaben_60jahrewaehrung-reform.php. Accessed 30 Dec 2008.
Carroll, A.B.: 1999, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct’, Business & Society 38(3), 268-295.
Commission, E.: 2001, Green Paper, Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (COM (2001) 366, Brussels).
Crane, A. and D. Matten: 2004, Business Ethics, a European Perspective: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
Crane, A., D. Matten and L.J. Spence: 2007, Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in a Global Context (Routledge, Milton Park).
Erhard, L.: 1964, Wohlstand für Alle (ECON Verlag, Düsseldorf).
Fabiunke, G.: 1963, Martin Luther als Nationalökonom (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin).
Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine.
Galbraith J.K (1948) ‘The German Economy’. In S.E. Harris (ed) Foreign Economic Policy for the United States. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge), 91-103.
Giersch, H., K.-H. Paqué and H. Schmieding: 1994, The Fading Miracle: Four Decades of Market Economy in Germany (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Graf Fugger von Glött, U.: 2003, Die Fuggerei: die älteste Sozialsiedlung der Welt (Wißner-Verlag, Augsburg).
Hauser R, B. Rudolph (1999) ‘Soziale Sicherungssysteme’. In: W. Korff (ed) Handbuch der Wirtschaftsethik. Band 4. (Gütersloher Verlagshaus, Gütersloh), 455-471.
Hayek F.A.v (1978) ‘The Primacy of the Abstract’. In F. A. v. Hayek (ed) New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas. (Routledge, London), 35-49.
Hayek, F.A.v.: 1979, The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason (Liberty Press, Indianapolis).
Hayek F.A. v. (1991) ‘Dr. Bernard Mandeville (1670-1733)’. In: W. W. Bartley, S. Kresge (eds) The Trend of Economic Thinking: Essays on Political Economists and Economic History. (Routledge, London), 79-100.
Hetzel, R. L.: 2002, German Monetary History in the First Half of the Twentieth Century. http://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedreq/y2002iwinp1-35.html.
Homann K (2003) ‘Reformstau in der Sozialpolitik: ein Beitrag zur Strukturierung der Diskussion’. In: C. Luetge (eds) Anreize und Moral: Gesellschaftstheorie - Ethik – Anwendungen. (LIT-Verlag, Münster), 287-298.
Howard-Grenville, J., J. Nash and C. Coglianese: 2008, ‘Constructing the License to Operate: Internal Factors and Their Influence on Corporate Environmental Decisions’, Law & Policy 30(1), 73-107.
Kellenbenz, H.: 1971, ‘Die sozialgeschichtliche Bedeutung der Fuggerei’, Schwäbische Blätter für Heimatpflege und Volksbildung 22, 105-117.
Kießling R (1990) ‘Vom Pfenningalmosen zur Aussteuerstiftung: Materielle Kultur in den Seelgeräten des Augsburger Bürgertums während des Mittelalters’. In H. Kühnel (ed) Materielle Kultur und religiöse Stiftung im Spätmittelalter. (Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien), 37-62.
Kotlikoff L.J (1987) ‘Social Security’. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, P. Newman (eds) The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. (Macmillan, London), 413-418.
Krugman, P.R.: 2007, The Conscience of a Liberal: Reclaiming America from the Right (Penguin Books, London).
Lampert H (1990) ‘Notwendigkeit, Aufgaben und Grundzüge einer Theorie der Sozialpolitik’. In: T. Thiemeyer (ed) Theoretische Grundlagen der Sozialpolitik. (Duncker & Humblot, Berlin), 9-71.
Lampert, H. and J. Althammer: 2007, Lehrbuch der Sozialpolitik (Springer, Berlin).
Libertäre Plattform in der FDP: 2008, Grundsatzerklärung. http://cms.libertaere-plattform.de.sh01s004ws.isprouting.de/images/stories/downloads/grundsatzerklaerung_der_lp.pdf.
Luetge, C.: 2006, ‘An Economic Rationale for a Work and Savings Ethic? J. Buchanan’s Late Works and Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 66(1), 43-51.
Mandeville, B.: 1934, The Fable of the Bees; or, Private Vices, Public Benefits (Wishart & Company, London).
Meerhaeghe, M.v.: 2006, ‘Bismarck and the Social Question’, Journal of Economic Studies 33, 284-301.
Merkel, A.: 2000, ‘Die Wir-Gesellschaft: Über die Notwendigkeit einer Neuen Sozialen Marktwirtschaft’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 269, 11.
Meyer, M.: 2004, Prinzipale, Agenten und ökonomische Methode: von einseitiger Steuerung zu wechselseitiger Abstimmung (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen).
Müller-Armack, A.: 1946, ‘Wirtschaftslenkung und Marktwirtschaft’, in A. Müller-Armack (ed.), Wirtschaftsordnung und Wirtschaftspolitik: Studien und Konzepte zur Sozialen Marktwirtschaft und zur Europäischen Integration (Haupt, Bern), pp. 19–170.
Müller-Armack, A.: 1976, Wirtschaftsordnung und Wirtschaftspolitik: Studien und Konzepte zur Sozialen Marktwirtschaft und zur Europäischen Integration (Haupt, Bern).
Müller-Armack A (1989) ‘The Meaning of the Social Market Economy’. In A.T. Peacock, H. Willgerodt (eds) Germany’s Social Market Economy: Origins and Evolution. (Macmillan for the Trade Policy Research Centre, London), 82-86.
Nef, R.: 2006, The Welfare State Destroys Welfare and the State. http://www.unternehmerische-freiheit.de/wm_files/wm_pdf/w1_the_welfare_state.pdf.
Nozick, R.: 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Basic Books, New York).
Obama, B.: 2006, The Audacity of Hope (Three Rivers Press, New York).
Okun, A.M.: 1975, Equality and Efficiency, the Big Tradeoff (The Brookings Institution, Washington).
Petrick, M. and I. Pies: 2007, ‘In Search for Rules that Secure Gains from Cooperation: The Heuristic Value of Social Dilemmas for Normative Institutional Economics’, European Journal of Law and Economics 23(3), 251-271.
Pigou, A.C.: 1932, The Economics of Welfare (Macmillan, London).
Pölnitz, G.: 1970, Die Fugger (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen).
Rawls, J.: 1993, Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press, New York).
Ritter, G.A.: 1991, Der Sozialstaat: Entstehung und Entwicklung im internationalen Vergleich (Oldenbourg, München).
Ritter, G.A.: 1998, Bismarck und die Entstehung der deutschen Sozialversicherung (Stadt Pforzheim, Pforzheim).
Rosen, S., J. Simon, J.R. Vincent, W. MacLead, M. Fox and D.M. Thea: 2003, ‘AIDS Is Your Business’, Harvard Business Review 81(2), 81-87.
Rothbard, M.N.: 1970, Power & Market; Government and the Economy (Institute for Humane Studies, Menlo Park).
Rothbard, M.N.: 1982, The Ethics of Liberty (Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands).
Rothbard, M. N.: 2002, For a New Liberty: the Libertarian Manifesto (Ludwig von Mises Institute). http://mises.org/rothbard/foranewlb.pdf.
Scheller, B.: 2004, Memoria an der Zeitenwende: die Stiftungen Jakob Fuggers des Reichen vor und während der Reformation (ca. 1505 - 1555) (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin).
Schlecht O. (1999) ‘Soziale Marktwirtschaft’. In W. Korff (ed) Handbuch der Wirtschaftsethik: Band 1 – 4. (Gütersloher Verl.-Haus, Gütersloh), 289-303.
Schmidt, M.G.: 2005, Sozialpolitik in Deutschland: historische Entwicklung und internationaler Vergleich (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden).
Sigerist, H.Y.: 1999, ‘From Bismarck to Beveridge: Developments and Trends in Social Security Legislation’, Journal of Public Health Policy 20(4), 474-496.
Sinn, H.-W.: 1995, ‘A Theory of the Welfare State’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97(4), 495-526.
Sinn H.-W. (1996) ‘Social Insurance, Incentives and Risk Taking’. International Tax and Public Finance 3:259-280.
Sinn, H.-W.: 2000, ‘The Threat to the German Welfare State’, Atlantic Economic Journal 28(3), 279-294.
Sinn, H.-W.: 2003, The New Systems Competition (Blackwell, Malden, MA).
Sinn, H.-W.: 2007, Can Germany be Saved? The Malaise of the World’s First Welfare State (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.).
Steinmann, H. and A. G. Scherer: 2000, Corporate Ethics and Management Theory. In P. Koslowski (ed.), Contemporary Economic Ethics and Business Ethics: Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, pp. 148–192.
Strieder, J.: 1931, Jacob Fugger the Rich, Merchant and Banker of Augsburg, 1459-1525 (The Adelphi Company, New York).
Suchanek, A.: 1994, Ökonomischer Ansatz und theoretische Integration (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen).
Tietz-Strödel, M.: 1982, Die Fuggerei in Augsburg: Studien zur Entwicklung des sozialen Stiftungsbaus im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen).
Weber, M.: 1949, The Methodology of the Social Sciences (The Free Press, Glencoe).
Weidenbacher, J.: 1926, Die Fuggerei in Augsburg: die erste deutsche Kleinhaus-Stiftung (Selbstverlag, Augsburg).
Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations (Macmillan, New York).
Wünsche, H.F.: 1982, Standard Texts on the Social Market Economy: Two Centuries of Discussion (Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waldkirch, R.W., Meyer, M. & Homann, K. Accounting for the Benefits of Social Security and the Role of Business: Four Ideal Types and Their Different Heuristics. J Bus Ethics 89 (Suppl 3), 247–267 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0392-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0392-6