Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility and the “Divided Corporate Self”: The case of Chiquita in Colombia

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article employs Maak’s framework of the seven “Cs” of Corporate Integrity to assess the problems faced by Chiquita Brands in dealing with extortion by left-wing guerilla and right wing paramilitary groups in Colombia from 1989 to 2004. Both types of organizations used Chiquita payments to engage in terrorist activity in Colombia. The extended and systematic dealings with these groups were antithetical to the process of corporate responsibility to which the firm was committed during the timeframe of 1998–2004, revealing a “divided self” in which major corporate activities diverged dramatically from the core values of the firm. Maak’s framework provides a useful tool in analyzing the division and the potential for applying lessons from the case to our understanding of corporate social responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altschuller, S., D. Feldman, and L. Blecher: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’, The International Lawyer 42(2), 489-500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R. and P.E. Murphy: 2006, ‘The Many Faces of Integrity’, Business Ethics Quarterly 16(1), 3-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, H., W. H. Camp and C. Hasler: February 2009, ‘Report of the Special Litigation Committee of Chiquita Brands International, Inc., In Re: Chiquita Brands International Inc. Alien Tort Statute and Shareholder Derivative Action, Doc 202 Case No.: 08-01916-MD, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

  • Becker, T.E.; 1998, ‘Integrity in Organizations: Beyond Honesty and Conscientiousness’, Academy of Management Review 23(1), 154-161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.T.: 2005, Corporate Integrity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahn, N. and A. Gambino.: 2008, ‘Towards of Typology of Corporate Responsibility in Different Governance Contexts: What to Do in the Absence of Responsible Country Governance?’, Georgetown Journal of International Law 39(4), 655-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C.: 1995, ‘Standing for Something’, Journal of Philosophy 92(5), 235-260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diperna, T.A..: 2008, ‘Small Arms and Light Weapons: Complicity “With a View” Toward Extended State Responsibility’, Florida Journal of International Law, 20(1), 25-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T.W.: 1999, ‘Corporate Governance in a Market with Morality’, Law and Contemporary Problems 62: 129-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T.W.: 2000, ‘Tightening the Ties that Bind – Defending a Contractarian Approach to Business Ethics’, American Business Law Journal 37(3), 579-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T.W.: 2006, ‘A Critical Perspective of Integrative Social Contracts Theory: Recurring Criticisms and the Next Generation Research Topics’, Journal of Business Ethics 68: 303-328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E. and D. Mele 2004 ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory’. Journal of Business Ethics 53: 51-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez E 2002 ‘Defining a Post-Conventional Corporate Moral Responsibility’. Journal of Business Ethics 39:101-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. and J. Wempe 2002 The Balanced Company: A Theory of Corporate Integrity. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D.: 2005, ‘Integrity as a Business Asset’, Journal of Business Ethics 58, 125-136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, Thomas.: 2008, ‘Undivided Corporate Responsibility: Towards a Theory of Corporate Integrity’, Journal of Business Ethics 82: 353-368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D.: 2001, ‘Community, Business Ethics, and Global Capitalism’, American Business Law Journal 38(2), 215-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D.: 2007, ‘Corporate Citizenship and Trustworthy Capitalism: Cocreating a More Peaceful Planet’, American Business Law Journal 44(2), 237-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFall, L.: 1987, ‘Integrity’, Ethics 98, 5-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. S.: 1994, ‘Managing for Organizational Integrity’, Harvard Business Review March–April, pp. 106–117

  • Petrick, J. A. and J. F. Quinn: 2001, ‘The Challenge of Leadership Accountability for Integrity Capacity as a Strategic Asset’, Journal of Business Ethics 34, 331-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, B.: 2000, ‘Book Review: Ties That Bind (Donaldson, T. and T. W. Dunfee)’, American Business Law Journal 37(3), 563–578.

  • Solomon, R.C.: 1993, Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business (Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C.: 1999, A Better Way to Think About Business: How Personal Integrity Leads to Corporate Success (Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastva, S. and Associates (eds): 1988, Executive Integrity: The Search for High Human Values in Organizational Life (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA/London)

  • Wempe, B.: 2008, ‗Four Design Criteria for any Future Contractarian Theory of Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 81, 697-714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werre, M.: 2003, ‗Implementing Corporate Responsibility – The Chiquita Case’, Journal of Business Ethics 44, 247-260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virginia G. Maurer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maurer, V.G. Corporate Social Responsibility and the “Divided Corporate Self”: The case of Chiquita in Colombia. J Bus Ethics 88 (Suppl 4), 595–603 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0313-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0313-8

Keywords

Navigation