Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Relative Importance of Ethics as a Selection Criterion for Entry-Level Public Accountants: Does Gender Make a Difference?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines public accountants’ perceptions of the relative importance of business ethics as a selection criterion for entry-level public accounting positions. Also, it seeks to determine whether gender differences do exist with respect to these perceptions. The data were collected through a survey of 335 professional accountants in four southeastern states. The results show that, among the eight selection factors that were studied, technical competence in accounting, communication skills, and interpersonal skills were the most influential, while professionalism and leadership abilities were the least important. Ethics was ranked fourth by the females and sixth by the males. A multivariate analysis of variance revealed significant differences between the genders with respect to five of the eight factors. The females’ scores were higher for ethics and interpersonal skills and lower for conceptual aptitude, strategic thinking, and leadership abilities. Implications for accounting educators and practitioners are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahadiat, N. and K. J. Smith: 1994, ‹A Factor-Analytic Investigation of Employee Selection Factors of Significance to Recruiters of Entry-Level Accountants’, Issues in Accounting Education 9(1), 59–79

    Google Scholar 

  • AICPA: 2006, ‹What Women in the Profession are Thinking’. Available at: http://www.aicpa.org/download/career/wofi/9690-331_FocusGpReport-v3.pdf

  • Akaah, I.P. and E. A. Riordan: 1989. ‹Judgments of Marketing Professionals About Ethical Issues in Marketing Research: A replication and Extension’, Journal of Marketing Research 26(1), 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, W. S. and R. J. Sack: 2000, ‹Accounting Education: Charting the Course Through a Perilous Future’, Accounting Education Series, Vol. 16 (American Accounting Association, Sarasota, Florida)

  • Anderson, J., E. Johnson and P. Reckers: 1994, ‹Perceived Effects of Gender, Family Structure, and Physical Appearance on Career Progression in Public Accounting: A Research Note’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(6), 483–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M.: 1993, ‹Ethics and Professionalism in Accounting Education: A Sample Course’, Journal of Accounting Education 11(1), 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. H. and M. J. Karson: 1989, ‹Managers, Values and Executive Decisions: An Exploration of the Role of Gender, Career Stage, Organizational Level, Function and the Managerial Decision Making’, Journal of Business Ethics 8(10), 747–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bay, D. and K. McKeage: 2006, ‹Emotional Intelligence in Undergraduate Accounting Students: Preliminary Assessment’, Accounting Education 15(4), 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, D. and R. Bernardi: 2007, ‹Accounting Ethics Courses: Do They Work?’. The CPA Journal Online. Available at: http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2007/107/essentials/p64.htm

  • Bonner, S.: 1999, ‹Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Accounting’, Accounting Horizons 13(4), 385–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, D.: 2004, ‹Wider Teaching as a Matter of Course: What Employers Want’, Financial Times November 15, 2004, p. 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazelton, J.: 1998, ‹Implications for Women in Accounting: Some Preliminary Evidence Regarding Gender Communication’, Issues in Accounting Education 13(3), pp. 509–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, J. and N. Zabriskie: 1983, How Ethical are Industrial Buyers?. Industrial Marketing Management 12(4), 219–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J. and J. D'Aquila: 2004, `A Crucial Test for New CPAs', The CPA Journal (January), 17–23.

  • Cohen, J., L. Pant and D. Sharp: 1996, ‹Measuring the Ethical Awareness and Ethical Orientation of Canadian Auditors’, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8 (1), 98–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, D., R. Boyatzis and A. McKee: 2002, Primal Leadership: Realizing the Power of Emotional Intelligence. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T.: 2005, ‹How Strong are the Ethical Preferences of Senior Business Executives?’, Journal of Business Ethics 56(1), 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aquila, J.: 2001, ‹Financial Accountants’ Perceptions of Management’s Ethical Standards’, Journal of Business Ethics 31(3), 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, J.M., J. Kantor, J. and I. Greenberg: 1994, ‹Possible Ethical Issues and their Impact on the Firm: Perceptions Held by Public Accountants, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 919–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L.: 1997, ‹Ethical Differences Between Men and Women in the Sales Profession’. Journal of Business Ethics 16(11), 1143–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, S., J. Joseph and V. Maxomov, V: 2004, ‹Perceptions of Proper Ethical Conduct of Male and Female Russian Managers,’ Journal of Business Ethics 24(2), 179–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmond-Kiger, C., M. Tucker and C. Yost: 2006, ‹Emotional Intelligence: From the Classroom to the Workplace’, Management Accounting Quarterly 7(2), 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, C., M. Milne, C. Stringer and R. Whiting, R.: 2005, ‹Oral and Written Communication Apprehension in Accounting Students: Curriculum Impacts and Impacts on Academic Performance’, Accounting Education 14(3), 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C., and J. Attanucci: 1994, Two Moral Orientations: Gender Differences and Similarities. In: B. Puka (eds) Caring Voices and Women’s Moral Frames: Gilligan’s view. Garland, NY, pp 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., R. Anderson, B. Babin, R. Tatham and W. Black: 2006, Multivariate Data Analysis (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D.: 2004, ‹Professional Competence’, CGA Magazine 38 (2), 14–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassall, T., J. Joyce, J. Montano and J. Anes: 1999, ‹Vocational Skills and Capabilities for Management Accountants’, Management Accounting 77(11), 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, G., S. Maxwell, R. Wiener, K. Boynton and W. Rooney: 1980, ‹Is a Behavioral Measure the Best Estimate of Behavioral Parameters? Perhaps Not’, Applied Psychological Measurement 4(3), 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, K. and C. Hartley: 2005, ‹Learning to Design and Teach an Accounting Capstone’, Issues in Accounting Education 20(4), 311–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. and K. Hiltebeital: 1995, ‹Organizational Influence in a Model of the Moral Decision Process of Accountants’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(6), 417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, G.: 2006, ‹Understanding Accounting Techniques in the Context of Organizational Change’, Management Accounting Quarterly 7(4), pp. 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, S. W, O. C. Ferrell, and S. J. Skinner: 1990, ‹Ethical Behavior among Marketing Researchers: An Assessment of Selected Demographic Characteristics’, Journal of Business Ethics 9(8), 681–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, J., R. Stevens and R. Bethke: 1987, Differences in Ethical Perceptions Between Male and Female Managers: Myth or Reality?. Journal of Business Ethics 6(6), 489–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, R., P. Leathers, and K. Snead: 1993, ‹Student Versus Recruiter Perceptions of the Importance of Staff Auditor Performance Variables’, Accounting Horizons, 7(4), 58–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L., W. Wiggins and C. Brown: 1990, ‹Personnel Selection by CPA DFrms – The On-Campus Interview’, in Proceedings: Decision Sciences Institute (November 19–21), pp. 128–130

  • Messmer, M.: 2003, ‹Professional Trends in Accounting’, National Public Accountant (February/March), 35–37

  • Messmer, M: 2005, ‹2005 Accounting Hiring Trends’, Strategic Finance 86(7), 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R.: 2005, ‹Accounting Education Changes Course’, Journal of Accountancy 200(4), 108–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R.: 2006, ‹Interviewing Techniques, Tips from the Pros’, Journal of Accountancy 202(2), 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A.: 1985, ‹Methods of Coping with Social Desirability Bias: A Review’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3), 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, I.; 1995, ‹What’s New about Accounting Education Change? An Historical Perspective on the Change Movement’, Accounting Horizons, 9(4), 62–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novin, A.: 1997, ‹Education for Careers in Management Accounting, Auditing, and Tax: A Comparison’, Journal of Education for Business, 73(1), 29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peppas, S. and T. Yu: 2005, ‹Job Candidate Attributes: A Comparison of Chinese and US Employer Evaluations and the Perceptions of Chinese Students’, Cross Cultural Management 12(4), 78–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. and D. Organ: 1986, ‹Self-reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects’, Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L. A. and D. Gabhart: 1994, Ethical Reasoning Research in the Accounting and Auditing Professions. In: J. Rest and D. Narvaez (eds) Moral Development in the Professions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 101–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radtke, R. R.: 2000, ‹The Effects of Gender and Setting on Accountants’ Ethically Sensitive Decisions’, Journal of Business Ethics 24(4), 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. and M. Fernandes: 1991, ‹The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 10(11), 805–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serwinek, P. J.: 1992, ‹Demographic and Related Differences in Ethical Views Among Small Business’, Journal of Business Ethics 11(7), 555–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaub, M.: 1994, ‹An Analysis of the Association of Traditional Demographic Variables with the Moral Reasoning of Auditing Students and Auditors’, Journal of Accounting Education, 12(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegal, G.: 2000, ‹Skills Needed for Entry-level Management Accounting Positions’, Strategic Finance 81(10), 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simga-Mugan, C., B. Daly, D. Onkal, D. and L. Kavut: 2005, ‹The Influence of Nationality and Gender on Ethical Sensitivity: An Application of the Issue-Contingent Model’, Journal of Business Ethics 57(2), 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. and E. Oakley: 1997, ‹Gender-Related Differences in Ethical and Social Values of Business Students: Implications for Management,’ Journal of Business Ethics, 16(1), 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Specht, L. and P. Sandlin: 2006, ‹Preliminary Response to the Computer-Based CPA Exam Education’, The CPA Journal Online. Available at: http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2006/1106/essentials/p68.htm

  • Tan, L., M. Fowler and L. Hawkes: 2004, ‹Management accounting curricula: Striking a balance between the views of educators and practitioners’, Accounting Education, 13(1), 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatikonda, L.: 2004, ‹Naked Truths About Accounting Curricula’, Management Accounting Quarterly 5(4), 62–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turpen, R. and P. Witmer: 1997, ‹Ethics in the Search for Accounting Employment: Student and Recruiter Perceptions’, Accounting Horizon, 11(2), 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, W. A., C. W. Moore, J. A. McKinney and J. G. Longenecker: 1999, ‹The Effects of Gender and Career Stage on Ethical Judgment’, Journal of Business Ethics 20(4), 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, M. and M. Stocks: 2004, ‹Are Accounting Graduates Favorably Recruited for Entry-Level Management Positions?’, Management Accounting Quarterly 5(3), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Business Administration, Augusta State University, Augusta, GA, 30904-2200, U.S.A.

    Nabil Ibrahim

  2. Department of Management, St. John’s University, 8000 Utopia Parkway, Jamaica, NY, 11439, U.S.A.

    John Angelidis

Authors
  1. Nabil Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Angelidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nabil Ibrahim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ibrahim, N., Angelidis, J. The Relative Importance of Ethics as a Selection Criterion for Entry-Level Public Accountants: Does Gender Make a Difference?. J Bus Ethics 85 (Suppl 1), 49–58 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9946-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9946-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation