Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Complementary Resources and Capabilities for an Ethical and Environmental Management: A Qual/Quan Study

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Managers’ commitment to contribute to sustainable development holds the key to their long-term business success and may be a source of competitive advantage. The managerial perception of business ethics is influenced by the level of moral development and personal characteristics of managers. These perceptions are also shaped by forces existing in the environment of the firm, including available resources, societal expectations, sector, and regulations. The resource-based perspective can thus contribute to the analysis of ethical issues offering important insights on how they can influence the environmental strategy of the firm. The findings of this study show that firm resources have a strong influence on business managers’ ethical attitudes. In addition, the application of resource-based rationales to ethical issues can be justified in the following several ways: it influences a managerial perception of natural environment as a competitive opportunity, it requires investments of financial and human resources, flexibility and speed in the adaptation to environmental changes, and it creates new resource-based opportunities through changes in prevention pollution technology, policy process, and market forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. (1988) Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin 119: 411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong J., Overton (1977) Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14:396–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragón-Correa J. A. (1998) Strategic Proactivity and Firm Approach to the Natural Environment. Academy of Management Journal 40(2): 556–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragón-Correa J. A., Sharma S. (2003) A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy. Academy of Management Review 28(1):71–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft K. (2001) Organized Dissonance: Feminist Bureaucracy as Hybrid Form. Academy of Management Journal 44(6): 1301–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S. B. (2002) Corporate Environmentalism: The Construct and Measurement. Journal of Business Research 55(3): 177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P. (2005) Evolving Sustainability: A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Sustainable Development. Strategic Management Journal 26:197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P., Bogner W. (2002) Deciding on ISO 14001: Economics, Institutions, and Context. Long Range Planning 35:269–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P., Hunter T. (2003) Strategic Explanations for the Early Adoption of ISO 14001. Journal of Business Ethics 46:289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol W. J., Blackman S. A. B. (1991) Perfect Markets and Easy Virtue: Business Ethics and the Invisible Hand. Blackwell, Cambridge MA and Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K. A. (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen F. E. (2000) Environmental Visibility: A Trigger of Green Organizational Response? Business Strategy and the Environment 9(2): 92–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen F. (2002) Does Size Matter? Business and Society 41(1):118–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer S., Pavelin S. (2004) Building a Good Reputation. European Management Journal 22(6):74–713

    Google Scholar 

  • Brío J. A., Fernández E., Junquera B. (2002) The Role of the Public Administrations in the Promotion of the Environmental Activity in Spanish Industrial Companies. Ecological Economics 40:279–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brío J. A., Junquera B. (2001) Level of Implementation of the ISO 14001 Standard in Spanish Industrial Companies. Eco-Management and Auditing 8:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burewoy, M.: 1991, ‹Reconstructing Social Theories”, in M. Burawoy et al. (eds.), Ethnography Unbound (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA), pp. 8–27.

  • Buysse K., Verbeke A. (2003) Proactive Environmental Strategies: A Stakeholder Management Perspective. Strategic Management Journal 24(5):453–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairncross F. (1992) Costing the Earth. The Challenge for Governments, the Opportunities for Business. Harvard Business School Press, Boston Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona-Moreno E., Cespedes-Lorente J., De Burgos-Jiménez J. (2004) Environmental Strategies in Spanish Hotels: Contextual Factors and Performance. The Service Industries Journal 24(3):101–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter G. S., Nakamoto K. (1994) Reflections on Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage. Journal of Marketing Research 31:570–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelo M., Lima L. (2006) Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics 69:11–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, D.: 1995, ‹Achieving Leadership in Environmental R & D’, Research & Technology Management, 32(8), March–April, 37–42.

  • Chen Y.-S., Lai S.-B., Wen C.-T. (2006) The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 67:331–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child J., McGrath R. (2001) Organizations Unfettered: Organizational Form in an Information-Intensive Economy. Academy of Management Journal 44(6):1135–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho C. H., Patten D. M., Roberts R. W. (2006) Corporate Political Strategy: An Examination of the Relation between Political Expenditures, Environmental Performance, and Environmental Disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics 67:139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann P. (2000) Effects of the ‹Best Practices’ of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets. Academy of Management Journal 43(4):663–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke M., Butcher D. (2006) Voluntarism as an Organizing Principle for ‹Responsible Organizations’. Corporate Governance 6(4):527–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements R. (1996) Complete Guide to ISO 14001. Hardcover, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cludts S. (1999) Organization Theory and the Ethics of Participation. Journal of Business Ethics 21(2/3):157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D., I. M. Gordon and M. Magnan.: 2004, ‹Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Contrasting Management’s Perceptions with Reality’, Journal of Business Ethics 49(2), 143-on line.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrill M. T. (1990) Corporate Social Responsibility and the Marketplace. Journal of Business Ethics 9(9):723–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell J. (2003) Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Daboub A. (2002) Strategic Alliances, Network Organizations, and Ethical Responsibility. SAM Advanced Management Journal 67(4):40–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnall N., Edwards D. (2006) Predicting the Cost of Environmental Management System Adoption: The Role of Capabilities, Resources and Ownership Structure. Strategic Management Journal 27:301–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin N. K. (1978) The Research Act. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx I., Cool K. (1989) Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage. Management Science 35(12):1504–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E.: 1988, ‹Understanding Strategic Agenda Building and its Implications for Managing Change’, in L. R. Pondy and R. J. Pondy (eds.), Managing Ambiguity and Change (John Wiley & Sons Ltd), pp. 127–144.

  • Dutton, J. E. and W. J. Penner: 1993, ‹The Importance of Organizational Identity for Strategic Agenda Building’, in J. Hendry, G. Johnson and J. Newton (eds.), Strategic Thinking: Leadership and the Management of Change (John Wiley & Sons Ltd), pp. 89–113.

  • Eisenhardt K. (1989) Building Theories Rom Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review 14:532–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsayed K. (2006) Reexamining the Expected Effect of Available Resources and Firm Size on Firm Environmental Orientation: An Empirical Study of UK Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 65:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erzberger C., Prein G. (1997) Triangulation: Validity and Empirically Based Hypothesis Construction. Quality & Quantity 2:141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faucheux S., Nicolaï I., O’Connor M. (1998) Globalization, Competitiveness, Governance and Environment: What Prospects for a Sustainable Development?. In: Faucheux S., Gowdy J., Nicolaï I. (eds) Sustainability and Firms, Technological Change and the Changing Regulatory Environment. Edward Elgar Publishing, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida R. (1996) Lean and Green: The Move to Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing. California Management Review 39: 80–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Fundación Entorno: 2003, Informe de la Gestión Ambiental en la Empresa Española. Avances hacia la Sostenibilidad (Fundación Entorno, Madrid).

  • Galunic D., Eisenhardt K. M. (2001) Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms. Academy of Management Journal 44(6):1229–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giménez G., Casadesús M., Valls J. (2003) Using Environmental Management Systems to Increase Firms’ Competitiveness. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 10:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B. G., Strauss A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies of Qualitative Research. Wiedenfeld & Nicholson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajulu N., Daily B. F. (2004) Motivating Employees for Environmental Improvement. Industrial Management and Data System 104(3/4):364–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant R. M. (2002) Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications, 4th edition. Blackwell Publishers, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribbons B. C., Hocevar D. (1998) Levels of Aggregation in Higher Level Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Application for Academic Self-Concept. Structural Equation Modeling 4(4):377–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin J. J., Mahon J. F. (1997) The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business and Society 36(2):5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart S. L. (1995) A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Academy of Management Review 20(4):986–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques I., Sadorsky P. (1996) The Determinants of an Environmentally Responsive Firm: An Empirical Approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30:381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill C. W., Jones G. R. (2004) Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach, 6th edition. Houghton-Mifflin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman A. J., Hitt M. A. (1999) Corporate Political Strategy Formulation: A Model of Approach, Participation, and Strategy Decisions. Academy of Management Review 24(4):825–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman A. J., Keim G. D. (2001) Stakeholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal 22:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe K. (1988) Against the Quantitative-Qualitative Incompatibility Thesis, or, Dogmas Die Hard. Educational Researcher 17:10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson C. (1992) Environmental Issues: The Challenge for the Chief Executive. Long Range Planning 25(3):50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson C. (1996) Integrating Environment Policy with Business Strategy. Long Range Planning 29(1):11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INE (Spanish Statistics Institute): 2003, Encuesta de Ocupación en Alojamientos Turísticos (Establecimientos Hoteleros (EOH), Press Bulletin).

  • James H. S. Jr. (2000) Reinforcing Ethical Decision Making Through Organizational Structure. Journal of Business Ethics 28:43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R. A., Greening D. W. (1999) The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Journal 42(5):564–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R., Onwuegbuzie A. (2004) Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher 33:14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, I. and M. Pollitt: 1998, The Role of Business Ethics in Economic Performance (St. Martin’s Press, Hampshire and London).

  • Jöreskog K. G., Sorbom D. (1993) LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Scientific Software International, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge W., Douglas T. (1998) Performance Implications of Incorporating Natural Environmental Issues into the Strategic Planning Process: An Empirical Assessment. Journal of Management Studies 35(2):241–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge W., Elenkov D. (2005) Organizational Capacity for Change and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Assessment of Bulgarian Firms. Journal of Business Research 58:893–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karagozoglu N., Lindell M. (2000) Environmental Management: Testing the Win-Win Model. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43(6):817–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen R., Angell L. (1998) An International Comparison of Environmental Management in Operations: The Impact of Manufacturing Flexibility in the U.S. and Germany. Journal of Operations Management 16:177–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen R. D., Whybark D. C. (1999) The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance. Academy of Management Journal 42(6):599–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulshreshtha P. (2007) Economics, Ethics and Business Ethics: A Critique of Interrelationships. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3(1):33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis R. S., Bela D. J., Tesluk P. E. (2000) A Comparison of Approaches to Composite Measures in Structural Equation Models. Organizational Research Methods 3(2):186–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeClair D. T., Ferrell L. (2000) Innovation in Experiential Business Ethics Training. Journal of Business Ethics 23:313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee T. W. (1999) Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee H., Smith K. G., Grimm C. M., Schomburg A. (2000) Timing, Order and Durability of New Product Advantages with Imitation. Strategic Management Journal 21:23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis G. J. (2004) Uncertainty and Equivocality in the Commercial and Natural Environments: the Implications for Organizational Design. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental management 11:167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logsdon J. M., Yuthas K. (1997) Corporate Social Performance, Stakeholder Orientation, and Organizational Moral Development. Journal of Business Ethics 16(12/13):1213–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luengo R. (1992) La Empresa y el Medio Ambiente. Revista de Economía 14:47–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Megone C. (2002) Two Aristotelian Approaches to Business Ethics. In: Megone C., Robinson S. J. (eds.) Case Studies in Business. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles M. W. (1979) Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 24(4):590–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles M. P., Covin J. G. (2000) Environmental Marketing: A Source of Reputational Competitive, and Financial Advantage. Journal of Business Ethics 23:299–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles M. B., Huberman A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd edition. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore G. (2001) Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry. Journal of Business Ethics 34(3/4):299–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse J. M. (1991) Approaches to Qualitative-Quantitative Methodological Triangulation. Nursing Research 40(2): 120–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen R. A., Smith J. E., Cavanagh G. F. (1989) The Importance of Ethics to Job Performance: An Empirical Investigation of Managers’ Perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics 8(4):253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Statistics Institute Information Bulletin: 2002, The Economic Impact of Tourism, http://www.ine.es/revistas/cifraine/cifrasine_satelit.pdf (current Feb. 7, 2006).

  • National Statistics Institute Information Bulletin: 2003, Tourism in 2002. Development of Tourism from the Point of View of the Tourist Supply, http://www.ine.es/revistas/cifraine/cifine_turismo02.pdf (current Feb. 7, 2006).

  • Nehrt C. (1996) Timing and Intensity Effects of Environmental Investments. Strategic Management Journal 17:535–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp P., Rodenburg C., Verhoef E. (1999) The Adoption and Diffusion of Environmental Friendly Technologies among Firms. International Journal of Technology Management 17:421–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noci G., Verganti R. (1999) Managing 〈Green〉 Product Innovation in Small Firms. R & D Management 29(1):3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pava M. L., Krausz J. (1996) The Association between Corporate Social-Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost. Journal of Business Ethics 15(3):321–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell W. W., DiMaggio P.J. (eds.) (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindova V., Kotha S. (2001) Continuous Morphing: Competing Through Dynamic Capabilities, Form and Function. Academy of Management Journal 44(6):1263–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli D. A., Vastag G. (2000) Panacea, Common Sense, or Just a Label? The Value of ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems. European Management Journal 18:499–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton K. (2002) Business Ethics: A Sustainable Approach. Business Ethics: A European Review 11(2):137–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo M., Fouts P. (1997) A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40(3):534–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satorra A., Bentler P. M. (1994) Corrections to Test Statistics and Standard Errors in Covariance Structure Analysis. In: Von Eye A, Clogg C.C. (eds.), Latent Variables Analysis. Sage, Applications for Development Research, Thousand Oaks, pp. 399–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder D. (2002) Ethics from the Top: Top Management and Ethical Business. Business Ethics: A European Review 11(3):260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S. (2000) Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy. Academy of Management Journal 43(4):681–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S., Vredenburg H. (1998) Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy and the Development of Competitively Valuable Organizational Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19(8):729–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen T. (1995) Industrial Pollution Prevention. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P.: 1995, ‹Environmental Technologies and Competitive Advantage’. Strategic Management Journal 16, summer, 183–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanwick P., Stanwick S. (1998) The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics 17(2):195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanwick P., Stanwick S. (2000) The Relationship between Environmental Disclosures and Financial Performance. Eco-Management and Auditing 7(4):155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A. L. (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A., Corbin J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (1998) Mixed Methodology. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie C., Tashakkori A. (2003) Major Issues and Controversies in the Use of Mixed Methods in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. In: Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas T., Shermerhom J. R. Jr., Dienharrt J. W. (2004) Strategic Leadership of Ethical Behavior in Business. The Academy of Management Executive 18(2):56–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine S., Barnett T. (2002) Ethics Codes and Sales Professionals’ Perceptions of Their Organizations’ Ethical Values. Journal of Business Ethics 40:191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine S., Fleischman G. (2003) Ethical Reasoning in an Equitable Relief Innocent Spouse Context. Journal of Business Ethics 45:325–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine S., Fleischman G. (2004) Ethics Training and Businesspersons’ Perceptions of Organizational Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 52:381–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vastag G., Kerekes S., Rondinelli D. A. (1996) Evaluation of Corporate Environmental Management Approaches: A Framework and Application. International Journal of Production Economics 43:193–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webley S. (2001) Business Ethics: A SWOT Exercise. Business Ethics: A European Review 10(3): 267–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R. (1997) Economics, Ethics and Religion: Jewish, Christian and Muslim Economic Thought. Macmillan, Hampshire and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood D. J., Jones R. E. (1995) Stakeholder mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3(3):229–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin R. K. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S., Markman A. B. (1998) Overcoming the Early Entrant Advantage: The Role of Alignable and Nonalignable Differences. Journal of Marketing Research 35:413–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Management, University of Alicante, P.O. Box 99, Campus de San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, E-03080, Spain

    María Dolores López-Gamero, Enrique Claver-Cortés & José Francisco Molina-Azorín

Authors
  1. María Dolores López-Gamero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Enrique Claver-Cortés
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José Francisco Molina-Azorín
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Dolores López-Gamero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López-Gamero, M.D., Claver-Cortés, E. & Molina-Azorín, J.F. Complementary Resources and Capabilities for an Ethical and Environmental Management: A Qual/Quan Study. J Bus Ethics 82, 701–732 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9587-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9587-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation