Abstract
Two fundamental business ethics issues that repeatedly surface in the academic literature relate to business’s role in the development of public policy [Suarez, S. L.: 2000, Does Business Learn? (The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI); Roberts, R. W. and D. D. Bobek: 2004, Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(5–6), 565–590] and its role in responsibly managing the natural environment [Newton, L.: 2005, Business Ethics and the Natural Environment (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford)]. When studied together, researchers often examine if, and how, corporations influence environmental policy decisions. Drawing from literatures on␣corporate political activity, corporate social and environmental performance, and corporate environmental disclosure, we develop and empirically examine two research questions concerning the relations between corporate political expenditures, environmental performance, and environmental disclosure. The questions are: (1) Do corporations that are poorer environmental performers spend more on political activities than their better-performing counterparts? (2) Is there an association between corporations’ spending on political activities and the extent of their financial report environmental disclosures? We investigated these questions through analyses of data we gathered on a sample consisting of 119 U.S. environmentally sensitive firms for the 2001–2002 election cycle. After controlling for firm size and specific industry effects, our tests reveal a significant, inverse relationship between firm environmental performance and political spending. This is consistent with the notion that U.S. firms with relatively poorer environmental performance records engage more intensely in corporate political activities as part of their overall strategic management of their relationship with the state. In addition, a significant and positive association between the amount of political spending and the extent of environmental disclosure suggests that environmental disclosure and political spending are both proactive, complementary tactics to strategically manage public policy pressure. If corporations’ strategies are intentionally designed to unreasonably limit their environmental responsibilities or to misrepresent firm environmental performance, then we argue that these activities reflect a significant lapse in ethical conduct.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argandona A (2004). On Ethical, Social and Environmental Management Systems. Journal of Business Ethics 51(1): 41–62
Blacconiere W. G. and Patten D. M. (1994). “Environmental Disclosures, Regulatory Costs and Changes in Firm Value". Journal of Accounting and Economics 18(3): 357–377
Center for Responsive Politics (CRP): 2004, PAC Database. Available at <http://www.opensecrets.org>
Clawson D., Neustadtl A. and Weller M. (1998). Dollars and Votes: How Business Campaign Contributions Subvert Democracy. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA
Cordano M., Frieze I. and Ellis K. (2004). Entangled Affiliations and Attitudes: An Analysis of the Influences on Environmental Policy Stakeholders’ Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Business Ethics 49: 27–40
Cormier D., Gordon I. M. and Magnan M. (2004). “Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Contrasting Management’s Perceptions with Reality”. Journal of Business Ethics 49(2), 143–165
Deegan C. and Rankin M.(1996). “Do Australian Companies Report Environmental News Objectively? An Analysis of Environmental Disclosures by Firms Successfully Prosecuted by the Environmental Protection Authority?”. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 9(2): 50–67
Eismeier T. J and Pollock P. H. (1988). Business, Money, and the Rise of Corporate PACs in American Elections. Quorum Books, Westport, CT
Evans C. L. (2001). Leadership in Committee: A Comparative Analysis of Leadership Behavior in the U.S. Senate. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI
FECInfo: (2004). PAC Database. Available at <http://www.fecinfo.com>
Fleisher R. (1993). “PAC Contributions and Congressional Voting on National Defense”. Legislative Studies Quarterly 18(3): 391–409
Freed G. and Swenson C.(1995). “Rent-seeking and U.S. Corporate Income Tax Laws. Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2): 873–894
Graves S. B. and Waddock S. A. (1994). “Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance”. Academy of Management Journal 37(4): 1034–1046
Greening D. W. and Turban D. B. (2000). “Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce”, Business and Society 39(3): 254–280
Grier K., Munger M. and Torrent G. (1990). “Allocation Patterns of PAC Monies: The U.S. Senate”. Public Choice 67(2): 111–128
Grier K. and Munger M. (1991). “Committee Assignments, Constituent Preferences, and Campaign Contributions”. Economic Inquiry 29: 24–43
Griffin J. J. and Mahon J. F. (1997). “The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate”. Business and Society 36(1): 5–31
Hillman A. J. and Hitt M. A. (1999). “Corporate Political Strategy Formulation: A Model of Approach Participation, and Strategy Decisions”. Academy of Management Review 24(4): 825–842
Hillman A. J. and Keim G. D. (2001). “Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line?”. Strategic Management Journal 22: 125–139
Hoberg G., Jr. (1990). “Risk, Science and Politics: Alachor Regulation in Canada and the United States”. Canadian Journal of Political Science 23(2): 227–237
KLD Research & Analytics, Inc.: 2003, KLD Ratings Data: Inclusive Social Rating Criteria
Kroszner R. and Stratmann T. (1998). “Interest-Group Competition and the Organization of Congress: Theory and Evidence from Financial Services’ Political Action Committees”. The American Economic Review 88(5): 1163–1187
Mack, C.: 1997, Business, Politics, and the Practice of Government Relations (Quorum Books, Westport, CT)
Mahon J. and Kelly P. (1998). “The Politics of Toxic Wastes: Multinational Corporations as Facilitators of Transnational Public Policy”. In: Preston L. (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 10. JAI, Greenwich, CT
McDonald J. and Moffitt R. (1980). The Uses of Tobit Analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics 62(2): 318–321
Neu D., Warsame H. and Pedwell K.(1998). “Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports”. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23(3): 265–282
Newton L. (2005). Business Ethics and the Natural Environment. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford
Parker L. (1986). “Polemical Themes in Social Accounting: A Scenario for Standard Setting”. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 1: 67–93
Patten D. M. (1992). “Intra-Industry Environmental Disclosures in Response to the Alaskan Oil Spill: A Note on Legitimacy Theory”. Accounting, Organizations and Society 15(5):471–475
Patten D. M. (2000). “Changing Superfund Disclosure and its Relation to the Provision of Other Environmental Information”. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management 1: 101–121
Patten D. M. (2002). “The Relation between Environmental Performance and Environmental Disclosure: A Research Note”. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27(8): 763–773
Patten D. M. and Trompeter G. (2003). “Corporate Responses to Political Costs: An Examination of the Relation between Environmental Disclosure and Earnings Management”. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22(1): 83–94
Roberts R. W and Bobek D. D. (2004). The Politics of Tax Accounting in the United States: Evidence From the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(5–6): 565–590
Roberts R. W., Dwyer P. D. and Sweeney J. T. (2003). “Political Strategies Used by the U.S. Public Accounting Profession During Auditor Liability Reform: The Case of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995”. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22(5): 433–457
Romano R. (1997). “The Political Dynamics of Derivative Securities Regulations”. Yale Journal of Regulation 14(2): 279–406
Roth W. (2002). The Assault on Social Policy. Columbia University Press, New York, NY
Ruf B. M., Muralidhar K., Brown R. M., Janney J. J., Paul K. (2001). “An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective”. Journal of Business Ethics 32(2): 143–156
Smith M. A. (2000). American Business and Political Power. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Stanwick P. A. and Stanwick S. D. (1998). “The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination”. Journal of Business Ethics 17(2): 195–204
Suarez S. L. (1998). “Lessons Learned: Explaining the Political Behavior of Business”. Polity 31(1): 161–186
Suarez S. L. (2000). Does Business Learn? The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI
Waddock S. A. and Graves S. B. (1997). “The Corporate Social Performance – Financial Performance Link”. Strategic Management Journal 18(4): 303–319
Walden W. D. and Schwartz B. N. (1997). “Environmental Disclosures and Public Policy Pressures”. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16(2): 125–154
Watts R. and Zimmerman J. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Wiseman J. (1982). “An Evaluation of Environmental Disclosures Made in Corporate Annual Reports”. Accounting, Organizations and Society 7(1): 53–63
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and the participants of the 2004 Inter-Disciplinary Corporate Social Responsibility Research Conference held in Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, C.H., Patten, D.M. & Roberts, R.W. Corporate Political Strategy: An Examination of the Relation between Political Expenditures, Environmental Performance, and Environmental Disclosure. J Bus Ethics 67, 139–154 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9019-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9019-3