Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical study of moral reasoning among managers

  • Sixth Annual Society Of Business Ethics Conference
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current research in moral development suggests that there are two distinct modes of moral reasoning, one based on a morality of justice, the other based on a morality of care. The research presented here examines the kinds of moral reasoning used by managers in work-related conflicts. Twenty men and twenty women were randomly selected from the population of first level managers in a Fortune 100 industrial corporation. In open-ended interviews each participant was asked to describe a situation of moral conflict in her or his work life. The results indicated a clearly preferred mode of moral reasoning among the participants who described moral conflicts. Nearly all of these predominated with a justice orientation. These findings suggest that a correlation between gender and preferred mode may be context specific.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Derry, R.: 1987a, Sincerely, Moral Reasoning In Organizations. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, R.: 1987b, ‘Moral Reasoning in Work-Related Conflicts”, Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy. Vol 9 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT).

    Google Scholar 

  • England, G. W.: 1975, The Manager and His Values (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, P. and McBurney, P.: 1988, ‘The Ethical Concerns of Contemporary Zimbabwean Managers: A Preliminary Sounding’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 263–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1977, ‘In A Different Voice: Women's Conception of the Self and of Morality’, Harvard Educational Review 47, 481–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982, In A Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C., Langdale, C., Lyons, N., and Murphey, J. M.: 1982, ‘The Contribution of Women's Thought To Developmental Theory’, Final Report to the National Institute of Education (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, M. and Jardim, A.: 1977, The Managerial Woman (Coubleday, Garden City, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T.: 1987, ‘The Institutionalization of Unethical Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 439–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D. K.: 1985, Two Moral Orientations — Two Problem Soving Strategies: Adolescents' Solutions to Dilemmas in Fables. Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University (University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. and Gautschi, F. H.: 1988, ‘Will the Ethics of Business Change? A Survey of Future Executives’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 231–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1959, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (1978). Trans. Lewis White Beck (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, IN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. and Kahn, R. L.: 1978, The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd Ed.). (John Wiley and Sons, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1971, ‘From Is to Ought: How to Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy and Get Away With It in the Study of Moral Development,’ in T. Mischel (ed.), Cognitive Development and Epistemology. (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1981, The philosophy of Moral Development (Harper and Row, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdale, C. H.: 1983, Moral Orientations and Moral Development: The Analysis of Care and Justice Reasoning Across Different Dilemmas in Females and Males from Childhood through Adulthood. Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University (University Microfilsm, Ann Arbor, MI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, N. P.: 1982, Conceptions of Self and Morality and Modes of Moral Choice. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University.

  • Lyons, N. P.: 1983, ‘The Perspectives: on Self, Relationships, and Morality”, Harvard Educational Review 53, 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, M.: 1976, The Gamesman (Simon and Schuster, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J. B., Goodpaster, K. E., and Nash, L. L.: 1985, Policies and Persons (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, C. S.: 1985, Management of Values (Pitman, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, B. Z. and Schmidt, W. H.: 1987, ‘Ethics in American Companies, A Managerial Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 383–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, J. A., Bird, F., and Chant, P. D.: 1986, ‘Everyday Moral Issues Experienced by Managers’, Journal of Business Ethics 5, 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, J. A. and Bird, F.: 1987, ‘The Moral Dimension of Organizational Culture’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Robbin Derry is an associate professor at The American College in Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, where she holds the Lamont Post Chair in Business Ethics. She recently completed a year as a Rockefeller Fellow at The Ethics Institute at Darthmouth College. She has presented and published numerous articles on the ethical decision-making of managers and is currently working on a business ethics textbook.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Derry, R. An empirical study of moral reasoning among managers. J Bus Ethics 8, 855–862 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384528

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384528

Keywords

Navigation