Skip to main content
Log in

Contrasting corporate profiles: Women and minority representation in top management positions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the characteristics of firms which have underrepresented groups in top management positions and those which do not. It is argued that profiles of these characteristics will be different for firms with minorities vs. women and that these profiles will be different depending on whether representation is by board membership or through officerships. A discriminant analysis found both similarities and differences in variables that were associated with these different forms of representation. It was found, for example, that size is associated with representation for both minorities and women, whereas high advertising intensity is associated with firms with women on board, but not as officers. Other findings and the implications of the study are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, R. W.: 1975, The Social Challenge to Business, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlow, P. and Gannon, M. J.: 1982, ‘Social Responsiveness, Corporate Structure, and Economic Performance’, Academy of Management Review 18(2), 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A. A.: 1959, Power Without Property, New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black Enterprise: 1985, ‘Black Directors in The Corporate Boardroom’, December, 41.

  • Chaganti R. S., Mahajan, V., and Sharma, S.: 1985, ‘Corporate Board Size, Composition, and Corporate failures in Retailing Industry’, Journal of Management Studies 22, 400–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, P. L., and Wood, R. A.: 1984, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 27, 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Economic Priorities: 1986, Rating America's Corporate Conscience, Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, G. W.: 1983, Who Rules America Now?, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgart, L. D.: 1983, ‘Women on Fortune 500 Boards’, California Management Review 24(4), 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E. and Trist, E. L.: 1965, ‘The Causal Texture of Organization Environments’, Human Relations 18, 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, L. W., Keim, G. D., and Meiners, R. E.: 1982, ‘Corporate Contributions: Altruistic or For-Profit?’, Academy of Management Journal 25, 94–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortune: 1988, ‘Black Executives: How They're Doing’, January 18, 109–114.

  • Harrigan, K. R.: 1981, ‘Numbers and Positions of Women Elected to Corporate Boards’, Academy of Management Journal 24, 619–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P.: 1986, ‘On the Other Side of The Roadblock’, Boards and Directors Fall, 40–41.

  • Jones, T. M.: 1986, ‘Corporate Board Structure and Performance: Variations in the Incidence of Shareholder Suits’, In J. E. Post (Ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, vol. 8, pp. 345–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesner, I. F.: 1988, ‘Director's Characteristics and Committee Membership: An Investigation of Type, Occupation, Tenure, and Gender’, Academy of Management Journal 31, 66–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesner, I. F., Victor, B., and Lamont, B.: 1986, ‘Board Composition and The Commission of Illegal Acts: An Investigation of Fortune 500 Companies, Academy of Management Journal 29, 789–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohls, J.: 1985, ‘Corporate Board Structure, Social Reporting, and Social Performance’, in L. E. Preston (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, vol. 7, 165–189 Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, L. D. and Fryxell, G. E.: 1988, ‘An Empirical Study of The Predictors of Corporate Social Performance: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 951–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattar, E., and Ball, M.: 1985, Handbook for Corporate Directors, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. H.: 1987, Managing The Corporate Social Environment, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H.: 1983, ‘The Case for Corporate Social Responsibility’, The Journal of Business Strategy 4(2), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norburn, D.: 1986, ‘GOGOs, YOYOs, and DODOs: Company Directors and Company Performance, Strategic Management Journal 7, 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, L. H.: 1977, ‘Out of The Typing Pool-Into the Board: A List of Women Directors’, Business and Society Review Summer, 27–33.

  • Powell, G. N.: 1988, Women and Men in Management, Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, F. N.: 1980, ‘“Invisible” resource: Women for boards’, Harvard Business Review 58(2), 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, F. N.: 1986, ‘Beyond the First Generation of Women Directors’, Directors and Boards Fall: 39–40.

  • Varadarajan, P., and Ramanujam, V. 1987. Diversification and performance: A reexamination using a new two dimensional conceptualization of diversity in firms. Academy of Management Journal 30, 380–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldo, C. N.: 1985, Board of Directors: Their Changing Roles, Structure and Information Needs, Westport, Conn.: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall Street Journal: 1986, ‘The Board Game: More Women are Becoming Directors But It's Still a Token Situation’, March 24, 29D.

  • Wall Street Journal: 1987, ‘Losing Ground? Surveyed Firms Report Fewer Women Directors’, July 17, 23.

  • Wall Street Journal: 1988, ‘More Blacks Quitting White-Run Firms’, June 7, 1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Jerry Fryxell is an Assistant Professor of Management at the University of Tennessee — Knoxville. His current research interests are in the area of corporate culture, innovation, and strategic management.

Linda Lerner is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Management at the University of Tennessee — Knoxville. Her current research interests include strategic management, social issues, and corporate governance. She has over ten years of management and consulting experience.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fryxell, G.E., Lerner, L.D. Contrasting corporate profiles: Women and minority representation in top management positions. J Bus Ethics 8, 341–352 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381725

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381725

Keywords

Navigation