Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Associations between genetic variants in the TGF-β signaling pathway and breast cancer risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The TGF-β signaling pathway has a significant role in breast cancer initiation and promotion by regulating various cellular processes. We evaluated whether genetic variation in eight genes (TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-βR1, TGF-βR2, TGF-βR3, RUNX1, RUNX2, and RUNX3) is associated with breast cancer risk in women from the Breast Cancer Health Disparities Study. A total of 3,524 cases (1,431 non-Hispanic whites (NHW); 2,093 Hispanics/Native Americans(NA)) and 4,209 population-based controls (1,599 NHWs; 2,610 Hispanics/NAs) were included in analyses. Genotypes for 47 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were determined. Additionally, 104 ancestral informative markers estimated proportion of NA ancestry. Associations with breast cancer risk overall, by menopausal status, NA ancestry, and estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor tumor phenotype were evaluated. After adjustment for multiple comparisons, two SNPs were significantly associated with breast cancer risk: RUNX3 (rs906296 ORCG/GG = 1.15 95 % CI 1.04–1.26) and TGF-β1 (rs4803455 ORCA/AA = 0.89 95 % CI 0.81–0.98). RUNX3 (rs906296) and TGF-βR2 (rs3773644) were associated with risk in pre-menopausal women (p adj = 0.002 and 0.02, respectively) and in those with intermediate to high NA ancestry (p adj = 0.04 and 0.01, respectively). Self-reported race was strongly correlated with NA ancestry (r = 0.86). There was a significant interaction between NA ancestry and RUNX1 (rs7279383, p adj = 0.04). Four RUNX SNPs were associated with increased risk of ER− tumors. Results provide evidence that genetic variation in TGF-β and RUNX genes are associated with breast cancer risk. This is the first report of significant associations between genetic variants in TGF-β and RUNX genes and breast cancer risk among women of NA ancestry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shi Y, Massague J (2003) Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell 113(6):685–700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Massague J (1990) The transforming growth factor-beta family. Annu Rev Cell Biol 6:597–641

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Elliott RL, Blobe GC (2005) Role of transforming growth factor beta in human cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(9):2078–2093

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pierce DF Jr et al (1995) Mammary tumor suppression by transforming growth factor beta 1 transgene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92(10):4254–4258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Scollen S et al (2011) TGF-beta signaling pathway and breast cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20(6):1112–1119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zu X et al (2012) Transforming growth factor-beta signaling in tumor initiation, progression and therapy in breast cancer: an update. Cell Tissue Res 347(1):73–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang B et al (2011) RUNX3 acts as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer by targeting estrogen receptor alpha. Oncogene, New England

    Google Scholar 

  8. Band AM, Laiho M (2011) Crosstalk of TGF-beta and estrogen receptor signaling in breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 16(2):109–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chimge NO, Frenkel B (2012) The RUNX family in breast cancer: relationships with estrogen signaling. Oncogene, New England

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bierie B et al (2009) Abrogation of TGF-beta signaling enhances chemokine production and correlates with prognosis in human breast cancer. J Clin Invest 119(6):1571–1582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miyazono K, Maeda S, Imamura T (2004) Coordinate regulation of cell growth and differentiation by TGF-beta superfamily and Runx proteins. Oncogene 23(24):4232–4237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cameron ER, Neil JC (2004) The Runx genes: lineage-specific oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Oncogene 23(24):4308–4314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ito Y (2004) Oncogenic potential of the RUNX gene family: ‘overview’. Oncogene 23(24):4198–4208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lund AH, van Lohuizen M (2002) RUNX: a trilogy of cancer genes. Cancer Cell 1(3):213–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Levy L, Hill CS (2006) Alterations in components of the TGF-beta superfamily signaling pathways in human cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 17(1–2):41–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Serra R, Crowley MR (2005) Mouse models of transforming growth factor beta impact in breast development and cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 12(4):749–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cox A et al (2007) A common coding variant in CASP8 is associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet 39(3):352–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Qi X et al (2010) Transforming growth factor-beta1 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 27 case-control studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 122(1):273–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liao RY et al (2010) TGFBR1×6A/9A polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 13,662 cases and 14,147 controls. Mol Biol Rep 37(7):3227–3232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Colleran G et al (2010) The TGFBR1×6A/9A polymorphism is not associated with differential risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119(2):437–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma X et al (2012) Pathway analyses identify TGFBR2 as potential breast cancer susceptibility gene: results from a consortium study among Asians. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21(7):1176–1184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pasche B et al (2004) TGFBR1×6A and cancer: a meta-analysis of 12 case-control studies. J Clin Oncol 22(4):756–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Niu W et al (2010) Association of TGFB1 -509 C > T polymorphism with breast cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis involving 23,579 subjects. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124(1):243–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang YQ et al (2012) Association between TGFBR1 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 35 case-control studies. PLoS One 7(8):e42899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Woo SU et al (2010) Association of a TGF-beta1 gene -509 C/T polymorphism with breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124(2):481–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Baxter SW et al (2002) Transforming growth factor beta receptor 1 polyalanine polymorphism and exon 5 mutation analysis in breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11(2):211–214

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jin Q et al (2004) Polymorphisms and haplotype structures in genes for transforming growth factor beta1 and its receptors in familial and unselected breast cancers. Int J Cancer 112(1):94–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaklamani VG et al (2005) Combined genetic assessment of transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathway variants may predict breast cancer risk. Cancer Res 65(8):3454–3461

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Le Marchand L et al (2004) T29C polymorphism in the transforming growth factor beta1 gene and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(3):412–415

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cox DG et al (2007) TGFB1 and TGFBR1 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in the Nurses’ Health Study. BMC Cancer 7:175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hishida A et al (2003) Transforming growth factor B1 T29C polymorphism and breast cancer risk in Japanese women. Breast Cancer 10(1):63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dunning AM et al (2003) A transforming growth factor beta1 signal peptide variant increases secretion in vitro and is associated with increased incidence of invasive breast cancer. Cancer Res 63(10):2610–2615

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pasche B et al (2010) Constitutively decreased TGFBR1 allelic expression is a common finding in colorectal cancer and is associated with three TGFBR1 SNPs. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 29:57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wallace TA, Martin DN, Ambs S (2011) Interactions among genes, tumor biology and the environment in cancer health disparities: examining the evidence on a national and global scale. Carcinogenesis 32(8):1107–1121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Slattery M et al (2012) Genetic variation in genes involved in hormones, inflammation, and energetic factors and breast cancer risk in an admixed population. Carcinogenesis, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  36. Collins-Schramm HE et al (2004) Mexican American ancestry-informative markers: examination of population structure and marker characteristics in European Americans, Mexican Americans Amerindians and Asians. Hum Genet 114(3):263–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155(2):945–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bursac Z et al (2008) Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med 3:17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dubin N, Pasternack BS (1986) Risk assessment for case-control subgroups by polychotomous logistic regression. Am J Epidemiol 123(6):1101–1117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hosmer D Jr, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. In: Sons JWA (ed) Probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  41. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nyholt DR (2004) A simple correction for multiple testing for single-nucleotide polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with each other. Am J Hum Genet 74(4):765–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Li J, Ji L (2005) Adjusting multiple testing in multilocus analyses using the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix. Heredity (Edinb) 95(3):221–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Akhurst RJ (2004) TGF beta signaling in health and disease. Nat Genet 36(8):790–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Massague J (2008) TGFbeta in Cancer. Cell 134(2):215–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Moustakas A et al (2002) Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling in regulation of cell growth and differentiation. Immunol Lett 82(1–2):85–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Lee JD et al (2010) The type III TGF-beta receptor suppresses breast cancer progression through GIPC-mediated inhibition of TGF-beta signaling. Carcinogenesis 31(2):175–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Gobbi H et al (1999) Transforming growth factor-beta and breast cancer risk in women with mammary epithelial hyperplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(24):2096–2101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ewen ME et al (1995) p53-dependent repression of CDK4 translation in TGF-beta-induced G1 cell-cycle arrest. Genes Dev 9(2):204–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Li QL et al (2002) Causal relationship between the loss of RUNX3 expression and gastric cancer. Cell 109(1):113–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Blyth K, Cameron ER, Neil JC (2005) The RUNX genes: gain or loss of function in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 5(5):376–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ito Y, Miyazono K (2003) RUNX transcription factors as key targets of TGF-beta superfamily signaling. Curr Opin Genet Dev 13(1):43–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Slattery ML et al (2011) Associations between genetic variation in RUNX1, RUNX2, RUNX3, MAPK1 and eIF4E and riskof colon and rectal cancer: additional support for a TGF-beta-signaling pathway. Carcinogenesis 32(3):318–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Ito I et al (2010) Estrogen inhibits transforming growth factor beta signaling by promoting Smad2/3 degradation. J Biol Chem 285(19):14747–14755

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Matsuda T et al (2001) Cross-talk between transforming growth factor-beta and estrogen receptor signaling through Smad3. J Biol Chem 276(46):42908–42914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Lau QC et al (2006) RUNX3 is frequently inactivated by dual mechanisms of protein mislocalization and promoter hypermethylation in breast cancer. Cancer Res 66(13):6512–6520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded in part through a Susan G. Komen training grant: Breast Cancer Disparities Epidemiology Research Training Program (KG090926) to Dr. K. Baumgartner and Dr. R. Baumgartner at the University of Louisville. The Breast Cancer Health Disparities Study was funded by Grant CA14002 from the National Cancer Institute to Dr. Slattery. The San Francisco Bay Area Breast Cancer Study was supported by Grants CA63446 and CA77305 from the National Cancer Institute, Grant DAMD17-96-1-6071 from the U.S. Department of Defense and Grant 7 PB-0068 from the California Breast Cancer Research Program. The collection of cancer incidence data used in this study was supported by the California Department of Public Health as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Section 103885; the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program under contract HHSN261201000036C awarded to the Cancer Prevention Institute of California; and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Program of Cancer Registries, under agreement #1U58 DP000807-01 awarded to the Public Health Institute. The 4-Corner’s Breast Cancer Study was funded by Grants CA078682, CA078762, CA078552, and CA078802 from the National Cancer Institute. The research also was supported by the Utah Cancer Registry, which is funded by contract N01-PC-67000 from the National Cancer Institute, with additional support from the State of Utah Department of Health, the New Mexico Tumor Registry, and the Arizona and Colorado cancer registries, funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Program of Cancer Registries and additional state support. The contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the National Cancer Institute or endorsement by the State of California Department of Public Health, the National Cancer Institute, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or their Contractors and Subcontractors. The Mexico Breast Cancer Study was funded by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) (SALUD-2002-C01-7462). We would also like to acknowledge the contributions of the following individuals to the study: Sandra Edwards for data harmonization oversight; Erica Wolff and Michael Hoffman for laboratory support; Carolyn Ortega for her assistance with data management for the Mexico Breast Cancer Study, Jocelyn Koo for data management for the San Francisco Bay Area Breast Cancer Study, Dr. Tim Byers for his contribution to the 4-Corner’s Breast Cancer Study, and Dr. Josh Galanter for assistance in selection of AIMS markers for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie D. Boone.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 98 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boone, S.D., Baumgartner, K.B., Baumgartner, R.N. et al. Associations between genetic variants in the TGF-β signaling pathway and breast cancer risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 141, 287–297 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2690-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2690-z

Keywords

Navigation