Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A randomized and open-label trial evaluating the addition of pazopanib to lapatinib as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer

  • Clinical Trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This phase II study (VEG20007; NCT00347919) with randomized and open-label components evaluated first-line lapatinib plus pazopanib therapy and/or lapatinib monotherapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Patients were enrolled sequentially into two cohorts: Cohort 1, patients were randomly assigned to lapatinib 1,000 mg plus pazopanib 400 mg or lapatinib 1,500 mg monotherapy; Cohort 2, patients received lapatinib 1,500 mg plus pazopanib 800 mg. The primary endpoint was week-12 progressive disease rate (PDR) for Cohort 1. The principal secondary endpoint was week-12 response rate (RR) for Cohort 2. Efficacy was assessed in patients with centrally confirmed HER2 positivity (modified intent-to-treat population [MITT]). The study enrolled 190 patients (Cohort 1, combination n = 77, lapatinib n = 73; Cohort 2, n = 40). The MITT population comprised n = 141 (Cohort 1) and n = 36 (Cohort 2). In Cohort 1, week-12 PDRs were 36.2 % (combination) versus 38.9 % (lapatinib; P = 0.37 for the difference). Week-12 RRs were 36.2 % (combination) versus 22.2 % (lapatinib). In Cohort 2, week-12 RR was 33.3 %. In Cohort 1, grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) included diarrhea (combination, 9 %; lapatinib, 5 %) and hypertension (combination, 5 %; lapatinib, 0 %). Grades 3/4 AEs in Cohort 2 included diarrhea (40 %), hypertension (5 %), and fatigue (5 %). Alanine aminotransferase elevations >5 times the upper limit of normal occurred in Cohort 1 (combination, 18 %; lapatinib, 5 %) and Cohort 2 (20 %). Upon conclusion, the combination of lapatinib plus pazopanib did not improve PDR compared with lapatinib monotherapy, although RR was increased. Toxicity was higher with the combination, including increased diarrhea and liver enzyme elevations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AE:

Adverse event

CI:

Confidence interval

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

FISH:

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

HER2:

Human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2

HR:

Hazard ratio

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

MITT:

Modified intent-to-treat

PDGFR:

Platelet-derived growth factor receptor

PDR:

Progressive disease rate

PFS:

Progression-free survival

RECIST:

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

RR:

Response rate

SAE:

Serious adverse event

VEGFR:

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

References

  1. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL (1987) Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 235(4785):177–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, Baselga J, Norton L (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344(11):783–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith I, Procter M, Gelber RD, Guillaume S, Feyereislova A, Dowsett M, Goldhirsch A, Untch M, Mariani G, Baselga J, Kaufmann M, Cameron D, Bell R, Bergh J, Coleman R, Wardley A, Harbeck N, Lopez RI, Mallmann P, Gelmon K, Wilcken N, Wist E, Sanchez Rovira P, Piccart-Gebhart MJ (2007) 2-Year follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 369(9555):29–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Linderholm B, Bergqvist J, Hellborg H, Johansson U, Linderholm M, von Schoultz E, Elmberger G, Skoog L, Bergh J (2009) Shorter survival-times following adjuvant endocrine therapy in oestrogen- and progesterone-receptor positive breast cancer overexpressing HER2 and/or with an increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor. Med Oncol 26(4):480–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Konecny GE, Meng YG, Untch M, Wang HJ, Bauerfeind I, Epstein M, Stieber P, Vernes JM, Gutierrez J, Hong K, Beryt M, Hepp H, Slamon DJ, Pegram MD (2004) Association between HER-2/neu and vascular endothelial growth factor expression predicts clinical outcome in primary breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 10(5):1706–1716

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yen L, You XL, Al Moustafa AE, Batist G, Hynes NE, Mader S, Meloche S, Alaoui-Jamali MA (2000) Heregulin selectively upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor secretion in cancer cells and stimulates angiogenesis. Oncogene 19(31):3460–3469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rusnak DW, Lackey K, Affleck K, Wood ER, Alligood KJ, Rhodes N, Keith BR, Murray DM, Knight WB, Mullin RJ, Gilmer TM (2001) The effects of the novel, reversible epidermal growth factor receptor/ErbB-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, GW2016, on the growth of human normal and tumor-derived cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther 1(2):85–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Geyer CE, Forster J, Lindquist D, Chan S, Romieu CG, Pienkowski T, Jagiello-Gruszfeld A, Crown J, Chan A, Kaufman B, Skarlos D, Campone M, Davidson N, Berger M, Oliva C, Rubin SD, Stein S, Cameron D (2006) Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 355(26):2733–2743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnston S, Pippen J Jr, Pivot X, Lichinitser M, Sadeghi S, Dieras V, Gomez HL, Romieu G, Manikhas A, Kennedy MJ, Press MF, Maltzman J, Florance A, O’Rourke L, Oliva C, Stein S, Pegram M (2009) Lapatinib combined with letrozole versus letrozole and placebo as first-line therapy for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27(33):5538–5546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Di Leo A, Gomez HL, Aziz Z, Zvirbule Z, Bines J, Arbushites MC, Guerrera SF, Koehler M, Oliva C, Stein SH, Williams LS, Dering J, Finn RS, Press MF (2008) Phase III, double-blind, randomized study comparing lapatinib plus paclitaxel with placebo plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(34):5544–5552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gomez HL, Doval DC, Chavez MA, Ang PC, Aziz Z, Nag S, Ng C, Franco SX, Chow LW, Arbushites MC, Casey MA, Berger MS, Stein SH, Sledge GW (2008) Efficacy and safety of lapatinib as first-line therapy for ErbB2-amplified locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(18):2999–3005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar R, Knick VB, Rudolph SK, Johnson JH, Crosby RM, Crouthamel MC, Hopper TM, Miller CG, Harrington LE, Onori JA, Mullin RJ, Gilmer TM, Truesdale AT, Epperly AH, Boloor A, Stafford JA, Luttrell DK, Cheung M (2007) Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlation from mouse to human with pazopanib, a multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor with potent antitumor and antiangiogenic activity. Mol Cancer Ther 6(7):2012–2021

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dejonge M, Savage S, Verweij J (2006) A phase I, open-label study of the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of pazopanib (P) and lapatinib (L) administered concurrently. J Clin Oncol 24(Supp 1):Abstract 3088

  14. Taylor SK, Chia S, Dent S, Clemons M, Grenci P, Wang L, Oza AM, Ivy P, Pritchard K, Leighl N (2009) A phase II study of GW786034 (pazopanib) in patients with recurrent or metastatic invasive breast carcinoma: results after completion of stage I: a trial of the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium. J Clin Oncol 27(15 suppl):Abstract 1133

  15. Sternberg CN, Davis ID, Mardiak J, Szczylik C, Lee E, Wagstaff J, Barrios CH, Salman P, Gladkov OA, Kavina A, Zarba JJ, Chen M, McCann L, Pandite L, Roychowdhury DF, Hawkins RE (2010) Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 28(6):1061–1068

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pegram M, Chan D, Dichmann R, Tan-Chiu E, Yeon C, Durna L, Lin L, Slamon D (2006) Phase II combined biological therapy targeting the HER2 proto-oncogene and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) using trastuzumab and bevacizumab as first-line treatment of HER2-amplified breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 100(Suppl 1):S28 Abstract 301

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bachelot T, Lluch A, Gutierrez M, Martin M, Kozloff M, Prady C, Tassell V, Kern K, Huang X, Verma S, Blay J-Y (2008) Activity and safety of sunitinib in combination with trastuzumab for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: initial results from a phase II study. In: Presented at San Antonio breast cancer symposium, 10–13 Dec 2008, San Antonio, TX. Abstract 4115

  18. Rugo HS, Franco S, Munster P, Stopeck A, Ma W, Lyandres J, Lahiri S, Arbushites M, Koehler M, Dickler MN (2008) A phase II evaluation of lapatinib (L) and bevacizumab (B) in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 26(15 suppl):Abstract 1042

  19. GlaxoSmithKline A phase II, open-label, randomized, parallel-group multicenter trial comparing two schedules of GW572016 as first-line monotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Updated 2007. http://download.gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com/files/20700.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2011

  20. Sleijfer S, Ray-Coquard I, Papai Z, Le Cesne A, Scurr M, Schoffski P, Collin F, Pandite L, Marreaud S, De Brauwer A, van Glabbeke M, Verweij J, Blay JY (2009) Pazopanib, a multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a phase II study from the European organisation for research and treatment of cancer-soft tissue and bone sarcoma group (EORTC study 62043). J Clin Oncol 27(19):3126–3132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the following investigators who enrolled patients in this study: David Fenton, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada; Tallal Younis, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Canada; Jacques Bonneterre, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Véronique Diéras, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Louis-Marie Dourthe, Centre de Radiothérapie, Clinique Sainte Anne, Strasbourg, France; Magdolna Dank, Semmelweis Egyetem, Budapest, Hungary; István Láng, Országos Onkológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary; Tamás Pintér, Petz Aladár Megyei Kórház, Győr, Hungary; Lokanatha Dasappa, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, India; Dinesh Doval, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute, Delhi, India; Sudeep Gupta, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India; Hemant Malhotra, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, India; Anantbhushan Ranade, Dinanath Mangeshkar Hospital, Pune, India; Santosh Thyagu, Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, India; Noa Efrat, Kaplan MC, Rehovot, Israel; Ron Epelbaum, Rambam MC, Haifa, Israel; Alberto Gabizon Barchilon, Shaare-Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Bella Kaufman, Sheba MC, Ramat Gan, Israel; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin MC, Campus Beilinson, Petach Tikva, Israel; Sung-Bae Kim, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Christina Ng, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Tirzo Súarez-Sahui, Hospital Regional ISSSTE “Mérida”, Merida, Mexico; Zeba Aziz, Hameed Latif Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan; Abrar Javed, Nishtar Medical College and Hospital, Multan, Pakistan; Humera Mahmood, NORI, Islamabad, Pakistan; Neelam Siddiqui, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan; Naila Zahid, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan; Henry Gomez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Fernando Hurtado de Mendoza, Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru; Manuel Philco, Hospital Nacional Alberto Sabogal Sologuren, Callao, Peru; Agnieszka Jagiello-Gruszfeld, Samodzielny Publiczny Zespol Pulmonologii i Onk., Olsztyn, Poland; Jolanta Smok-Kalwat, Swietokrzyskie Centrum Onkologii, Kielce, Poland; Natalya Dobrovolskaya, Russian Scientific Center of Roentgeno-Radiology, Moscow, Russian Federation; Alexey Manikhas, St Petersburg City Oncology Dispensary, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Vladimir Semiglazov, Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Sergei Tjulandin, Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation; Nan-Soon Wong, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore; Virote Sriuranpong, Chulalongkorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand; Peter Canney, The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK; Stephen Chan, Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK; Neville Davidson, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, UK; Mark Harries, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK; Stephen Johnston, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Andrew Wardley, Christie Hospital, Withington, Manchester, UK; Mary Ann Allison, Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA; David Chan, Cancer Care Associates Medical Group, Inc., Redondo Beach, USA; Fairooz Kabbinavar, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA; Frederic Kass, Santa Barbara Hematology Oncology Medical, Santa Barbara, USA; Andre Liem, Pacific Shores Medical Group, Long Beach, USA; Giribala Patel, California Medical Research Group, Inc., Fullerton, USA; Ravi Patel, Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center, Bakersfield, USA; Gladys Rodriguez, South Texas Oncology and Hematology, San Antonio, USA; Carroll Scroggin, Jr., NEA Clinic, Jonesboro, USA; Joseph Sparano, Montefiore Medical, Bronx, USA. Laura Evans, Phillips Gilmore Oncology Communications, and William Sinkins, PhD, ProEd Communications, Inc., provided medical editorial assistance with this manuscript. This study (VEG20007; NCT00347919) was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA, and financial support for medical editorial assistance was provided by GlaxoSmithKline.

Conflict of interest

Drs. Richie, Durante, Pandite, and Goodman are GlaxoSmithKline employees and stock holders. Drs. Johnston and Slamon have received speakers bureau honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline and Dr. Johnston’s institution has received research funding from GlaxoSmithKline. Drs. Gómez and Stemmer report no competing financial interests.

Ethical standards

The institutional review board for each participating institution approved the study protocol and the study complied with each country’s laws.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen R. D. Johnston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnston, S.R.D., Gómez, H., Stemmer, S.M. et al. A randomized and open-label trial evaluating the addition of pazopanib to lapatinib as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137, 755–766 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2399-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2399-4

Keywords:

Navigation