Abstract
The association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the interleukin-10 (IL-10) gene promoter and breast cancer risk is still ambiguous. We here performed a meta-analysis based on the evidence currently available from the literature to make a more precise estimation of the relationship between two genetic variants in the IL-10 gene promoter, −1082A > G (rs1800896) and −592C > A (rs1800872), and breast cancer. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the corresponding strengths of association under the codominant, dominant, and recessive models. A total of ten studies (4,181 cases and 4,384 controls) were eligible for meta-analysis. There were six studies with 3,032 cases and 3,190 controls for rs1800872, and eight studies with 1,636 cases and 1,670 controls for rs1800896. Meta-analysis showed that neither of the two polymorphisms had any association with increased breast cancer risk (for rs1800896: OR = 1.060, 95% CI = 0.785–1.432 in the dominant model, and OR = 1.152, 95% CI = 0.958–1.386 in the recessive model; and for rs1800872: OR = 0.952, 95% CI = 0.859–1.056 in the dominant model, and OR = 0.892, 95% CI = 0.741–1.072 in the recessive model). The results did not change when the analyses were restricted in Caucasians, or in the studies fulfilling Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, or according to source of controls. In outlier analysis, no individual study affected the overall OR dominantly, since omission of any single study made no material huge difference. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis suggests a lack of association between the two SNPs (rs1800896 and rs1800872) in the IL-10 gene promoter and breast cancer risk. Further studies, either with larger sample size or regarding other SNPs/haplotypes within the IL-10 gene, are needed to clarify the role of IL-10 in breast carcinogenesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pharoah PD, Antoniou AC, Easton DF, Ponder BA (2008) Polygenes, risk prediction, and targeted prevention of breast cancer. New Engl J Med 358:2796–2803
Dong LM, Potter JD, White E, Ulrich CM, Cardon LR, Peters U (2008) Genetic susceptibility to cancer: the role of polymorphisms in candidate genes. Jama 299:2423–2436
Mosser DM, Zhang X (2008) Interleukin-10: new perspectives on an old cytokine. Immunol Rev 226:205–218
Kurzrock R (2001) Cytokine deregulation in cancer. Biomed Pharmacother 55:543–547
Smyth MJ, Cretney E, Kershaw MH, Hayakawa Y (2004) Cytokines in cancer immunity and immunotherapy. Immunol Rev 202:275–293
Serefoglou Z, Yapijakis C, Nkenke E, Vairaktaris E (2008) Genetic association of cytokine DNA polymorphisms with head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 44:1093–1099
Howell WM, Rose-Zerilli MJ (2007) Cytokine gene polymorphisms, cancer susceptibility, and prognosis. J Nutr 137:194S–199S
Merendino RA, Arena A, Capozza AB, Chillemi S, Mesiti M (1996) Serum levels of interleukin-10 in patients affected by breast cancer. Immunol Lett 53:59–60
Yu KD, Di GH, Yuan WT, Fan L, Wu J, Hu Z, Shen ZZ, Zheng Y, Huang W, Shao ZM (2009) Functional polymorphisms, altered gene expression and genetic association link NRH: quinone oxidoreductase 2 to breast cancer with wild-type p53. Hum Mol Genet 18:2502–2517
Crawley E, Kay R, Sillibourne J, Patel P, Hutchinson I, Woo P (1999) Polymorphic haplotypes of the interleukin-10 5′ flanking region determine variable interleukin-10 transcription and are associated with particular phenotypes of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 42:1101–1108
Turner DM, Williams DM, Sankaran D, Lazarus M, Sinnott PJ, Hutchinson IV (1997) An investigation of polymorphism in the interleukin-10 gene promoter. Eur J Immunogenet 24:1–8
Economopoulos KP, Sergentanis TN (2010) Differential effects of MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism on breast cancer risk along with race: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Tr 120:211–216
Sergentanis TN, Economopoulos KP (2010) GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Tr 121:195–202
Li N, Dong J, Hu Z, Shen H, Dai M (2010) Potentially functional polymorphisms in ESR1 and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Tr 121:177–184
Yu KD, Di GH, Fan L, Chen AX, Yang C, Shao ZM (2010) Lack of an association between a functional polymorphism in the interleukin-6 gene promoter and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis involving 25,703 subjects. Breast Cancer Res Tr 122:483–488
Yu KD, Chen AX, Yang C, Qiu LX, Fan L, Xu WH, Shao ZM (2010) Current evidence on the relationship between polymorphisms in the COX-2 gene and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Tr 122:251–257
Yu KD, Di GH, Fan L, Wu J, Hu Z, Shen ZZ, Huang W, Shao ZM (2009) A functional polymorphism in the promoter region of GSTM1 implies a complex role for GSTM1 in breast cancer. FASEB J 23:2274–2287
Wittke-Thompson JK, Pluzhnikov A, Cox NJ (2005) Rational inferences about departures from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 76:967–986
Yu KD, Di GH, Fan L, Shao ZM (2009) Test of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in breast cancer case–control studies: an issue may influence the conclusions. Breast Cancer Res Tr 117:675–677
Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH, Lingle WL, Degnim AC, Ghosh K, Vierkant RA, Maloney SD, Pankratz VS, Hillman DW, Suman VJ, Johnson J, Blake C, Tlsty T, Vachon CM, Melton LJ 3rd, Visscher DW (2005) Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. New Engl J Med 353:229–237
Giordani L, Bruzzi P, Lasalandra C, Quaranta M, Schittulli F, Della Ragione F, Iolascon A (2003) Association of breast cancer and polymorphisms of interleukin-10 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha genes. Clin Chem 49:1664–1667
Smith KC, Bateman AC, Fussell HM, Howell WM (2004) Cytokine gene polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility and prognosis. Eur J Immunogenet 31:167–173
Guzowski D, Chandrasekaran A, Gawel C, Palma J, Koenig J, Wang XP, Dosik M, Kaplan M, Chu CC, Chavan S, Furie R, Albesiano E, Chiorazzi N, Goodwin L (2005) Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the promoter region of interleukin-10 by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography. J Biomol Tech 16:154–166
Balasubramanian SP, Azmy IA, Higham SE, Wilson AG, Cross SS, Cox A, Brown NJ, Reed MW (2006) Interleukin gene polymorphisms and breast cancer: a case control study and systematic literature review. BMC Cancer 6:188
Onay VU, Briollais L, Knight JA, Shi E, Wang Y, Wells S, Li H, Rajendram I, Andrulis IL, Ozcelik H (2006) SNP–SNP interactions in breast cancer susceptibility. BMC Cancer 6:114
Scola L, Vaglica M, Crivello A, Palmeri L, Forte GI, Macaluso MC, Giacalone A, Di Noto L, Bongiovanni A, Raimondi C, Accardo A, Verna R, Candore G, Caruso C, Lio D, Palmeri S (2006) Cytokine gene polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1089:104–109
Gonullu G, Basturk B, Evrensel T, Oral B, Gozkaman A, Manavoglu O (2007) Association of breast cancer and cytokine gene polymorphism in Turkish women. Saudi Med J 28:1728–1733
Kong F, Liu J, Liu Y, Song B, Wang H, Liu W (2010) Association of interleukin-10 gene polymorphisms with breast cancer in a Chinese population. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 29:72
Langsenlehner U, Krippl P, Renner W, Yazdani-Biuki B, Eder T, Koppel H, Wascher TC, Paulweber B, Samonigg H (2005) Interleukin-10 promoter polymorphism is associated with decreased breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Tr 90:113–115
Pharoah PD, Tyrer J, Dunning AM, Easton DF, Ponder BA (2007) Association between common variation in 120 candidate genes and breast cancer risk. PLoS Genet 3:e42
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by grants from the National Basic Research Program of China (2006CB910501), 2009 Youth Foundation of Shanghai Public Health Bureau, 2009 Youth Foundation of Shanghai Medical College, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30971143, 30972936).
Conflict of interest
All authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, KD., Chen, AX., Yang, C. et al. The associations between two polymorphisms in the interleukin-10 gene promoter and breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131, 27–31 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1133-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1133-3