Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the prognostic value of HER-2 and VEGF in breast cancer patients participating in a randomized study with dose–dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Purpose

To assess the prognostic and predictive significance of HER-2 overexpression and high expression of VEGF in high-risk patients with breast cancer treated with dose–dense sequential chemotherapy.

Patients and methods

From June 1997 until November 2000, 595 patients were randomized to three cycles of epirubicin (E) 110 mg/m2 followed by three cycles of paclitaxel (T) 250 mg/m2 followed by three cycles of “intensified” CMF (cyclophosphamide 840 mg/m2, methotrexate 47 mg/m2 and fluorouracil 840 mg/m2) or to four cycles of E, followed by four cycles of CMF. HER-2 was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 394 patients, and by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in cases scored as 2+ by IHC. VEGF was evaluated in 323 patients by IHC.

Results

HER-2 overexpression was detected in 123 patients (31%) and high expression of VEGF in 233 (72%). The rate of HER-2 overexpression was significantly higher in patients with positive VEGF staining (35% vs. 21%, p=0.02). Overexpression of HER-2 was significantly associated with negative hormonal status, high histologic grade and larger tumors. HER-2 overexpression was a significant negative predictor of DFS (p=0.002), but not of OS. Adjusting for HER-2 overexpression, DFS and OS did not significantly differ between treatment groups. Positive VEGF staining was not associated with receptor status, number of positive nodes, grade, tumor size, incidence of relapse or death.

Conclusions

For both treatments, HER-2 overexpression was a significant negative prognostic factor for DFS but not for OS, while high expression of VEGF was not significantly associated to either DFS or OS. No predictive ability of HER-2 status or VEGF overexpression for T treatment was evident.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group: 1998 Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomized trials Lancet 352: 930–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hayes DF, Bast RC, Desch CE, Fritsche H Jr., Kemeny NE, Jessup JM, Locker GY, Macdonald JS, Mennel RG, Norton L, Ravdin P, Taube S, Winn RJ, 1996 Tumor marker utility grading system: a framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 1456–1466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gusterson BA, 1995 The changing role of pathologist in the prediction of tumor behaviour and response to treatment it. In: Dickson RB, Lippman ME, (eds.) Drug and Hormonal Resistance in Breast Cancer. Ellis Horwood, New York, p. 39–53

    Google Scholar 

  4. Akiyama T, Sudo C, Ogawara H, Toyoshima K, Yamamoto T, 1986 The product of the human c-erbB2 gene: a 185-kilodalton glycoprotein with tyrosine kinase activity Science 232: 1644–1646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ross JS, Fletcher JA, 1999 HER-2/neu (c-erbB2) gene and protein in breast cancer Am J Clin Pathol 112: S53–S67

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ross JS, Fletcher JA, 1999 The Her-2/neu oncogene: prognostic factor, predictive factor and target for therapy Semin Cancer Biol 9: 125–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ratcliffe N, Wells W, Wheeler K, Memoli V, 1997 The combination of in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analysis: an evaluation of Her-2/neu expression in paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas and adjacent normal-appearing breast epithelium Mod Pathol 10: 1247–1252

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gusterson BA, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Price KN, Save-Soderborgh J, Anbazhagan R, Styles J, Rudenstam CM, Golouh R, Reed R, 1992 Prognostic importance of c-erbB2 expression in breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group, Bern, Switzerland J Clin Oncol 10: 1049–1056

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marsigliante S, Muscella A, Ciardo V, Barker S, Leo G, Baker V, Mottaghi A, Vinson GP, Storelli C, 1993 Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of HER-2/neu gene product (p185) in breast cancer: its correlation with sex steroid receptors, cathepsin D and histologic grades Cancer Lett 75: 195–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell MS, Press MF, 1999 The role of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization for HER2/neu in assessing the prognosis of breast cancer Semin Oncol 26: 108–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hartmann LC, Ingle JN, Wold LE, Farr GH Jr., Grill JP, Su JQ, Maihle NJ, Krook JE, Witzig TE, Roche PC, 1994 Prognostic value of c-erbB2 overexpression in axillary lymph node positive breast cancer. Results from a randomized adjuvant treatment protocol Cancer 74: 2956–2963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Muss HB, Thor AD, Berry DA, Kute T, Liu ET, Koerner F, Cirrincione CT, Budman DR, Wood WC, Barcos M, Henderson IC, 1994 c-erbB2 expression and response to adjuvant therapy in women with node-positive early breast cancer N Engl J Med 330(4): 1260–1266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paik S, Bryant J, Park C, Fisher B, Tan-Chiu E, Hyams D, Fisher ER, Lippman ME, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N, 1998 erbB-2 and response to doxorubicin in patients with axillary lymph node-positive, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 90: 1361–1370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moliterni A, Menard S, Valagussa P, Biganzoli E, Boracchi P, Balsari A, Casalini P, Tomasic G, Marubini E, Pilotti S, Bonadonna G, 2003 HER2 overexpression and Doxorubicin in adjuvant chemotherapy for respectable breast cancer J Clin Oncol 21: 458–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Konecny GE, Thomssen C, Luck HJ, Untch M, Wange HJ, Kuhn W, Eidtmann H, du Bois A, Olbricht S, Steinfeld D, Mobus V, von Minckwitz G, Dandekar S, Ramos L, Pauletti G, Pegram MD, Janicke F, Slamon DJ, 2004 Her-2/neu gene amplification and response to paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 96(15):1141–1151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Krishnamurthy S, Yamamura Y, Broglio KR, Pusztai L, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN, Esteva FJ, 2004 Lack of association between amplification of her-2 and response to preoperative taxanes in patients with breast carcinoma Cancer 101(2): 258–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanahan D, Folkman J, 1996 Patterns and emerging mechanism of the angiogenic switch during angiogenesis Cell 86: 353–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dvorak HF, Brown LF, Detmar M, Dvorak AM, 1995 Vascular permeability/vascular endothelial growth factor, microvascular hyperpermeability, and angiogenesis Am J Pathol 146: 1029–1039

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Harmey JH, Dimitriadis E, Kay E, Redmond HP, Bouchier-Hays D, 1998 Regulation of macrophage production of vascular endothelial growth factor by hypoxia and TGFβ-1 Ann Surg Oncol 5: 271–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis JS, Landers RJ, Underwood JCE, Harris AL, Lewis CE, 2000 Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor by macrophages is up regulated in poorly vascularized areas of breast carcinomas J Pathol 192: 150–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Linderholm B, Andersson J, Lindh B, Beckman L, Erlanson M, Edin K, Tavelin B, Grankvist K, Henriksson R, 2004 Overexpression of c-erbB-2 is related to a higher expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and constitutes an independent prognostic factor in primary node-positive breast cancer after adjuvant systemic treatment Eur J Cancer 40: 33–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fountzilas G, Skarlos D, Dafni U, Gogas H, Briasoulis E, Pectasides D, Papadimitriou Ch, Markopoulos Ch, Polychronis A, Kalofonos H, Siafaka V, Kosmidis P, Timotheadou E, Tsavdaridis D, Bafaloukos D, Papakostas P, Razis E, Makrantonaks P, Aravantinos G, Christodoulou Ch, Dimopoulos AM, 2005 Postoperative dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, followed by CMF with or without paclitaxel, in patients with high risk operable breast cancer. A randomised phase III study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Ann Oncol 16: 1762–1771

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bloom HJ, Richardson WW, 1957 Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer Br J Cancer 11: 359–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee IJ, Park KR, Lee KK, Song JS, Lee KG, Lee JY, Cha DS, Choi HI, Kim DH, Deung YK, 2002 Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor in Stage IB carcinoma of the uterine cervix Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54(3): 768–779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Têtu B, Brisson J, 1994 Prognostic significance of her-2/neu oncoprotein expression in node-positive breast cancer. The influence of the pattern of immunostaining and adjuvant therapy Cancer 73: 3259–3265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaptain S, Tan LK, Chen B, 2001 Her-2/neu and breast cancer Diagn Mol Pathol 10(3): 139–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Giai M, Roagna R, Ponzone R, De Bortoli M, Dati C, Sismondi P, 1994 Prognostic and predictive relevance of c-erbB2 and ras expression in node positive and negative breast cancer Anticancer Res 14: 1441–1450

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pegram MD, Pauletti G, Slamon DJ, 1998 Her-2/neu as a predictive marker of response to breast cancer therapy Breast Cancer Res Treat 52: 65–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Thor AD, Berry DA, Budman DR, Muss HB, Kute T, Henderson IC, Barcos M, Cirrincione C, Edgerton S, Allred C, Norton L, Liu ET, 1998 erbB2, p53, and efficacy of adjuvant therapy in lymph node-positive breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 90: 1346–1360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Miles DW, Harris WH, Gillett CE, Smith P, Barnes DM, 1999 Effect of c-erbB2 and estrogen receptor status on survival of women with primary breast cancer treated with adjuvant cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil Int J Cancer 84: 354–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Menard S, Valagussa P, Pilotti S, Gianni L, Biganzoli E, Boracchi P, Tomasic G, Casalini P, Marubini E, Colnaghi MI, Cascinelli N, Bonadonna G, 2001 Response to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in lymph node-positive breast cancer according to Her-2overexpression and other tumor biologic variables J Clin Oncol 19: 329–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Linderholm B, Lindh B, Tavelin B, Grankvist K, Henriksson R, 2000 p53 and vascular-endothelial-growth-factor (VEGF) expression predicts outcome in 833 patients with primary breast carcinoma Int J Cancer 89: 51–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Linderholm B, Tavelin B, Grankvist K, Henriksson R, 1998 Vascular endothelial growth factor is of high prognostic value in node-negative breast carcinoma J Clin Oncol 16: 3121–3128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Linderholm B, Grankvist K, Wilking N, Johansson M, Tavelin B, Henriksson R, 2000 Correlation of vascular endothelial growth factor content with recurrences, survival, and first relapse site in primary node-positive breast carcinoma after adjuvant treatment J Clin Oncol 18: 1423–1431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bevilacqua P, Barbareschi M, Verderio P, Boracchi P, Caffo O, Dalla Palma P, Meli S, Weidner N, Gasparini G, 1995 Prognostic value of intratumoral microvessel density, a measure of tumor angiogenesis, in node-negative breast carcinoma-results of a multiparametric study Breast Cancer Res Treat 36: 205–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Petit AM, Rak J, Hung MC, Rockwell P, Goldstein N, Fendly B, Kerbel RS, 1997 Neutralizing antibodies against epidermal growth factor and ErbB-2/neu receptor tyrosine kinases down-regulate vascular endothelial growth factor production by tumor cells in vitro and in vivo: angiogenic implications for signal transduction therapy of solid tumors Am J Pathol 151: 1523–1530

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Yen L, You XL, Al Moustafa AE, Batist G, Hynes NE, Mader S, Meloche S, Alaoui-Jamali MA, 2000 Heregulin selectively upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor secretion in cancer cells and stimulates angiogenesis Oncogene 19: 3460–3469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Mrs. Irene Grimani (MSc) HeCOG Data Office, Athens, for statistical analysis, Mrs. Evita Fragou HeCOG Data Office, Athens for monitoring the study, Mrs. Maria Moschoni, HeCOG Data Office, Athens, for data coordination and Mrs. Thalia Spinari HeCOG Data Office, Athens for secretarial assistance. This study was supported in part by a HeCOG research Grant (HE R_1097) and a grant for Hellenic Post Office.

Also the authors would like to thank the following pathologists who contributed with paraffin-embedded tissues for the present study: G. Kafiri, D. Vlachodimitropoulos, D. Tziortziotis, Ch. Vambouka, Th. Filippidis, Th. Toliou, J. Ghiconti, A. Zizi, K. Manoloudaki, G. Liapi, S. Nikolopoulou, E. Parassi, S. Mavropoulou, K. Gavriilidis, E. Molyvas, E. Eleftheriadis and I. Hatzibougias.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Fountzilas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kostopoulos, I., Arapantoni-Dadioti, P., Gogas, H. et al. Evaluation of the prognostic value of HER-2 and VEGF in breast cancer patients participating in a randomized study with dose–dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 96, 251–261 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-9062-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-9062-2

Keywords

Navigation