Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-Resolution FOCUSS: A Source Imaging Technique Applied to MEG Data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Brain Topography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary:

A variety of techniques are available for imaging magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data to the corresponding cortical structures. Each performs a functional optimization that includes mathematical and physical restrictions on source activity. Unlike other imaging techniques, MR-FOCUSS (Multi-Resolution FOCal Underdetermined System Solution) utilizes a wavelet statistical operator that allows spatial resolution to be chosen appropriately for focal or extended sources. Control of focal imaging properties is achieved by specifying P in an lP norm distribution template used to construct the wavelets. In addition, incorporation of a multi-resolution wavelet operator desensitizes the mathematical algorithm to noise, (regularization). Like the FOCUSS imaging technique, an initial estimate of cortical activity is recursively enhanced to obtain the final high resolution imaging results. Studies of model MEG data representing all regions of a realistic cortical model are performed to quantify MR-FOCUSS imaging properties. These modeled data studies included single and multiple dipole sources as well as an extended source model. Thus, MR-FOCUSS is found to be very effective for imaging language processing for pre-surgical planning and provides a high-resolution method to image sequential activation of multiple correlated sources involved in language processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baillet, S., Mosher, J.C. and Leahy, R.M. Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2001, 18(6): 14ߝ30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer, S.M., Moran, J.E., Mason, K.M., Constantinou, J.E., Smith, B.J., Barkley, G.L. and Tepley, N. MEG localization of language specific cortex utilizing MR-FOCUSS. Neurology, 2004, 6: 2247–2255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, A.M., Liu, A.K., Fischl, B.R., Buckner, R.L., Belliveau, J.W., Lewine, J.D. and Halgren, E. Dynamic statistical parameteric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron, 2000, 26: 55–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darvas, F., Pantazis, D., Kucukaltun-Yildirim, E. and Leahy, R.M. Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: methods and validation. NeuroImage, 2004, 23: S289–S299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flaig, A., Arce, G.R. and Barner, K.E. Affine order-statistic filters: “medianization” of linear FIR filters. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1998 46(8): 2101–2112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y., Williamson, G.A. and Clarkson, P.M. Adaptive algorithms for non-gaussian noise environments: the order statistic least mean square algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1994, 42(11): 2945–2954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavit, L., Baillet, S., Mangin, J.F., Jérémie P. and Garnero, L. A multiresolution framework to MEG/EEG source imaging. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2001, 48(10): 1080–1087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorodnitsky, I.F., George, J.S. and Rao, B.D. Neuromagnetic source imaging with FOCUSS: a recursive weighted minimum norm algorithm. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1995, 95: 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorodnitsky, I.F. and Rao, B.D. Sparse signal reconstruction from limited data using FOCUSS: a re-weighted minimum norm algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1997, 45(3): 600–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R., Knuutila, J. and Lounasmaa, O. Magnetoencephalography. Theory, instrumentation and applications to the noninvasive study of human brain function. Rev. Mod. Phys., 1993, 6: 413–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. and Swithenby, S.J. The Bassian Power Imaging (BPI) Method for Magnetic Source Imaging. In: J. Nenonen, R.J. Iimoniemi and T. Katila (Eds.), Biomag2000, Proc. 12th int. Conf. On Biomagnetism (Helsinki Univ. of Technology, Espoo, Finland) 2001: 701–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haweel, T.I. and Clarkson, P.M. A class of order statistic LMS algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1992, 40(1): 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helenius, P., Salmelin, R., Service, E. and Connolly, J. Distinct time courses of word and context comprehension in the left temporal cortex. Brain, 1998, 121:1133–1142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, B. and Poeppel, D. How can EEG/MEG and fMRI/PET data be combined? Human Brain Mapping, 2002, 17(1): 1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leahy, R.M., Mosher, J.C., Spencer, M.E., Huang, M.X. and Lewine, J.D. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom. Electorencephal. clin. Neurophysiology, 1998, 107: 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W., Praamstra, P. and Meyer, A. A MEG study of picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1998, 10(5): 553–567.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, A.K., Belliveau, J.W. and Dale, A.M. Spatiotemporal imaging of human brain activity using functional MRI constrained magnetoencephalography data: Monte Carlo simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998, 95: 8945–8950.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, A.K., Dale, A.M. and Belliveau, J.W. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy. Human Brain Mapping, 2002, 16: 47–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moran J.E., Tepley N., Two Dimensional Inverse Imaging of Current Sources in Magnetoencephalography, Brain Topography 2000, 12(3) 201–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, J.E. and Tepley, N. Source space minimization technique for MEG source analysis. In: J. Nenonen, R.J. Ilmoniemi and T. Katila (Eds.), Biomag2000, Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Biomagnetism, (Helsinki Univ. of Technology, Espoo, Finland) 2001: 674–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, J.E., Bowyer, S. and Tepley, N. Multi-resolution FOCUSS source imaging of MEG data. In: G. Fischer and F.X. Roithinger (Eds.), Proceeding of NFSI 2001. Biomedizinische Technik, 2001, 46(2): 112–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, J.E. and Tepley, N. MEG_Tools for MATLAB: MEG imaging and Visualization Software, 2005, available at: http://www.megimaging.com.

  • Moran, J.E., Drake, C.L. and Tepley, N. ICA methods for MEG imaging. Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, 2004: 72 (http://www.aacnonline.com/).

  • Mosher, J.C., Lewis, P.S. and Leahy, R.M. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1992, 39(6): 541–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, J.C., Leahy, R.M. and Lewis, P.S. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1999, 46(3): 245–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, J.C. and Leahy, R.M. Source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1999 47(2): 332–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada, J.C., Huang, J. and Xu, C. A hierachical minimum norm estimation method for reconstructing current densities in the brain from remotely measured magnetic fields. In: M. Hoke, S.N. Erné, Y.C. Okada and G.L. Romani (Eds.), Biomagnetism: Clinical aspects, 8th international conference on Biomagnetism. Elsevier, 1992: 729–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, B.D. and Kreutz-Delgado, K. An affine scaling methodology for best basis selection. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1999, 47(1): 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, B.D., Engan, K., Cotter, S.F., Palmer, J. and Dreutz-Delgado, K. Subset selection in noise based on diversity measure minimization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2003, 51(3): 760–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, D.M., George, J.S. and Wood, C.C. Bayesian inference applied to the electromagnetic inverse problem. Human Brain Mapping, 1999, 7(3): 195–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sekihara, K., Nagarajan, S.S., Poeppel, D., Marantz, A. and Miyashita, Y. Reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources using an MEG vector beamformer technique. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2001, 48(7): 760–771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uitert, R. and Van Johnson, C. Can a Spherical Model Substitute for a Realistic Head Model in Forward and Inverse MEG Simulations? In: H. Nowak, J. Hauesen, F. GieBler and R. Huonker (Eds.), Biomag 2002 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Biomagnetism (Verlag), 2002: 798–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek, S.P., Reinders, F., Donderwinkel, M., and Peters, M.J. Volume conduction effects in EEG and MEG. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiology, 1998, 106: 522–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.E. Moran.

Additional information

This research Including the development of the MR-FOCUSS imaging technique and software implementation was supported by NIH/NINDS Grant R01 NS30914.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moran, J., Bowyer, S. & Tepley, N. Multi-Resolution FOCUSS: A Source Imaging Technique Applied to MEG Data. Brain Topogr 18, 1–17 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-005-7896-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-005-7896-x

Key words:

Navigation