Abstract
We examine the performance of two steady-state models, a numerical solution of the advection-diffusion equation and the Gaussian plume-model-based AERMOD (the American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model), to predict dispersion for surface releases under low wind-speed conditions. A comparison of model estimates with observations from two tracer studies, the Prairie Grass experiment and the Idaho Falls experiment indicates that about 50% of the concentration estimates are within a factor of two of the observations, but the scatter is large: the 95% confidence interval of the ratio of the observed to estimated concentrations is about 4. The model based on the numerical solution of the diffusion equation in combination with the model of Eckman (1994, Atmos Environ 28:265–272) for horizontal spread performs better than AERMOD in explaining the observations. Accounting for meandering of the wind reduces some of the overestimation of concentrations at low wind speeds. The results deteriorate when routine one-level observations are used to construct model inputs. An empirical modification to the similarity estimate of the surface friction velocity reduces the underestimation at low wind speeds.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anfossi D, Alessandrini S, Trini Castelli S, Ferrero E, Oettl D (2006) Tracer dispersion simulation in low wind speed conditions with a new 2D Langevin equation system. Atmos Environ 40: 7234–7245
Arya SP (1995) Modelling and parameterization of near-source diffusion in weak winds. J Appl Meteorol 34: 1112–1122
Barad ML (ed) (1958) Project Prairie Grass. A field program in diffusion. Geophysical research paper no. 59, vols I (300 pp) and II (221 pp). AFCRF-TR-58-235. Air Force Cambridge Research Center, Bedford
Brusasca G, Tinarelli G, Anfossi D (1992) Particle model simulation of diffusion in low wind speed stable conditions. Atmos Environ 26A: 707–723
Businger JA (1973) Turbulent transfer in the atmospheric surface layer. In: Haugen DH (ed) Workshop on micrometerology. American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 67–100
Carruthers DJ, Holroyd RJ, Hunt JCR, Weng W-S, Robins AG, Apsley DD, Thompson DJ, Smith FB (1994) UK-ADMS: a new approach to modelling dispersion in the earth’s atmospheric boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 52: 139–153
Caughey SJ, Wyngaard JC, Kaimal JC (1979) Turbulence in the evolving stable boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 36: 1041–1052
Chang JC, Hanna SR (2004) Air quality model performance evaluation. Meteorol Atmos Phys 87: 167–196
Cimorelli AJ, Perry SG, Venkatram A, Weil JC, Paine RJ, Wilson RB, Lee RF, Peters WD, Brode RW (2005) AERMOD: a dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part I: General model formulation and boundary layer characterization. J Appl Meteorol 44: 682–693
Cirillo M, Poli A (1992) An intercomparison of semiempirical diffusion models under low wind speed, stable conditions. Atmos Environ 26A: 765–774
Eckman RM (1994) Re-examination of empirically derived formulas for horizontal diffusion from surface sources. Atmos Environ 28: 265–272
Gryning SE, van Ulden AP, Larsen S (1983) Dispersion from a ground level source investigated by a K-model. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 109: 355–364
Izumi Y (1971) Kansas 1968 field program data report. Environmental research papers, no. 379, AFCRL-72-0041. Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, Bedford, Massachusetts
Luhar AK (2010) Horizontal turbulence and dispersion in low-wind stable conditions. In: Proceeding of the 13th conference on harmonisation with atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes, 1–4 June, Paris, France, pp 863–867
Luhar AK, Hurley PJ, Rayner KN (2009) Modelling near-surface low winds over land under stable conditions: sensitivity tests, flux–gradient relationships, and stability parameters. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 130: 249–274
Nieuwstadt FTM, van Ulden AP (1978) A numerical study on the vertical dispersion of passive contaminants from a continuous source in the atmospheric surface layer. Atmos Environ 12: 2119–2124
Oettl D, Almbauer RA, Sturm PJ (2001) A new method to estimate diffusion in stable, low wind conditions. J Appl Meteorol 40: 259–268
Panofsky HA, Dutton JA (1984) Atmospheric turbulence. Wiley, New York, p 397
Sagendorf JF, Dickson CR (1974) Diffusion under low wind speed, inversion conditions. NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL ARL-52, 89 pp
Sharan M, Yadav AK (1998) Simulation of experiments under light wind, stable conditions by a variable K-theory model. Atmos Environ 32: 3481–3492
Sharan M, Yadav AK, Singh MP (1995) Comparison of sigma schemes for air pollutant dispersion in low winds. Atmos Environ 29: 2051–2059
van Ulden AP (1978) Simple estimates for vertical dispersion from sources near the ground. Atmos Environ 12: 2125–2129
Venkatram A (1980) Estimating the Monin-Obukhov length in the stable boundary layer for dispersion calculations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 19: 481–485
Venkatram A (1992) Vertical dispersion of ground-level releases in the surface boundary layer. Atmos Environ 26A: 947–949
Venkatram A (2004) The role of meteorological inputs in estimating dispersion from surface releases. Atmos Environ 28: 2439–2446
Venkatram A (2008) Computing and displaying model performance statistics. Atmos Environ 24: 6862–6868
Venkatram A, Princevac M (2008) Using measurements in urban areas to estimate turbulent velocities for modeling dispersion. Atmos Environ 42: 3833–3841
Venkatram A, Isakov V, Yuan J, Pankratz D (2004) Modeling dispersion at distances of meters from urban sources. Atmos Environ 38: 4633–4641
Acknowledgment
The research described in this paper was sponsored by the National Science Foundation under grant ATMOS 0430776 and the California Energy Commission.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Qian, W., Venkatram, A. Performance of Steady-State Dispersion Models Under Low Wind-Speed Conditions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 138, 475–491 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9565-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9565-1