Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modelling Mean and Turbulence Fields in the Dry Convective Boundary Layer with the Eddy-Diffusivity/Mass-Flux Approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The treatment of turbulence closure in atmospheric models is examined in the context of the dry convective boundary layer (CBL) and the eddy-diffusivity/mass-flux (EDMF) approach. The EDMF approach is implemented into a model called TAPM to use a coupled two-equation prognostic turbulence closure and the mass-flux approach to represent turbulence in the CBL. This work also extends the range of turbulence variables that can be derived from the mass-flux component of the model and uses these along with their values from the prognostic scheme to provide total turbulence fields that can be used to compare to data and/or to feed into other components of TAPM, including those needed to drive Eulerian and Lagrangian air pollution dispersion modules. Model results are presented for the afternoon of a simulated summer day and are compared to both laboratory and field observations in a mixed-layer scaled framework. The results show that the EDMF approach works well within TAPM and can provide good predictions of mean and turbulence fields, including in the upper levels of the CBL. The EDMF approach has several attractive features, including the potential to be one approach to unify the treatment of turbulence and dry and moist convection in atmospheric models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andren A (1990). Evaluation of a turbulence closure scheme suitable for air pollution applications. J Appl Meteorol 29: 224–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caughey S and Palmer S (1979). Some aspects of turbulence structure through the depth of the convective boundary layer. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 105: 811–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff J (1966). The counter-gradient heat flux in the lower atmosphere and in the laboratory. J Atmos Sci 23: 503–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff J and Willis G (1985). Further results from a laboratory model of the convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 32: 205–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deRoode S, Duynkerke P and Siebesma A (2000). Analogies between mass-flux and Reynolds-averaged equations. J Atmos Sci 57: 1585–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duynkerke P (1988). Application of the E–ε turbulence closure model to the neutral and stable atmospheric boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 45: 865–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards M, Hurley P and Physick W (2004). Verification of TAPM meteorological predictions using sodar data in the Kalgoorlie region. Aust Met Mag 53: 29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson M and Launder B (1978). Ground effects on pressure fluctuations in the atmospheric boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 86: 491–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibberd M and Sawford B (1994). A saline laboratory model of the planetary convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 67: 229–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill J and Hurley P (2003). The use of TAPM at Anglesea. Proceedings of the national clean air conference of CASANZ. Newcastle, Australia, 23–27 November 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtslag A and Boville B (1993). Local versus non-local boundary-layer diffusion in a global climate model. J Climate 6: 1825–1842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley P (1997). An evaluation of several turbulence schemes for the prediction of mean and turbulent fields in complex terrain. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 83: 43–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley P (2005a). TAPM V3—model description and verification. Clean Air 39: 32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley P (2005b) The air pollution model (TAPM) version 3. Part 1: Technical description. CSIRO Atmospheric Research Technical Paper No. 71

  • Hurley P, Blockley A and Rayner K (2001). of a prognostic meteorological and air pollution model for year-long predictions in the Kwinana region of Western Australia. Atmos Environ 35: 1871–1880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley P, Manins P, Lee S, Boyle R, Ng Y and Dewundege P (2003). Year-long, high-resolution, urban airshed modelling: Verification of TAPM predictions of smog and particles in Melbourne, Australia. Atmos Environ 37: 1899–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley P, Physick W, Cope M, Borgas M, Brace P (2003b) An evaluation of TAPM for photochemical smog applications in the Pilbara region of WA. Proceedings of the national clean air conference of CASANZ, Newcastle, Australia, 23–27 November 2003

  • Hurley P, Physick W and Luhar A (2005). TAPM—A practical approach to prognostic meteorological and air pollution modelling. Environ Modell & Software 20: 737–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley P, Physick W, Luhar A, Edwards M (2005b) The air pollution model (TAPM) version 3. Part 2: Summary of some verification studies. CSIRO Atmospheric Research Technical Paper No. 72

  • Jakob C and Siebesma A (2003). A new subcloud model for mass-flux convection schemes: Influence on triggering, updraft properties and model climate. Mon Wea Rev 131: 2765–2778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhar A and Hurley P (2003). Evaluation of TAPM, a prognostic meteorological and air pollution model, using urban and rural point-source data. Atmos Environ 37: 2795–2810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhar A, Hibberd M and Hurley P (1996). Comparison of closure schemes used to specify the velocity pdf in Lagrangian stochastic dispersion models for convective conditions. Atmos Environ 30: 1407–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Physick WL, Rayner KN, Mountford P and Edwards M. (2004). Observations and modelling of dispersion meteorology in the Pilbara region. Aust Met Mag 53: 175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodi W (1985). Calculation of stably stratified shear-layer flows with a buoyancy-extended k–ε turbulence model. In: Hunt, JCR (eds) Turbulence and diffusion in stable environments, pp 111–143. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares P, Miranda P, Siebesma A and Teixeira J (2004). An eddy-diffusivity/mass-flux parameterisation for dry and shallow cumulus convection. Quart J Ray Meteorol Soc 130: 3365–3383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebesma A, Teixeira J (2000) An advection-diffusion scheme for the convective boundary layer: description and 1D results. 14th symposium on boundary layer turbulence, 7–11 August 2000, Aspen, Colorado, USA, pp 133–136. American Meteorological Society

  • Teixeira J, Siebesma A (2000) A mass-flux/K-diffusion approach to the parameterisation of the convective boundary layer: Global model results. 14th Symposium on Boundary Layer Turbulence, 7–11 August 2000, Aspen, Colorado, USA, pp 231–234. American Meteorological Society

  • Young G (1988). Turbulence structure of the convective boundary layer. Part I: Variability of normalised turbulence statistics. J Atmos Sci 45: 719–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, PMB #1, Aspendale, VIC, 3195, Australia

    Peter Hurley

Authors
  1. Peter Hurley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Hurley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hurley, P. Modelling Mean and Turbulence Fields in the Dry Convective Boundary Layer with the Eddy-Diffusivity/Mass-Flux Approach. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 125, 525–536 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9203-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9203-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation