Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction of quantitative PCR components with polymeric surfaces

  • Published:
Biomedical Microdevices Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of exposing a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) mixture to capillary tubing of different materials and lengths, at different contact times and flow rates and the adsorption of major reaction components into the tubing wall. Using 0.5 mm ID tubing, lengths of 40 cm and residence times up to 45 min, none of the tested polymeric materials was found to affect subsequent PCR amplification. However, after exposure of the mixture to tubing lengths of 3 m or reduction of sample volume, PCR inhibition occurred, increasing with the volume to length ratio. Different flow velocities did not affect PCR yield. When the adsorption of individual PCR components was studied, significant DNA adsorption and even more significant adsorption of the fluorescent dye Sybr Green I was found. The results indicate that PCR inhibition in polymeric tubing results from adsorption of reaction components to wall surfaces, increasing substantially with tubing length or sample volume reduction, but not with contact time or flow velocities typical in dynamic PCR amplification. The data also highlight that chemical compatibility of polymeric capillaries with DNA dyes should be carefully considered for the design of quantitative microfluidic devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J.F. Allemand, D. Bensimon, L. Jullien, A. Bensimon, and V. Croquette, pH-dependent specific binding and combing of DNA. Biophys. J. 73(4), 2064–2070 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Arya, I.S. Shergill, M. Williamson, L. Gommersall, N. Arya, and H.R. Patel, Basic principles of real-time quantitative PCR. Expert. Rev. Mol. Diagn. 5(2), 209–219 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.D. Dorfman, M. Chabert, J.H. Codarbox, G. Rousseau, P. de Cremoux, and J.L. Viovy, Contamination-free continuous flow microfluidic polymerase chain reaction for quantitative and clinical applications. Anal. Chem. 77(11), 3700–3704 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Erill, S. Campoy, N. Erill, J. Barbe, and J. Aguilo, Biochemical analysis and optimization of inhibition and adsorption phenomena in glass-silicon PCR-chips. Sensors and Actuators B-Chem. 96(3), 685–692 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.C. Giordano, E.R. Copeland, and J.P. Landers, Towards dynamic coating of glass microchip chambers for amplifying DNA via the polymerase chain reaction. Electrophoresis 22(2), 334–340 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L.J. Kricka and P. Wilding, Microchip PCR. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 377(5), 820–825 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Krishnan, D.T. Burke, and M.A. Burns, Polymerase chain reaction in high surface-to-volume ratio SiO2 microstructures. Anal. Chem. 76(22), 6588–6593 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.H. Liu, J. Yang, R. Lenigk, J. Bonanno, and P. Grodzinski, Self-contained, fully integrated biochip for sample preparation, polymerase chain reaction amplification, and DNA microarray detection. Anal. Chem. 76(7), 1824–1831 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N.J. Panaro, X.J. Lou, P. Fortina, L.J. Kricka, and P. Wilding, Surface effects on PCR reactions in multichip microfluidic platforms. Biomed. Microdevices 6(1), 75–80 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Ramakers, J.M. Ruijter, R.H. Deprez, and A.F. Moorman, Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neurosci. Lett. 339(1), 62–66 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Schneegass and J.M. Kohler, Flow-through polymerase chain reactions in chip thermocyclers. J. Biotechnol. 82(2), 101–121 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A. Shoffner, J. Cheng, G.E. Hvichia, L.J. Kricka, and P. Wilding, Chip PCR. I. Surface passivation of microfabricated silicon-glass chips for PCR. Nucleic. Acids Res. 24(2), 375–379 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L.T. Skeggs, New dimensions in medical diagnoses. Anal. Chem. 38(6), 31A–44A (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • T.B. Taylor, E.S. Winn-Deen, E. Picozza, T.M. Woudenberg, and M. Albin, Optimization of the performance of the polymerase chain reaction in silicon-based microstructures. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 25(15), 3164–3168 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.J. Walsh, C. King, R. Grimes, and A. Gonzalez, Influence of segmenting fluids on efficiency, crossing point and fluorescence level in real time quantitative PCR. Biomed. Microdevices. 8(1), 59–64 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Wilding, M.A. Shoffner, and L.J. Kricka, PCR in a silicon microstructure. Clin. Chem. 40(9), 1815–1818 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • I.G. Wilson, Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63(10), 3741–3751 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Zhang, J. Xu, W. Ma, and W. Zheng, PCR microfluidic devices for DNA amplification. Biotechnol. Adv. 24(3), 243–284 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Anne McHugh and Claire O’Sullivan for their technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronan Grimes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonzalez, A., Grimes, R., Walsh, E.J. et al. Interaction of quantitative PCR components with polymeric surfaces. Biomed Microdevices 9, 261–266 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-006-9030-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-006-9030-6

Keywords

Navigation