Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution, altruism and cognitive architecture: a critique of Sober and Wilson’s argument for psychological altruism

  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sober and Wilson have propose a cluster of arguments for the conclusion that “natural selection is unlikely to have given us purely egoistic motives” and thus that psychological altruism is true. I maintain that none of these arguments is convincing. However, the most powerful of their arguments raises deep issues about what egoists and altruists are claiming and about the assumptions they make concerning the cognitive architecture underlying human motivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beatty J. (1992) Fitness: theoretical contexts. In: Keller E., Lloyd E. (eds) Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey S., Spelke E. (1996) Science and core knowledge. Philosophy of Science 63(4): 515–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin M. (1974) The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P. (1996) Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A. (1970) A Theory of Human Action. Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga A. (1993) Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E. 1994. The adaptive advantage of learning and a priori prejudice. In: From a Biological Point of View. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Sober E., Wilson D.S. (1998) Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelke E. (2000) Core knowledge. Am Psychol 55: 1233–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelke E. 2003. Core knowledge. In: Kanwisher N. and Duncan J. (eds), Attention and Performance, Vol. 20: Functional Neuroimaging of Visual Cognition. Oxford University Press

  • Stich S. (1978) Beliefs and sub-doxastic states. Philos Sci 45: 499–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stich S. (1990) The Fragmentation of Reason. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich S., Doris J. and Roedder E. (in preparation). Egoism vs. altruism. In: Doris J. et al. (eds), The Handbook of Moral Psychology. Oxford University Press (to be published)

Download references

Acknowledgements

I’m grateful to Elliott Sober, Edouard Machery, Kim Sterelny and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Stich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stich, S. Evolution, altruism and cognitive architecture: a critique of Sober and Wilson’s argument for psychological altruism. Biol Philos 22, 267–281 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9030-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9030-1

Keywords

Navigation