Abstract
Sober and Wilson have propose a cluster of arguments for the conclusion that “natural selection is unlikely to have given us purely egoistic motives” and thus that psychological altruism is true. I maintain that none of these arguments is convincing. However, the most powerful of their arguments raises deep issues about what egoists and altruists are claiming and about the assumptions they make concerning the cognitive architecture underlying human motivation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beatty J. (1992) Fitness: theoretical contexts. In: Keller E., Lloyd E. (eds) Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Carey S., Spelke E. (1996) Science and core knowledge. Philosophy of Science 63(4): 515–533
Fodor J. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
Ghiselin M. (1974) The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. University of California Press, Berkeley
Godfrey-Smith P. (1996) Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Goldman A. (1970) A Theory of Human Action. Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, NJ
Plantinga A. (1993) Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sober E. 1994. The adaptive advantage of learning and a priori prejudice. In: From a Biological Point of View. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sober E., Wilson D.S. (1998) Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Spelke E. (2000) Core knowledge. Am Psychol 55: 1233–1243
Spelke E. 2003. Core knowledge. In: Kanwisher N. and Duncan J. (eds), Attention and Performance, Vol. 20: Functional Neuroimaging of Visual Cognition. Oxford University Press
Stich S. (1978) Beliefs and sub-doxastic states. Philos Sci 45: 499–518
Stich S. (1990) The Fragmentation of Reason. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Stich S., Doris J. and Roedder E. (in preparation). Egoism vs. altruism. In: Doris J. et al. (eds), The Handbook of Moral Psychology. Oxford University Press (to be published)
Acknowledgements
I’m grateful to Elliott Sober, Edouard Machery, Kim Sterelny and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stich, S. Evolution, altruism and cognitive architecture: a critique of Sober and Wilson’s argument for psychological altruism. Biol Philos 22, 267–281 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9030-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9030-1