Abstract
Darwin suggested that evolution would shed new light on human psychology. There have been various attempts in the ensuing century and a half to articulate exactly what that might mean. Evolutionary psychology is the most recent program aiming to explain the relevance of Darwinism to psychology. This program of research is varied, but in general it takes a strongly selectionist perspective, guided by a series of assumptions about the evolutionary process. One of the most promising applications of evolutionary theory involves the explanation of incest avoidance, as an instance of altruism to be explained in terms of kin selection. Evolutionary psychologists typically assume that ancestral hominids lived in compact groups that are kin based. Assuming this is so, kin selection could have been a crucial influence in explaining altruism, and in particular incest avoidance. This case highlights not only the promise of evolutionary psychology but also the inadequacies of the program when it is applied to the evolution of human psychological and social capacities. The evolutionary program could be improved considerably by taking account of more recent work in evolutionary biology, though this is unlikely to deal with the epistemological problems the program confronts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This is not true, though it’s often touted as true. It is clear that deontic contexts concerned with obligation and permission are logically much more nuanced and complex. These issues are contested. What this means for human performance is unclear.
References
Abbot, P., Abe, J., Alcock, J., Alizon, S., Alpedrinha, J. A., Andersson, M., et al. (2011). Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature, 471(7339), E1–E4.
Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.). (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bolhuis, J. J., Brown, G. R., Richardson, R. C., & Laland, K. N. (2011). Darwin in mind: New opportunities for evolutionary psychology. PLoS Biology, 9(7), e1001109. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001109.
Boomsma, J. J., Beekman, M., Cornwallis, C. K., Griffin, A. S., Holman, L., Hughes, W. O., et al. (2011). Only full-sibling families evolved eusociality. Nature, 471(7339), E4–E5.
Buller, D. J. (2005). Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6(1), 1–30.
Buss, D. M. (Ed.). (2005). The handbook of evolutionary psychology. New York: Wiley.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, L. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind. evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). New York: Oxford University Press.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. In J. T. Bonner & R. M. May (Eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Doebeli, M. (2010). Inclusive fitness is just bookkeeping. Nature, 467(7316), 661.
Ferriere, R., & Michod, R. E. (2011). Inclusive fitness in evolution. Nature, 471(7339), E6–E8.
Gadagkar, R. (2010). Sociobiology in turmoil again. Current Science (Bangalore), 99(8), 1036–1041.
Gigerenzer, G., & Hug, K. (1992). Domain specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating and perspective change. Cognition, 43(2), 127–177.
Herre, E. A., & Wcislo, W. T. (2011). In defence of inclusive fitness theory. Nature, 471(7339), E8–E9.
Laland, K. N., & Brown, G. R. (2011). Sense and nonsense: Evolutionary perspectives on human behaviour (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2003). Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270(1517), 819–826.
Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E., & Wilson, E. O. (2010). The evolution of eusociality. Nature, 466(7310), 1057–1062.
Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, E. E., & Wilson, E. O. (2011). Nowak et al. reply. Nature, 471(7339), E9–E10.
Richardson, R. C. (2007). Evolutionary psychology as maladapted psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Strassmann, J. E., Page, R. E., Robinson, G. E., & Seeley, T. D. (2011). Kin selection and eusociality. Nature, 471(7339), E5–E6.
Trivers, R. L. (1974). Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14(1), 249–264.
Trivers, R. L., & Hare, H. (1976). Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science, 191(4224), 249–263.
Van Veelen, M., Garcıá, J., Sabelis, M. W., & Egas, M. (2010). Call for a return to rigour in models. Nature, 467(7316), 661.
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wilson, E. O. (1978). On human nature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Richardson, R. (2015). Evolutionary Psychology, Altruism, and Kin Selection. In: Breyer, T. (eds) Epistemological Dimensions of Evolutionary Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1387-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1387-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1386-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1387-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)