Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Supplemental precipitation accelerates decay but only in photodegraded litter and implications that sunlight promotes leaching loss

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While moisture availability exerts strong controls on biogeochemical processes in drylands, several studies have found no relationship between litter decay and precipitation. We examined whether interactions between precipitation and photodegradation could play a role in the inconsistent response of decay to precipitation. We assessed mass loss of 4 leaf litter types on the surface of the Sonoran Desert over 9.5 months in a full-factorial experiment consisting of 3 radiation treatments (full sunlight, filtered from photodegrading (UV/violet-blue) sunlight, complete shade) and 2 precipitation levels (ambient, supplemental (2.7 × ambient)). Exposure to photodegrading sunlight nearly doubled (i.e. 1.9) litter mass loss, and in combination with supplemental precipitation accelerated decay by 2.6 times. Surprisingly, supplemental precipitation had no influence on decay of litter that did not receive photodegrading sunlight. That photodegradation was required for supplemental precipitation to accelerate decay could explain past findings that decay is not related to precipitation, as most studies assessed litter shaded by plant canopies. Sunlight or precipitation treatments had no effect on litter microbial respiration, even though concentrations of water-soluble compounds were > 2 times greater in photodegraded litter. In a second experiment, we assessed the mass loss from litter attributable to a 30-min immersion in water. Immersion losses were 2.5 times greater from litter exposed to photodegrading sunlight for 20 months in the field than litter filtered from this sunlight, and these losses were strongly correlated with decay. Our findings demonstrate that photodegrading sunlight greatly accelerates litter decay, precipitation magnifies this effect, and leaching is likely a significant mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almagro M, Maestre FT, Martínez-López J, Valencia E, Rey A (2015) Climate change may reduce litter decomposition while enhancing the contribution of photodegradation in dry perennial Mediterranean grasslands. Soil Bio Biochem 90:214–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almagro M, Martínez-López J, Maestre FT, Rey A (2017) The contribution of photodegradation to litter decomposition in semiarid Mediterranean grasslands depends on its interaction with local humidity conditions, litter quality and position. Ecosystems 20:527–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin AT (2011) Has water limited our imagination for aridland biogeochemistry? Trends Ecol Evol 26:229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin AT, Ballaré CL (2010) Dual role of lignin in plant litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad of Sci USA 107:4618–4622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin AT, Méndez MS, Ballaré CL (2016) Photodegradation alleviates the lignin bottleneck for carbon turnover in terrestrial ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:4392–4397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker NR, Allison SD (2015) Ultraviolet photodegradation facilitates microbial litter decomposition in a Mediterranean climate. Ecology 96:1994–2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard RL, Blazewicz SJ, Firestone MK (2020) Rewetting of soil: Revisiting the origin of soil CO2 emissions. Soil Biol Biochem 147:107819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes PW, Throop HL, Archer SR, Breshears DD, McCulley RL, Tobler MA (2015) Sunlight and soil-litter mixing: drivers of litter decomposition in drylands. Prog Bot 76:273–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenstecher P, Vivanco L, Pérez LI, Ballaré CL, Austin A (2020) Sunlight doubles aboveground carbon loss in a seasonally dry woodland in Patagonia. Curr Biol 30:3243–3251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosco T, Bertiller MB, Carrera AL (2016) Combined effects of litter features, UV radiation, and soil water on litter decomposition in denuded areas of the arid Patagonian Monte. Plant Soil 406:71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt LA, King JY, Milchunas DG (2007) Effects of ultraviolet radiation on litter decomposition depend on precipitation and litter chemistry in a shortgrass steppe ecosystem. Glob Change Biol 13:2193–2205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt LA, Bohnet C, King JY (2009) Photochemically induced carbon dioxide production as a mechanism for carbon loss from plant litter in arid ecosystems. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 114:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DE, Brennan TC, Unmack PJ (2007) A digitized biotic community map for plotting and comparing North American plant and animal distributions. Canotia 3:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Day TA, Bliss MS (2019) A spectral weighting function for abiotic photodegradation based on photochemical emission of CO2 from leaf litter in sunlight. Biogeochemistry 146:173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day TA, Bliss MS (2020) Solar photochemical emission of CO2 from leaf litter: sources and significance to C loss. Ecosystems 23:1344–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day TA, Zhang ET, Ruhland CT (2007) Exposure to solar UV-B radiation accelerates mass and lignin loss of Larrea tridentata litter in the Sonoran Desert. Plant Ecol 193:185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day TA, Guénon R, Ruhland CT (2015) Photodegradation of plant litter in the Sonoran Desert varies by litter type and age. Soil Biol Biochem 89:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day TA, Bliss MS, Tomes AR, Ruhland CT, Guénon R (2018) Desert leaf litter decay: coupling of microbial respiration, water soluble fractions and photodegradation. Glob Change Biol 24:5454–5470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks I, Navon Y, Kanas D, Dumbur R, Grünzweig JM (2010) Atmospheric water vapor as driver of litter decomposition in Mediterranean shrubland and grassland during rainless seasons. Glob Change Biology 16:2799–2812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekaya W, Kinyamario J (2001) Production and decomposition of plant litter in an arid rangeland of Kenya. Afr J Range Forage Sci 18:125–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esch EH, King JY, Cleland EE (2019) Foliar litter chemistry mediates susceptibility to UV degradation in two dominant species from a semi-arid ecosystem. Plant Soil 440:265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans S, Todd-Brown KEO, Jacobson K, Jacobson P (2020) Non-rainfall moisture: a key driver of microbial respiration from standing litter in arid, semiarid, and mesic grasslands. Ecosystems 23:1154–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foereid B, Bellarby J, Meier-Augenstein W, Kemp H (2010) Does light exposure make plant litter more degradable? Plant Soil 333:275–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J, Cajthaml T, Mudrák O (2011) The effect of lignin photodegradation on decomposability of Calamagrostis epigeios grass litter. Biodegradation 22:1247–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gliksman D, Rey A, Seligmann R, Dumbur R, Sperling O, Navon Y, Haenel S, DeAngelis P, Arnone JA, Grünzweig JM (2017) Biotic degradation at night, abiotic degradation at day: positive feedbacks on litter decomposition in drylands. Glob Change Biology 23:1564–1574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamerlynck EP, McAuliffe JR, Smith SD (2000) Effects of surface and sub-surface soil horizons on the seasonal performance of Larrea tridentata (creosotebush). Funct Ecol 14:596–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewins DB, Throop HL (2016) Leaf litter decomposition is rapidly enhanced by the co-occurrence of monsoon rainfall and soil-litter mixing across a gradient of coppice dune development in the Chihuahuan Desert. J Arid Environ 129:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang G, Li Y (2017) Photodegradation effects are related to precipitation amount, precipitation frequency and litter traits in a desert ecosystem. Soil Bio Biochem 115:383–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang G, Zhao M, Li Y (2017) Litter decomposition in hyper-arid deserts: photodegradation is still important. Sci Total Environ 601–602:784–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson K, Van Diepeningen A, Evans S, Fritts R, Gemmel P, Marsho C, Seely M, Wenndt A, Yang X, Jacobson P (2015) Non-rainfall moisture activates fungal decomposition of surface litter in the Namib Sand Sea. PLoS One 10:e0126977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joly F-X, Kurupas KL, Throop HL (2017) Pulse frequency and soil-litter mixing alter the control of cumulative precipitation over litter decomposition. Ecology 98:2255–2260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp PR, Reynolds JF, Virginia RA, Whitford WG (2003) Decomposition of leaf and root litter of Chihuahuan desert shrubs: effects of three years of summer drought. J Arid Environ 53:21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King JY, Brandt LA, Adair EC (2012) Shedding light on plant litter decomposition: advances, implications and new directions in understanding the role of photodegradation. Biogeochemistry 111:57–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Rahn T, Throop H (2012) An accounting of C-based trace gas release during abiotic plant litter degradation. Glob Change Biology 18:1185–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, King JY (2014) Effects of UV exposure and litter position on decomposition in a California grassland. Ecosystems 17:158–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Karlen SD, Ralph J, King JY (2018) Short-term facilitation of microbial litter decomposition by ultraviolet radiation. Sci Total Environ 615:838–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinho OA, Martinelli LA, Duarte-Neto PJ, Mazzi EA, King JY (2020) Photodegradation influences litter decomposition rate in a humid tropical ecosystem. Brazil. Sci Total Environ 715:136601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez MS, Martinez ML, Araujo PI, Austin AT (2019) Solar radiation exposure accelerates decomposition and biotic activity in surface litter but not soil in a semiarid woodland ecosystem in Patagonia, Argentina. Plant Soil 445:483–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Predick KI, Archer SR, Aguillon SM, Keller DA, Throop HL, Barnes PW (2018) UV-B radiation and shrub canopy effects on surface litter decomposition in a shrub-invaded dry grassland. J Arid Environ 157:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pucheta E, Llanos M, Meglioli C, Gaviorno M, Ruiz M, Parera C (2006) Litter decomposition in a sandy Monte desert of western Argentina: Influences of vegetation patches and summer rainfall. Aust Ecol 31:808–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge S, Campbell DI, Baldocchi D, Schipper LA (2010) Photodegradation leads to increased carbon dioxide losses from terrestrial organic matter. Glob Change Biology 16:3065–3074

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos PF, Elkins NZ, Steinberger Y, Whitford WG (1984) A comparison of surface and buried Larrea tridentata leaf litter decomposition in North American hot deserts. Ecology 65:278–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer D, Steinberger Y, Whitford WG (1985) The failure of nitrogen and lignin control of decomposition in a North American desert. Oecologia 65:382–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sponseller RA (2007) Precipitation pulses and soil CO2 flux in a Sonoran Desert ecosystem. Glob Change Biology 13:426–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberger Y, Whitford WG (1988) Decomposition process in Negev ecosystems. Oecologia 75:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strojan CL, Randall DC, Turner FB (1987) Relationship of leaf litter decomposition rates to rainfall in the Mojave Desert. Ecology 68:741–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Throop HL, Archer SR (2009) Resolving the dryland decomposition conundrum: some new perspectives on potential drivers. Prog Bot 70:171–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderbilt KL, White CS, Hopkins O, Craig J (2008) Aboveground decomposition in arid environments: results of a long-term study in central New Mexico. J Arid Environ 72:696–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Liu L, Wang X, Chen Y (2015a) The interaction between abiotic photodegradation and microbial decomposition under ultraviolet radiation. Glob Change Biology 21:2095–2104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Throop HL, Gill T (2015b) A novel method to continuously monitor litter moisture – a microcosm-based experiment. J Arid Environ 115:10–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Yang S, Zhang B, Liu W, Deng M, Chen S, Liu L (2017a) Temporal dynamics of ultraviolet radiation impacts on litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem. Plant Soil 419:71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Liu L, Wang X, Yang S, Zhang B, Li P, Qiao C, Deng M, Liu W (2017b) High night-time humidity and dissolved organic carbon content support rapid decomposition of standing litter in a semi-arid landscape. Funct Ecol 31:1659–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WG, Repass R, Parker LW, Elkins NZ (1982) Effects of initial litter accumulation and climate on litter disappearance in a desert ecosystem. Am Midl Nat 108:105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WG, Steinberger Y, MacKay W, Parker LW, Freckman D, Wallwork JA, Weems D (1986) Rainfall and decomposition in the Chihuahuan Desert. Oecologia 68:512–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yahdjian L, Sala O, Austin A (2006) Differential controls of water input on litter decomposition and nitrogen dynamics in the Patagonian Steppe. Ecosystems 9:128–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The assistance of Alexander Tomes, Rachel Roland, Madison Lusk and Sarah Placek in field work, sample preparation and analyses is appreciated. We thank three anonymous reviewers whose constructive comments improved this manuscript. This work was supported by US National Science Foundation grant DEB-1256180 to TAD. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA

    Thomas A. Day, Jennifer M. Urbine & Michael S. Bliss

Authors
  1. Thomas A. Day
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer M. Urbine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael S. Bliss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas A. Day.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Marie-Anne de Graaff.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 302 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Day, T.A., Urbine, J.M. & Bliss, M.S. Supplemental precipitation accelerates decay but only in photodegraded litter and implications that sunlight promotes leaching loss. Biogeochemistry 158, 113–129 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00888-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00888-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation