Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Solar Photochemical Emission of CO2 From Leaf Litter: Sources and Significance to C Loss

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although photodegradation can be a significant mechanism of plant litter decay in drylands, the abiotic photochemical emission component of this process is not well characterized. We measured the temperature response of abiotic photochemical emission of CO2 from 12 litter types under midday sunlight in the Sonoran Desert, assessed what litter traits predicted emission rates, and estimated its significance to litter C loss. Emission rates increased exponentially with temperature (Q10= 1.75) and declined as litter decayed. Rates varied substantially among litter types. Microbial respiration rates of litter explained the most variation in emission rates at lower temperature (78% at 45 °C), suggesting that compounds amenable to microbial consumption were major precursors of emission. In contrast, wax concentrations explained the most variation at high temperature (76% at 70 °C), implying that precursors shifted with temperature. Photochemical emission of initial litter at 55 °C was a strong predictor of the mass loss of litter in full sunlight over 34 months in the field, explaining 67% of the variation among litter types. We estimate that photochemical emission of CO2 was responsible for 10% of all C lost from litter in sunlight over 34 months and accounted for 39% of the greater C lost from litter in sunlight compared to litter that did not receive sunlight in the UV to blue wavelength bands. Hence, abiotic photodegradation via photochemical emission appeared to be a significant pathway for C loss from sunlit litter. The substantial exponential increase in photochemical emission with temperature illustrates that temperature needs to be considered in assessments of abiotic photodegradation and implies this process will be greatest in systems where litter is exposed to high solar irradiance in conjunction with high temperatures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adair EC, Parton WJ, Del Grosso SJ, Silver WL, Harmon ME, Hall SA, Burke IC, Hart SC. 2008. Simple three-pool model accurately describes patterns of long-term litter decomposition in diverse climates. Glob Change Biol 14:2636–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adair EC, Parton WJ, King JY, Brandt LA, Lin Y. 2017. Accounting for photodegradation dramatically improves prediction of carbon losses in dryland systems. Ecosphere 8:e01892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlström A, Raupach MR, Schurgers G, Smith B, Arneth A, Jung M, Reichstein M, Canadell JG, Friedlingstein P, Jain AK, Kato E, Poulter B, Sitch S, Stocker BD, Viovy N, Wang YP, Wiltshire A, Zaehle S, Zeng N. 2015. The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink. Science 348:895–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anesio AM, Tranvik LJ, Granéli W. 1999. Production of inorganic carbon from aquatic macrophytes by solar radiation. Ecology 80:1852–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asao S, Parton WJ, Chen M, Gao W. 2018. Photodegradation accelerates ecosystem N cycling in a simulated California grassland. Ecosphere 9:e02370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin AT, Ballaré CL. 2010. Dual role of lignin in plant litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:4618–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austin AT, Méndez MS, Ballaré CL. 2016. Photodegradation alleviates the lignin bottleneck for carbon turnover in terrestrial ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:4392–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker NR, Allison SD. 2015. Ultraviolet photodegradation facilitates microbial litter decomposition in a Mediterranean climate. Ecology 96:1994–2003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes PW, Throop HL, Archer SR, Breshears DD, McCulley RL, Tobler MA. 2015. Sunlight and soil-litter mixing: drivers of litter decomposition in drylands. Prog Bot 76:273–302.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes PW, Throop HL, Hewins DB, Abbene ML, Archer SR. 2012. Soil coverage reduces photodegradation and promotes the development of soil-microbial films on dryland leaf litter. Ecosystems 15:311–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt LA, Bohnet C, King JY. 2009. Photochemically induced carbon dioxide production as a mechanism for carbon loss from plant litter in arid ecosystems. J Geophys Res 114:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn D, Mikkelsen TN, Øbro J, Willats WGT, Ambus P. 2009. Effects of temperature, ultraviolet radiation and pectin methyl esterase on aerobic methane release from plant material. Plant Biol 11:43–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn D, Mikkelsen TN, Rolsted MMM, Egsgaard H, Ambus P. 2014. Leaf surface wax is a source of plant methane formation under UV radiation and in the presence of oxygen. Plant Biol 16:512–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cepeda-Pizarro JG, Whitford WG. 1990. Decomposition patterns of surface leaf litter of six plant species along a Chihuahuan Desert watershed. Am Midl Nat 123:319–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Parton WJ, Adair EC, Asao S, Hartman MD, Gao W. 2016. Simulation of the effects of photodecay on long-term litter decay using DayCent. Ecosphere 7:e01631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day TA, Bliss MS. 2019. A spectral weighting function for abiotic photodegradation based on photochemical emission of CO2 from leaf litter in sunlight. Biogeochemistry 146:173–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day TA, Bliss MS, Tomes AR, Ruhland CT, Guénon R. 2018. Desert leaf litter decay: coupling of microbial respiration, water soluble fractions and photodegradation. Glob Change Biol 24:5454–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day TA, Bliss MS, Placek SK, Tomes AR, Guénon R. 2019. Thermal abiotic emission of CO2 and CH4 from leaf litter and its significance in a photodegradation assessment. Ecosphere 10:e02745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day TA, Guénon R, Ruhland CT. 2015. Photodegradation of plant litter in the Sonoran Desert varies by litter type and age. Soil Biol Biochem 89:109–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Derendorp L, Quist JB, Holzinger R, Röckmann T. 2011. Emissions of H2 and CO from leaf litter of Sequoiadendron giganteum and their dependence on UV radiation and temperature. Atmos Environ 45:7520–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flint SD, Caldwell MM. 2003. A biological spectral weighting function for ozone depletion research with higher plants. Physiol Plant 117:137–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foereid B, Bellarby J, Meier-Augenstein W, Kemp H. 2010. Does light exposure make plant litter more degradable? Plant Soil 333:275–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J, Cajthaml T, Mudrák O. 2011. The effect of lignin photodegradation on decomposability of Calamagrostis epigeios grass litter. Biodegradation 22:1247–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keppler F, Hamilton JTG, Braß M, Röckmann T. 2006. Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions. Nature 439:187–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keppler F, Hamilton JTG, McRoberts WC, Vigano I, Braß M, Röckmann T. 2008. Methoxyl groups of plant pectin as a precursor of atmospheric methane: evidence from deuterium labelling studies. New Phytol 178:808–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King JY, Brandt LA, Adair EC. 2012. Shedding light on plant litter decomposition: advances, implications and new directions in understanding the role of photodegradation. Biogeochemistry 111:57–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschbaum MUF, Lambie SM, Zhou H. 2011. No UV enhancement of litter decomposition observed on dry samples under controlled laboratory conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1300–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambie SM, Kirschbaum MUF, Dando J. 2014. No photodegradation of litter and humus exposed to UV-B radiation under laboratory conditions: no effect of leaf senescence or drying temperature. Soil Biol Biochem 69:46–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Rahn T, Throop H. 2012. An accounting of C-based trace gas release during abiotic plant litter degradation. Glob Change Biol 18:1185–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Karlen SD, Ralph J, King JY. 2018. Short-term facilitation of microbial litter decomposition by ultraviolet radiation. Sci Total Environ 615:838–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod AR, Fry SC, Loake GJ, Messenger DJ, Reay DS, Smith KA, Yun BW. 2008. Ultraviolet radiation drives methane emissions from terrestrial plant pectins. New Phytol 180:124–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Messenger DJ, McLeod AR, Fry SC. 2009. The role of ultraviolet radiation, photosensitizers, reactive oxygen species and ester groups in mechanisms of methane formation from pectin. Plant Cell Environ 32:1–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen TN, Bruhn D, Ambus P. 2016. Solar UV irradiation-induced production of greenhouse gases from plant surfaces: from leaf to earth. Prog Bot 78:407–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulter B, Frank D, Ciais P, Myneni RB, Andela N, Bi J, Broquet G, Canadell JG, Chevallier F, Liu YY, Running SW, Sitch S, van der Werf GR. 2014. Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to interannual variability of the global carbon cycle. Nature 509:600–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge S, Campbell DI, Baldocchi D, Schipper LA. 2010. Photodegradation leads to increased carbon dioxide losses from terrestrial organic matter. Glob Change Biol 16:3065–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schade GW, Hofmann R-M, Crutzen PJ. 1999. CO emissions from degrading plant matter (I). Measurements. Tellus Ser B 51:889–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer D, Steinberger Y, Whitford WG. 1985. The failure of nitrogen and lignin control of decomposition in a North American desert. Oecologia 65:382–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sulzberger B, Austin AT, Cory RM, Zepp RG, Paul ND. 2019. Solar UV radiation in a changing world: roles of cryosphere-land-water-atmosphere interfaces in global biogeochemical cycles. Photochem Photobiol Sci 18:747–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tarr MA, Miller WL, Zepp RG. 1995. Direct carbon monoxide photoproduction from plant matter. J Geophys Res 100:11403–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Throop HL, Archer SR. 2009. Resolving the dryland decomposition conundrum: some new perspectives on potential drivers. Prog Bot 70:171–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderbilt KL, White CS, Hopkins O, Craig J. 2008. Aboveground decomposition in arid environments: results of a long-term study in central New Mexico. J Arid Environ 72:696–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigano I, Röckmann T, Holzinger R, van Dijk A, Keppler F, Greule M, Brand WA, Geilmann H, van Weelden H. 2009. The stable isotope signature of methane emitted from plant material under UV irradiation. Atmos Environ 43:5637–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vigano I, van Weelden H, Holzinger R, Keppler F, McLeod A, Röckmann T. 2008. Effect of UV radiation and temperature on the emission of methane from plant biomass and structural components. Biogeosciences 5:937–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Liu L, Wang X, Chen Y. 2015. The interaction between abiotic photodegradation and microbial decomposition under ultraviolet radiation. Glob Change Biol 21:2095–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WG. 2002. Ecology of desert systems. San Diego (CA): Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WG, Meentemeyer V, Seastedt TR, Cromack K, Crossley DA, Santos PF, Todd RL, Waide JB. 1981. Exceptions to the AET model: deserts and clear-cut forests. Ecology 62:275–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dionne Leesley for assistance with sample preparation, Dr. Christopher T. Ruhland for carbon fraction analysis, and the subject editor, Dr. Kiona Ogle, and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments. The research was supported by National Science Foundation grant DEB-1256180 to TAD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA

    Thomas A. Day & Michael S. Bliss

Authors
  1. Thomas A. Day
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael S. Bliss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas A. Day.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Author Contributions

TAD conceived and designed the study, wrote the paper and contributed to the data analysis. MSB performed the research and contributed to the design, data analysis and writing.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 205 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Day, T.A., Bliss, M.S. Solar Photochemical Emission of CO2 From Leaf Litter: Sources and Significance to C Loss. Ecosystems 23, 1344–1361 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00473-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00473-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation