Skip to main content
Log in

Optimisation of a fast DMS sensor (FDS) for real time quantification of dimethyl sulfide production by algae

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Production of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) from marine samples is often quantified using gas chromatography techniques. Typically, these are labour intensive and have a slow sample turnover rate. Here we demonstrate the use of a portable fast DMS sensor (FDS) that utilises the chemiluminescent reaction of DMS and ozone to measure DMS production in aqueous samples, with a maximum frequency of 10 Hz. We have developed a protocol for quantifying DMS production that removes potential signal interference from other biogenic trace gases such as isoprene (2-methyl-1,3-butadiene) and hydrogen sulfide. The detection limit was 0.89 pM (0.02 ppbv) when using a DMS standard gas mixture. The lowest DMS production rates quantified with the FDS and verified using conventional gas chromatography with flame photometric detection (GC-FPD) were around 0.01 nmol min−1. There was a strong correlation in DMS production when comparing the FDS and GC-FPD techniques with a range of marine samples (e.g., r 2 = 0.94 for Emiliania huxleyi). However, the combined dataset showed the FDS measured 22% higher DMS production than the GC-FPD, with the differences in rates likely due to interfering gases, for example hydrogen sulfide and isoprene. This possible overestimation of DMS production is smaller than the two-fold difference in DMS production between day and night samples from a culture of E. huxleyi. The response time of the instrument to changes in DMS production is method dependent (e.g., geometry of incubation vessel, bubble size) and was approximately 4 min under our conditions when using a culture of E. huxleyi (800 ml) with aeration at 100 ml min−1. We suggest the FDS can reduce sample handling, is suitable for short- and long-term measurements of DMS production in algal cultures, and will widen the range of DMS research in marine environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acuña Alvarez L, Exton DA, Timmis KN, Suggett DJ, McGenity TJ (2009) Characterization of marine isoprene-degrading communities. Environ Microbiol 11:3280–3291

  • Arora PK, Chatha JPS (1984) Chemiluminescence from the reactions of ozone with sulphur compounds. Can J Chem 62:417–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers GP, Cainey JM (2007) The CLAW hypothesis: a review of the major developments. Environ Chem 4:366–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azad MAK, Ohira S, Toda K (2006) Single column trapping/separation and chemiluminescence detection for on-site measurement of methyl mercapatan and dimethyl sulphide. Anal Chem 78:6252–6259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell TG, Malin G, Lee GA, Stefels J, Archer S, Steinke M, Matrai P (2011) Global oceanic DMS data inter-comparability. Biogeochem. doi:10.1007/s10533-011-9662-3

  • Berges JA, Franklin DJ, Harrison PJ (2001) Evolution of an artificial seawater medium: improvements in enriched seawater, artificial water over the last two decades. J Phycol 37:1138–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berges JA, Franklin DJ, Harrison PJ (2004) Evolution of an artificial seawater medium: improvements in enriched seawater, artificial water over the last two decades (vol 37, pg 1138, yr 2003). J Phycol 40:619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard JN, Yamasaki H (2008) Heat stress stimulates nitric oxide production in Symbiodinium microadriaticum: a possible linkage between nitric oxide and the coral bleaching phenomenon. Plant Cell Physiol 49:641–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breckels MN, Roberts EC, Archer SD, Malin G, Steinke M (2011) The role of dissolved infochemicals in mediating predator-prey interactions in the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Oxyrrhis marina. J Plankton Res 33:629–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadgate WJ, Malin G, Küpper FC, Thompson A, Liss PS (2004) Isoprene and other non-methane hydrocarbons from seaweeds: a source of reactive hydrocarbons to the atmosphere. Mar Chem 88:61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Exton DA, Smith DJ, McGenity TJ, Steinke M, Hills AJ, Suggett DJ (2010) Application of a Fast Isoprene Sensor (FIS) for measuring isoprene production from marine samples. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 8:185–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenther AB, Hills AJ (1998) Eddy covariance measurement of isoprene fluxes. J Geophys Res 103:13145–13152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills AJ, Zimmerman PR (1990) Isoprene measurement by ozone-induced chemiluminescence. Anal Chem 62:1055–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills AJ, Birks AW, Lenschow DH (1998) Fast dimethyl sulphide (DMS) measurement by fluorine-induced chemiluminescence. Anal Chem 70:1735–1742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kameyama S, Tanimoto H, Inomata S, Tsunogai U, Ooki A, Yokouchi Y, Takeda S, Obata H, Uematsu M (2009) Equilibrator inlet-proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (EI-PTR-MS) for sensitive high-resolution measurement of dimethyl sulfide dissolved in seawater. Anal Chem 81:9021–9026

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly TJ, Gaffney JS, Phillips MF, Tanner RL (1983) Chemiluminescent detection of reduced sulfur compounds with ozone. Anal Chem 55:135–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiene RP (1996) Production of methanethiol from dimethylsulfoniopropionate in marine surface waters. Mar Chem 54:69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis ND, Breckels MN, Archer SD, Morozov A, Pitchford JW, Steinke M, Codling EA (2011) Grazing-induced production of DMS can stabilize food-web dynamics and promote the formation of phytoplankton blooms in a multitrophic plankton model. Biogeochem. doi:10.1007/s10533-011-9649-0

  • Monson RKA, Hills AJ, Zimmerman PR, Fall RR (1991) Studies of the relationship between isoprene emission rate and CO2 or photon-flux density using a real-time isoprene analyzer. Plant Cell Environ 14:517–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Provasoli L, McLaughlin JJA, Droop MR (1957) The development of artificial media for marine algae. Arch Mikrobiol 25:392–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman ES, De Bruyn WJ, Lawler MJ, Marandino CA, McCormick CA (2009) A chemical ionization mass spectrometer for continuous underway shipboard analysis of dimethylsulfide in near-surface seawater. Ocean Sci 5:537–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer H, Myronova N, Boden R (2010) Microbial degradation of dimethylsulphide and related C1-sulphur compounds: organisms and pathways controlling fluxes of sulphur in the biosphere. J Exp Bot 61:315–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefels J, Steinke M, Turner S, Malin G, Belviso S (2007) Environmental constraints on the production and removal of the climatically active gas dimethyl sulphide (DMS) and implications for ecosystem modelling. Biogeochem 83:245–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinke M, Stefels J, Stamhuis E (2006) Dimethyl sulfide triggers search behavior in copepods. Limnol Oceanogr 51:1925–1930

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinke M, Brading P, Kerrison P, Warner ME, Suggett DJ (2011) Concentrations of dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) and dimethylsulfide (DMS) are strain specific in symbiotic dinoflagellates (Symbiodinium sp., Dinophyceae). J Phycol 47:775–783

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunda W, Kieber DJ, Kiene RP, Huntsman S (2002) An antioxidant function for DMSP and DMS in marine algae. Nature 418:317–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Toda K, Dasgupta PK (2008) New applications of chemiluminescence for selective gas analysis. Chem Eng Commun 195:82–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tortell PD (2005) Dissolved gas measurements in oceanic waters made by membrane inlet mass spectrometry. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 3:24–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner SM, Malin G, Bågander LE, Leck C (1990) Interlaboratory calibration and sample analysis of dimethyl sulphide in water. Mar Chem 29:47–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt M, Turner S, Yasaa N, Steinke M, Williams J, Liss P (2008) Laboratory inter-comparison of dissolved dimethyl sulphide (DMS) measurements using purge-and-trap and solid-phase microextraction techniques during a mesocosm experiment. Mar Chem 108:32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh RA, Cutter GA, Dunstan WM, Radford-Knoery J, Elder JT (1994) The biogeochemistry of hydrogen sulfide: phytoplankton production in the surface ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 39:941–998

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe GV, Strom SL, Holmes JL, Radzio T, Olson MB (2002) Dimethylsulfoniopropionate cleavage by marine phytoplankton in response to mechanical, chemical or dark stress. J Phycol 38:948–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Yassaa N, Colomb A, Lochte K, Peeken I, Williams J (2006) Development and application of a headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method for the determination of dimethylsulfide emitted by eight marine phytoplankton species. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 4:374–381

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Tania Cresswell-Maynard, Patrick Brading and Mark Breckels for their assistance with this project. This project was supported by funding from the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC; NE/H012567/1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Steinke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Green, B.C., Suggett, D.J., Hills, A. et al. Optimisation of a fast DMS sensor (FDS) for real time quantification of dimethyl sulfide production by algae. Biogeochemistry 110, 163–172 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9678-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9678-8

Keywords

Navigation