Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Non-native species and invasion biology in a megadiverse country: scientometric analysis and ecological interactions in Brazil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The number of invasions by non-native species and their negative impacts is increasing, especially in developing megadiverse countries. The current catalogue of hypotheses, concepts and management policies related to invasions was typically created and evaluated in temperate and economically rich regions. So what we know about invasion biology may not provide a general pattern applicable to developing megadiverse regions. All recent reviews have indicated a demand for more studies in tropical and megadiverse regions. Additionally, potential differences in the quality and availability of data may preclude any comparative analyses between developing and developed nations and hinder global strategies to combat invasions. Therefore, it is important to synthesize the existing knowledge on the subject in order to aid conservation activities in such regions. We conducted a systematic review of non-native species and invasions in Brazil and found geographical bias towards the most populated regions and biomes. Plants and fish were the most studied groups and were, for the most part, intentionally introduced, usually to meet some economic interest. We also noted the dominance of studies concerning terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Most studies did not address species interactions and, in the few cases where they did, the most frequently studied were between non-native and native species. There was a paucity of research beyond the level of species records and descriptive patterns. We highlight major vectors of introduction, the number of non-native species (proxy to colonization pressure) and papers (proxy to propagule pressure) related to each vector and the need for designed surveys and experiments focusing on specific invasion hypotheses and/or species interactions. We indicate major gaps and biases nationally that should be the focus for future studies, and that can serve as examples for other megadiverse countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida WR, Lopes AV, Tabarelli M, Leal IR (2015) The alien flora of Brazilian Caatinga: deliberate introductions expand the contingent of potential invaders. Biol Invasions 17:51–56. doi:10.1007/s10530-014-0738-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelo C (2016) Brazil’s science woes mount. Nature 533:301. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19910

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo-Santos VM et al (2015) How to avoid fish introductions in Brazil: education and information as alternatives. Nat Conserv 13:123–132. doi:10.1016/j.ncon.2015.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo-Santos VM et al (2016) Misguided strategy for mosquito control. Science 351:675. doi:10.1126/science.351.6274.675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellard C, Jeschke JM (2016) A spatial mismatch between invader impacts and research publications. Conserv Biol 30:230–232. doi:10.1111/cobi.12611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braga RR, Bornatowski H, Vitule JRS (2012) Feeding ecology of fishes: an overview of worldwide publications. Rev Fish Biol Fish 22:915–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenton-Rule E, Barbieri R, Lester P (2016) Corruption as a predictor of invasive species trade risk. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). https://www.oecd.org/cleangovbiz/Integrity-Forum-16-Rafael-Barbieri-Phil-Lester.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2016

  • Bronstein JL (2009) The evolution of facilitation and mutualism. J Ecol 97:1160–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD (2003) Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol Evol 18:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castello L, McGrath DG, Hess LL, Coe MT, Lefebvre PA, Petry P, Macedo MN, Renó VF, Arantes CC (2013) The vulnerability of Amazon freshwater ecosystems. Conserv Lett 6:217–229. doi:10.1111/conl.12008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNPq (2015) http://estatico.cnpq.br/painelLattes/mapa/. Accessed 05 Nov 2015

  • Coura JR, Willcox CB (2003) Impact factor, scientific production and quality of Brazilian medical journals. Mem I Oswaldo Cruz 98:293–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias J et al (2013) Invasive alien plants in Brazil: a nonrestrictive revision of academic works. Nat Conserv 11:31–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside PM (2006) Dams in the Amazon: Belo Monte and Brazil’s hydroelectric development of the Xingu river basin. Environ Manage 38:16–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca CR, Guadagnin DL, Emer C, Masciadri S, Germain P, Zalba SM (2013) Invasive alien plants in the Pampas grasslands: a tri-national cooperation challenge. Biol Invasions 15:1751–1763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibney E (2015) Brazilian science paralysed by economic slump. Nature 526:16–17. doi:10.1038/526016a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heger T, Jeschke JM (2014) The enemy release hypothesis as a hierarchy of hypotheses. Oikos 123:741–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ et al (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:1–7. doi:10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00212.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeinghaus DJ, Agostinho AA, Gomes LC, Pelicice FM, Okada EK, Latini JD, Kashiwaqui EAL, Winemiller KO (2009) Effects of river impoundment on ecosystem services of large Tropical rivers: embodied energy and market value of artisanal fisheries. Conserv Biol 23:1222–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • I3N Brazil Invasive Alien Species Database. http://i3n.institutohorus.org.br/www. The Horus Institute for Environmental Conservation and Development. Accessed on Aug 2016

  • IBGE (2011) Censo Demográfico 2010. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. http://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=798. Accessed 03 March 2016

  • Jackson MC (2015) Interactions among multiple invasive animals. Ecology 96:2035–2041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PTJ, Olden JD, Zanden MJV (2008) Dam invaders: impoundments facilitate biological invasions into freshwaters. Front Ecol Environ 6:357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuebbing SE, Nuñez MA (2015) Negative, neutral, and positive interactions among nonnative plants: patterns, processes, and management implications. Glob Change Biol 21:926–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuebbing SE, Nuñez MA, Simberloff D (2013) Current mismatch between research and conservation efforts: the need to study co-occurring invasive plant species. Biol Conserv 160:121–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leprieur F, Beauchard O, Blanchet S, Oberdorff T, Brosse S (2008) Fish invasions in the World’s River Systems: when natural processes are blurred by human activities. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060322

    Google Scholar 

  • Liew JH, Tan HH, Yeo DJC (2016) Dammed rivers: impoundments facilitate fish invasions. Freshw Biol. doi:10.1111/fwb.12781

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin W, Zhou G, Cheng X, Xu R (2007) Fast economic development accelerates biological invasions in China. PLoS ONE 2(11):e1208. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001208

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, McGarrity ME, Li Y (2012) The influence of traditional Buddhist wildlife release on biological invasions. Conserv Lett 5:107–114. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00215.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP (2007) Invasion ecology. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2009) The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers Distrib 15:904–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM et al (1998) Predicting impact of freshwater exotic species on native biodiversity: challenges in spatial scaling. Aust J Ecol 23:53–67. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1998.tb00705.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lövei GL et al (2012) Megadiverse developing countries face huge risks from invasives. Trends Ecol Evol 27:2–3. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.10.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry E et al (2012) Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature. Ecol Evol 3:182–196. doi:10.1002/ece3.431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loyola R (2014) Brazil cannot risk its environmental leadership. Divers Distrib 20:1365–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucy FE et al (2016) INVASIVESNET towards an International Association for Open Knowledge on Invasive Alien Species. Manage Biol Invasions 7:131–139. doi:10.3391/mbi.2016.7.2.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier RA, Myers M, Thomsen JB, Fonseca GAB, Olivieri S (1998) Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv Biol 12:516–520. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003516.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier R et al (2010) O protagonismo do Brasil no histórico acordo global de proteção à biodiversidade. Nat Conserv 8:197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N et al (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nuñez MA, Pauchard A (2010) Biological invasions in developing and developed countries: does one model fit all? Biol Invasions 12:707–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauchard A, Quiroz C, García RA, Anderson CB, Arroyo MTK (2011) Invasiones biológicas en América Latina y el Caribe: Tendencias en la investigación para la conservación. In: Simonetti JA, Dirzo R (eds) Conservación biológica: Perspectivas desde América Latina. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago, pp 79–90

  • Pelicice FM et al (2013) A serious new threat to Brazilian freshwater ecosystems: the naturalization of non-native fish by decree. Conserv Lett 7:55–60. doi:10.1111/conl.12029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D et al (2001) Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 84:1–20. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00178-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proença VM, Pereira HM, Vicente L (2008) Organismal complexity is an indicator of species existence value. Front Ecol Environ 6:298–299. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2008)6[298:OCIAIO]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P et al (2008) Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 23:237–244. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quiroz C, Pauchard A, Cavieres LA, Anderson CB (2009) Análisis cuantitativo de la investigación en invasiones biolgicas en Chile: tendencias y desafíos. Rev Chil Hist Nat 82:497–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Regalado A (2010) Brazilian Science: riding a Gusher. Science 330:1306–1312. doi:10.1126/science.330.6009.1306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reis RE, Albert JS, Di Dario F, Mincarone MM, Petry P, Rocha LA (2016) Fish biodiversity and conservation in South America. J Fish Biol 89(1):12–47

  • Ricciardi A (2001) Facilitative interactions among aquatic invaders: is an “invasional meltdown” occurring in the Great Lakes? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:2513–2525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A (2007) Are modern biological invasions an unprecedent form of global change? Conserv Biol 21:329–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A, MacIsaac HJ (2008) The book that began invasion biology. Nature 452:34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Pysek P (2008) Fifty years of invasion ecology—the legacy of Charles Elton. Divers Distrib 14:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez JP (2001) Exotic species introductions into South America: an underestimated threat? Biodivers Conserv 10:1983–1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolim RG et al (2015) How much do we know about distribution and ecology of naturalized and invasive alien plant species? A case study from subtropical southern Brazil. Biol Invasions 17:1497–1518. doi:10.1007/s10530-014-0811-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampaio FDF et al (2015) The precautionary principle and its approach to risk analysis and quarantine related to the trade of marine ornamental fishes in Brazil. Mar Policy 51:163–168. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarano FR, Ceotto P (2015) Brazilian Atlantic forest: impact, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change. Biodivers Conserv 24:2319–2331. doi:10.1007/s10531-015-0972-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarano F, Guimarães A, Silva JM (2012) Lead by example. Nature 486:25–26. doi:10.1038/486025a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2006) Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecol Lett 9:912–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2011) Scope Project. In: Simberloff D, Rejmánek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 617–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Rejmánek M (2011) Encyclopedia of biological invasion. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Vitule JRS (2014) A call for an end to calls for the end of invasion biology. Oikos 123:408–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJ, Muir RDJ, Walpole MJ, Balmford A, Leader-Williams N (2003) Governance and the loss of biodiversity. Nature 426:67–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Speziale KL, Lambertucci SA, Carrete M, Tella JM (2012) Dealing with non-native species: what makes the difference in South America? Biol Invasions 14:1609–1621. doi:10.1007/s10530-011-0162-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speziale KL, Lambertucci SA, Souto CP, Hiraldo F (2014) Recovering native culture in a world of non-native species. Conserv Biol 28:1129–1131. doi:10.1111/cobi.12251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stachowicz JJ (2001) Mutualism, facilitation, and the structure of ecological communities. Bioscience 51:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toussaint A, Charpin N, Brosse S, Villéger S (2016) Global functional diversity of freshwater fish is concentrated in the Neotropics while functional vulnerability is widespread. Sci Rep 6:22125. doi:10.1038/srep22125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez DP, Aragón R (2002) Introduction [to special issue on biological invasions in southern South America]. Biol Invasions 4:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitule JRS (2009) Introdução de peixes em ecossistemas continentais brasileiros: revisão, comentários e sugestões de ações contra o inimigo quase invisível. Neotrop Biol Conserv 4:111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitule JRS, Prodocimo V (2012) Introdução de espécies não nativas e invasões biológicas. Estud Biol 34:225–237. doi:10.7213/estud.biol.7335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitule JRS, Freire CA, Simberloff D (2009) Introduction of non-native freshwater fish can certainly be bad. Fish Fish 10:98–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitule JRS, Freire CA, Vazquez DP, Nuñez MA, Simberloff D (2012) Revisiting the potential conservation value of non-native species. Conserv Biol 26:1153–1155. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01950.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wade L (2016) Brazilian crisis threatens science and environment. Science 352:1044. doi:10.1126/science.352.6289.1044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilms W, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Engels W (1996) Resource partitioning between highly eusocial bees and possible impact of the introduced africanized honey bee on native stingless bees in the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 31:137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JRU, Proches S, Braschler B, Dixon ES, Richardson DM (2007) The (bio)diversity of science reflects the interests of society. Front Ecol Environ 5:409–414. doi:10.1890/060077.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenni RD (2014) Analysis of introduction history of invasive plants in Brazil reveals patterns of association between biogeographical origin and reason for introduction. Austral Ecol 39:401–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenni RD (2015) The naturalized flora of Brazil: a step towards identifying future invasive non-native species. Rodriguésia 66(4):1137–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenni RD, Dechoum MS, Ziller RS (2016) Dez anos do informe brasileiro sobre espécies exóticas invasoras: avanços, lacunas e direções futuras. Biotemas 23:133–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the three anonymous reviewers that contribute substantially to improve this manuscript. We also thank the LEC (Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação) members for significant contributions during manuscript preparation, JA Nienow for English revision, CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior) for scholarship provided to FAF and RRB and CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) for permanent grants to JRSV.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação, Departamento de Engenharia Ambiental, Setor de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

    Fabrício de Andrade Frehse, Raul Rennó Braga & Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule

  2. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

    Fabrício de Andrade Frehse, Raul Rennó Braga & Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule

  3. Departamento de Engenharia Ambiental, Setor de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

    Gabriel Augusto Nocera & Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule

Authors
  1. Fabrício de Andrade Frehse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raul Rennó Braga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gabriel Augusto Nocera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frehse, F.A., Braga, R.R., Nocera, G.A. et al. Non-native species and invasion biology in a megadiverse country: scientometric analysis and ecological interactions in Brazil. Biol Invasions 18, 3713–3725 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1260-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1260-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation