Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can genetic data confirm or refute historical records? The island invasion of the small Indian mongoose (Herpestes auropunctatus)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies aimed at reconstructing the invasion history of a species rely, in part, on inferences based on patterns of genetic variation. These inferences warrant careful interpretation, however. In particular, given the time scale of most invasions, the typical demography of invasive species in their invaded range, and the available molecular tools, the underlying assumptions of population genetic models will often be violated. Given this fact, we examined the potential of population genetic data for reconstructing the history of serial introductions of the small Indian mongoose, Herpestes auropunctatus. We used simulations to test the power of existing microsatellite data for testing the credibility of historical introduction records. Although our results are generally consistent with most historical records for H. auropunctatus, the existing data have low power to reject alternative historical hypotheses. Simulations of a wide range of founder population sizes show broadly overlapping results, making rather different historical scenarios of introductions difficult to rule out with typical datasets. We advocate caution in the use of molecular population genetics to infer the history of invasive species, and we suggest extensive simulations as a tool to evaluate, in advance, this approach for addressing important research questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelkrim J, Pascal M, Samadi S (2007) Evaluating causes of eradication failure based on genetics: case study of ship rat eradication in Ste. Anne Archipelago. Conserv Biol 21:719–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abe S, Takatsuki Y, Handa Y, Nigi H (1991) Establishment in the wild of the mongoose (Herpestes sp.) on Amami-oshima Island. Honyurui Kagaku 31:23–36 (in Japanese with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arntzen JW, Burke T, Jehle R (2010) Estimating the propagule size of a cryptogenic crested newt population. Anim Conserv 13:74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barun A, Budinski I, Simberloff D (2008) A ticking time-bomb? The small Indian mongoose in Europe. Aliens 26:14–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Barun A, Hanson CC, Campbell KJ, Simberloff D (2011) A review of small Indian mongoose management and eradications on islands. In: Veitch CR, Clout MN, Towns DR (eds) Island invasives: eradication and management. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland, pp 17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont M (1999) Detecting population expansion and decline using microsatellites. Genetics 153:2013–2029

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan EH Jr (1938) The much maligned mongoose. Paradise Pac 50(4):32–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty R, Nei M (1977) Bottleneck effects on average heterozygosity and genetic distance with the stepwise mutation model. Evolution 31:347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheke AS (1987) An ecological history of the Mascarene islands, with particular reference to extinctions and introductions of land vertebrates. In: Diamond AW (ed) Studies of Mascarene island birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 5–89

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg SM, Degnan SM, Kikkawa J (2002) Genetic consequences of sequential founder events by an island-colonizing bird. PNAS 99:8127–8132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008) Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17:431–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Espeut WB (1882) On the acclimatization of the Indian mongoose in Jamaica. Proc Zool Soc Lond 1882:712–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Estoup A, Wilson IJ, Sullivan C, Cornuet JM, Moritz C (2001) Inferring population history from microsatellite and enzyme data in serially introduced cane toads, Bufo marinus. Genetics 159:1671–1687

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Estoup A, Baird SJE, Ray N et al (2010) Combining genetic, historical and geographical data to reconstruct the dynamics of bioinvasions: application to the cane toad Bufo marinus. Mol Ecol Resour 10:886–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ficetola GF, Bonin A, Miaud C (2008) Population genetics reveals origin and number of founders in a biological invasion. Mol Ecol 17:773–782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick BM, Fordyce JA, Neimiller M, Reynolds RG (2012) What can DNA tell us about biological invasions? Biol Invasions 14:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genton BJ, Shykoff JA, Giraud T (2005) High genetic diversity in French invasive populations of common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, as a result of multiple sources of introduction. Mol Ecol 14:4275–4285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman ML (1975) The diet of feral Herpestes auropunctatus (Carnivora: Viverridae) in the Fijian Islands. J Zool Lond 175:273–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartl DL, Clark AG (1997) Principles of population genetics, 3rd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland DB, Horst GR, Kilpatrick CW (1989) Biogeography and population biology of the mongoose in the West Indies. In: Woods CA (ed) Biogeography of the West Indies. Sand Hill Crane Press, Gainesville, FL, pp 611–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer RA, Bogdanowicz SM, Harrison RG (2004) The population genetics of a biological control introduction: mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite variation in native and introduced populations of Aphidus ervi, a parisitoid wasp. Mol Ecol 13:337–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii N (1998) Amami mongoose. Aliens 7:14

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawamura K, Yonekura R, Katano O, Taniguchi Y, Saitoh K (2006) Origin and dispersal of bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus, in Japan and Korea. Mol Ecol 15:613–621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kishida K (1931) Professor Watase and the import of mongooses. Zoolog Sci 43:70–78 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe JJ, Glor RE, Rodriguez Schettino L, Lara AC, Larson A (2004) Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 431:177–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1988) Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241:1455–1460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laval G, Excoffier L (2004) SIMCOAL 2.0: a program to simulate genomic diversity over large recombining regions in a subdivided population with complex history. Bioinformatics 20:2485–2487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2007) Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3883–3888

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Louette M (1987) Poissons dulç aquicoles, batraciens, reptiles et mammifères de l’archipel des Comores. Ya Mkobe 3:4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley CG (2004) Has the invasive mongoose Herpestes javanicus yet reached the island of Taveuni, Fiji? Oryx 38:457–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability of populations. Evolution 29:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nellis DW, Everard COR (1983) The biology of the mongoose in the Caribbean. Stud Fauna Curaçao Caribb Isl 1:1–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins LA, Woolnough AP, Wilton AN, Sinclair R, Sherwin WB (2009) Invasive species can’t cover their tracks: using microsatellites to assist management of starling (Sturnus vulgaris) populations in Western Australia. Mol Ecol 18:1560–1573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roman J, Darling JA (2007) Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:454–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross KG, Shoemaker DD (2008) Estimation of the number of founders of an invasive pest insect population: the fire ant Solenopsis invicta in the USA. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:2231–2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltonstall K (2002) Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:2445–2449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:81–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Dayan T, Jones C, Ogura G (2000) Character displacement and release in the small Indian mongoose, Herpestes javanicus. Ecology 81:2086–2099

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer CC, Neigel JE, Leberg PL (2000) Experimental evaluation of the usefulness of microsatellite DNA for detecting demographic bottlenecks. Mol Ecol 9:1517–1528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000)  Inference in molecular population genetics. J Roy Stat Soc B 62:605–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor DR, Keller SR (2007) Historical range expansion determines the phylogenetic diversity introduced during contemporary species invasion. Evolution 61:334–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thulin CG, Simberloff D, Barun A, McCracken G, Pascal M, Islam MA (2006) Genetic divergence in the small Indian mongoose (Herpestes auropunctatus), a widely distributed invasive species. Mol Ecol 15:3947–3956

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tvrtkovic N, Kryštufek B (1990) Small Indian mongoose, Herpestes auropunctatus (Hodgson 1836) on the Adriatic islands of Yugoslavia. Bonn Zool Beitr 41:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Veron G, Patou ML, Pothet G, Simberloff D, Jennings AP (2007) Systematic status and biogeography of the Javan and small Indian mongooses (Herpestidae, Carnivora). Zoolog Scr 36:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada F (2002) Impacts and control of introduced small Indian mongoose on Amami Island, Japan. In: Veitch CR, Clout MN (eds) Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland, pp 389–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada F, Sugimura K (2004) Negative impact of an invasive small Indian mongoose Herpestes javanicus on native wildlife species and evaluation of a control project in Amami-Ohshima and Okinawa Islands, Japan. Glob Environ Res 8:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Zayed A, Constantin SA, Packer L (2007) Successful biological invasion despite a severe genetic load. PLoS One 2:e868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Carl Thulin, Veronica Brown and Gary McCracken for technical assistance and the University of Tennessee Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology for funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arijana Barun.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLS 168 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (R 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barun, A., Niemiller, M.L., Fitzpatrick, B.M. et al. Can genetic data confirm or refute historical records? The island invasion of the small Indian mongoose (Herpestes auropunctatus). Biol Invasions 15, 2243–2251 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0447-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0447-6

Keywords

Navigation