Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What can DNA tell us about biological invasions?

  • Perpectives and Paradigms
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is often hoped that population genetics can answer questions about the demographic and geographic dynamics of recent biological invasions. Conversely, invasions with well-known histories are sometimes billed as opportunities to test methods of population genetic inference. In both cases, underappreciated limitations constrain the usefulness of genetic methods. The most significant is that human-caused invasions have occurred on historical timescales that are orders of magnitude smaller than the timescales of mutation and genetic drift for most multicellular organisms. Analyses based on the neutral theory of molecular evolution cannot resolve such rapid dynamics. Invasion histories cannot be reconstructed in the same way as biogeographic changes occurring over millenia. Analyses assuming equilibrium between mutation, drift, gene flow, and selection will rarely be applicable, and even methods designed for explicitly non-equilibrium questions often require longer timescales than the few generations of most invasions of current concern. We identified only a few population genetic questions that are tractable over such short timescales. These include comparison of alternative hypotheses for the geographic origin of an invasion, testing for bottlenecks, and hybridization between native and invasive species. When proposing population genetic analysis of a biological invasion, we recommend that biologists ask (i) whether the questions to be addressed will materially affect management practice or policy, and (ii) whether the proposed analyses can really be expected to address important population genetic questions. Despite our own enthusiasm for population genetic research, we conclude that genetic analysis of biological invasions is justified only under exceptional circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander JM, Poll M, Dietz H, Edwards PJ (2009) Contrasting patterns of genetic variation and structure in plant invasions of mountains. Divers Distrib 15:502–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK (2001) The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol 16:613–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E, Thompson EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160:1217–1229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ascunce MS, Yang C-C, Oakey J et al (2011) Global invasion history of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Science 331:1066–1068

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomquist EW, Lemey P, Suchard MA (2010) Three roads diverged? Routes to phylogeographic inference. Trends Ecol Evol 25:626–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chadès I, Martin TG, Nicol S et al (2011) General rules for managing and surveying networks of pests, diseases, and endangered species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. Online early, doi:10.1073/pnas.1016846108

  • Chapman MA, Burke JM (2006) Letting the gene out of the bottle: the population genetics of genetically modified crops. New Phytol 170:429–443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chikhi L, Sousa VC, Luisi P, Goossens B, Beaumont M (2010) The confounding effects of population structure, genetic diversity and the sampling scheme on the detection and quantification of population size changes. Genetics 186:983–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crow JF, Aoki K (1984) Group selection for a polygenic behavioral trait: Estimating the degree of population subdivision. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:6073–6077

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels MJ, Corbett L (2003) Redefining introgressed protected mammals: when is a wildcat a wild cat and a dingo a wild dog? Wildlife Res 30:213–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008) Founding events in species invasions: Genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17:431–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Schierenbeck KA (2000) Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:7043–7050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Estoup A, Baird SJE, Ray N et al (2010) Combining genetic, historical and geographical data to reconstruct the dynamics of bioinvasions: application to the Cane Toad Bufo marinus. Mol Ecol Resour 10:886–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Heckel G (2006) Computer programs for population genetics data analysis: a survival guide. Nat Rev Genet 7:745–758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick BM, Johnson JR, Kump DK et al (2010) Rapid spread of invasive genes into a threatened native species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:3606–3610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (2005) Resolving the genetic paradox in invasive species. Heredity 94:385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gompert Z, Buerkle CA (2011) A hierarchical Bayesian model for next-generation population genomics. Genetics 187:903–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gompert Z, Forister ML, Fordyce JA et al (2010) Bayesian analysis of molecular variance in pyrosequences quantifies population genetic structure across the genome of Lycaeides butterflies. Mol Ecol 19:2455–2473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartl DL, Clark AG (1997) Principles of population genetics, 3rd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt GM (2000) The genetic legacy of the quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907–913

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hey J, Machado CA (2003) The study of structured populations—new hope for a difficult and divided science. Nat Rev Genet 4:535–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim KM, Nichols RA, Hewitt GM (1996) Spatial patterns of genetic variation generated by different forms of dispersal during range expansion. Heredity 77:282–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JR, Thomson RC, Micheletti SJ, Shaffer HB (2011) The origin of tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum) populations in California, Oregon, and Nevada: introductions or relicts. Conserv Genet 12:355–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe JJ, Glor RE, Schettino LR et al (2004) Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 431:177–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux JJ, Wieczorek AM, Meyer J-Y (2008) Genetic diversity and structure of the invasive tree Miconia calvescens in Pacific islands. Divers Distrib 14:935–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luikart G, Allendorf FW, Cornuet JM, Sherwin WB (1998) Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent bottlenecks. J Hered 89:238–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Ass, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Marisco TD, Wallace LE, Ervin GN et al (2011) Geographic patterns of genetic diversity from the native range of Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) support the documented history of invasion and multiple introductions for invasive populations. Biol Invasions 13:857–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neira C, Levin LA, Grosholz ED (2005) Benthic macrofaunal communities of three sites in San Francisco Bay invaded by hybrid Spartina, with comparison to uninvaded habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 292:111–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen R, Beaumont M (2009) Statistical inferences in phylogeography. Mol Ecol 18:1034–1047

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panchal M, Beaumont M (2010) Evaluating nested clade phylogeographic analysis under models of restricted gene flow. Syst Biol 59:415–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pasachnik SA, Fitzpatrick BM, Near TJ, Echternacht AC (2009) Gene flow between an endangered endemic iguana and its widespread relative on the island of Utila, Honduras: When is hybridization a threat? Conserv Genet 10:1247–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter BM, Wegmann D, Excoffier L (2010) Distinguishing between population bottleneck and population subdivision by a Bayesian model choice procedure. Mol Ecol 19:4648–4660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet JM (1999) BOTTLENECK: A computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J Hered 90:502–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed DH, Frankham R (2001) How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? Evolution 55:1095–1103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds RG (2011) Islands, metapopulations, and archipelagos: genetic equilibrium and non-equilibrium dynamics of structured populations in the context of conservation. Dissertation, University of Tennessee

  • Rhymer JM, Simberloff D (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:83–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieux A, Halkett F, De Lapeyre De Bellaire L et al (2011) Inferences on pathogenic fungus population structures from microsatellite data: new insights from spatial genetics approaches. Mol Ecol 20:1661–1674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riley SPD, Shaffer HB, Voss SR, Fitzpatrick BM (2003) Hybridization between a rare, native tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense) and its introduced congener. Ecol Appl 13:1263–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145:1219–1228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell JC, Abdelkrim J, Fewster RM (2009) Early colonisation population structure of a Norway rat island invasion. Biol Invasions 11:1557–1567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan ME, Johnson JR, Fitzpatrick BM (2009) Invasive hybrid tiger salamander genotypes impact native amphibians. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:11166–11171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS et al (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Gaines SD (2005) Species invasions: Insights into ecology evolution and biogeography. Sinauer Ass, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2003) How much information on population biology is needed to manage introduced species? Conserv Biol 17:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2009) We can eliminate invasions or live with them. Successful management projects. Biol Invasions 11:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Rejmanek M (2011) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley

  • Templeton AR, Read B (1994) Inbreeding: one word, several meanings, much confusion. In: Loeschcke V, Tomiuk J, Jain SK (eds) Conservation Genetics. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp 91–105

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thulin C-G, Simberloff D, Barun A et al (2006) Genetic divergence in the small Indian mongoose (Herpestes auropunctatus), a widely distributed invasive species. Mol Ecol 15:3947–3956

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ (2000) Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5948–5953

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock MC, McCauley DM (1999) Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: Fst ≠ 1/(4Nm + 1). Heredity 82:117–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Ideas and development of this manuscript were facilitated by discussions and comments from C. Nice and D. Simberloff. This work was supported, in part, by the United States National Science Foundation (DEB-0516475 to BMF, DEB-1050947 to JAF; DEB-1011216 to MLN), the American Philosphical Society (Lewis and Clark grant to RGR), the American Genetics Association (to RGR), the American Museum of Natural History (Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Fund grant to RGR), and the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Tennessee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin M. Fitzpatrick.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 2 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 4 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fitzpatrick, B.M., Fordyce, J.A., Niemiller, M.L. et al. What can DNA tell us about biological invasions?. Biol Invasions 14, 245–253 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0064-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0064-1

Keywords

Navigation