Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Secretory expression of K88 (F4) fimbrial adhesin FaeG by recombinant Lactococcus lactis for oral vaccination and its protective immune response in mice

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Biotechnology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 20 June 2009

Abstract

K88 (F4) fimbrial adhesin, FaeG, was expressed extracellularly in Lactococcus lactis using a nisin-controlled gene expression system. The antibody response and protective efficacy of the recombinant bacteria (L. lactis [spNZ8048-faeG]) against live enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) C83549 challenge were evaluated in ICR mice. Mice vaccinated with L. lactis [spNZ8048-faeG] had a significantly increased antigen-specific IgG level in the serum and decreased mortality rate (P < 0.05) compared with the control. This indicates that oral immunization of L. lactis [spNZ8048-faeG] can induce an immune-response protection upon challenge with live ETEC in ICR mice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnau J, Hjerl-Hansen E, Israelsen H (1997) Heterologous gene expression of bovine plasmin in Lactococcus lactis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 48:331–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheun HI, Kawamoto K, Hiramatsu M, Tamaoki H, Shirahata T, Igimi S, Makino SI (2004) Protective immunity of SpaA-antigen producing Lactococcus lactis against Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae infection. J Appl Microbiol 96:1347–1353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cho HJ, Shin HJ, Han IK, Jung WW, Kim YB, Sul D, Oh YK (2007) Induction of mucosal and systemic immune responses following oral immunization of mice with Lactococcus lactis expressing human papillomavirus type 16 L1. Vaccine 25:8049–8057

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Ruyter PG, Kuipers OP, de Vos WM (1996) Controlled gene expression systems for Lactococcus lactis with the food-grade inducer nisin. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3662–3667

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enouf V, Langella P, Commissaire J, Cohen J, Corthier G (2001) Bovine rotavirus nonstructural protein 4 produced by Lactococcus lactis is antigenic and immunogenic. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1423–1428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geller BL, Wade N, Gilberts TD, Hruby DE, Johanson R, Topisirovic L (2001) Surface expression of the conserved C repeat region of streptococcal M6 protein within the Pip bacteriophage receptor of Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:5370–5376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert C, Robinson K, Le Page RW, Wells JM (2000) Heterologous expression of an immunogenic pneumococcal type 3 capsular polysaccharide in Lactococcus lactis. Infect Immun 68:3251–3260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hampson DJ (1994) Postweaning Escherichia coli diarrhoea in pigs. In: Gyles CL (ed) Escherichia coli in domestic animals and humans. CAB International, Oxon, pp 171–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemsley A, Arnheim N, Toney MD, Cortopassi G, Galas DJ (1989) A simple method for site-directed mutagenesis using the polymerase chain reaction. Nucleic Acids Res 17:6545–6551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holo H, Nes IF (1995) Transformation of Lactococcus by electroporation. Methods Mol Biol 47:195–199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iwaki M, Okahashi N, Takahashi I, Kanamoto T, Sugita-Konishi Y, Aibara K, Koga T (1990) Oral immunization with recombinant Streptococcus lactis carrying the Streptococcus mutans surface protein antigen gene. Infect Immun 58:2929–2934

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joensuu JJ, Kotiaho M, Teeri TH, Valmu L, Nuutila AM, Oksman-Caldentey KM, Niklander-Teeri V (2006) Glycosylated F4 (K88) fimbrial adhesin FaeG expressed in barley endosperm induces ETEC-neutralizing antibodies in mice. Transgenic Res 15:359–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones GW, Rutter JM (1972) Role of the K88 antigen in the pathogenesis of neonatal diarrhea caused by Escherichia coli in piglets. Infect Immun 6:918–927

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee MH, Roussel Y, Wilks M, Tabaqchali S (2001) Expression of Helicobacter pylori urease subunit B gene in Lactococcus lactis MG1363 and its use as a vaccine delivery system against H. pylori infection in mice. Vaccine 19:3927–3935

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Vidal Y, Svennerholm AM (1990) Monoclonal antibodies against the different subcomponents of colonization factor antigen II of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 28:1906–1912

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melkebeek V, Verdonck F, Goddeeris BM, Cox E (2007) Comparison of immune responses in parenteral FaeG DNA primed pigs boosted orally with F4 protein or reimmunized with the DNA vaccine. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 116:199–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mol O, Oudega B (1996) Molecular and structural aspects of fimbriae biosynthesis and assembly in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Rev 19:25–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy B, Casey TA, Moon HW (1990) Phenotype and genotype of Escherichia coli isolated from pigs with postweaning diarrhea in Hungary. J Clin Microbiol 28:651–653

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro LA, Azevedo V, Le Loir Y, Oliveira SC, Dieye Y, Piard JC, Gruss A, Langella P (2002) Production and targeting of the Brucella abortus antigen L7/L12 in Lactococcus lactis: a first step towards food-grade live vaccines against brucellosis. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:910–916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniastis T (eds) (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi BE, Sandine WE (1975) Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages. Appl Microbiol 29:807–813

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Asseldonk M, de Vos WM, Simons G (1993) Functional analysis of the Lactococcus lactis usp45 secretion signal in the secretion of a homologous proteinase and a heterologous α-amylase. Mol Gen Genet 240:428–434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broeck W, Cox E, Oudega B, Goddeeris BM (2000) The F4 fimbrial antigen of Escherichia coli and its receptors. Vet Microbiol 71:223–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verdonck F, Cox E, Van der Stede Y, Goddeeris BM (2004) Oral immunization of piglets with recombinant F4 fimbrial adhesin FaeG monomers induces a mucosal and systemic F4-specific immune response. Vaccine 22:4291–4299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wells JM, Wilson PW, Norton PM, Gasson MJ, Le Page RW (1993) Lactococcus lactis: high-level expression of tetanus toxin fragment C and protection against lethal challenge. Mol Microbiol 8:1155–1162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yahong H, Liang W, Pan A, Zhou Z, Wang Q, Huang C, Chen J, Zhang D (2006) Protective immune response of bacterially-derived recombinant FaeG in piglets. J Microbiol 44:548–555

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou XX, Li WF, Ma GX, Pan YJ (2006) The nisin-controlled gene expression system: construction, application and improvements. Biotechnol Adv 24:285–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by Zhejiang Provincial Science and Technology Foundation, China (No. 2006C12086).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Fen Li.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10529-009-0045-y

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, C.X., Xu, Z.R., Li, W.F. et al. Secretory expression of K88 (F4) fimbrial adhesin FaeG by recombinant Lactococcus lactis for oral vaccination and its protective immune response in mice. Biotechnol Lett 31, 991–997 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-009-9966-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-009-9966-8

Keywords

Navigation