Abstract
One of the major unanswered questions with respect to the commercial use of genetic transformation in woody plants is the stability of the transgene expression over several decades within the same individual. Gene expression is strongly affected by the copy number which has been integrated into the plant genome and by the local DNA features close to the integration sites. Because woody plants cannot be subjected to selfing or backcrossing to modify the transgenic allelic structure without affecting the valuable traits of the cultivar, molecular characterization of the transformation event is therefore crucial. After assessing the transgene copy number of a set of apple transgenic clones with Southern blotting, we describe two alternative methods: the first is based on inverse PCR (i-PCR) and the second on the quantitative PCR (q-PCR). The methods produced comparable results with the exception of the data regarding a high copy number clone, but while the q-PCR-based system is rapid and easily adaptable to high throughput systems, the i-PCR-based method can provide information regarding the transformation event and the characteristics of the sequences flanking the transgenic construct.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biosystems A (2001) Relative quantitation of gene expression user bulletin #2 ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detection System
Bubner B, Baldwin IT (2004) Use of real-time PCR for determining copy number and zygosity in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep 23:263–271. doi:10.1007/s00299-004-0859-y
Chen X, Zhang Z, Visser RG, Broekgaarden C, Vosman B (2013) Over expression of IRM1 enhances resistance to aphids in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 8:e70914. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070914
Dellaporta S, Wood J, Hicks J (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:19–21. doi:10.1007/BF02712670
Does MP, Dekker BM, de Groot MJ, Offringa R (1991) A quick method to estimate the T-DNA copy number in transgenic plants at an early stage after transformation, using inverse PCR. Plant Mol Biol 17:151–153
Ferradini N, Nicolia A, Capomaccio S, Veronesi F, Rosellini D (2011) Assessment of simple marker-free genetic transformation techniques in alfalfa. Plant Cell Rep 30:1991–2000. doi:10.1007/s00299-011-1107-x
Fladung M (1999) Gene stability in transgenic aspen (Populus). I. Flanking DNA sequences and T-DNA structure. Mol Gen Genet 260:574–581
Forsbach A, Schubert D, Lechtenberg B, Gils M, Schmidt R (2003) A comprehensive characterization of single-copy T-DNA insertions in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Plant Mol Biol 52:161–176
German MA, Kandel-Kfir M, Swarzberg D, Matsevitz T, Granot D (2003) A rapid method for the analysis of zygosity in transgenic plants. Plant Sci 164:183–187. doi:10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00381-3
Gheysen G, Montagu MV, Zambryski P (1987) Integration of Agrobacterium tumefaciens transfer DNA (T-DNA) involves rearrangements of target plant DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:6169–6173. doi:10.2307/29794
Han Y, Gasic K, Sun F, Xu M, Korban SS (2007) A gene encoding starch branching enzyme I (SBEI) in apple (Malusxdomestica, Rosaceae) and its phylogenetic relationship to Sbe genes from other angiosperms. Mol Phylogenet Evol 43:852–863. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.09.001
He L, Winterrowd C, Kadura I, Frye C (2012) Transgene copy number distribution profiles in recombinant CHO cell lines revealed by single cell analyses. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:1713–1722. doi:10.1002/bit.24428
Ingham DJ, Beer S, Money S, Hansen G (2001) Quantitative real-time PCR assay for determining transgene copy number in transformed plants. Biotechniques 31(132–134):136–140
James D, Dandekar A (1997) Regeneration and transformation of Apple (Malus pumila Mill). In: Lindsey K (ed) Plant tissue culture manual. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 335–352. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-0103-2_19
Kim S-R, Lee J, Jun S-H, Park S, Kang H-G, Kwon S, An G (2003) Transgene structures in T-DNA-inserted rice plants. Plant Mol Biol 52:761–773. doi:10.1023/A:1025093101021
Kumar S, Fladung M (2002) Transgene integration in aspen: structures of integration sites and mechanism of T-DNA integration. Plant J 31:543–551. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01368.x
Kumpatla SP, Teng W, Buchholz WG, Hall TC (1997) Epigenetic transcriptional silencing and 5-azacytidine-mediated reactivation of a complex transgene in rice. Plant Physiol 115:361–373. doi:10.1104/pp.115.2.361
Latham JR, Wilson AK, Steinbrecher RA (2006) The mutational consequences of plant transformation. J Biomed Biotechnol 2006:25376. doi:10.1155/JBB/2006/25376
Lipiński D, Zeyland J, Pławski A, Słomski R (2012) Determination of the absolute number of transgene copies in CMVFUT transgenic pigs. 12. doi:10.2478/v10220-012-0029-z
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408. doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262
Mason G, Provero P, Vaira AM, Accotto GP (2002) Estimating the number of integrations in transformed plants by quantitative real-time PCR. BMC Biotechnol 2:20
Matzke MA, Matzke AJM (1995) How and why do plants inactivate homologous (trans)genes? Plant Physiol 107:679–685. doi:10.2307/4276379
Minocha S, Wallace J (2000) Gene transfer techniques and their relevance to woody plants. In: Jain SM, Minocha S (eds) Molecular biology of woody plants, vol 66. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 1–24. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2313-8_1
Ochman H, Gerber AS, Hartl DL (1988) Genetic applications of an inverse polymerase chain reaction. Genetics 120:621–623
Omar AA, Dekkers MGH, Graham JH, Grosser JW (2008) Estimation of transgene copy number in transformed citrus plants by quantitative multiplex real-time PCR. Biotechnol Prog 24:1241–1248. doi:10.1002/btpr.62
Pasquali G, Biricolti S, Locatelli F, Baldoni E, Mattana M (2008) Osmyb4 expression improves adaptive responses to drought and cold stress in transgenic apples. Plant Cell Rep 27:1677–1686. doi:10.1007/s00299-008-0587-9
Sambrook J, Russell D (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.
Southern EM (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98:503–517. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(75)80083-0
Tesson L, Heslan J-M, Ménoret S, Anegon I (2002) Rapid and accurate determination of zygosity in transgenic animals by real-time quantitative PCR. Transgen Res 11:43–48. doi:10.1023/A:1013928600442
Walter C, Find J, Grace L (2005) Somatic embryogenesis and genetic transformation in Pinus radiata. In: Jain SM, Gupta P (eds) Protocol for somatic embryogenesis in woody plants, vol 77. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 11–24. doi:10.1007/1-4020-2985-3_2
Yang L, Ding J, Zhang C, Jia J, Weng H, Liu W, Zhang D (2005) Estimating the copy number of transgenes in transformed rice by real-time quantitative PCR. Plant Cell Rep 23:759–763. doi:10.1007/s00299-004-0881-0
Yi CX, Zhang J, Chan KM, Liu XK, Hong Y (2008) Quantitative real-time PCR assay to detect transgene copy number in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Anal Biochem 375:150–152. doi:10.1016/j.ab.2007.11.022
Yu C, Han F, Zhang J, Birchler J, Peterson T (2012) A transgenic system for generation of transposon Ac/Ds-induced chromosome rearrangements in rice. Theor Appl Genet 125:1449–1462. doi:10.1007/s00122-012-1925-4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stefano, B., Patrizia, B., Matteo, C. et al. Inverse PCR and Quantitative PCR as Alternative Methods to Southern Blotting Analysis to Assess Transgene Copy Number and Characterize the Integration Site in Transgenic Woody Plants. Biochem Genet 54, 291–305 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-016-9719-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-016-9719-z