Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Novel Sib Pair Selection Strategy Increases Power in Quantitative Association Analysis

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantitative-trait association studies have been widely used in search for genetic loci for complex traits in recent years. Yet, fiscal constraints still prohibit many on-going research projects from recruiting a large number of individuals for genotyping to reach a desired level of statistical power. Accordingly, in this article, we describe a novel sib pair sampling strategy for genotyping in QTL association studies. With the use of phenotypic scores (and IBD allele-sharing probabilities if available), the genetic effect of a biallelic additive trait locus can be properly modelled within the maximum-likelihood variance components framework proposed by Fulker et al. (Am J Hum Genet 64(1):259–267, 1999) and sib pairs can be rank-ordered by use of informativeness indices. The performance of our method was investigated using simulation. The power of our approach was shown to be higher when compared with other phenotypic selection schemes. An R-script implementing all the selection approaches (including the traditional phenotype-based ones) used in the simulation is available at http://statgen.hku.hk/jshkwan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abecasis GR, Cookson WO, Cardon LR (2001) The power to detect linkage disequilibrium with quantitative traits in selected samples. Am J Hum Genet 68(6):1463–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR (2002) Merlin—rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees. Nat Genet 30(1):97–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allison DB, Heo M, Schork NJ, Wong SL, Elston RC (1998) Extreme selection strategies in gene mapping studies of oligogenic quantitative traits do not always increase power. Hum Hered 48(2):97–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardon LR, Bell JI (2001) Association study designs for complex diseases. Nat Rev Genet 2(2):91–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carey G, Williamson J (1991) Linkage analysis of quantitative traits: increased power by using selected samples. Am J Hum Genet 49(4):786–796

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eaves L, Meyer J (1994) Locating human quantitative trait loci: guidelines for the selection of sibling pairs for genotyping. Behav Genet 24(5):443–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingerlin TE, Boehnke M, Abecasis GR (2004) Increasing the power and efficiency of disease-marker case-control association studies through use of allele-sharing information. Am J Hum Genet 74(3):432–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fulker DW, Cherny SS, Sham PC, Hewitt JK (1999) Combined linkage and association sib-pair analysis for quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet 64(1):259–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell S, Cherny SS, Hewitt JK, Sham PC (2001) Optimal sibship selection for genotyping in quantitative trait locus linkage analysis. Hum Hered 52(1):1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ et al (2007) PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81(3):559–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Risch NJ (2000) Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium. Nature 405(6788):847–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Risch N, Merikangas K (1996) The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 273(5281):1516–1517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Risch N, Teng J (1998) The relative power of family-based and case-control designs for linkage disequilibrium studies of complex human diseases I. DNA pooling. Genome Res 8(12):1273–1288

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Risch N, Zhang H (1995) Extreme discordant sib pairs for mapping quantitative trait loci in humans. Science 268(5217):1584–1589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sham PC, Purcell S (2001) Equivalence between Haseman–Elston and variance-components linkage analyses for sib pairs. Am J Hum Genet 68(6):1527–1532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants HKU 7674/07M (A.W.C.K) and HKU 7669/06M (P.C.S) from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong and grant EY-12562 (S.S.C, P.C.S) from the National Institutes of Health (USA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johnny S. H. Kwan.

Additional information

Edited by David Allison.

Appendix

Appendix

For an additive locus with a trait-increasing allele, A 1, of frequency p and the other allele, A 2, of frequency 1 − p, the additive effects (a) of genotypes A 1 A 1, A 1 A 2 and A 2 A 2, can be coded as 1, 0.5 and 0, respectively. The expected additive effect of the locus in a random mating and large population, E(a), is therefore, 1 × p 2 + 0.5 × 2p(1 − p) + 0 × (1 − p)2 = p, and the variance,

$$ {\text{Var}}(a) = E(a^{2} )-\left[ {E(a)} \right]^{2} = [1^{2} \times p^{2} + (0.5)^{2} \times 2p(1-p) + 0^{2} \times (1-p)^{2} ]-p^{2} = p(1- p)/2 $$

Let Q = α + βa, where α and β are constants such that E(Q) = 0 and Var(Q) = 1, so

$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {E(Q) = \alpha + \beta \cdot E(a) = \alpha + \beta p = 0} \hfill \\ {{\text{Var}}(Q) = {\text{Var}}(\beta a) = \beta^{2} {\text{Var}}(a) = \beta p(1 - p)/2 = 1} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right. $$

By solving the equations, one gets \( \alpha = { - p/\sqrt {p(1 - p)/2} } \) and \( \beta = {1/\sqrt {p(1 - p)/2} } \), respectively.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kwan, J.S.H., Cherny, S.S., Kung, A.W.C. et al. Novel Sib Pair Selection Strategy Increases Power in Quantitative Association Analysis. Behav Genet 39, 571–579 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-009-9284-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-009-9284-x

Keywords

Navigation