Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the Parameters of the Target Unit of a Molten-Salt Subcritical Electronuclear Facility

  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

A variant of the target unit based on tungsten rods cooled by molten-salt coolant (alkali-metal fluorides) in a subcritical electronuclear facility is examined. The results of calculations of its main parameters are presented: the neutron yield, neutron spectrum on the lateral surface, top and bottom ends of the target, total energy release, specific energy release and induced activity. The calculations are performed using the three codes MCNPX 2.6B, SHIELD and KATRIN-2.5 and the codes ORIHET3 and DCHAIN-SP for calculating the changes in the radioactivity of the main units. The discrepancies in the parameters of the target unit of a subcritical electronuclear facility were determined by calculating the standard deviation factors. Apparently, the uncertainties in the computational results for the differential and integral parameters are due to the nuclear models and libraries in the programs used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. A. Nevinitsa, A. A. Dudnikov, A. A. Frolov, et al., “Analysis of the possibility of developing a molten-salt blanket for a demonstration subcritical reactor,” At. Énerg., 117, No. 1, 14–18 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. V. Artisyuk, A. Ignatyuk, Yu. Korovin, et al., “Transmutation of radioactive nuclear waste – present status and requirement for the problem-oriented nuclear database: approach to scheduling the experiment,” in: Int. Conf. Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, USA, Sept. 26 – Oct. 1, 2004, pp. 1564–1567.

  3. Yu. F. Titarenko and V. F. Batyaev, “The ITEP experiments with target exposed to up-to 2.6 GeV protons,” in: Joint ICTP-IAEA Advanced Workshop on Model Codes for Spallation Reactions, Italy, Feb. 4–8, 2008, pp. 148–180.

  4. Yu. E. Titarenko, Experimental Determination of the Nuclear-Physical Parameters of Targets and Blanket of Electronuclear Facilities: Dissert. Doct. Phys.-Math. Sci., Moscow (2001).

  5. R. Michel and P. Nagel, International Codes and Model Intercomparison for Intermediate Energy Activation Yields, NEA/OECD, NSC/DOC(97)-1 (1997).

  6. D. Filges, S. Leray, Y. Yariv, et al., in: Joint ICTP-IAEA Advanced Workshop on Model Codes for Spallation Reactions, Italy, Feb. 4–8, 2008, pp. 1–128.

  7. S. Leray, J. C. David, M. Khandaker, et al., “Results from the IAEA benchmark of spallation models,” J. Korean Phys. Soc., 59, No. 2, 791–796 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yu. E. Titarenko, V. F. Batyaev, M. A. Butko, et al., “Verification of high-energy transport codes on the basis of activation data,” Phys. Rev. C, 84, 064612-1–064612-19 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu. E. Titarenko, V. F. Batyaev, M. A. Butko, et al., “Analysis of the main nuclear-physical characteristics of the interaction of proton beams with heavy metallic targets,” At. Énerg., 104, No. 4, 242–249 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. V. Bakhmutkin, A. I. Bogdanov, V. G. Bogdanov, et al., “Neutron energy spectra on the surface of a cylindrical lead target, irradiated the 1 GeV protons,” At. Énerg., 62, No. 1, 59–61 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yu. E. Titarenko, V. F. Batyaev, A. Yu. Titarenko, et al., “Experimental determination and computational modeling of threshold reaction rates in a thick lead target irradiated by 0.8 GeV protons,” At. Énerg., 107, No. 1, 37–46 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. V. I. Belyakov-Bodin, A. M. Andreev, V. D. Dubinsky, et al., “Calorimetric measurements of the spatial component of heat deposition in targets lead and bismuth bombarded by medium-energy protons,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 373, 316–319 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. V. I. Belyakov-Bodin, I. L. Azhgirey, and I. I. Degtyarev, “Comparison of calculation of energy deposition parameters with experimental results,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 572, 935–941 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Filges and F. Goldenbaum, Handbook of Spallation Research: Theory, Experiments and Applications, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &Co (2009).

  15. D. Filges, F. Goldenbaum, M. Enke, et al., “Spallation neutron production and the current intra-nuclear cascade and transport codes,” Eur. Phys. J. A, 11, 467–490 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. V. Dementyev and N. M. Sobolevsky, “SHIELD – universal Monte Carlo hadron transport code: scope and applications,” Rad. Measur., 30, 553–557 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. MCNPX, Ver. 2.6.B, LA-UR-06-3248 (2006).

  18. CNCSN 2009: One-, Two- and Three-Dimensional Coupled Neutral and Charged Particle Discrete Ordinates Parallel Multi-Threaded Code System, RSICC Code Package CCC-726 (2009).

  19. P. N. Alekseev, A. V. Vasil’ev, A. M. Voloshchenko, et al., “Computational studies of a cascade scheme of a subcritical molted-salt reactor,” Preprint IAE-6280/4 (2003).

  20. ORIHET3, Ver. 2.12: A Guide for Users, PSI (2000).

  21. L. N. Latysheva and N. M. Sobolevskii, “LOENT – program for modeling neutron transport in complex geometries by the Monte Carlo method,” Preprint IYaI RAN 1200/2008 (2008).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 117, No. 1, pp. 19–25, July, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Titarenko, Y.E., Batyaev, V.F., Pavlov, K.V. et al. Analysis of the Parameters of the Target Unit of a Molten-Salt Subcritical Electronuclear Facility. At Energy 117, 19–28 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-014-9882-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-014-9882-4

Keywords

Navigation