Abstract
We compare the canonical treatment of calcite’s dissolution rate from the literature in a closed system, particle batch reactor, with the alternative approach suggested by Truesdale (Aquat Geochem, 2015). We show that the decay of rate over time can be understood in terms of the evolution and distribution of reactive sites on the surface of these particles. We also emphasize that interpretation of observed rates must not exclude the fundamental role of crystal defects, whose importance is already implicitly reflected in the common form of rate laws in geochemistry. The empirical behavior of overall rate in closed systems, such as those described by Truesdale, may thus reflect relationships between defect centers and the generation of steps over the calcite surface (previously documented for silicates), such that below a critical free energy limit, there is insufficient driving force to open hollow cores and thus a loss of reaction mechanism. Dissolution in this very-near-equilibrium regime will be dependent on the distribution of extant steps and the energetics of new kink site nucleation. However, these sensitivities are complicated in the case of particle systems by grain boundaries, edges, corners, and other terminations. Such discontinuities constitute a defect class whose overall kinetic importance will be strongly tied to particle diameter and which can act independently of the internal strain field imposed by screw and edge dislocations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arvidson RS, Morse JW (2014) In: Turekian KK, Holland HD (eds) Treatise on geochemistry, chap. 9.3, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 61–101. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.00703-8
Arvidson RS, Ertan IE, Amonette JE, Luttge A (2003) Variation in calcite dissolution rates: a fundamental problem? Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67(9):1623. doi:10.1016/S0016-7037(02)01177-8
Arvidson RS, Luttge A (2010) Mineral dissolution kinetics as a function of distance from equilibrium—new experimental results. Chem Geol 269(1–2):79. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.06.009
Beig MS, Luttge A (2006) Albite dissolution kinetics as a function of distance from equilibrium: implications for natural feldspar weathering. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70(6):1402. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2005.10.035
Burton WK, Cabrera N, Frank FC (1951) The growth of crystals and the equilibrium structure of their surfaces. Philos Trans R Soc Lon A Math Phys Sci 243(866):299. doi:10.1098/rsta.1951.0006
Fischer C, Arvidson RS, Luttge A (2012) How predictable are dissolution rates of crystalline material? Geochim Cosmochim Acta 98:177. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2012.09.011
Fischer C, Kurganskaya I, Schaefer T, Luttge A (2014) Variability of crystal surface reactivity: what do we know? Appl Geochem 43:132. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.02.002
Frank FC (1951) Capillary equilibria of dislocated crystals. Acta Crystallogr 4(6):497. doi:10.1107/S0365110X51001690
Lasaga AC (1998) Kinetic theory in the earth sciences. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Lasaga AC, Luttge A (2001) Variation of crystal dissolution rate based on a dissolution stepwave model. Science 291(5512):2400. doi:10.1126/science.1058173
Luttge A (2006) Crystal dissolution kinetics and Gibbs free energy. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 150:248. doi:10.1016/j.elspec.2005.06.007
Luttge A, Arvidson RS, Fischer C (2013) A stochastic treatment of crystal dissolution kinetics. Elements 9(3):183. doi:10.2113/gselements.9.3.183
Morse JW, Arvidson RS, Luttge A (2007) Calcium carbonate formation and dissolution. Chem Rev 107(2):342. doi:10.1021/cr050358j
Morse JW, Arvidson RS (2002) The dissolution kinetics of major sedimentary carbonate minerals. Earth Sci Rev 58(1–2):51. doi:10.1016/S0012-8252(01)00083-6
Nielsen AE (1981) Theory of electrolyte crystal growth: the parabolic rate law. Pure Appl Chem 53(11):2025. doi:10.1351/pac198153112025
Nielsen AE (1984) Electrolyte crystal growth mechanisms. J Cryst Growth 67(2):289. doi:10.1016/0022-0248(84)90189-1
Reddy MM, Nancollas GH (1971) The crystallization of calcium carbonate: I. Isotopic exchange and kinetics. J Colloid Interface Sci 36(2):166. doi:10.1016/0021-9797(71)90161-5
Rickard DT, Sjöberg EL (1983) Mixed kinetic control of calcite dissolution rates. Am J Sci 283:815. doi:10.2475/ajs.283.8.815
Ruiz-Agudo E, Putnis CV, Hawthorne F (2012) Direct observations of mineral–fluid reactions using atomic force microscopy: the specific example of calcite. Mineral Mag 76(1):227. doi:10.1180/minmag.2012.076.1.227
Schott J, Brantley S, Crerar D, Guy C, Borcsik M, Willaime C (1989) Dissolution kinetics of strained calcite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 53(2):373. doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90389-X
Sjöberg EL (1976) A fundamental equation for calcite dissolution kinetics. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 40(4):441. doi:10.1016/0016-7037(76)90009-0
Tolman RC (1925) The principle of microscopic reversibility. Proc Nat Acad Sci 11:436
Truesdale VW (2015) Evidence and potential implications of exponential tails to concentration versus time plots for the batch dissolution of calcite. Aquat Geochem 21:365–396
Acknowledgments
We thank Professor George W. Luther III for organizing this response format. Support from US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Award # DTFH61-12-H-00003, is gratefully acknowledged.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arvidson, R.S., Fischer, C. & Luttge, A. Calcite Dissolution Kinetics. Aquat Geochem 21, 415–422 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10498-015-9268-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10498-015-9268-9