Abstract
The successful integrated mite management program for Washington apples was based on conservation of the mite predator Galendromus occidentalis (Nesbitt). In the 1960s, this mite was assumed to be the only phytoseiid in Washington commercial apple orchards, due to its preference for the most common mite pest of that period, Tetranychus mcdanieli McGregor, as well as its resistance to organophosphate pesticides. A recent survey of phytoseiids in Washington apple found that another phytoseiid, Amblydromella caudiglans (Schuster) has become common. It is a more generalized predator than G. occidentalis (it is not a Tetranychus spp. specialist) and is not known to be organophosphate-resistant. A series of experiments was conducted to compare the life history, prey consumption, and pesticide tolerance of these two species. Galendromus occidentalis developed more quickly than A. caudiglans, but had slightly lower egg survival. Although A. caudiglans attacked more Tetranychus urticae Koch eggs than G. occidentalis, it could not reproduce on this diet. Both predators performed equally well on a diet of T. urticae protonymphs. Unlike G. occidentalis, A. caudiglans experienced significant mortality when exposed to carbaryl, azinphosmethyl, and bifenazate. Both predators experienced significant mortality due to imidacloprid and spinetoram. These results highlight the key differences between these two predators; the shift away from organophosphate use as well as the change in dominant mite pest to Panonychus ulmi (Koch) may be driving factors for the observed increased abundance of A. caudiglans in Washington apple.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlstrom KR, Rock GC (1973) Comparative studies on Neoseiulus fallacis and Metaseiulus occidentalis for azinphosmethyl toxicity and effects of prey and pollen on growth. Ann Entomol Soc Am 66:1109–1113
Babcock JM, Tanigoshi LK (1988) Resistance levels of Typhlodromus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Washington apple orchards to ten pesticides. Exp Appl Acarol 4:151–157
Beers EH, Hoyt SC (1993) European red mite. In: Beers EH, Brunner JF, Willett MJ, Warner GM (eds) Orchard pest management: a resource book for the Pacific Northwest. Good Fruit Grower, Yakima
Beers EH, Hoyt E (2007) European red mite. In: Beers EH, Brunner JF (eds) Orchard pest management online http://jenny.tfrec.wsu.edu/opm/displaySpecies.php?pn=290
Beers EH, Schmidt RA (2014) Impacts of orchard pesticides on Galendromus occidentalis: lethal and sublethal effects. Crop Prot 56:16–24
Beers EH, Schmidt-Jeffris RA (2015) Effects of orchard pesticides on Galendromus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae): repellency and irritancy. J Econ Entomol 108:259–265
Beers EH, Martinez-Rocha L, Talley RR, Dunley JE (2009) Lethal, sublethal, and behavioral effects of sulfur-containing products in bioassays of three species of orchard mites. J Econ Entomol 102:324–335
Blackwood JS, Schausberger P, Croft BA (2001) Prey-stage preference in generalist and specialist phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) when offered Tetranychus urticae (Acrari: Tetranychidae) eggs and larvae. Environ Entomol 30:1103–1111
Blackwood JS, Luh H-K, Croft BA (2004) Evaluation of prey-stage preference as an indicator of life-style type in phytoseiid mites. Exp Appl Acarol 33:261–280
Bostanian NJ, Thistlewood HA, Hardman JM, Laurin M-C, Racette G (2009) Effect of seven new orchard pesticides on Galendromus occidentalis in laboratory studies. Pest Manag Sci 65:635–639
Clements DR, Harmsen R (1993) Prey preferences of adult and immature Zetzellia mali Ewing (Acari: Stigmaeidae) and Typhlodromus caudiglans Schuster (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Can Entomol 125:967–969
Croft BA, Jeppson LR (1970) Comparative studies on four strains of Typhlodromus occidentalis. II. Laboratory toxicity of ten compounds common to apple pest control. J Econ Entomol 63:1528–1531
Denmark HA, Evans GA (2011) Phytoseiidae of North America and Hawaii (Acari: Mesostigmata). Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield
Downing RS, Moilliet TK (1967) Relative densities of predaceous and phytophagous mites on three varieties of apple trees. Can Entomol 99:738–741
Downing RS, Moilliet TK (1972) Replacement of Typhlodromus occidentalis by T. caudiglans and T. pyri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) after cessation of sprays on apple trees. Can Entomol 104:937–940
Environmental Protection Agency (2012) Azinphos-methyl uses cancellation September 30, 2012; use of existing stocks allowed through September 2013. http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/cb/csb_page/updates/2012/azinphos-methyl.html
Hoy MA (2011) Integrated mite management in Washington apple orchards. In: Agricultural acarology: introduction to integrated mite management, Taylor and Francis Group, LLC, Boca Raton, pp 237–242
Hoyt SC (1969) Integrated chemical control of insects and biological control of mites on apple in Washington. J Econ Entomol 62:74–86
Hoyt SC, Beers EH (1993) Western predatory mite. In: Beers EH, Brunner JF, Willett MJ, Warner GM (eds) Orchard pest management: a resource book for the Pacific Northwest. The Good Fruit Grower, Yakima
Lefebvre M, Bostanian NJ, Thistlewood HMA, Mauffette Y, Racette G (2011) A laboratory assessment of the toxic attributes of six ‘reduced risk insecticides’ on Galendromus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Chemosphere 84:25–30
McMurtry JA (1982). The use of phytoseiids for biological control: progress and future prospects. In: Hoy MA (ed) Proceedings, conference of the acarology society of America, 29 November–3 December 1981, San Diego. University of California Press, Oakland, pp 23–48
McMurtry JA, Croft BA (1997) Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annu Rev Entomol 42:291–321
McMurtry JA, de Moraes GJ, Famah Sourassou N (2013) Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Syst Appl Acarol 18:297–320
NASS (1991) Agricultural chemical usage fruit and nut summary, USDA/NASS/ERS
NASS (1994) Agricultural chemical usage fruit and nut summary, USDA/NASS/ERS
NASS (2011) Agricultural chemical usage fruit and nut summary, USDA/NASS/ERS
Putman WL (1962) Life-history and behaviour of the predacious mite Typhlodromus (T.) caudiglans Schuster (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in Ontario, with notes on the prey of related species. Can Entomol 94:163–177
Putman WL, Herne DHC (1966) The role of predators and other biotic agents in regulationg the population density of phytophagous mites in Ontario peach orchards. Can Entomol 98:808–820
Sabelis MW, Bakker FM (1992) How predatory mites cope with the web of their tetranychid prey: a functional view on dorsal chaetotaxy in the Phytoseiidae. Exp Appl Acarol 16:203–225
Sabelis MW, Van de Baan HE (1983) Location of distant spider mite colonies by phytoseiid predators: demonstration of specific kairomones emitted by Tetranychus urticae and Panonychus ulmi. Entomol Exp Appl 33:303–314
Schausberger P, Croft BA (1999) Activity, feeding, and development among larvae of specialist and generalist phytoseiid mite species (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environ Entomol 28:322–329
Schmidt-Jeffris RA, Beers EH, Crowder DW (2015) Phytoseiids in Washington commercial apple orchards: biodiversity and factors affecting abundance. Exp. Appl. Acarol. doi:10.1007/s10493-015-9927-y
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical help of Jordan Takasugi. We also thank Bahman Shafii and Bill Price for statistical consultation. This work was funded in part by grants from the Washington Tree Fruit Research Commission and the Washington State Commission on Pesticide Registration.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt-Jeffris, R.A., Beers, E.H. Comparative biology and pesticide susceptibility of Amblydromella caudiglans and Galendromus occidentalis as spider mite predators in apple orchards. Exp Appl Acarol 67, 35–47 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-015-9931-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-015-9931-2