Abstract
It has been proposed from behavioural observations that the ability of Phytoseiidae to penetrate the web is related to chaetotaxy. As phytoseiid species differ widely in chaetotaxy, as well as in their ability to cope with complex webs, this hypothesis was tested by studying relations between these two variables. In this paper we develop a simple method to quantify the degree to which the soma is protected from contact with the silk and apply it to phytoseiid species for which behavioural performance in the web is known from the literature. It is found that the better protected species experience less hinder from complex webs, such as produced byTetranychus spp. Moreover, they appear to be more successful in exterminating local populations ofTetranychus spp. Thus, setal patterns in the Phytoseiidae may well be a good indicator for selecting candidates for biological control ofTetranychus spp. Finally, we propose a parsimonious scenario for the evolution of dorsal chaetotaxy in the Phytoseiidae.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abou-Setta, M.M. and Childers, C.C., 1989. Biology ofEuseius mesembrinus (Acari: Phytoseiidae): life tables and feeding behavior on tetranychid mites in citrus. Environ. Entomol., 18: 665–669.
Abou-Setta, M.M., Childers, C.C., Denmark, H.A. and Browning, H.W., 1991. Comparative morphology and reproductive compatibility between populations ofEuseius mesembrinus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Florida and Texas. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 10: 213–220.
Amano, H. and Chant, D.A., 1977. Life history and reproduction of two species of predacious mitesPhytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot andAmblyseius andersoni (Chant) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool., 55: 1978–1983.
Athias-Henriot, C., 1958. Contribution à la connaissance du genreTyphlodromus Scheuten (Acariens Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Description de deux espèces nouvelles d'Algérie et clé des espèces de groupefinlandicus. Rev. Path. Veg. Entomol. Agr. France, 37 (2): 179–186.
Athias-Henriot, C., 1960. NouveauxAmblyseius d'Algérie (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 2: 288–299.
Badii, M.H. and McMurtry, J.A., 1984. Life history of and life table parameters forPhytoseiulus longipes with comparative studies onP. persimilis andTyphlodromus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 25: 111–123.
Badii, M.H. and McMurtry, J.A., 1988. Effect of prey density on functional and reproductive responses of the predatory mitePhytoseiulus longipes (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Int. J. Acarol., 14(2): 61–69.
Ball, J.C., 1980. Development, fecundity and prey consumption of four species of predacious mites (Phytoseiidae) at two constant temperatures. Environ. Entomol., 9: 298–303.
Blommers, L., 1973. Five new species of phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from south-west Madagascar. Bull. Zool. Mus. Univ. Amsterdam, 3: 109–117.
Blommers, L., 1974. Preliminary studies on two predators (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) of the spider miteTetranychus neocaledonicus André (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Z. Angew. Entomol., 75: 315–321.
Blommers, L., 1976. Capacities for increase and predation inAmblyseius bibens (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Z. Angew. Entomol., 81: 225–244.
Blommers, L. and Chazeau, J., 1974. Two new species of predator mites of the genusAmblyseius Berlese (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from Madagascar. Z. Angew. Entomol., 75: 308–315.
Bounfour, M. and McMurtry, J.A., 1987. Biology and ecology ofEuseius scutalis (Athias-Henriot) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Hilgardia, 55(5): 1–23.
Buryn, R. and Brandl, R., 1992. Are the morphometrics of chelicerae correlated with diet in mesostigmatid mites (Acari)? Exp. Appl. Acarol., 14: 67–82.
Caceres, S. and Childers, C., 1991. Biology and life tables ofGalendromus helveolus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Florida citrus. Environ. Entomol., 20(1): 224–229.
Chant, D.A., 1959. Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part I. Bionomics of seven species in southeastern England. Part II. A taxonomic review of the family Phytoseiidae, with descriptions of thirty-eight new species. Can. Entomol., Supplement 12: 166 pp.
Chant, D.A., 1965. Generic concepts in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. Entomol., 97: 351–374.
Chant, D.A. and baker, E.W., 1965. The Phytoseiidae (Acarina) of Central America. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can., 41: 1–56.
Chant, D.A. and Yoshida-Shoul, E., 1989. Adult dorsal setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). Int. J. Acarol., 15(4): 219–233.
Chant, D.A., Hansell, R.I.C., Rowell, H.J. and Yoshida-Shaul, E., 1978. A study of the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) using the methods of numerical taxonomy. Can. J. Zool., 56: 1330–1347
Denmark, H.A., 1966. Revision of the genusPhytoseius Ribaga, 1904 (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Fla. Dept. Agr. Bull., 6: 1–105.
Denmark, H.A. and Muma, M.H., 1973. Phytoseiid mites of Brazil (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Rev. Brasil. Biol., 33: 235–276.
Ehara, S., 1959. Some predatory mites of the generaTyphlodromus andAmblyseius from Japan (Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 1: 285–295.
Ehara, S., 1962. Notes on some predatory mites (Phytoseiidae and Stigmaeidae). Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool., 6(1): 53–60.
Evans, G.O., 1954. The genusIphiseius Berlese (Acarina: Laelaptidae). Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 124: 517–526.
Evans, G.O. and Till, W.M., 1979. Mesostigmatic mites of Britain and Ireland (Chelicerata: Acari-Parasitiformes). An introduction to their external morphology and classification. Trans. Zool. Soc. London, 35: 139–270.
Fransz, H.G., 1974. The functional response to prey density in an acarine system. Simulation Monographs, Pudoc, Wageningen, 143 pp.
Gerson, U., 1979. Silk production inTetranychus (Acari: Tetranychidae). In: J.G. Rodriguez (Editor), Recent Advances in Acarology, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 177–188.
Gerson, U., 1985. Webbing. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests Series, Vol 1A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 223–232.
Gonzalez, R.H. and Schuster, R.O., 1962. Especies de la familia Phytoseiidae en Chile I. (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Univ. Chile, Facultad de Agronomia, Est. Exp. Agron., Bol. Tecnico, 16: 1–35.
Gupta, S.K., 1978. Some phytoseiid mites from South India with descriptions of five new species. Oriental Insects, 12(3): 327–338.
Hislop, R. and Prokopy, R., 1981. Mite predator responses to prey and predator emitted stimuli. J. Chem. Ecol., 7: 895–904.
Hoying, S.A. and Croft, B.A., 1976. Comparisons between populations ofTyphlodromus longipilus Nesbitt andT. occidentalis Nesbitt; Taxonomy, distribution, and hybridization. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 70: 150–159.
Ivancich-Gambaro, P., 1975. Observations on the biology and behaviour of the predaceous miteTyphlodromus italicus (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in peach orchards. Entomophaga, 20: 171–177.
James, D.G., 1989. Influence of diet on development, survival and oviposition in an Australian phytoseiid,Amblyseius victoriensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 6: 1–10.
Janssen, A. and Sabelis, M.W., 1992. Phytoseiid life-histories, local predator-prey dynamics, and strategies for control of tetranychid mites, Exp. Appl. Acarol., 14: 233–250.
Karg, W., 1989. Die okologische Differenzierung der Raubmilbenarten der Überfamilie Phytoseioidae Karg (Acarina, Parasitiformes). Zool. Jb. Syst., 116: 31–46.
Karg, W., Mack, S. and Baier, B., 1987. Advantages of oligophagous predatory mites for biological control. Bulletin SROP/WPRS, 10(2): 66–73.
Knisley, C.B. and Swift, F.C., 1971. Biological studies ofAmblyseius umbraticus (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 64: 813–822.
Kropczynska, D., Van de Vrie, M. and Tomczyk, A., 1985. Woody ornamentals. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests Series, Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 385–393.
Kropczynska, D., Van de Vrie, M. and Tomczyk, A., 1988. Bionomics ofEotetranychus tiliarium and its phytoseiid predators. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 5: 65–82.
Lindquist, E.E. and Evans, G.O., 1965. Taxonomic concepts in the Ascidae, with a modified setal nomenclature for the idiosoma of the Gamasina (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can., 47: 1–64.
Lo, P.K., 1984. The role of the native phytoseiid miteAmblyseius longispinosus (Evans) in the biological control of two spider mites on strawberry in Taiwan. In: D.A. Griffiths and C.E. Bowman (Editors), Acarology VI, Vol. 2. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp. 703–709.
Mahr, D.L., 1978. Systematics of California spcies of theTyphlodromus pini group and bionomics of selected populations (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Dissertation, University of California, Riverside, CA.
Mallik, B., Krishnaswamy, H.S. and ChannaBassavanna, G.P., 1989. Mathematical models for the interaction betweenTetranychus ludeni and its phytoseiid predators. In: G.P. Channabassavanna and C.A. Viraktamath (Editors), Progress in Acarology. Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, pp. 343–355.
McMurtry, J.A., 1980. Biosystematics of three taxa in theAmblyseius finlandicus group from South Africa, with comparative life history studies (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Int. J. Acarol., 6(2): 147–156.
McMurtry, J.A., 1982. The use of phytoseiids for biological control: Progress and future prospects. In: M.A. Hoy (Editor), Recent Advances in the Knowledge of the Phytoseiidae. Agricultural Sciences Publications, Berkeley, CA, pp. 23–48.
McMurtry, J.A., 1985. Citrus. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests, Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 339–347.
McMurtry, J.A. and Johnson, H.G., 1966. An ecological study of the spider miteOligonychus punicae (Hirst) and its natural enemies. Hilgardia, 37(11): 363–402.
McMurtry, J.A. and Scriven, G.T., 1964a. Biology of the predaceous miteTyphlodromus rickeri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 57: 362–367.
McMurtry, J.A. and Scriven, G.T., 1964b. Studies on the feeding, reproduction, and development ofAmblyseius hibisci (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on various food substances. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 57: 649–655.
McMurtry, J.A. and Scriven, G.T., 1965. Life history studies ofAmblyseius limonicus, with comparative studies onAmblyseius hibisci (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 58: 106–111.
McMurtry, J.A., Huffaker, C.B. and Van de Vrie, M., 1970. Ecology of tetranychid mites and their natural enemies: A review. I. Tetranychid enemies: their biological characters and the impact of spray practices. Hilgardia, 40: 331–390
Mesa, N.C., Braun, A.R. and Bellotti, A.C., 1990. Comparison ofMononychellus progresivus andTetranychus urticae as prey for five species of phytoseiid mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 9: 159–168.
Miedema, E., 1987. Survey of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in orchards and surrounding vegetation of northwestern Europe, especially in the Netherlands. Keys, descriptions and figures. Neth. J. Plant Pathol., 93 (Suppl. 2): 1–64.
Moraes, G.J., McMurtry, J.A. and Denmark, H.A., 1986. A catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. References to taxonomy, synonymy, distribution and habitat. Publication of EMBRAPA, Brasilia, 1–353.
Mori, H., 1969. The influence of prey density on the predation ofAmblyseius longispinosus (Evans) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Proc. 2nd Int. Congress Acarology held at Sutton-Bonington. Akad. Kiado, Budapest, pp. 149–153.
Mori, H. and Saîto, Y., 1979. Biological control ofTetranychus urticae Koch (Acarina: Tetranychidae) populations by three species of phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). J. Fac. Agric., Hokkaido University, 59: 303–311.
Muma, M.H., 1955. Phytoseiidae associated with citrus in Florida. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 48: 262–272.
Muma, M.H., Denmark H.A. and De Leon, D., 1970. Phytoseiidae of Florida. In: H.V. Weems (Editor), Arthropods of Florida and neighbouring land areas, Vol. 6. Fla. Dept. Agric. Cons. Serv., Div. Plant. Ind., Gainesville, 150 pp.
Nangia, N. and ChannaBassavanna, G.P., 1984. The biology ofTyphlodromips tetranychivorus Gupta (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on selected plant feeding mites of economic importance. In: D.A. Griffiths and C.E. Bowman (Editors), Acarology VI, Vol. 2. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp. 725–732.
Nesbitt, H.H.J., 1951. A taxonomic study of the Phytoseiinae (Family Laelaptidae) predacious upon Tetranychidae of economic importance., Zool. Verh., 12: 64 pp.
Oatman, E.R., McMurtry, J.A., Gilstrap, F.E. and Voth, V., 1977. Effect of releases ofAmblyseius californicus on the twospotted spider mite on strawberry in Southern California. J. Econ. Entomol., 70(5): 638–640.
O'Dowd, D.J. and Wilson, M.F., 1989. Leaf domatia and mites on Australasian plants: ecological and evolutionary implications. Biol. J. Linnean Soc., 37: 191–236.
Pemberton, R.W. and Turner, C.E., 1989. Occurrence of predatory and fungivorous mites in leaf domatia. Am. J. Bot., 76(1): 105–112.
Penman, D.R., Wearing, C.H., Collyer, E. and Thomas W.P., 1979. The role of insecticideresistant phytoseiids in integrated mite control in New Zealand. In: J.G. Rodriguez (Editor), Recent advances in Acarology, 1. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 59–71.
Putman, W.M., 1962. Life-history and behaviour of the predacious miteTyphlodromus (T.) caudiglans Schuster (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in Ontario, with notes on the prey of related species. Can. Entomol., 94(2): 163–177.
Ragusa, S., 1979. Laboratory studies on the food habits of the predacious miteTyphlodromus exhilaratus. In: J.G. Rodriguez (Editor), Recent Advances in Acarology. Academic Press. New York, NY, pp. 485–490.
Rowell, H.J., Chant, D.A. and Hansell, R.I.C., 1978. The determination of setal homologies and setal patterns on the dorsal shield in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Can. Entomol., 110: 859–876.
Sabelis, M.W., 1981. Biological control of two-spotted spider mites using phytoseiid predators. Dissertation, Agricultural University, Wageningen, 242 pp.
Sabelis, M.W., 1985. Predation on spider mites. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests, Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 103–127.
Sabelis, M.W. and Dicke, M., 1985. Long-range dispersal and searching behaviour. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests, Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 141–157.
Sabelis, M.W. and Van de Baan, H.E., 1983. Location of distant spider-mite colonies by phytoseiid predators: Demonstration of specific kairomones emitted byTetranychus urticae andPanonychus ulmi. Entomol. Exp. Appl., 33: 303–314.
Sabelis, M.W. and Van de Vrie, M., 1979. Evaluation of predatory mites for control of spider mites. In: J.G. Rodriguez (Editor), Recent Advances in Acarology. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 491–499.
Saîto, Y., 1985. Life types of spider mites. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests, Vol. 1A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 253–264.
Sandness, J.N. and McMurtry, J.A., 1970. Functional response of three species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina) to prey density. Can. Entomol., 102: 692–704.
Sandness, J.N. and McMurtry, J.A., 1972. Prey consumption behavior ofAmblyseius largoensis in relation to hunger. Can. Entomol., 104: 461–470.
Schicha, E., 1975. Bionomics ofPhytoseius fotheringhamiae Denmark and Schicha, 1974 (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on apple in Australia. Z. Angew. Entomol., 78: 195–203.
Schicha, E., 1987. Phytoseiidae of Australia and neighbouring areas. Indira Publishing House, Oak Park, MI, 187 pp.
Schmidt, G., 1976. Der Einfluss der von Beutetieren hinterlassenen Spuren auf Suchverhalten und Sucherfolg vonPhytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Z. Angew. Entomol., 82: 216–218.
Schruft, G.A., 1985. Grape. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider, Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests, Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 359–365.
Schuster, R.O. and Pritchard, A.E., 1963. Phytoseiid mites of California. Hilgardia, 34: 191–285.
Takafuji, A., 1980. Population dynamics of some phytophagous mites and their predators on goldenrodSolidago altissima I. Seasonal trends in population numbers and spatial distributions. Res. Pop. Ecol. (Kyoto), 21: 197–216.
Takafuji, A. and Chant, D.A., 1976. Comparative studies on two species of predacious phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), with special reference to their responses to the density of their prey. Res. Pop. Ecol., 17: 255–310.
Tanigoshi, L.K. and McMurtry, J.A., 1977. The dynamics of predation ofStethorus picipes (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) andTyphlodromus floridanus (Acarina: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae). Hilgardia, 45 (8): 237–288.
Van Dinh, N., Janssen, A., and Sabelis, M.W., 1988. Reproductive success ofAmblyseius idaeus andA. anonymus on a diet of two-spotted spider mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 4: 41–51.
Waite, G.K., 1988. Integrated control ofTetranychus urticae in strawberries in South-East Queensland. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 5: 23–32.
Xin, J.L., Liang, L.R. and Ke, L.S., 1981. A new species of the genusAmblyseius from China (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) Int. J. Acarol., 7: 75–80.
Xin, J., Liang, L. and Ke, L., 1984. Biology and utilisation ofAmblyseius longispinosus (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in China. In: D.A. Griffiths and C.E. Bowman (Editors), Acarology VI, Vol. 2. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp. 693–698.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sabelis, M.W., Bakker, F.M. How predatory mites cope with the web of their tetranychid prey: a functional view on dorsal chaetotaxy in the Phytoseiidae. Exp Appl Acarol 16, 203–225 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193804
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193804