Skip to main content
Log in

How predatory mites cope with the web of their tetranychid prey: a functional view on dorsal chaetotaxy in the Phytoseiidae

  • Published:
Experimental & Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been proposed from behavioural observations that the ability of Phytoseiidae to penetrate the web is related to chaetotaxy. As phytoseiid species differ widely in chaetotaxy, as well as in their ability to cope with complex webs, this hypothesis was tested by studying relations between these two variables. In this paper we develop a simple method to quantify the degree to which the soma is protected from contact with the silk and apply it to phytoseiid species for which behavioural performance in the web is known from the literature. It is found that the better protected species experience less hinder from complex webs, such as produced byTetranychus spp. Moreover, they appear to be more successful in exterminating local populations ofTetranychus spp. Thus, setal patterns in the Phytoseiidae may well be a good indicator for selecting candidates for biological control ofTetranychus spp. Finally, we propose a parsimonious scenario for the evolution of dorsal chaetotaxy in the Phytoseiidae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou-Setta, M.M. and Childers, C.C., 1989. Biology ofEuseius mesembrinus (Acari: Phytoseiidae): life tables and feeding behavior on tetranychid mites in citrus. Environ. Entomol., 18: 665–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abou-Setta, M.M., Childers, C.C., Denmark, H.A. and Browning, H.W., 1991. Comparative morphology and reproductive compatibility between populations ofEuseius mesembrinus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Florida and Texas. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 10: 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amano, H. and Chant, D.A., 1977. Life history and reproduction of two species of predacious mitesPhytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot andAmblyseius andersoni (Chant) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool., 55: 1978–1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athias-Henriot, C., 1958. Contribution à la connaissance du genreTyphlodromus Scheuten (Acariens Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Description de deux espèces nouvelles d'Algérie et clé des espèces de groupefinlandicus. Rev. Path. Veg. Entomol. Agr. France, 37 (2): 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athias-Henriot, C., 1960. NouveauxAmblyseius d'Algérie (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 2: 288–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badii, M.H. and McMurtry, J.A., 1984. Life history of and life table parameters forPhytoseiulus longipes with comparative studies onP. persimilis andTyphlodromus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 25: 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badii, M.H. and McMurtry, J.A., 1988. Effect of prey density on functional and reproductive responses of the predatory mitePhytoseiulus longipes (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Int. J. Acarol., 14(2): 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, J.C., 1980. Development, fecundity and prey consumption of four species of predacious mites (Phytoseiidae) at two constant temperatures. Environ. Entomol., 9: 298–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommers, L., 1973. Five new species of phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from south-west Madagascar. Bull. Zool. Mus. Univ. Amsterdam, 3: 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommers, L., 1974. Preliminary studies on two predators (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) of the spider miteTetranychus neocaledonicus André (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Z. Angew. Entomol., 75: 315–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommers, L., 1976. Capacities for increase and predation inAmblyseius bibens (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Z. Angew. Entomol., 81: 225–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommers, L. and Chazeau, J., 1974. Two new species of predator mites of the genusAmblyseius Berlese (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from Madagascar. Z. Angew. Entomol., 75: 308–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bounfour, M. and McMurtry, J.A., 1987. Biology and ecology ofEuseius scutalis (Athias-Henriot) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Hilgardia, 55(5): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buryn, R. and Brandl, R., 1992. Are the morphometrics of chelicerae correlated with diet in mesostigmatid mites (Acari)? Exp. Appl. Acarol., 14: 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caceres, S. and Childers, C., 1991. Biology and life tables ofGalendromus helveolus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Florida citrus. Environ. Entomol., 20(1): 224–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chant, D.A., 1959. Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part I. Bionomics of seven species in southeastern England. Part II. A taxonomic review of the family Phytoseiidae, with descriptions of thirty-eight new species. Can. Entomol., Supplement 12: 166 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chant, D.A., 1965. Generic concepts in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. Entomol., 97: 351–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chant, D.A. and baker, E.W., 1965. The Phytoseiidae (Acarina) of Central America. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can., 41: 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chant, D.A. and Yoshida-Shoul, E., 1989. Adult dorsal setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). Int. J. Acarol., 15(4): 219–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chant, D.A., Hansell, R.I.C., Rowell, H.J. and Yoshida-Shaul, E., 1978. A study of the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) using the methods of numerical taxonomy. Can. J. Zool., 56: 1330–1347

    Google Scholar 

  • Denmark, H.A., 1966. Revision of the genusPhytoseius Ribaga, 1904 (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Fla. Dept. Agr. Bull., 6: 1–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denmark, H.A. and Muma, M.H., 1973. Phytoseiid mites of Brazil (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Rev. Brasil. Biol., 33: 235–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehara, S., 1959. Some predatory mites of the generaTyphlodromus andAmblyseius from Japan (Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 1: 285–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehara, S., 1962. Notes on some predatory mites (Phytoseiidae and Stigmaeidae). Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool., 6(1): 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G.O., 1954. The genusIphiseius Berlese (Acarina: Laelaptidae). Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 124: 517–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G.O. and Till, W.M., 1979. Mesostigmatic mites of Britain and Ireland (Chelicerata: Acari-Parasitiformes). An introduction to their external morphology and classification. Trans. Zool. Soc. London, 35: 139–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransz, H.G., 1974. The functional response to prey density in an acarine system. Simulation Monographs, Pudoc, Wageningen, 143 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, U., 1979. Silk production inTetranychus (Acari: Tetranychidae). In: J.G. Rodriguez (Editor), Recent Advances in Acarology, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, U., 1985. Webbing. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests Series, Vol 1A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, R.H. and Schuster, R.O., 1962. Especies de la familia Phytoseiidae en Chile I. (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Univ. Chile, Facultad de Agronomia, Est. Exp. Agron., Bol. Tecnico, 16: 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S.K., 1978. Some phytoseiid mites from South India with descriptions of five new species. Oriental Insects, 12(3): 327–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hislop, R. and Prokopy, R., 1981. Mite predator responses to prey and predator emitted stimuli. J. Chem. Ecol., 7: 895–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoying, S.A. and Croft, B.A., 1976. Comparisons between populations ofTyphlodromus longipilus Nesbitt andT. occidentalis Nesbitt; Taxonomy, distribution, and hybridization. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 70: 150–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivancich-Gambaro, P., 1975. Observations on the biology and behaviour of the predaceous miteTyphlodromus italicus (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in peach orchards. Entomophaga, 20: 171–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, D.G., 1989. Influence of diet on development, survival and oviposition in an Australian phytoseiid,Amblyseius victoriensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 6: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, A. and Sabelis, M.W., 1992. Phytoseiid life-histories, local predator-prey dynamics, and strategies for control of tetranychid mites, Exp. Appl. Acarol., 14: 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karg, W., 1989. Die okologische Differenzierung der Raubmilbenarten der Überfamilie Phytoseioidae Karg (Acarina, Parasitiformes). Zool. Jb. Syst., 116: 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karg, W., Mack, S. and Baier, B., 1987. Advantages of oligophagous predatory mites for biological control. Bulletin SROP/WPRS, 10(2): 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knisley, C.B. and Swift, F.C., 1971. Biological studies ofAmblyseius umbraticus (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 64: 813–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropczynska, D., Van de Vrie, M. and Tomczyk, A., 1985. Woody ornamentals. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests Series, Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 385–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropczynska, D., Van de Vrie, M. and Tomczyk, A., 1988. Bionomics ofEotetranychus tiliarium and its phytoseiid predators. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 5: 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, E.E. and Evans, G.O., 1965. Taxonomic concepts in the Ascidae, with a modified setal nomenclature for the idiosoma of the Gamasina (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can., 47: 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, P.K., 1984. The role of the native phytoseiid miteAmblyseius longispinosus (Evans) in the biological control of two spider mites on strawberry in Taiwan. In: D.A. Griffiths and C.E. Bowman (Editors), Acarology VI, Vol. 2. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp. 703–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahr, D.L., 1978. Systematics of California spcies of theTyphlodromus pini group and bionomics of selected populations (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Dissertation, University of California, Riverside, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallik, B., Krishnaswamy, H.S. and ChannaBassavanna, G.P., 1989. Mathematical models for the interaction betweenTetranychus ludeni and its phytoseiid predators. In: G.P. Channabassavanna and C.A. Viraktamath (Editors), Progress in Acarology. Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, pp. 343–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J.A., 1980. Biosystematics of three taxa in theAmblyseius finlandicus group from South Africa, with comparative life history studies (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Int. J. Acarol., 6(2): 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J.A., 1982. The use of phytoseiids for biological control: Progress and future prospects. In: M.A. Hoy (Editor), Recent Advances in the Knowledge of the Phytoseiidae. Agricultural Sciences Publications, Berkeley, CA, pp. 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J.A., 1985. Citrus. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests, Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 339–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J.A. and Johnson, H.G., 1966. An ecological study of the spider miteOligonychus punicae (Hirst) and its natural enemies. Hilgardia, 37(11): 363–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J.A. and Scriven, G.T., 1964a. Biology of the predaceous miteTyphlodromus rickeri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 57: 362–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J.A. and Scriven, G.T., 1964b. Studies on the feeding, reproduction, and development ofAmblyseius hibisci (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on various food substances. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 57: 649–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J.A. and Scriven, G.T., 1965. Life history studies ofAmblyseius limonicus, with comparative studies onAmblyseius hibisci (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 58: 106–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J.A., Huffaker, C.B. and Van de Vrie, M., 1970. Ecology of tetranychid mites and their natural enemies: A review. I. Tetranychid enemies: their biological characters and the impact of spray practices. Hilgardia, 40: 331–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesa, N.C., Braun, A.R. and Bellotti, A.C., 1990. Comparison ofMononychellus progresivus andTetranychus urticae as prey for five species of phytoseiid mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 9: 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miedema, E., 1987. Survey of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in orchards and surrounding vegetation of northwestern Europe, especially in the Netherlands. Keys, descriptions and figures. Neth. J. Plant Pathol., 93 (Suppl. 2): 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraes, G.J., McMurtry, J.A. and Denmark, H.A., 1986. A catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. References to taxonomy, synonymy, distribution and habitat. Publication of EMBRAPA, Brasilia, 1–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, H., 1969. The influence of prey density on the predation ofAmblyseius longispinosus (Evans) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Proc. 2nd Int. Congress Acarology held at Sutton-Bonington. Akad. Kiado, Budapest, pp. 149–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, H. and Saîto, Y., 1979. Biological control ofTetranychus urticae Koch (Acarina: Tetranychidae) populations by three species of phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). J. Fac. Agric., Hokkaido University, 59: 303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muma, M.H., 1955. Phytoseiidae associated with citrus in Florida. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 48: 262–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muma, M.H., Denmark H.A. and De Leon, D., 1970. Phytoseiidae of Florida. In: H.V. Weems (Editor), Arthropods of Florida and neighbouring land areas, Vol. 6. Fla. Dept. Agric. Cons. Serv., Div. Plant. Ind., Gainesville, 150 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nangia, N. and ChannaBassavanna, G.P., 1984. The biology ofTyphlodromips tetranychivorus Gupta (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on selected plant feeding mites of economic importance. In: D.A. Griffiths and C.E. Bowman (Editors), Acarology VI, Vol. 2. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp. 725–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbitt, H.H.J., 1951. A taxonomic study of the Phytoseiinae (Family Laelaptidae) predacious upon Tetranychidae of economic importance., Zool. Verh., 12: 64 pp.

  • Oatman, E.R., McMurtry, J.A., Gilstrap, F.E. and Voth, V., 1977. Effect of releases ofAmblyseius californicus on the twospotted spider mite on strawberry in Southern California. J. Econ. Entomol., 70(5): 638–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Dowd, D.J. and Wilson, M.F., 1989. Leaf domatia and mites on Australasian plants: ecological and evolutionary implications. Biol. J. Linnean Soc., 37: 191–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, R.W. and Turner, C.E., 1989. Occurrence of predatory and fungivorous mites in leaf domatia. Am. J. Bot., 76(1): 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penman, D.R., Wearing, C.H., Collyer, E. and Thomas W.P., 1979. The role of insecticideresistant phytoseiids in integrated mite control in New Zealand. In: J.G. Rodriguez (Editor), Recent advances in Acarology, 1. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putman, W.M., 1962. Life-history and behaviour of the predacious miteTyphlodromus (T.) caudiglans Schuster (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in Ontario, with notes on the prey of related species. Can. Entomol., 94(2): 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragusa, S., 1979. Laboratory studies on the food habits of the predacious miteTyphlodromus exhilaratus. In: J.G. Rodriguez (Editor), Recent Advances in Acarology. Academic Press. New York, NY, pp. 485–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, H.J., Chant, D.A. and Hansell, R.I.C., 1978. The determination of setal homologies and setal patterns on the dorsal shield in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Can. Entomol., 110: 859–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis, M.W., 1981. Biological control of two-spotted spider mites using phytoseiid predators. Dissertation, Agricultural University, Wageningen, 242 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis, M.W., 1985. Predation on spider mites. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests, Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 103–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis, M.W. and Dicke, M., 1985. Long-range dispersal and searching behaviour. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests, Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis, M.W. and Van de Baan, H.E., 1983. Location of distant spider-mite colonies by phytoseiid predators: Demonstration of specific kairomones emitted byTetranychus urticae andPanonychus ulmi. Entomol. Exp. Appl., 33: 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis, M.W. and Van de Vrie, M., 1979. Evaluation of predatory mites for control of spider mites. In: J.G. Rodriguez (Editor), Recent Advances in Acarology. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 491–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saîto, Y., 1985. Life types of spider mites. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests, Vol. 1A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandness, J.N. and McMurtry, J.A., 1970. Functional response of three species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina) to prey density. Can. Entomol., 102: 692–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandness, J.N. and McMurtry, J.A., 1972. Prey consumption behavior ofAmblyseius largoensis in relation to hunger. Can. Entomol., 104: 461–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schicha, E., 1975. Bionomics ofPhytoseius fotheringhamiae Denmark and Schicha, 1974 (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on apple in Australia. Z. Angew. Entomol., 78: 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schicha, E., 1987. Phytoseiidae of Australia and neighbouring areas. Indira Publishing House, Oak Park, MI, 187 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G., 1976. Der Einfluss der von Beutetieren hinterlassenen Spuren auf Suchverhalten und Sucherfolg vonPhytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Z. Angew. Entomol., 82: 216–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schruft, G.A., 1985. Grape. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider, Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests, Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 359–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, R.O. and Pritchard, A.E., 1963. Phytoseiid mites of California. Hilgardia, 34: 191–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takafuji, A., 1980. Population dynamics of some phytophagous mites and their predators on goldenrodSolidago altissima I. Seasonal trends in population numbers and spatial distributions. Res. Pop. Ecol. (Kyoto), 21: 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takafuji, A. and Chant, D.A., 1976. Comparative studies on two species of predacious phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), with special reference to their responses to the density of their prey. Res. Pop. Ecol., 17: 255–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanigoshi, L.K. and McMurtry, J.A., 1977. The dynamics of predation ofStethorus picipes (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) andTyphlodromus floridanus (Acarina: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae). Hilgardia, 45 (8): 237–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dinh, N., Janssen, A., and Sabelis, M.W., 1988. Reproductive success ofAmblyseius idaeus andA. anonymus on a diet of two-spotted spider mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 4: 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite, G.K., 1988. Integrated control ofTetranychus urticae in strawberries in South-East Queensland. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 5: 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin, J.L., Liang, L.R. and Ke, L.S., 1981. A new species of the genusAmblyseius from China (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) Int. J. Acarol., 7: 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin, J., Liang, L. and Ke, L., 1984. Biology and utilisation ofAmblyseius longispinosus (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in China. In: D.A. Griffiths and C.E. Bowman (Editors), Acarology VI, Vol. 2. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp. 693–698.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sabelis, M.W., Bakker, F.M. How predatory mites cope with the web of their tetranychid prey: a functional view on dorsal chaetotaxy in the Phytoseiidae. Exp Appl Acarol 16, 203–225 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193804

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193804

Keywords

Navigation