Abstract
Drawing on social cognitive theory, we build a comprehensive understanding of how, why, and when exploitative leadership relates to employee expediency by identifying moral disengagement as one psychological mechanism and Chinese traditionality as one boundary condition. To test our model, we administrated a three-wave survey to collect data from 350 employees in China. The results showed that exploitative leadership was positively related to employee expediency and that moral disengagement mediated this relationship. Additionally, we found that Chinese traditionality buffered the positive relationship between exploitative leadership and moral disengagement as well as the indirect effect of exploitative leadership on employee expediency through moral disengagement. Theoretical and practical implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We thank one of the anonymous reviewers for offering this insight.
We thank one of the anonymous reviewers for offering this insight.
References
Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs.
Bandura, A. 1991. Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. Kurtines, & J. Gewirtz (Eds.). Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research and applications: 71–129. Erlbaum.
Bandura, A. 1999. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3): 193–209.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. 1996. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2): 364–374.
Brislin, R. W. 1980. Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. Triandis, & J. W. Berry (Eds.). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: 389–444. Allyn & Bacon.
Buunk, A. P., & Gibbons, F. X. 2007. Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(1): 3–21.
Chen, M., Chen, C. C., & Sheldon, O. J. 2016. Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8): 1082–1096.
Christian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J. C., & Burke, M. J. 2009. Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5): 1103–1127.
Cohen, J. 1969. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.
Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. 2008. Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2): 374–391.
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. 2007. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1): 1–22.
Eissa, G. 2020. Individual initiative and burnout as antecedents of employee expediency and the moderating role of conscientiousness. Journal of Business Research, 110: 202–212.
Fang, J. Y. 2016. Country Garden claims that the fraud is due to employee expediency. https://3g.163.com/money/article/BMB71MNU002534NU.html?from=dynamic.
Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. 1997. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3): 421–444.
Fida, R., Paciello, M., Tramontano, C., Fontaine, R. G., Barbaranelli, C., & Farnese, M. L. 2015. An integrative approach to understanding counterproductive work behavior: The roles of stressors, negative emotions, and moral disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1): 131–144.
Gray, J. 1991. Fear, panic, and anxiety: What’s in a name? Psychological Inquiry, 2(1): 77–78.
Greenbaum, R. L., Mawritz, M. B., Bonner, J. M., Webster, B. D., & Kim, J. 2018. Supervisor expediency to employee expediency: The moderating role of leader-member exchange and the mediating role of employee unethical tolerance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(4): 525–541.
Greenberg, J., Ashton-James, C. E., & Ashkanasy, N. M. 2007. Social comparison processes in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(1): 22–41.
Guo, L., Cheng, K., & Luo, J. 2021. The effect of exploitative leadership on knowledge hiding: A conservation of resources perspective. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 42: 83–98.
Halbesleben, J. R. B. 2010. The role of exhaustion and workarounds in predicting occupational injuries: A cross-lagged panel study of health care professionals. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(1): 1–16.
Hayes, A. F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Guilford Press.
He, P., Peng, Z., Zhao, H., & Estay, C. 2019. How and when compulsory citizenship behavior leads to employee silence: A moderated mediation model based on moral disengagement and supervisor-subordinate guanxi views. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(1): 259–274.
Hu, J. I. A., & Liden, R. C. 2013. Relative leader–member exchange within team contexts: How and when social comparison impacts individual effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 66(1): 127–172.
Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D. M. 2004. Employment relationships in China: Do workers relate to the organization or to people? Organization Science, 15(2): 232–240.
Kang, J. H., Matusik, J. G., & Barclay, L. A. 2017. Affective and normative motives to work overtime in Asian organizations: Four cultural orientations from Confucian ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(1): 115–130.
Kim, Y., Chiu, C., Peng, S., Cai, H., & Tov, W. 2010. Explaining east–west differences in the likelihood of making favorable self-evaluations: The role of evaluation apprehension and directness of expression. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(1): 62–75.
Kouchaki, M., & Desai, S. D. 2015. Anxious, threatened, and also unethical: How anxiety makes individuals feel threatened and commit unethical acts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2): 360–375.
Liu, J., Kwan, H. K., Wu, L. Z., & Wu, W. 2010. Abusive supervision and subordinate supervisor-directed deviance: The moderating role of traditional values and the mediating role of revenge cognitions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4): 835–856.
Majeed, M., & Fatima, T. 2020. Impact of exploitative leadership on psychological distress: A study of nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 28: 713–724.
Meyer, K. E. 2007. Asian contexts and the search for general theory in management research: A rejoinder. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4): 527–534.
Moore, C., Detert, J. R., Trevinõ, L. K., Baker, V. L., & Mayer, D. M. 2012. Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65(1): 1–48.
Peng, J., Wang, Z., & Chen, X. 2019. Does self-serving leadership hinder team creativity? A moderated dual-path model. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2): 419–433.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879–903.
Schmid, E. A., Pircher Verdorfer, A., & Peus, C. 2019. Shedding light on leaders’ self-interest: Theory and measurement of exploitative leadership. Journal of Management, 45(4): 1401–1433.
Schmid, E. A., Pircher Verdorfer, A., & Peus, C. 2018. Different shades–different effects? Consequences of different types of destructive leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 9: 1289.
Sohu. 2021. The insurance industry has been debunked, and when will turn to telecom carriers?. https://www.sohu.com/a/453344896_120949831.
Syed, F., Naseer, S., Akhtar, M. W., Husnain, M., & Kashif, M. 2021. Frogs in boiling water: A moderated-mediation model of exploitative leadership, fear of negative evaluation and knowledge hiding behaviors. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2019-0611.
Tepper, B. J. 2000. Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 178–190.
Wang, Z., Sun, C., & Cai, S. 2021. How exploitative leadership influences employee innovative behavior: The mediating role of relational attachment and moderating role of high-performance work systems. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 42: 233–248.
White, S. 2002. Rigor and relevance in Asian management research: Where are we and where can we go? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2/3): 287–352.
Valle, M., Kacmar, K. M., Zivnuska, S., & Harting, T. 2019. Abusive supervision, leader-member exchange, and moral disengagement: A moderated-mediation model of organizational deviance. Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3): 299–312.
Yan, J., & Sorenson, R. 2006. The effect of Confucian values on succession in family business. Family Business Review, 19(3): 235–250.
Yang, K. S., Yu, A. B., & Yeh, M. H. 1989. Chinese individual modernity and traditionality: Construct definition and measurement. In K. S. Yang, & A. B. Yu (Eds.). Chinese psychology and behavior: 241–306. Taipei: Laureate.
Yu, W., Fan, Y., Zhang, J., & Men, Y. 2015. The relationship between abusive supervision and job performance: The effect of supervisor-subordinate guanxi, traditionality, and employees’ forgiveness to supervisor. Nankai Business Review, 18: 16–25.
Zhao, H., Liu, W., Li, J., & Yu, X. 2019. Leader–member exchange, organizational identification, and knowledge hiding: The moderating role of relative leader–member exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(7): 834–848.
Zhao, H., Peng, Z., Han, Y., Sheard, G., & Hudson, A. 2013. Psychological mechanism linking abusive supervision and compulsory citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation study. Journal of Psychology, 147(2): 177–195.
Zhang, P., Li, S., Liu, W., Han, Y., & Muhammad, N. A. 2018. Exploring the role of moral disengagement in the link between perceived narcissistic supervision and employees’ organizational deviance: A moderated mediation model. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21(4): 223–236.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71772138) and the Shanghai Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science (No. 2017BGL001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Limin Guo, upon reasonable request.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, K., Guo, L. & Luo, J. The more you exploit, the more expedient I will be: A moral disengagement and Chinese traditionality examination of exploitative leadership and employee expediency. Asia Pac J Manag 40, 151–167 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09781-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09781-x