Abstract
Hofstede’s cross-cultural paradigm has stimulated academic interest in value and behavioral variations across national borders and helped practitioners to capture national cultural stereotypes in concrete and measurable terms. Nevertheless, the Hofstede paradigm with its focus on cultural differences can hardly capture today’s new cross-cultural management environment characterized by change and paradox in borderless and wireless cultural learning, knowledge transfer, and synchronized information sharing. In the twenty-first century, management faces new challenges because people in the twenty-first century are increasingly no longer bipolarized and isolated creatures but of multicultural identities and multicultural minds. Asian management researchers need to learn from the West but at the same time need to have self-confidence and courage in using indigenous knowledge to make contributions to theory building with global relevance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“Mice Loves Rice” (Laoshu ai dami in Chinese) is a Chinese love song well received in China in recent years.
This is similar to the use of the term “comrade” in Taiwan and Hong Kong when referring to homosexuals.
In October 2007 when I contacted Klaus E. Meyer to borrow the title of his (2006) article “Asian management research needs more self-confidence” as the main title for this paper I didn’t know that the article would later be selected as APJM’s first Best Paper Award (Peng, 2009). But recently when I knew that Meyer (2006) won, I was not surprised at all.
References
Arnett, J. J. 2002. The psychology of globalization. American Psychologist, 57(10): 774–783.
Bem, D. J. 1970. Beliefs, attitudes, and human affairs. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Bird, A., & Stevens, M. J. 2003. Toward an emergent global culture and the effects of globalization on obsolescing national cultures. Journal of International Management, 9: 395–407.
Brannen, M. Y., & Salk, J. 2000. Partnering across borders. Human Relations, 53(4): 451–487.
Carney, M., Gedjalovic, E., & Yang, X. H. 2009. Editorial: Varieties of Asian capitalism: Toward an institutional theory of Asian enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management (in press).
Chen, M.-J. 2001. Inside Chinese business: A guide for managers worldwide. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Chen, M.-J. 2002. Transcending paradox: The “middle way” perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19: 179–199.
Cooper, J. C. 1990. Taoism: The way of the mystic (revised ed.). Wellingborough: The Aquarian Press.
Fang, T. 2003. A critique of Hofstede’s fifth national culture dimension. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3: 347–368.
Fang, T. 2005–2006. From “onion” to “ocean”: Paradox and change in national cultures. International Studies of Management and Organizations, 35: 71–90.
Fang, T., Zhao, S., & Worm, V. 2008. Editorial: The changing Chinese culture and business behavior. International Business Review, 17(2): 141–145.
Faure, G. O., & Fang, T. 2008. Changing Chinese values: Keeping up with paradoxes. International Business Review, 17(2): 194–207.
Fletcher, R., & Fang, T. 2006. Assessing the impact of culture on relationship creation and network formation in emerging Asian markets. European Journal of Marketing, 40: 430–446.
Gao, G., Ting-Toomey, S., & Gudykunst, W. B. 1996. Chinese communication processes. In M. H. Bond (Ed.). The handbook of Chinese psychology: 280–293. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G. 2001a. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. 2001b. Culture’s recent consequences: Using dimension scores in theory and research. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 1: 11–30.
Hofstede, G. 2002. Dimensions do not exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney. Human Relations, 55(11): 1355–1361.
Hofstede, G. 2007. Asian management in the 21st century. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 411–420.
Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. 2005. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Holden, N. J. 2002. Cross-cultural management: A knowledge management perspective. Harlow, England: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
Hong, Y.-Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C.-Y., & Benet-Martinez, V. 2000. Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55: 709–720.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., & Dorfman, P. W. (Eds). 2004. Leadership, culture and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. 2005. Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Leung, K. 2006. The rise of East Asia: Implications for research on cultural variations and globalization. Journal of International Management, 12(2): 235–241.
Leung, K., Bhagat, R. S., Buchan, N. R., Erez, M., & Gibson, C. B. 2005. Culture and international business: Recent advances and their implications for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36: 357–378.
Lewis, M. W. 2000. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4): 760–776.
Li, Y., & Peng, M. W. 2008. Developing theory from strategic management research in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25: 563–572.
Lu, Y., Tsang, E. W. K., & Peng, M. W. 2008. Knowledge management and innovation strategy in the Asia Pacific. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25: 361–374.
McSweeney, B. 2002. Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith—A failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1): 89–118.
Meredith, R. 2006. The elephant and the dragon: The rise of India and China and what it means for all of us. New York: Norton.
Meyer, K. E. 2006. Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 119–137.
Nisbett, R. E. 2003. The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently—And why. London: Nicholas Brealey.
Osland, J. S., & Bird, A. 2000. Beyond sophisticated stereotyping: Cultural sensemaking in context. Academy of Management Executive, 14: 65–79.
Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. 1999. Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54(9): 741–754.
Peng, M. W. 2007. Celebrating 25 years of Asia Pacific management research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 385–393.
Peng, M. W. 2009. APJM’s first Best Paper Award. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26 (in press) doi:10.1007/s10490-009-9132-9.
Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. I. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39: 920–936.
Popper, K. R. 1959/2002. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
Rokeach, M. 1973. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
Sackmann, S. A., & Phillips, M. E. 2004. One’s many cultures: A multiple cultures perspective. In N. A. Boyacigiller, R. A. Goodman & M. E. Phillips (Eds.). Crossing cultures: Insights from master teachers: 38–47. New York: Routledge.
Schwartz, S. H. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology, 25: 1–65. New York: Academic.
Singh, K. 2007. The limited relevance of culture to strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 421–428.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I would like to thank Klaus E. Meyer for allowing me to borrow the title of his APJM article “Asian management research needs more self-confidence” as the main title for this paper. Special thanks go to Mike Peng (Editor-in-Chief) and Klaus E. Meyer for their comments on earlier versions of the paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fang, T. Asian management research needs more self-confidence: Reflection on Hofstede (2007) and beyond. Asia Pac J Manag 27, 155–170 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9134-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9134-7