Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The many futures of Asian business groups

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What does the future hold for Asian business groups? This paper discusses three rival hypotheses whose predictions for the future of Asian business groups differ from the predictions of the prevailing institutional voids hypothesis. The latter is a two stage model that posits that business groups first emerge to solve market failures for affiliated firms. Subsequently government initiates the construction of a “soft market infrastructure” that plug institutional voids and so weakens the rationale for group affiliation. Groups should then unravel and dissolve. Yet, business groups remain important in Asian countries that have attained high levels of market development, which casts doubt on the institutional voids hypothesis. In this paper I review three alternative hypotheses of business group development—life cycle, state-led industrialization, and crony capitalism perspectives. A synthesis of these rival hypotheses suggests that Asian business groups are likely to persist in many possible future scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abegaz, B. 2005. The diversified business group as an innovative organizational model for large state-enterprise reform in China and Vietnam. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 5(5/6): 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, H., & Wolfenzon, D. 2006. Should business groups be dismantled? The equilibrium costs of efficient internal capital markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 79: 99–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. 1989. Asia's next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. H., & Euh, Y.-D. 1993. South Korea’s 1980s financial reforms: Good-bye financial repression (maybe), hello new institutional restraints. World Development, 21(3): 379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., Mehta, P., & Mullainathan, S. 2002. Ferreting out tunneling: An application to Indian business groups. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1): 121–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggart, N. W., & Hamilton, G. G. 1992. On the limits of a firm-based theory to explain business networks: The Western bias of neoclassical economics. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action: 471–490. Boston: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. 2004. Institutional change and globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M. 2004. The institutions of industrial restructuring in Southeast Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M. 2008. Asian business groups: Context, governance, and performance. Oxford UK: Chandos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M., & Gedajlovic, E. 2003. Strategic innovation and the administrative heritage of East Asian Chinese family business groups. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20: 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S.-J. 2006. Business groups in East Asia: Post-crisis restructuring and new growth. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J., & Choi, U. 1988. Strategy structure and performance of Korean business groups. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 37(2): 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, H.-M. 2006. Managerial ties, control and deregulation: An investigation of business groups entering the deregulated banking industry in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): 505–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. 2000a. East Asian corporations: heroes or villains?, World Bank discussion paper 409: World Bank.

  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. 2000b. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58: 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2006. Business groups and their types. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): 419–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewenter, K., Novaes, W., & Pettway, R. 2001. Visibility versus complexity in business groups evidence from Japanese Keiretsu. Journal of Business, 74(1): 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman, M., & Sachs, W. 2006. Oscillating between a relationship-based and a market-based model: The Salim Group. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): 521–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drori, G. S., Jang, Y. S., & Meyer, J. W. 2006. Sources of rationalized governance: Cross-national longitudinal analyses, 1985–2002. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(2): 205–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Encarnation, D. J. 1989. Dislodging multinationals: India's strategy in comparative perspective. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. 1979. Dependent development: the alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisman, R. 2001. Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review, 91(4): 1095–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisman, R., & Khanna, T. 2004. Facilitating development: The role of business groups. World Development, 32(4): 609–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, E., Johnson, S., & Mitton, T. 2003. Propping and tunneling. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(4): 732–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, M. L. 1992. Alliance capitalism: The social organization of Japanese business. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, R. 2000. Globalizing corporate governance: Convergence of form or function. New York: Columbia Law school Center for Law and Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1994. Business groups. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedburg (eds.). The handbook of economic sociology: 453–475. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Granovetter, M. 2005. Business groups and social organization. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedburg (eds.). The handbook of economic sociology. (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillen, M. F. 2000. Business groups in emerging economies: A resource based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 362–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S. 1990. Pathways from the periphery: The politics of growth in the newly industrializing countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S. 2001. Politics, institutions and globalization: The aftermath of the Asian financial crisis. American Asian Review, 19(2): 71–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W., Zelner, B., & Guillen, M. 2005. The worldwide diffusion market oriented infrastructure reform 1977–1999. American Sociological Review, 70: 871–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. 1995. East Asian latecomer firms: Learning the technology of electronics. World Development, 23: 1171–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchcroft, P. 1991. Oligarchs and cronies in the Philippine state: The politics of patrimonial plunder. World Politics, 43(3): 414–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, D. 2003. Crony capitalism: Corruption and development in South Korea and the Philippines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. 1994. Top executive rewards and Firm performance: A comparison of Japan and the US. Journal of Political Economy, 102(3): 510–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kedia, B. L., Mukherjee, D., & Lahiri, S. 2006. Indian business groups: Evolution and transformation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): 559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keister, L. A. 1998. Engineering growth: Business groups structure and firm performance in China’s transition economy. American Journal of Sociology, 104: 404–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keister, L. A. 2000. Chinese business groups: The structure and impact of interfirm relations during economic development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4): 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. 2001. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 45–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Yafeh, Y. 2005. Business groups and risk sharing around the world. Journal of Business, 78: 301–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., Kogan, E., & Palepu, K. 2006. Globalization and similarities in corporate governance: A cross-country analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(1): 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Yafeh, Y. 2007. Business groups in emerging markets: paragons or parasites? Journal of Economic Literature, 45(2): 331–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Hoskisson, R. E., & Wan, W. P. 2004. Power dependence, diversification strategy, and performance in keiretsu member firms. Strategic Management Journal, 25(7): 613–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock, C. J., & Guillén, M. F. 2001. Strategy and structure in developing countries: Business groups as an evolutionary response to opportunities for unrelated diversification. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10: 77–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Peng, M. W., & Lee, K. 2008. From diversification premium to diversification discount during institutional transitions. Journal of World Business, 43: 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leff, N. H. 1978. Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: The economic groups. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26: 661–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J. R., & Gerlach, M. L. 2004. Japan’s network economy: Structure, persistence, and change. Cambridge United Kingdom: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., & Yao, J. 2006. Impact of state ownership and control mechanisms on the performance of group affiliated companies in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 485–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Chung, C. N. 2005. Keeping it all in the family: The role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3): 404–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X., Yao, X., & Xi, Y. 2006. Business group affiliation and performance in the transition economy: A focus on the ownership voids. Asia-Pacific Journal of management, 23(4): 467–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. A. 1999. A Silicon island of the east: Creating a semiconductor industry in Singapore. California Management Review, 41: 55–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. 1994. Rationalized environments. In W. R. Scott & J. W. Meyer (eds.). Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism: 28–54. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R. K., Strangeland, D. A., & Yeung, B. 1998. Inherited wealth, corporate control and economic growth: The Canadian disease. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papersw6814.

  • Morck, R. K., Wolfenzon, D., & Yeung, B. 2005. Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 43: 655–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., & Yeung, B. 2004. Family control and the rent seeking society. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28: 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morikawa, H. 1992. Zaibatsu: The rise and fall of family enterprise groups in Japan. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mursitama, T. N. 2006. Creating relational rents: The effect of business groups on affiliated firms’ performance in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): 537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, G. W. 1998. Collective action in East Asia: How ruling parties shape industrial policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P. 2001. China and the global economy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. 1985. Triad power: The coming shape of global competition. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Delios, A. 2006. What determines the scope of the firm over time and around the world? An Asia Pacific perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): 385–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., Lee, S.-H., & Wang, D. Y. L. 2005. What determines the scope of the firm over time? A Focus on institutional relatedness. Academy of Management Review, 30(3): 622–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perotti, E. C., & Gelfer, S. 2001. Red barons or robber barons? Governance and investment in Russian financial–industrial groups. European Economic Review, 9: 1601–1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prowse, S. D. 1996. Corporate finance in international perspective: Legal and regulatory influences on financial system development. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic Review: 2–16.

  • Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. 2003. The great reversals: The politics of financial development in the 20th century. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1): 5–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. 2000. A multilevel model of privatization in emerging economies. Academy of Management Review, 25(3): 525–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. 2000. The dark side of internal capital markets: Divisional rent-seeking and inefficient investment. The Journal of Finance, 55(6): 2537–2564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, H. W. 1976. Family and other business groups in economic development: The case of Nicaragua. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, E. 1991. The four little dragons: The spread of industrialization in East Asia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. 2004. Stakeholders, structure, and failures of corporate governance reform initiatives in post-crisis Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(1/2): 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 196–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zutshi, R., & Gibbons, P. 1998. The Internationalization process of Singapore Government Linked companies: A contextual review. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15(2): 219–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. John Molson School of Business, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd., West, Montreal, QC, H3G 1M8, Canada

    Michael Carney

Authors
  1. Michael Carney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Carney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carney, M. The many futures of Asian business groups. Asia Pac J Manage 25, 595–613 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9092-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9092-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation