Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social tie, social capital, and social behavior: Toward an integrative model of informal exchange

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What is the unique nature of social capital that differentiates itself from other forms of capital? How should we conceptualize and operationalize social capital? What are the major drivers and outcomes of social capital? To address the three questions, I apply the duality lens—the perspective of regarding each entity as a paradox consisting of two contrasting yet interdependent components—to social capital for an integrative model of informal exchange. The focus of this paper is on the duality relationship between the content variables (social tie, social capital, social behavior along two basic dimensions: trust for tie strength and option for network structure) and the process variables (antecedent, content, process, and consequence) toward a geocentric framework of formal–informal exchange. I intend to make two contributions. First, the conceptualization and operationalization of social capital is developed from the duality lens of formal–informal exchange so as to identify the unique nature of social capital as an informal entity. Second, a holistic, dynamic, and dialectic model of social capital is provided to explore the causal links between various elements related to social capital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, P. S. 2001. Market, hierarchy and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12: 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27: 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adner, R., & Levinthal, D. A. 2004. What is not a real option: Considering boundaries for the application of real options to business strategy. Academy of Management Review, 29: 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barringer, B. R., & Harrison, J. S. 2000. Walking a tightrope: Creative value through interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 26: 367–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian, Y. 1997. Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62: 366–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian, Y. 2001. Guanxi capital and social eating in Chinese cities: Theoretical models and empirical analysis. In Lin, N., Cook, K., & Burt, R. S. (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 275–295). NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1996. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China’s emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 600–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. 2003. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29: 991–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1985. The form of capital. In Richardson, J. G. (Ed.), The handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, E. H., & Hurry, D. 1993. Strategy through the option lens: An integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. Academy of Management Review, 18: 760–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. 1989. Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15: 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1998. Competing on the edge: Strategy as structural chaos. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. 2001. Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In Lin, N., Cook, K., & Burt, R. S. (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 31–56). NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110: 349–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinal, L. B., Sitkin, S. B., & Long, C. P. 2004. Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organization Science, 15: 411–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M. 2005. Globalization and the renewal of Asian business networks. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. P., & Chen, C. C. 2004. On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi: A process model of guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal Management, 21: 305–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, I. H., & Ng, I. 2004. The characteristics of Chinese personal ties (guanxi): Evidence from Hong Kong. Organization Studies, 25: 1075–1093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. A. 1994. Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic management. NY: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B. 2001. Trust, control and risk in strategic alliances. Organization Studies, 22: 251–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L., & Hamel, G. 1998. Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 1995. Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in an age of alliance capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 26: 461–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989a. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environment. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 543–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989b. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Journal, 14: 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1105–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farh, J. L., Early, P. C., & Lin, S. C. 1997. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 421–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farh, J. L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, C., & Cheng, B. S. 1998. The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9: 471–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flap, H. 1994. No man is an island: The research program of a social capital theory. Presented at the World Congress of Sociology, Bielefeld, Germany.

  • Flap, H., & Boxman, E. 2001. Getting started: The influence of social capital on the start of the occupational career. In Lin, N., Cook, K., & Burt, R. S. (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 159–181). NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, F. J. 2005. Identity orientations and forms social exchange in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30: 737–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, D. E. 2004. Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 238–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. 2004. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Working Paper. New York University.

  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. 1995. Development of leader–manager exchange (LEM) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6: 219–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1983. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1: 201–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1992. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. C. (Eds.), Networks and organizations (pp. 25–56). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 2002. A theoretical agenda for economic sociology. In Gillen, M., Collins, R., England, P., & Meyer, M. (Eds.), The new economic sociology: Developments in an emerging field (pp. 35–61). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. 1995. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimer, C. A. 1992. Doing your job and helping your friends: Universalistic norms about obligations to particular others in networks. In Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. C. (Eds.), Networks and organizations (pp. 143–164). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E. 1997. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 339–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. 2003. Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Paper presented at the Conference of Informal Institutions and Politics in Latin America, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame.

  • Hitt, M. A., Lee, H., & Yucel, E. 2002. The importance of social capital to the management of multinational enterprises: Relational networks among Asian and Western firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19: 353–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilinitch, A. Y., D’Aveni, R. A., & Lewin, A. 1996. New organisational forms and strategies for managing in hypercompetitive environment. Organization Science, 7: 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. J. 1988. Toward a theory of marketing control: Environmental context, control types, and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 52(2): 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. 1997. A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22: 911–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. 1994. Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 656–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2003. Social capital in multinational corporations and a micro–macro model of its formation. Academy of Management Review, 28: 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, R., Martin, X., & Noordeerhaven, N. G. 2006. When does trust matter to alliance performance? Academy of Management Journal, 49: 894–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D., & Cross, R. 2004. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50: 1477–1490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. 1985. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63: 967–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. 1998. Towards a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxical approach. Organization Studies, 19: 829–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. 2003. Toward a geocentric theory of multinational evolution: The implications from the Asian MNEs as latecomers. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20: 217–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. 2005a. The puzzle of China’s township-village enterprises: The paradox of local corporatism in a dual-track economic transition. Management and Organization Review, 1: 197–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. J. 2005b. The formation of managerial networks of foreign firms in China: The effects of strategic orientation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 423–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. 2006a. Guanxi as the Chinese norm for personalized social capital: Toward an integrated duality framework of informal exchange. In Yeung, H. W. (Ed.), Handbook of research on Asian business (pp. 62–83). London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. 2006b. The duality of trust-as-attitude and trust-as-choice: A relationship-embedded model of interactive trust-building cycle. Working paper, California State University, Stanislaus.

  • Lin, N. 1999. Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 467–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. 2001. Social capital: A theory of social: Structure and action. NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. 2002. How the East and the West shall meet. Development and Society, 31: 211–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, C. P., & Sitkin, S. B. 2004. Trust in balance: How managers integrate trust-building and task control. Working paper 2004-10-002, Olin School of Business, Washington University.

  • Lovett, S., Simmons, L. C., & Kali, R. 1999. Guanxi versus the market: Ethics and efficiency. Journal of International Business Studies, 30: 231–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. 1979. Trust and power. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20: 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D. J. 1995. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 24–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. 2003. Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14: 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G., Ferrier, W. J., & Mendelow, A. L. 2004. Real options as engines of choice and heterogeneity. Academy of Management Review, 29: 86–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Lynn, S., & Cook, J. M. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 415–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E. 2006. Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Management Journal, 23: 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. 1994. Fit, failure, and the hall of fame: How companies succeed and fail. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morand, D. A. 1995. The role of behavioral formality and informality in the enactment of bureaucratic versus organic organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20: 831–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P., & Provost, C. 1973. Measurement of cultural complexity. Ethnology, 12: 379–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23:242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, I., & Chow, I. H. 2005. Does networking with colleagues matter in enhancing job performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 405–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. 2002. Trust: Forms, foundations, functions, failures and figures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Numagani, T. 1998. The infeasibility of invariant laws in management studies: A reflective dialogue in defense of case studies. Organization Science, 9: 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. 1951. The social system. NY: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. 1960. Pattern variables revisited: A response to Robert Dubin. American Sociological Review, 25: 467–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejovich, S. 1999. The effects of the interaction of formal and informal institutions on social stability and economic development. Journal of Markets & Morality, 2: 164–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28: 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. S. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21: 492–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., Lee, S., & Wang, D. 2005. What determines the scope of the firm over time? A focus on institutional relatedness. Academy of Management Review, 30: 622–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Zhou, J. Q. 2005. How network strategies and institutional transitions evolve in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 321–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Y. 2004. Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China’s transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology, 109: 1045–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillai, R., Schriesheim, C. A., & Willaims, E. S. 1999. Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of Management, 25: 897–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. 2002. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23: 707–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. 1998. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 22: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. 2000. The two meanings of social capita. Sociological Forum, 15: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. In Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (Eds.). Research in organizational behavior, 12 (pp. 295–336). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. 1990. The core competence of the organizations. Harvard Business Review, 90(3): 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. 1993. Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L. 1996. Trust and breach of psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 574–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roniger, L. 1994. The comparative study of clientelism and the changing nature of civil society in the contemporary world. In Roniger, L., & Gunes-Ayata, A. (Eds.), Democracy, clientelism, and civil society (pp. 1–18). London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. 2003. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49: 751–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruef, M. 2002. Strong ties, weak ties and islands: Structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11: 427–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saparito, P. A., Chen, C. C., & Sapienza, H. J. 2004. The role of relational trust in bank–small firm relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 400–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. 2003. Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems (5th edition). Eaglewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B. S., & Baum, J. A. 2002. Alliance-based competitive dynamics. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 791–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. 1978. The philosophy of money. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. 2000. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intra-group trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 102–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J. 1998. Understanding the constitution of interorganizational trust. In Lane, C., & Bachmann, R. (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations: Conceptual issues and empirical applications (pp. 31–63). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, F., & Xi, Y. 2006. Exploring dynamic multi-level linkages in inter-organizational networks. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, T. W., Reuer, J. J., & Peng, M. W. 2007. International joint ventures and the value of real options. Academy of Management Journal (in press).

  • Triandis, H. C. 1988. Collectivism vs. individualism: A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural social psychology. In Verma, G. K., & Bagley, C. (Eds.), Cross-cultural studies of personality, attitudes, and cognition (pp. 60–95). New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 464–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. 2004. Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asian Pacific Management Journal, 21: 491–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1951. The religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., & Frank, K. A. 2001. Network capital in a multilevel world: Getting support from personal communities. In Lin, N., Cook, K., & Burt, R. S. (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 233–273). NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieselquist, J., Rusbult, C. E., Foster, C. A., & Agnew, C. R. 1999. Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77: 942–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1993. Calculativeness, trust and economic organisation. Journal of Law and Economics, 36: 453–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, A., & Tjosvold, D. 2006. Collectivist values for learning in organizational relationships in China: The role of trust and vertical coordination. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 299–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, A., Tjosvold, D., & Zhang, P. 2005. Supply chain relationships for customer satisfaction in China: Interdependence and cooperative goals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M. 1998. Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27: 151–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W., & Leung, A. 2005. Does a micro–macro link exist between managerial value of reciprocity, social capital and firm performance? The case of SMEs in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 445–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., Cook, K. S., & Watabe, M. 1998. Uncertainty, trust, and commitment formation in the United States and Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 104: 165–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M. M. 1994. Gifts, favors, and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M. M. 2002. The resilience of guanxi and its new deployments: A critique of some new guanxi scholarship. China Quarterly, 170: 459–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W. C. 2006. Change and continuity in Southeastern Asian ethic Chinese business. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 229–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenger, T. R., Lazzarini, S. G., & Poppo, L. 2002. Informal and formal organization in new institutional economics. In Ingram, P., & Silverman, B. S. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in strategic management (pp. 275–303). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Business Administration, California State University, Stanislaus, 801 West Monte Vista Avenue, Turlock, CA, 95382, USA

    Peter Ping Li

Authors
  1. Peter Ping Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Ping Li.

Additional information

I thank Mike Peng (Editor-in-Chief) for his comments and suggestions to improve this manuscript. I also express my gratitude to Yung Hua (Managing Editor) for her editorial help.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, P.P. Social tie, social capital, and social behavior: Toward an integrative model of informal exchange. Asia Pacific J Manage 24, 227–246 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-9031-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-9031-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation