Abstract
In this study, we have developed a SYBR Green™ I-based real-time multiplexed PCR assay for the detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Gulf of Mexico water (gulf water), artificially seeded and natural oysters targeting three hemolysin genes, tlh, tdh and trh in a single reaction. Post-amplification melt-temperature analysis confirmed the amplification of all three targeted genes with high specificity. The detection sensitivity was 10 cfu (initial inoculum) in 1 ml of gulf water or oyster tissue homogenate, following 5 h enrichment. The results showed 58% of the oysters to be positive for tlh, indicating the presence of V. parahaemolyticus; of which 21% were positive for tdh; and 0.7% for trh, signifying the presence of pathogenic strains. The C t values showed that oyster tissue matrix had some level of inhibition, whereas the gulf water had negligible effect on PCR amplification. The assay was rapid (~8 h), specific and sensitive, meeting the ISSC guidelines. Rapid detection using real-time multiplexed PCR will help reduce V. parahaemolyticus-related disease outbreaks, thereby increasing consumer confidence and economic success of the seafood industry.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Vibrio parahaemolyticus, a Gram-negative, facultative halophilic bacterium is commonly found in warm coastal waters worldwide (Twedt 1989). Shellfish and other bivalves accumulate this pathogen in their tissue during filter-feeding, and could cause gastroenteritis in humans who consumed raw or poorly cooked seafood (DePaola et al. 1990). Although the illnesses caused by this organism are usually self-limiting, in some severe cases dehydration or bloody diarrhea may persist, resulting in hospitalization of the patient and/or prolonged antibiotic treatment (Shevchuk et al.1986; Miyamoto et al.1969; Morris 2003). Sporadic cases of V. parahaemolyticus-related gastroenteritis due to the consumption of raw oysters in humans primarily along the coastal states in the United States and other countries such as Japan and South East Asia have been documented (Alam and Miyoshi 2003; DePaola et al.1990, 2003; Hara-Kudo et al.2003; Ijumba 1984; Robert-Pillot et al.2004). The first recorded outbreak in the United States was reported in 1971 in Maryland (CFSAN 2000) including 10 cases followed by a relatively larger outbreak in 1998 in the Pacific Northwest United States affecting 209 individuals and including 1 death (CDC 1999). This has led to the Interstate Shellfish Sanitation Conference (ISSC 2000), FDA and seafood industry to seriously consider the development of a nucleic acid-based rapid detection of this pathogen to ensure the safety of post-harvest processed (PHP) shellfish for human consumption at the highest level, thereby protecting consumer health. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) methods of pathogen detection, using fluorogenic DNA-binding dyes or fluorescent-labeled oligonucleotide probes, have been shown to be effective, rapid and sensitive method for detection of vibrios (Fukushima et al.2003; Kim et al. 2008; Lo et al. 2008; Panicker et al.2004; Qin et al. 2008; Rosec et al. 2009; Wittwer et al. 2001). Using this approach, recently a nucleic acid-based real-time PCR with Taqman™ fluorescence probes targeting V. parahaemolyticus three hemolysin genes, the thermolabile hemolysin (tlh), thermostable direct hemolysin (tdh) (Tada et al.1992; Takeda 1982; Taniguchi et al.1985, 1986) and thermostable-related hemolysin (trh) genes have been described for rapid detection of total and pathogenic strains of this pathogen in shellfish (Membrillo-Hernandez 1997; Nordstrom et al.2007; Ward and Bej 2006). In another study, Taqman™ probe-based real-time PCR was developed for the detection of a newly emerged pandemic V. parahaemolyticus O3:K6 in Gulf of Mexico water targeting a segment of the ORF8 DNA (Okuda et al.1997; Myers et al.2003 Rizvi et al.2006). However, since the first appearance in 1996 in the U.S. causing an outbreak of gastroenteritis disease, the pandemic V. parahaemolyticus O3:K6 serogroup strain has not been further isolated. Therefore, the importance of this pathogen in the U.S. coastal waters and seafood harvested from these areas has become less significant. Although the Taqman™ probe-based real-time PCR has been shown to be effective for rapid and specific detection of this pathogen, this approach could be relatively costly. Therefore a cost-effective detection method for routine monitoring of PHP oysters that will maintain the highest level of product safety without compromising the market cost of the product is desirable. Recently, real-time PCR using DNA-binding fluorescent dye SYBR green has been reported for the detection of pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus in shellfish targeting a single gene tdh (Tyagi et al. 2009). In addition, conventional PCR detection of V. parahaemolyticus in Middle Black Sea Coast of Turkey by targeting the tlh, tdh and trh genes has been reported (Terzi et al. 2009). Here we describe a rapid, specific, sensitive and cost-effective multiplexed SYBR Green™ I-based real-time PCR detection of total and pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus in shellfish and gulf water targeting all three targeted genes tlh, tdh, and trh simultaneously in a single reaction in an effort to reduce shellfish-related V. parahaemolyticus-illnesses.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains and microbiological media
All V. parahaemolyticus strains used in this study, along with other various Vibrio strains, are listed in Table 1. V. parahaemolyticus was cultured in T1N1 broth medium [10% (w/v) tryptone, 1% (w/v) NaCl] or on T1N3 agar plates (10% tryptone, 3% NaCl) (Atlas 1993) at 35°C overnight. All other strains were grown and maintained as follows: all V. vulnificus strains were grown on one-half strength marine agar or broth (Becton–Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ); V. cholera was grown on Luria–Bertani (LB) agar or broth (Atlas and Bej 1990); V. alginolyticus, V. campbelli, V. furnisii, and V. mimicus were all grown on full strength marine agar or broth.
DNA purification for PCR optimization
Genomic DNA from an overnight (1.5 ml) culture of V. parahaemolyticus F113A was purified by following method described by Ausubel et al. (1987). Purified DNA was resuspended in Tris–EDTA (pH 8.0) buffer (Ausubel et al. 1987) and the concentration measured in a Lambda II spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer, Shelton, CT) at a wavelength of 260 nm.
Oligonucleotide primers
A segment of the thermolabile hemolysin encoding gene, tlh, was targeted for the detection of all V. parahaemolyticus; thermostable direct hemolysin encoding gene, tdh, and the tdh related gene, trh were also targeted for the pathogenic strains of V. parahaemolyticus. The description of the primers including the nucleotide sequence, position within the gene, length and the T m values are presented in Table 2. The T m values of all of the primers were determined using the equation [T m (°C) = 2(A + T) + 4(G + C)] (Bej et al. 1991; Rychlik and Rhoads 1989). All primers were custom synthesized by Integrated DNA Technology, Inc., Coralville, IA.
Optimization of PCR
Purified DNA from V. parahaemolyticus F113A was used for the optimization of the PCR (Bej et al. 1999). The PCR consisted of 1× PCR buffer [10× buffer consisted of 200 mM Tris–Cl (pH 8.4), 500 mM KCl], 1.5, 2.5 or 3.5 μl of PCR Enhancer mixture (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA), 2.5, 3 or 4 mM MgCl2; 0.2, 0.6 or 1 μM each of the tlh, tdh and trh primers, 200 μM of each dNTP (Sigma-Aldrich), 1×, 2× or 4× SYBR Green™ I nucleic acid fluorescent dye (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), three units of thermostable DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) and autoclaved (121°C under 15 psi for 20 min) MilliQ water (Millipore, Bedford, MA) to bring the total reaction volume to 25 μl.
The PCR temperature cycling parameters used for the optimization of the amplification reaction are described below: initial denaturation of the template DNA at 95°C for 120 s followed by ample number of amplification cycles to surpass the threshold cycle by six cycles. These amplification cycles consisted of denaturation of the template DNA at 94°C for 15 or 20 s, primer annealing at 52°C, 56°C or 60°C for 15 or 30 s, and primer extension at 72°C for 25 or 45 s. All PCR amplification reactions were performed in a Cepheid™ Smart Cycler instrument (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA). Following PCR amplification, the sizes of the amplicons were confirmed by 2% (w/v) NuSeive 3:1 (FMC Bioproducts, Philadelphia, PA) agarose gel (Ausubel et al. 1987), and the results were documented digitally using a Kodak ds120 photo documentation system and 1D image analysis software (ver. 3) (Kodak, Rochester, NY).
Specificity of the PCR
The specificity of the primers to their respective targeted genes was confirmed by using the BLAST search program (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and by PCR amplification in multiplexed format on 44 V. parahaemolyticus strains and other Vibrio spp. using the PCR parameters described above (Table 1).
Sensitivity of the PCR
Purified genomic DNA from V. parahaemolyticus F113A was tenfold serially diluted (1.0 μg/μl to 0.1 pg/μl) in sterile distilled water. PCR amplifications were performed using optimized concentrations of reagents and temperature cycling parameters as described in the results section. Positive amplifications of the targeted gene segments were identified by the melt temperatures, which were generated by the melt curve analysis by the Cepheid™ Smart Cycler software (ver. 2d). The amplicon sizes were confirmed by gel electrophoresis using a 2% (w/v) NuSeive 3:1 agarose gel. This experiment was performed in triplicate to ensure a consistent level of detection.
Detection of V. parahaemolyticus in pure culture
A stationary-phase V. parahaemolyticus F113A culture (4.6 × 107 cfu/ml) grown overnight culture was tenfold serially diluted to extinction. Then cells were collected by centrifugation at 9,300×g for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the cells were resuspended in 100 μl of Instagene™ Matrix consisting of specially formulated Chelex™ resin (BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The samples were then incubated at 56°C for 10 min, vortexed intermittently for 1 min and then boiled for 6 min. For each 25 μl PCR, 3 μl of the Instagene™ treated boiled sample was used as a source of the template DNA. All experiments were conducted in triplicate in order to evaluate the reliability of the sensitivity of detection.
Detection of V. parahaemolyticus in gulf water
An overnight culture of V. parahaemolyticus F113A was inoculated in fresh T1N1 broth in 1:10 ratio, and grown at 37°C until the OD450nm reached 0.2. The culture was centrifuged and cell pellet was resuspended in autoclaved Gulf of Mexico water (gulf water from herein). The viable plate count on T1N3 agar plate was determined to be 4.6 × 107 cfu/ml. The culture was then subjected to tenfold serial dilution to extinction in 10 ml of autoclaved gulf water and enriched at 37°C for 5 h in a rotary shaker incubator set at 150 rpm. The gulf water was collected from Dauphin Island, AL and the salinity was determined to be 27 ± 3 ppt (n = 5) using a refractometer (Reichert Scientific Instruments, Buffalo, NY). The cells were then collected by centrifugation; supernatant was carefully discarded, and the cells were resuspended in 100 μl of Instagene™ Matrix (BioRad) and used for PCR amplification as described above. To determine the consistency of the level of detection, all experiments were conducted in triplicate.
Detection of V. parahaemolyticus in seeded oysters
All oyster samples were obtained from a local seafood store in Birmingham, AL. A pure culture of V. parahaemolyticus F113A was grown in T1N1 broth until the OD450nm reached to 0.2. The viable plate count of 107 cfu/ml was determined on T1N3 agar plates (Atlas 1993). The culture was then tenfold serially diluted in T1N1 broth to extinction and 10 ml of each dilution was added to an additional 50 ml of T1N1 broth and 1 ml of homogenized oyster shell stock (ISSC, 2000). After 5 h of enrichment in a rotary shaker incubator (Innova 4000) set at 150 rpm and 37°C, 1 ml aliquots were collected by centrifugation at 9,500×g for 10 min. The supernatant was carefully discarded using a micropipette, and the cell pellet was resuspended in 100 μl of Instagene™ Matrix (BioRad) and treated to release template DNA as described above. For each SYBR Green™ I PCR, 3 μl of the supernatant of the boiled samples were used as a source of template DNA. Unseeded oyster homogenate shell stock (1 ml) was enriched and treated in Instagene™ matrix as described above, and used as a control. All experiments were conducted in triplicate in order to evaluate the reliability of the sensitivity of detection.
Detection of V. parahaemolyticus in natural oysters
A total of 24 oysters were collected from the Gulf of Mexico water near Dauphin Island, Alabama during the month of June 2007. Collected oysters were immediately chilled and cleaned with 70% (v/v) alcohol with a scrubbing brush using standard method (Kaysner et al. 1992; NSSP 1997). The oysters were shucked, and the shell stock homogenized in an autoclaved Waring Blender (Fisher Scientific). An aliquot (30 ml) of the samples from each group was then enriched for 5 h in T1N1 broth as described above. Enriched samples were aliquoted and stored in −80°C until used for PCR. DNA from the enriched samples were purified using the Instagene™ Matrix as described above and 3 μl was used for the multiplexed PCR amplification. Purified genomic DNA from V. parahaemolyticus F113A strain consisting of all three hemolysin genes were spiked into 3 μl Instagene™ treated oyster homogenate and PCR amplified to determine that negative detection of the samples was not due to the inhibition of the reaction by the oyster tissue matrix.
Results
Primer selection and optimization of real-time PCR
The primers for the tlh gene target amplified the expected 173 bp DNA fragment for each of the 44 V. parahaemolyticus strains tested, however tlh amplification was negative for the rest of the non-parahaemolyticus vibrios and non-vibrio species. This suggests that the R-TLH-731 and L-TLH-933 primers are specific for the detection of genus V. parahaemolyticus. Only 26 (~59%) of the V. parahaemolyticus strains tested positive for tdh and only 19 (~ 43%) for trh, showing that not all of the isolates tested were pathogenic. Amplification of tlh, tdh and trh was evident by the fluorescent detection displaying the expected amplicon melt temperature values (Table 2) and was confirmed by gel electrophoresis (not shown).
To achieve consistent and detectable level of fluorescence during the melt-temperature analysis for all amplicons, the tlh primer was sufficient at 0.2 μM concentration, whereas the tdh and trh primer needed to be 0.6 μM. The SYBR Green™ I dye was most favorable at a 2× concentration. The MgCl2 concentration of 3 mM along with 2.5 μl of enhancer mixture was found to be optimum for the assay.
The following PCR cycling parameters were used for efficient and consistent amplification of the targeted gene sequences: initial denaturation of the template DNA for 120 s at 95°C followed by 6 cycles of amplification cycles surpassing the threshold cycle (C t ). The amplification cycles consisted of a denaturation of the template DNA at 94°C for 15 s, annealing at 56°C for 15 s, and extension for 25 s at 72°C for consistent results.
Sensitivity of detection
A minimum of 10 pg of purified genomic DNA from V. parahaemolyticus F113A displayed a detectable level of positive amplification for all three gene targets with the C t value of 27.36 ± 1.53 (Table 3). The amplification was evident with the DNA melt temperatures (Fig. 1) and confirmed by gel electrophoresis displaying the DNA bands of expected size of 173 bp, 217 bp, and 270 bp for tlh, trh and tdh, respectively (data not shown). Increasing C t values with the expected melt temperatures were observed as the amount of initial template DNA increased (Table 3). This level of detection of genomic DNA is comparable to approximately 103 cfu V. parahaemolyticus (Atlas and Bej 1990). A good linear correlation of the samples with positive PCR amplification was found between the C t values and the concentration of purified DNA (n = 3; r 2 = 0.99) (Fig. 2).
Detection of V. parahaemolyticus in pure cultures
The level of detection of an unenriched V. parahaemolyticus in pure culture was 107 cfu/ml with a C t value of 24.56 ± 1.53 and amplicon melt temperatures of 84.45 ± 0.13°C (tlh), 81.83 ± 0.24°C (tdh), and 80.08 ± 0.06°C (trh) (Table 4). This level of detection was consistent with three individual reactions.
Detection of V. parahaemolyticus in seeded gulf water
The minimum level of detection of all three hemolysin genes following 5 h enrichment of gulf waters samples of a serial dilution consisted of an inoculum of 10 cfu/ml prior to enrichment. The observed C t value for this sample was 25.35 ± 0.06 and the amplicon melt temperatures were approximately 84.46 ± 0.04, 81.72 ± 0.14, and 81.43 ± 0.2°C for targeted genes tlh, tdh, and trh, respectively (Table 5). This level of detection was found to be consistent in all replicates.
Detection of V. parahaemolyticus in seeded oysters
The sensitivity of detection of V. parahaemolyticus in 1.0 ml of oyster shell stock homogenate with initial inoculum of 101 cfu V. parahaemolyticus exhibited positive results of C t value of 27.42 ± 0.18 and T m values of 84.19 ± 0.52 (tlh), 81.32 ± 0.67 (tdh) and 80.70 ± 0.23 (trh) following 5 h of enrichment (Table 6). This detection level was reproducible for three individual samples tested. The positive results were confirmed by the post-amplification melt temperature analysis and gel electrophoresis (not shown). Oyster tissue samples without any added V. parahaemolyticus exhibited negative amplification results confirming that the positive amplifications and sensitivity of detection were a direct result of the seeded culture and not pre-existing V. parahaemolyticus in the oyster samples.
Detection of V. parahaemolyticus in natural oysters
Multiplexed PCR amplification on enriched 24 oyster homogenates exhibited positive amplification of tlh on 14 samples (~58%); three of these 14 tlh-positive samples (~21%) were positive for tdh. Also, one of the 14 tlh-positive samples (0.7%) amplified for the trh, but was negative for the tdh gene. The PCR amplified DNA were confirmed for the tlh (174 bp); tdh (270 bp); and trh (217 bp) by agarose gel (data not shown). Oyster samples spiked with V. parahaemolyticus F113A exhibited amplification of all three targeted hemolysin genes suggesting that negative amplification was not due to the inhibition by oyster tissue matrix.
Discussion
In this study, we have developed and optimized a multiplexed real-time PCR assay using SYBR Green™ I DNA-binding fluorescent dye targeting hemolysin genes for the detection of V. parahaemolyticus in gulf water and shellfish. For the detection of total V. parahemolyticus, a species-specific gene tlh was targeted; and for virulent strains two other hemolysin genes, tdh and trh were used (Bej et al. 1999; Terzi et al. 2009; Tyagi et al. 2009; Ward and Bej 2006). These 2 hemolysin genes specifically detect the pathogenic strains of V. parahaemolyticus that has recently been validated by Espiñeira et al. (2010). Real-time PCR with SYBR Green™ I DNA-binding fluorescent dye targeting tdh or the trh gene of V. parahaemolyticus has been reported (Fukushima et al. 2003). However, a comprehensive detection of all three hemolysin genes using SYBR Green™ I have not been described. In fact, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which a SYBR Green™ I-based real-time multiplexed PCR amplification targeting three genes segments simultaneously has been optimized and applied in shellfish (shell stock) and in gulf water. The strategy for the primer selection for the multiplexed PCR assay was to choose segments of the targeted genes (tlh, tdh and trh) that will generate distinguishable melt temperature values enabling us to identify the unlike fragments upon completion of the PCR. In our experience, at least 1°C difference between two targeted genes was necessary for the Cepheid™ Smart Cycler system to distinguish unlike fragments and reliably display distinct melt temperature values. Additionally, the differences in the amplicon lengths were kept within 100 bp so that the amplification of all three genes remains equally efficient. The use of the enhancer reagent in the reaction helps keep the formation of primer artifacts to a minimum level. Although in previous studies tlh, tdh and trh genes were shown to be specific for V. parahaemolyticus (Bej et al. 1999; Terzi et al. 2009; Tyagi et al. 2009; Ward and Bej 2006), however, since we have selected new primer sets in this study, it was necessary to test the specificity of the assay. The selected primers amplified only V. parahaemolyticus. It helped avoid false negative detection and generated realistic C t values for DNA and cfu. Multiplexed PCR with SYBR Green™ I enabled us to establish reliable and specific detection of this pathogen in shellfish and gulf water. Multiplexed PCR amplification of the V. parahaemolyicus culture without enrichment exhibited detection level of 106 cfu. A recent study by Terzi et al. (2009) also showed similar level of detection in pure cultures V. parahaemolyicus for all three targeted genes in single-tube reaction. However, 5 h enrichment of the oyster homogenate shell stock significantly improved the sensitivity of detection to 10 cfu in 10 ml of gulf water and 1 g of oyster tissue homogenate. Detection of 1 cfu of V. parahaemolyticus in oyster tissue homogenate following either 8 h (Rizvi et al. 2006) or an overnight (Ward and Bej 2006) enrichment by real-time PCR and Taqman™ probes has been reported. Haldar et al. (2010) has reported similar level (10–100 cells) of detection of several pathogenic Vibrio including V. parahaemlytics. In another study by Nordstrom et al. (2007), V. parahaemolyticus was detected at <10 cfu following MPN enrichment. In this study, we were able to achieve detection of initial inoculum (prior to enrichment) of 10 cfu of V. parahaemolyticus in 10 ml Gulf of Mexico water or 1 ml homogenized shell stock after 5 h of enrichment, which is well within the minimum level of detection recommended by the ISSC for safe consumption of oysters. Also <10 cfu V. parahaemolyticus in 1 g of oyster tissue homogenate is considered as “non-detectable” level and therefore safe for human consumption (ISSC 2000). A biochemical test by the identification of a β-type hemolysis on Wagatsuma blood agar referred as the Kanagawa phenomenon was considered to be closely associated with the pathogenicity of V. parahaemolyticus (Miyamoto et al. 1969; Wagatsuma 1968). However, this method of detection is laborious and lengthy. Current real-time PCR assay with SYBR Green™ I is rapid (~8 h to complete), specific to the targeted genes and reliable for the detection of V. parahaemolyticus in shellfish and gulf water. The standard curve from the multiplexed PCR amplification on purified V. parahaemolyticus DNA exhibited a good linear correlation among serially diluted samples. This was used to provide us with a reliable means to compare C t values and correlate the amount of V. parahaemolyticus DNA present in samples to that with cfu. Also, the levels of inhibition of PCR by the shellfish or gulf water samples matrix could be estimated. In this study, the C t values for enriched oyster tissue homogenate was approximately 1.5 cycles higher than gulf water samples indicating that oyster tissue components may have had an inhibitory effect on the PCR amplification. The C t values for gulf water samples were <1 cycle higher than V. parahaemolyticus in pure cultures, suggesting that gulf water had a negligible inhibitory effect on the real-time PCR. However, for SYBR Green I-based PCR detection requires an accurate T m value to confirm the amplification of a targeted gene segment. Therefore, the C t values may not be essential for confirming detection, but are indicative of the presence of the targeted amplicons. All positive PCR amplifications exhibited expected T m values suggesting that the multiplexed PCR assay developed in this study is specific, reliable and reproducible. Enrichment of V. parahaemolyticus in oyster tissue homogenate and in gulf water allowed us to ensure detection of viable cells. In addition, an enrichment period enabled us to achieve the sensitivity of detection at a level that is in compliance with the current ISSC guidelines. In this study, the oyster shell stock was enriched in the ISSC-recommended T1N1 growth medium whereas no recommendation was specified for testing the presence of this pathogen in gulf water. It has been documented that the gulf water is a nutrient-rich environment mostly due ot the agricultural run-offs (U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Government Department of Interior, http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/sparrow/gulf_findings/primary_sources.html). The high level of nutrient and warm summer temperature often leads to eutrophication followed by hypoxic conditions in the coastal gulf water spreading miles offshore (Boesch et al. 2009). Due to the high nutrient content, the gulf water was used in this study for enrichment of V. parahaemolytius without addition of any nutrient medium. Moreover, Julie et al. (2010) correlated the importance of ecological parameters such as nutrient, salinity, turbidity, chlorophyll A and temperature and the level of total and pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus in sediment, water, and mussels prior to and day of collection from the French Atlantic coast. They have used the PCR method targeting the hemolysin genes to assess the level of this pathogen. The relevance of the study by Julie et al. (2010) to this report is that the level of the V. parahaemolyticus in environmental water modulates with the changing environmental parameters therefore enrichment step is crucial for samples with low counts on the targeted pathogen. The results from this study suggests that multiplexed real-time PCR with SYBR Green™ I is cost-effective, specific and sensitive and capable of simultaneously detecting species-specific and pathogenic strains of V. parahaemolyticus in shellfish and gulf water. This means of rapid detection will help the shellfish industry implement routine monitoring of oysters and keep track of global transmission of this pathogen, which often occurs through cargo ballast water. The current study offers a workable rapid detection assay for total species and pathogenic strains of V. parahaemolyticus, which will help seafood industry maintain a steady supply of safe oysters, thus prevent disease outbreaks and protect consumer health.
References
Alam MJ, Miyoshi M (2003) Studies on pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus during a warm weather season in the Seto Inland Sea, Japan. Environ Microbiol 5:706–710
Atlas RM (1993) Handbook of microbiological media. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, p 529
Atlas RM, Bej AK (1990) Detection of bacterial pathogens in environmental water samples by using polymerase chain reaction and gene probe. In: Innis M, Gelfand D, Sninsky J, White T (eds) A guide to methods and applications: a laboratory manual. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp 399–406
Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Smith JG, Seidman JD, Struhl K (eds) (1987) Current protocols in molecular biology. Wiley, New York, pp 2.10–2.11
Bej AK, Mahbubani MH, Atlas RM (1991) Amplification of nucleic acids by polymerase chain reaction and other methods. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 16:301–334
Bej AK, Patterson DP, Brasher CW, Vickery MCL, Jones DD, Kaysner CA (1999) Detection of total and hemolysin-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellfish using multiplex PCR amplification of tl, tdh and trh. J Microbiol Meth 36:215–225
Boesch DF, Boynton WR, Crowder LB, Diaz RJ, Howarth RW, Mee LD, Nixon SW, Rabalias NN, Rosenburg R, Sanders JG, Scavia D, Turner RE (2009) Nutrient enrichment drives Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia. EoS 90:117–128
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1999) Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections associated with eating raw oysters–Pacific Northwest, 1997. Morb Mortal Weekly Rep 47:457–462
Centers for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, F. D. A., U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (2000) Draft risk assessment of the public health impact of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in raw molluscan shellfish. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Washington, DC
DePaola A, Hopkins LH, Peeler JT, Wentz B, McPhearson RM (1990) Incidence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in US coastal waters and oysters. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:2299–2302
DePaola A, Ulaszek J, Kaysner CA, Tenge BJ, Nordstrom JL, Wells J, Puhr N, Gendel SM (2003) Molecular, serological, and virulence characteristics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from environmental, food, and clinical sources in North America and Asia. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:3999–4005
Espiñeira M, Atanassova M, Vieites JM, Santaclara FJ (2010) Validation of a method for the detection of five species, serogroups, biotypes and virulence factors of Vibrio by multiplex PCR in fish and seafood. Food Microbiol 27:122–131
Fukushima H, Tsunomori Y, Seki R (2003) Duplex real-time SYBR green PCR assays for detection of 17 species of food- or waterborne pathogens in stools. J Clin Microbiol 41:5134–5146
Haldar S, Neogi SB, Kogure K, Chatterjee S, Chowdhury N, Hinenoya A, Asakura M, Yamasaki S (2010) Detection of a haemolysin-based multiplexed PCR for simultaneous detection of Vibrio campbelli, Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Lett Appl Microbiol 50:146–152
Hara-Kudo Y, Sugiyama K, Nishibuchi M, Chowdhury A, Yatsuyanagi J, Ohtomo Y, Saito A, Nagano H, Nishina T, Nakagawa H, Konuma H, Miyahara M, Kumagai S (2003) Prevalence of pandemic thermostable direct hemolysin-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 in seafood and the coastal environment in Japan. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:3883–3891
Ijumba PK (1984) Occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Tanzanian coastal waters and fish. East Afr Med J 61:675–680
Interstate Shellfish Sanitation Conference (ISSC) (2000) Vibrio parahaemolyticus Interim Control Plan for Oysters. Columbia, SC, Interstate Shellfish Sanitation Conference
Julie D, Solen L, Antoine V, Jaufrey C, Annick D, Dominique HH (2010) Ecology of pathogenic and non-pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus on the French Atlantic coast: effects of temperature, salinity, turbidity and chlorophyll a. Environ Microbiol 12:923–937
Kaysner CA, Tamplin ML, Twedt RM (1992) Vibrio. In: Vanderzant C, Splittstoesser SF (eds) Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, pp 451–473
Kim JS, Lee GG, Kim J, Kwon JY, Kwon ST (2008) The development of rapid real-time PCR detection system for Vibrio parahaemolyticus in raw oyster. Lett Appl Microbiol 46:649–654
Lo CL, Leung PH, Yip SP, To TS, Ng TK, Kam KM (2008) Rapid detection of pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus by a sensitive and specific duplex PCR-hybridization probes assay using LightCycler. J Appl Microbiol 105:575–584
Membrillo-Hernandez J, Poole RK (1997) Bacterial flavohaemoglobins: a consensus sequence and identification of a discrete enterobacterial group and of further bacterial globins. FEMS Microbiol Lett 155:179–184
Miyamoto Y, Kato T, Obra S, Akiyama S, Takizawa K, Yamai S (1969) In vitro characteristic of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: its close correlation with human pathogenicity. J Bacteriol 100:1147–1149
Morris JG (2003) Cholera and other types of vibriosis: a story of human pandemics and oysters on the half shell. Clin Infect Dis 37:272–280
Myers ML, Paniker G, Bej AK (2003) PCR detection of a newly emerged pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 pathogen in pure cultures and seeded waters from the Gulf of Mexico. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:2194–2200
Nordstrom JL, Vickery MCL, Blackstone GM, Murray SL, Depaola A (2007) Development of a multiplex real-time PCR assay with the internal amplification control for the detection of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oysters. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5840–5847
NSSP: National Shellfish Sanitation Program (1997) Sanitation of Vibrio, the harvesting, processing and distribution of shellfish. In: Manual of operations Part II, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC
Okuda J, Ishibashi M, Hayakawa E, Nishino T, Takeda Y, Mukhopadhyay AK, Garg S, Bhattacharya SK, Nair GB, Nishibuchi M (1997) Emergence of a unique O3:K6 clone of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Calcutta, India, and isolation of strains from the same clonal group from Southeast Asian travelers arriving in Japan. J Clin Microbiol 35:3150–3155
Panicker G, Myers ML, Bej AK (2004) Rapid detection of Vibrio vulnificus in shellfish and Gulf of Mexico water by real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:498–507
Qin Y, Wu H, Xiao X, Yang X, Zhang J, Yu Y, Li H (2008) Rapid detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus by TaqMan-based real-time PCR assay targeting the toxR gene. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 24:1837–1842
Rizvi AV, Panicker G, Myers ML, Bej AK (2006) Detection of pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 serovar in Gulf of Mexico water and shellfish using real-time PCR with Taqman™ fluorescent probes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 262:185–192
Robert-Pillot A, Guénolé A, Lesne J, Delesmont R, Fournier JM, Quilici ML (2004) Occurrence of the tdh and trh genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates from waters and raw shellfish collected in two French coastal areas and from seafood imported into France. Int J Food Microbiol 91:319–325
Rosec JP, Simon M, Causse V, Boudjemaa M (2009) Detection of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellfish: comparison of PCR protocols using pR72H or toxR targets with a culture method. Int J Food Microbiol 129:136–145
Rychlik W, Rhoads RE (1989) A computer program for choosing optimal oligonucleotides for filter hybridization, sequencing and in vitro amplification of DNA. Nucl Acid Res 17:8543–8551
Shevchuk VB, Gebesh VV, Alekseenko VV, Dobroshtan EV, Padchenko AG (1986) Clinical aspects of acute intestinal infection caused by Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Vrach Delo 6:114–116
Tada J, Ohashi T, Nishimura N, Shirasaki Y, Ozaki H, Fukushima S, Takano J, Nishibuchi M, Takeda Y (1992) Detection of the thermostable direct hemolysin gene (tdh) and the thermostable direct hemolysin-related hemolysin gene (trh) of Vibrio parahaemolyticus by polymerase chain reaction. Mol Cell Prob 6:477–487
Takeda Y (1982) Thermostable direct hemolysin of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Pharmocol Ther 19:123–146
Taniguchi H, Ohta H, Ogawa M, Mizuguchi Y (1985) Cloning and expression of Escherichia coli of Vibrio parahaemolyticus thermostable direct hemolysin and thermolabile hemolysin genes. J Bacteriol 162:510–515
Taniguchi H, Hirano H, Kubomura S, Higashi K, Mizuguchi Y (1986) Comparison of the nucleotide sequences of the genes for the thermolabile hemolysin from Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Microb Pathogen 1:425–432
Terzi G, Buyuktanir O, Yurdusev N (2009) Detection of the tdh and trh genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates in fish and mussels from Middle Black Sea Coast of Turkey. J Appl Microbiol 49:757–763
Twedt RM (1989) Vibrio parahaemolyticus. In: Doyle MP (ed) Foodborne bacterial pathogens. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, NY, pp 552–554
Tyagi A, Saravanan KV, Karunasagar I (2009) Detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in tropical shellfish by SYBR green real-time PCR and evaluation of three enrichment media. Int J Food Microbiol 129:124–130
Wagatsuma S (1968) A medium for the test of the hemolytic activity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Media Circle 13:159
Ward LN, Bej AK (2006) Detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellfish by use of multiplexed real-time PCR with TaqMan™ fluorescent probes. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:2031–2042
Wittwer CT, Herrmann MG, Gundry CN, Elenitoba-Johnson KS (2001) Real-time multiplex PCR assays. Methods 25:430–442
Acknowledgements
We thank Gitika Panicker and Nazia Mojib for helping us with the PCR experiments and for reviewing the manuscript. This work was supported by funding from the Mississippi Alabama Sea Grant Consortium, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce, and the University of Alabama at Birmingham under research Grant NA86RG0039-4 (Project R/SP-8). We thank John Dindo and Joan Turner (Dauphin Island Sea Lab, AL) for assisting us in collecting oysters from the Gulf of Mexico; Angelo DePaola (FDA, Dauphin Island, AL) and Charles A Kaysner (FDA, Seattle, WA) for sharing with us some of the microbial cultures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rizvi, A.V., Bej, A.K. Multiplexed real-time PCR amplification of tlh, tdh and trh genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus and its rapid detection in shellfish and Gulf of Mexico water. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 98, 279–290 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-010-9436-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-010-9436-2