Skip to main content
Log in

Financial scenario generation for stochastic multi-stage decision processes as facility location problems

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quality of multi-stage stochastic optimization models as they appear in asset liability management, energy planning, transportation, supply chain management, and other applications depends heavily on the quality of the underlying scenario model, describing the uncertain processes influencing the profit/cost function, such as asset prices and liabilities, the energy demand process, demand for transportation, and the like. A common approach to generate scenarios is based on estimating an unknown distribution and matching its moments with moments of a discrete scenario model. This paper demonstrates that the problem of finding valuable scenario approximations can be viewed as the problem of optimally approximating a given distribution with some distance function. We show that for Lipschitz continuous cost/profit functions it is best to employ the Wasserstein distance. The resulting optimization problem can be viewed as a multi-dimensional facility location problem, for which at least good heuristic algorithms exist. For multi-stage problems, a scenario tree is constructed as a nested facility location problem. Numerical convergence results for financial mean-risk portfolio selection conclude the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dupačová, J., G. Consigli, and S.W. Wallace. (2000). “Generating Scenarios for Multistage Stochastic Programs.” Annals of Operations Research, 100, 25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupačová, J., N. Gröwe-Kuska, and W. Römisch. (2003). “Scenario Reduction in Stochastic Programming: An Approach Using Probability Metrics.” Mathematical Programming, Series A, 95, 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourer, R., D. Gay, and B. Kernighan. (2002). AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming. Duxbury Press/Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

  • Heitsch, H. and W. Römisch. (2003). “Scenario Reduction Algorithms in Stochastic Programming.” Computational Optimization and Applications, 24(2–3), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyde, C. (1963). “On the Property of the Lognormal Distribution.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 25, 392–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Høyland, K. and S.W. Wallace. (2001). “Generating Scenario Trees for Multistage Decision Problems.” Management Science, 47, 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivu, M. (2005). “Variance Reduction in Sample Approximations of Stochastic Programs.” Mathematical Programming, Series A, 103(3), 463–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouwenberg, R. (2001). “Scenario Generation and Stochastic Programming Models for Asset Liability Management.” European Journal of Operation Research, 134, 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monge, G. (1781). “Mémoire sur la théorie des déblais et remblais.” Hist. Acad. R. Sci. Paris.

  • Pennanen, T. (2005). “Epi-Convergent Discretizations of Multistage Stochastic Programs.” Mathematics of Operations Research, 30(1), 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennanen, T. and M. Koivu. (2005). “Epi-Convergent Discretizations of Stochastic Programs via Integration Quadratures.” Numerische Mathematik, 100(1), 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pflug, G. (2001). “Scenario Tree Generation for Multiperiod Financial Optimization by Optimal Discretization.” Mathematical Programming, Series B, 89, 251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachev, S. and W. Römisch. (2002). “Quantitative Stability in Stochastic Programming: The Method of Probability Metrics.” Mathematics of Operations Research, 27, 792–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachev, S.T. (1991). Probability Metrics and the Stability of Stochastic Models. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüschendorf1998]RachevRueschendorf1998 Rachev, S.T. and L. Rüschendorf. (1998). Mass Transportation Problems. Vol. I, Probability and its Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R. and S. Uryasev. (2000). “Optimization of Conditional Value-at-Risk.” The Journal of Risk, 2(3), 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruszczynski, A. and A. Shapiro (Eds.). (2003). Stochastic Programming, Vol. 10 of Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science. Elsevier.

  • Vallander, S. (1973). “Calculation of the Wasserstein Distance Between Probability Distributions on the Line.” Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 18, 784–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, S.W. and W.T. Ziemba (Eds.). (2005). Applications of Stochastic Programming, MPS-SIAM Series on Optimization. SIAM.

  • Zolotarev, V. (1983). “Probability Metrics.” Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 28, 278–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Hochreiter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hochreiter, R., Pflug, G.C. Financial scenario generation for stochastic multi-stage decision processes as facility location problems. Ann Oper Res 152, 257–272 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0140-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0140-6

Keywords

Navigation