We consider a new approach to investigating categoricity of structures computable in polynomial time. The approach is based on studying polynomially computable stable relations. It is shown that this categoricity is equivalent to the usual computable categoricity for computable Boolean algebras with computable set of atoms, and for computable linear orderings with computable set of adjacent pairs. Examples are constructed which show that this does not always hold. We establish a connection between dimensions based on computable and polynomially computable stable relations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. E. Alaev, “Structures computable in polynomial time. I,” Algebra and Logic, 55, No. 6, 421-435 (2016).
S. S. Goncharov, “The problem of the number of nonautoequivalent constructivizations,” Algebra and Logic, 19, No. 6, 401-414 (1980).
J. B. Remmel, “Recursive isomorphism types of recursive Boolean algebras,” J. Symb. Log., 46, No. 3, 572-594 (1981).
J. B. Remmel, “Recursively categorical linear orderings,” Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 83, No. 2, 387-391 (1981).
S. S. Goncharov and V. D. Dzgoev, “Autostability of models,” Algebra and Logic, 19, No. 1, 28-36 (1980).
P. E. Alaev, “Existence and uniqueness of structures computable in polynomial time,” Algebra and Logic, 55, No. 1, 72-76 (2016).
D. Cenzer and J. B. Remmel, “Complexity and categoricity,” Inf. Comput., 140, No. 1, 2-25 (1998).
E. I. Latkin, “Polynomial non-autostability. Algebraic approach,” in Logical Methods in Programming, Vychislitel’nye Systemy, 133, Sobolev Institute of Mathematics, Novosibirsk (1990), pp. 14-37.
S. S. Goncharov, “Algorithmic dimension of Abelian groups,” Proc. 17th All-Union Alg. Conf., Part 2, Minsk (1983).
B. M. Khusainov, “Algorithmic degree of unars,” Algebra and Logic, 27, No. 4, 301-312 (1988).
O. V. Kudinov, “Algebraic dependences and reducibilities of constructivizations in universal domains,” Tr. Inst. Mat. SO RAN, 25, 74-81 (1993).
S. T. Fedoryaev, “Countability of widths of algebraic reducibility structures for models in some classes,” Sib. Adv. Math., 3, No. 2, 81-103 (1993).
S. T. Fedoryaev, “Recursively inconsistent algorithmic problems on 1-constructivizable relatively complemented distributive lattices,” Algebra and Logic, 34, No. 6, 371-378 (1995).
V. A. Uspensky and A. L. Semenov, “Algorithm theory: Contributions and applications,” in Algorithms in Modern Mathematics and Its Applications [in Russian], Part 1, Computer Center SO AN SSSR, Novosibirsk (1982), pp. 99-342.
V. A. Uspensky and A. L. Semenov, Algorithm Theory: Contributions and Applications, Nauka, Moscow (1987).
S. T. Fedoryaev, “Constructivizable models with a linear structure of algebraic reducibility,” Mat. Zametki, 48, No. 6, 106-111 (1990).
S. T. Fedoryaev, “Some properties of algebraic reducibility of constructivizations,” Algebra and Logic, 29, No. 5, 395-405 (1990).
D. Cenzer and J. Remmel, “Polynomial-time versus recursive models,” Ann. Pure Appl. Log., 54, No. 1, 17-58 (1991).
M. Moses, “Relations intrinsically recursive in linear orders,” Z. Math. Log. Grund. Math., 32, No. 5, 467-472 (1986).
A. G. Pinus, “Conditional terms and identities on universal algebras,” Vych. Sist., 156, 59-78 (1996).
A. G. Pinus, “Inner homomorphisms and positive-conditional terms,” Algebra and Logic, 40, No. 2, 87-95 (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by RFBR, project No. 17-01-00247.
Translated from Algebra i Logika, Vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 651-670, November-December, 2017.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alaev, P.E. Structures Computable in Polynomial Time. II. Algebra Logic 56, 429–442 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10469-018-9465-x
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10469-018-9465-x