Erratum to: Toward an Evidence-Based System for Innovation Support for Implementing Innovations with Quality: Tools, Training, Technical Assistance, and Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement

Erratum to: Am J Community Psychol DOI 10.1007/s10464-012-9509-7

• 1. A misprint appears in the abstract of the article (the correction is shown in boldface below):

An individual or organization that sets out to implement an innovation (e.g., a new technology, program, or policy) generally requires support. In the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation, a Support System should work with Delivery Systems (national, state and/or local entities such as health and human service organizations, community-based organizations, schools) to enhance their capacity for quality implementation of innovations. The literature on the Support System has been underresearched and under-developed.

• 2. The arrows leading to the two “QA/QI” (Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement) boxes in Fig. 1 are not printed properly (the correct Fig. 1 is shown).

  Fig. 1

  

  Relationship between the EBSIS and the ISF. Solid lines indicate the original ISF (2008) figure and dashed lines indicate additions added by our EBSIS approach. QA/QI are emphasized in two places: the provision of support to the delivery system and the implementation of innovations (programs, policies, etc.)

• 3. Throughout the entire article, each of the three systems in the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation (Synthesis and Translation System, Support System, and Delivery System) should always be capitalized.