Skip to main content
Log in

Between Synergy and Conflict: Balancing the Processes of Organizational and Individual Resilience in an Afghan Women’s Community

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

This paper examines individual and organizational resilience processes among members of The Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan, (RAWA), an Afghan women’s underground resistance organization located in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Since 1977, RAWA has used humanitarian and political means to educate, serve, and motivate women and to advocate for peace, secular democracy, and human rights. The authors analyzed 110 qualitative interviews, collected in Pakistan and Afghanistan between December 2001 and July 2002. An iterative coding framework identified processes of resilience and domain specific stressors (risks) and resources (protective factors) at the individual and organizational level. Further analysis found that these process codes clustered by function into components of an operational model of individual and organizational resilience. While individual and organizational resilience are described by the same model, these two levels of resilience were found to operate in synergy as well as in conflict. Although this paper explores a unique setting, we argue that a better understanding of resilience processes in general will come from increased attention to context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A number of literatures in community psychology (e.g., Zimmerman 2000; Maton 2008) differentiate between the level of the organization and the community. Within the context of war-torn Afghanistan, where many natural communities have been disrupted (Brodsky 2003), RAWA is an organization that also creates community for its members, supporters, and the people it serves. For this reason, we refer to it herein as an organizational community as well as, where appropriate, the organization or the community.

  2. The line between member, supporter, student, family member, and other can often be blurred. For this reason some women who were very involved with RAWA, and whose actions were resilient, but who were technically not members, are included in the data set.

  3. All names used are pseudonyms.

  4. Many quotes have been edited for clarity and brevity. Further, to save on space and for ease of reading, unless needed to combine two thoughts, ellipses were not added when words were removed or sentences combined. None of these edits, however, resulted in change to the content or meaning of the quotes.

  5. RAWA uses the term join to refer only to members who join the organization. We use it here also to refer to individuals who “join” the community as supporters, students, family members, etc.

  6. Perhaps the best known example of this is Sima Samar, a former RAWA member, who remained active in Afghan humanitarian efforts and is now the head of the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission.

  7. It would be incorrect to believe that secrets and even lies are somehow absent from the rest of our research. While the secrecy of RAWA placed this fact front and center, this knowledge may lead to a better understanding than if we mistakenly assume that our participants are telling us the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

References

  • Agar, M. H. (1986). Speaking of ethnography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, E. J. (1987). Risk, vulnerability, and resilience: An overview. In E. J. Anthony & B. J. Cohler (Eds.), The invulnerable child. The Guilford psychiatry series (pp. 3–48). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, A. E. (1999). Making it: The components and process of resilience in urban African-American single mothers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 69, 148–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, A. E. (2000). The role of spirituality in the resilience of urban, African-American, single mothers. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(2), 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, A. E. (2003). With all our strength: The revolutionary association of the women of Afghanistan. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, A. E. (2009). Multiple psychological sense of community in Afghan context: Exploring commitment and sacrifice in an underground resistance community. American Journal of Community Psychology, 44, 176–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, A. E. (in press). Centuries of threat, centuries of resistance: The lessons of Afghan women’s resilience. In J. Heath & A. Zahedi (Eds.), Land of the unconquerable: The lives of contemporary Afghan women. University of California Press.

  • Brodsky, A. E., & Faryal, T. (2006). No matter how hard you try, your feet still get wet: Insider and outsider perspectives on bridging diversities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 37(3/4), 311–320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D., & Rizley, R. (1981). Developmental perspectives on the etiology, intergenerational transmission, and sequelae of child maltreatment. In R. Rizley & D. Cicchetti (Eds.), New directions for child development: Developmental perspectives on child maltreatment, 11, 31–55.

  • Cornell University Empowerment Group (1989). Networking Bulletin: Empowerment and Family Support.1, October, 1989.

  • Cowen, E. L., & Work, W. C. (1988). Resilient children, psychological wellness and primary prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 591–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, K. A. (1995). The self-concept and motivational patterns of resilient African American high school students. Journal of Black Psychology, 21, 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M., Perkins, D. D., & Perkins, D. V. (2005). Principles of community psychology: Perspectives and applications (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S. S., Cichetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543–562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper Row Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S. (1994). Resilience in individual development: Successful adaptation despite risk and adversity. In M. Wang & E. Gordon (Eds.), Risk and resilience in inner city America: Challenges and prospects (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S., & Garmezy, N. (1985). Risk, vulnerability, and protective factors in development psychopathology. In B. Lahey & A. Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (pp. 1–52). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I. (2008). Empowering community settings: Agents of individual development, community betterment, and positive social change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 4–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I., & Brodsky, A. E. (2011). Empowering community settings: Theory, research and action. In M. Aber, K. I. Maton, & E. Seidman (Eds.), Empowering settings and voices for social change. Oxford University Press.

  • McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWhirter, E. H. (1991). Empowerment in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 222–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. L., & Crabtree, B. F. (1999). Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map. In B. J. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (Vol. 3, pp. 3–30). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. A., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 127–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, V. E., & Ickovics, J. R. (1995). Resilience and thriving in response to challenge: An opportunity for a paradigm shift in women’s health. Women’s Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy, 1(2), 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 121–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1995). Empowerment meets narrative: Listening to stories and creating settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 795–807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A. (2008). Descent into chaos: How the war against Islamic extremism is being lost in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Central Asia. Noida, India: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S. (1993). What’s wrong with empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (1979). Protective factors in children’s responses to stress and disadvantage. In M. Kent & J. Rolf (Eds.), Primary prevention of psychopathology (Vol 3) Social competence in children (pp. 49–74). Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 316–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. (1984). Resilient children. Young Children, 40, 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E., & Smith, R. (1982). Vulnerable but not invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community level analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Data collection was supported by grants from Open Society Institute Network Women’s Program, the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), and the UMBC Gender and Women’s Studies Program and Department of Psychology. The authors wish to thank Melissa Book & David Chen for their contributions to this paper. A draft of this paper was presented at the 12th Biennial SCRA Conference in Montclair, NJ, in June 2009. The views expressed herein are not necessarily those of any of the named organizations, including RAWA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne E. Brodsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brodsky, A.E., Welsh, E., Carrillo, A. et al. Between Synergy and Conflict: Balancing the Processes of Organizational and Individual Resilience in an Afghan Women’s Community. Am J Community Psychol 47, 217–235 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9399-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9399-5

Keywords

Navigation