Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental Influences on Fighting Versus Nonviolent Behavior in Peer Situations: A Qualitative Study with Urban African American Adolescents

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

This qualitative study explored environmental factors that influence adolescents’ responses to problem situations involving peers. Interviews were conducted with 106 middle school students (97% African American) from an urban school system. Participants were asked to describe factors that would make it easier and those that would make it more difficult for adolescents to make specific responses to problem situations. Two types of responses were presented: nonviolent responses identified as effective in a previous study, and fighting responses. Qualitative analysis identified 24 themes representing family, peer, school, and neighborhood and broader social factors that were related to both nonviolent behavior and fighting. The identification of environmental influences on fighting and nonviolent responses has important implications for efforts to reduce aggression and promote effective nonviolent responses to problem situations encountered by adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, K. A., Burton, L., Marshall, S., Perez-Febles, A., Yarrington, J., Kirsh, L. B., et al. (1999). Life experiences among urban adolescents: Examining the role of context. Child Development, 70, 1017–1029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Attar, B. K., Guerra, N. G., & Tolan, P. H. (1994). Neighborhood disadvantage, stressful life events, and adjustment in urban elementary school children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23, 391–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, D. (1987). A developmental perspective on adolescent risk taking in contemporary America. New Directions for Child Development, 37, 93–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxer, P., & Dubow, E. F. (2001). A social-cognitive information-processing model for school-based aggression reduction and prevention programs: Issues for research and practice. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 10, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2002). Positive youth development in the United States. Research findings on evaluations of the positive youth development programs. Prevention and Treatment, 5(1), no pagination specified.

  • Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1999). Initial impact of the fast track prevention trial for conduct problems: II. Classroom effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 648–657.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Crean, H. F. (2004). Social support, conflict, major life stressors, and adaptive coping strategies in Latino middle school students: An integrative model. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 657–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., & Andrews, D. W. (1995). Preventing escalation in problem behaviors with high-risk young adolescents: Immediate and 1-year outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 538–548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, D. E., Kann, L., Kinchen, S., Ross, J., Hawkins, J., Harris, W. A., et al. (2006). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2005. MMWR, 55(ss05), 1–108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., et al. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, 5th ed. vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 701–778). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. W. (2004). The environment of childhood poverty. American Psychologist, 59, 77–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J., & Wilkinson, D. L. (1998). Social contexts and functions of adolescent violence. In D. S. Elliott, B. A. Hamburg, & K. R. Williams (Eds.), Violence in American schools: A new perspective (pp. 55–93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. D., Ampy, L. A., & Meyer, A. L. (1998). Identification and assessment of problematic interpersonal situations for urban adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 293–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. D., & Camou, S. (2006). School-based interventions for youth violence prevention. In J. R. Lutzker (Ed.), Preventing violence: Research and evidence-based intervention strategies (pp. 125–145). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. D., Erwin, E. H., Allison, K., Meyer, A. L., Sullivan, T. N., Camou, S., et al. (2007a). Problematic situations in the lives of urban African American middle school students: A qualitative study. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 413–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. D., Erwin, E. H., Bettencourt, A., Mays, S., Vulin-Reynolds, M., Sullivan, T., et al. (2008). Individual factors influencing effective nonviolent behavior and fighting in peer situations: A qualitative study with urban African American adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37, 397–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. D., Kliewer, W., Sullivan, T. N., Camou, S., Erwin, E. H., & Allison, K. (2007). Urban adolescents’ responses to problem situations: What they would do, think they should do, and think others would do. Virginia Commonwealth University, Manuscript in preparation.

  • Farrell, A. D., Sullivan, T. N., Kliewer, W., Allison, K. W., Erwin, E. H., Meyer, A. L., et al. (2006). Peer and school problems in the lives of urban adolescents: Frequency, difficulty, and relation to adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfried, M. R., & D’Zurilla, T. J. (1969). The behavioral-analytic method for assessing competence. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology (pp. 151–196). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, K. E., McCormick, A., Poindexter, L., Simpkins, T., Janda, C. M., Thomas, K. J., et al. (2005). Exposure to violence and parenting as mediators between poverty and psychological symptoms in urban African American adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 507–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O’Brien, M. U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., et al. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58, 466–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625–638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 69–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T., Farrington, D., Brewer, D., Catalano, R., & Harachi, T. (1998). A review of predictors of youth violence. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 106–146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D., Van Horn, M. L., & Arthur, M. W. (2004). Community variation in risk and protective factors and substance use outcomes. Prevention Science, 5, 213–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International, Q. S. R. (2002). N6. Melbourne, Australia: QSR International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagers, R. J., Sydnor, K., Mouttapa, M., & Flay, B. R. (2007). Protective factors associated with preadolescent violence: Preliminary work on a cultural model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 40, 138–145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kids Count (2004). Census data online. Retrieved November 29, 2004 from http://www.aecf.org/kidscount/census/.

  • Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2004). Peer victimization: The role of emotion in adaptive and maladaptive coping. Social Development, 13, 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Skinner, K. (2002). Children’s coping strategies: Moderators of the effects of peer victimization? Developmental Psychology, 38, 267–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lemerise, E. A., & Arsenio, W. F. (2000). An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child Development, 71, 107–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metropolitan Area Child Study Research Group. (2007). Changing the way children “think” about aggression: Social-cognitive effects of a preventive intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 160–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Multisite Violence Prevention Project. (2009). The ecological effects of universal and selective violence prevention programs for middle school students: A randomized trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 526–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, J. (2004). City ninth most dangerous. In: The Richmond Times Dispatch, pp. B3.

  • Orpinas, P., Murray, N., & Kelder, S. (1999). Parental influences on students’ aggressive behaviors and weapon carrying. Health Education & Behavior, 26, 774–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, A., & Hamburg, B. (1986). Adolescence: A developmental approach to problems and psychopathology. Behavior Therapy, 17, 480–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinstein, M. J., Boergers, J., & Vernberg, E. M. (2001). Overt and relational aggression in adolescence: Social psychological adjustment in aggressors and victims. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 479–491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high level status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese, L. E., Vera, E. M., Simon, T. R., & Ikeda, R. M. (2000). The role of families and care givers as risk and protective factors in preventing youth violence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 3, 61–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M. D., Bearman, P. S., Blum, R. W., Bauman, K. E., Harris, K. M., Jones, J., et al. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the national longitudinal study on adolescent health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 823–832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D., & Proctor, L. J. (2000). Community violence exposure and children’s social adjustment in the school peer group: The mediating roles of emotion regulation and social cognition. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 670–683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. P., & Hasbrouck, L. M. (2006). Preventing youth violence Among African American Youth: The sociocultural context of risk and protective factors. In N. Guerra & E. P. Smith (Eds.), Preventing youth violence in a multicultural society (pp. 169–197). Washington, DC: American Psychological Assoc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbott, E., Celinska, D., Simpson, J., & Coe, M. G. (2002). “Somebody else making somebody else fight”: Aggression and the social context among urban adolescent girls. Exceptionality, 10, 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health, Human Services. (2001). Youth violence: A report of the surgeon general. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissberg, R. P., Kumpfer, K. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2003). Prevention that works for children and youth. American Psychologist, 58, 425–432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grant #1 R21 HD40041 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). The research and interpretations reported are the sole responsibility of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by NICHD or represent the views, opinions, or policies of the NICHD or their staff. We appreciate the many contributions of other members of our research group made during various phases of this research, particularly Anne Greene, Wendy Kliewer, Aleta Meyer, and Terri Sullivan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert D. Farrell.

Appendix: Problem and Response Pairs for Interviews

Appendix: Problem and Response Pairs for Interviews

Effective Non-Violent Responses

  • Situation: Someone started a rumor about you and other students are keeping it going and making the rumor worse. Now, it seems like all the kids are talking about you.

  • Response: I would tell my friends to stop spreading the rumor.

  • Situation: You told a good friend you were interested in going with a girl/boy. You see your friend flirting and trying to talk with this person like they want to go out with them.

  • Response: I would confront my friend in a positive way. For example, I’d say I want to be friends and tell my friend that I don’t want them to flirt with someone I want to go with.

  • Situation: You told a friend something private and they told it to other people. This friend had promised they would not tell anyone but went behind your back and told other people.

  • Response: I’d talk to my friend and ask why they broke their promise not to tell.

  • Situation: Somebody is spreading a rumor about a student and you got blamed for it. Now you have a big problem with this person who thinks you were talking about them behind their back.

  • Response: I’d talk it out with the person the rumor was started about and explain I didn’t start it.

  • Situation: Someone is fake with you, sometimes acting like a friend and sometimes saying mean things about you. You can’t trust them because they change how they act all the time.

  • Response: I would talk it over with an adult I trust like one of my parents, a teacher, or my counselor and tell the what’s going on.

  • Situation: You and a friend are joking and cracking on each other. You accidentally say something that you didn’t think would cross the line but your friend gets really mad at you. You didn’t mean it, you were just joking around but you crossed the line and now your friend wants to fight you for real.

  • Response: I would say I’m sorry for what I said, I didn’t mean it.

  • Situation: Two of your friends are fighting and they try to put you into the middle of it. You feel pressure from both sides because they can’t get along and they each want you to take their side.

  • Response: I would get them together so they could talk but not fight and try to help them solve the problem.

  • Situation: Someone started a rumor about you and other students are keeping it going and making the rumor worse. Now, it seems like all the kids are talking about you.

  • Response: I would go to peer mediation with the person.

  • Situation: A friend asks to cheat off a paper you work really hard on. Their friendship is really important to you but this was your work and it took you a lot of time to do.

  • Response: I’d help them with the paper but not let them copy mine.

  • Situation: You and a friend are joking and cracking on each other. You accidentally say something that you didn’t think would cross the line but your friend gets really mad at you. You didn’t mean it, you were just joking around but you crossed the line and now your friend wants to fight you for real.

  • Response: I’d try to calm my friend down.

  • Situation: You and another kid get into an argument at school. Other students are there boosting it up saying, “Fight, fight, fight.”

  • Response: I would say, “I’m not going to fight.”

  • Situation: Other students are disrupting class and making it hard for you to concentrate and get your work done.

  • Response: I’d ask the teacher to move me.

  • Situation: Other kids at school tease and pick on you. They call you names and make fun of you.

  • Response: I would tell an adult at school, like the teacher or a principal.

  • Situation: Another kid at school says something that is disrespectful about your family.

  • Response: I wouldn’t let it bother me, because I’d know they were wrong.

Violent Responses

  • Situation: You and another kid get into an argument at school. Other students are there boosting it up saying, “Fight, fight, fight.”

  • Response: I would fight the person.

  • Situation: Someone started a rumor about you and other students are keeping it going and making the rumor worse. Now, it seems like all the kids are talking about you.

  • Response: I would fight the person who started the rumor.

  • Situation: You told a good friend you were interested in going with a girl/boy. You see your friend flirting and trying to talk with this person like they want to go out with them.

  • Response: I would fight my friend.

  • Situation: Other kids at school tease and pick on you. They call you names and make fun of you.

  • Response: I would fight the other kids doing it or saying it to me.

Note: From “Individual factors influencing effective nonviolent behavior and fighting in peer situations: A qualitative study with urban African American adolescents,” by A. D. Farrell, E. H. Erwin, A. Bettencourt, S. Mays, M. Vulin-Reynolds, T. N. Sullivan, K. Allison, W. Kliewer, & A. L. Meyer, 2008, Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37, pp. 410-411. Copyright 2008 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. Reprinted with permission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farrell, A.D., Mays, S., Bettencourt, A. et al. Environmental Influences on Fighting Versus Nonviolent Behavior in Peer Situations: A Qualitative Study with Urban African American Adolescents. Am J Community Psychol 46, 19–35 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9331-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9331-z

Keywords

Navigation