Skip to main content
Log in

Challenges of Evaluating Multilevel Interventions

  • Original paper
  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

This article uses the Comprehensive Mixed-Methods Participatory Evaluation (CMMPE; Nastasi and Hitchcock Transforming school mental health services: Population-based approaches to promoting the competency and wellness of children, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press with National Association of School Psychologists 2008; Nastasi et al. School-based mental health services: creating comprehensive and culturally specific programs. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 2004) model as a framework for addressing the multiplicity of evaluation decisions and complex nature of questions related to program success in multilevel interventions. CMMPE defines program success in terms of acceptability, integrity, social or cultural validity, outcomes (impact), sustainability and institutionalization, thus broadening the traditional notions of program outcomes. The authors use CMMPE and an example of a community-based multilevel sexual risk prevention program with multiple outcomes to discuss challenges of evaluating multilevel interventions. The sexual risk program exemplifies what Schensul and Tricket (this issue) characterize as multilevel intervention–multilevel evaluation (M–M), with both intervention and evaluation at community, health practitioner, and patient levels. The illustration provides the context for considering several challenges related to M–M designs: feasibility of randomized controlled trials within community-based multilevel intervention; acceptability and social or cultural validity of evaluation procedures; implementer, recipient, and contextual variations in program success; interactions among levels of the intervention; unanticipated changes or conditions; multiple indicators of program success; engaging multiple stakeholders in a participatory process; and evaluating sustainability and institutionalization. The complexity of multilevel intervention and evaluation designs challenges traditional notions of evaluation research and experimental designs. Overcoming these challenges is critical to effective translation of research to practice in psychology and related disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A full articulation of CPMME is beyond the scope of this article. Readers are referred to Nastasi and Hitchcock (2008) and Nastasi et al. (2004) for in-depth discussion of the conceptual foundations, assumptions, and application of the model to population-based services within school contexts.

  2. Note that providers were the unit of assignment for the purposes of the quasi-experimental portion of the design.

References

  • Bernstein, R. (2000). A demonstration of the acceptability of a mental health project through a participatory culture-specific model of consultation in the country of Sri Lanka. Unpublished dissertation. Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York.

  • Brantlinger, E., Jiminez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPRE (1995) Policy Brief: Helping Teachers Teach Well: Transforming Professional Development. Available on-line: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/CPRE/t61/t61c.html. Retrieved September, 2007.

  • Fetterman, D., & Wandersman, A. (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flay, R. B., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., et al. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6(3), 151–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nastasi, B. K., & Hitchcock, J. H. (2008). Evaluating quality and effectiveness of population-based services. In B. J. Doll & J. A. Cummings (Eds.), Transforming school mental health services: Population-based approaches to promoting the competency and wellness of children (pp. 245–276). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press with National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nastasi, B. K., Hitchcock, J., Sarkar, S., Burkholder, G., Varjas, K., & Jayasena, A. (2007). Mixed methods in intervention research: Theory to adaptation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 164–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nastasi, B. K., Moore, R. B., & Varjas, K. M. (2004). School-based mental health services: Creating comprehensive and culturally specific programs. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nastasi, B. K., & Schensul, S. L. (2005). Contributions of qualitative research to the validity of intervention research. Special issue of Journal of School Psychology, 43(3), 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2003). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. Annals of statistics, 6, 34–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schensul, S. L., Nastasi, B. K., & Verma, R.K. (2006). Community-based research in India: A case example of international and interdisciplinary collaboration. American Journal of Community Psychology, pp 1-17, [online version] DOI 10.1007/s10464-006-9066-z, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10464-006-9066-z.

  • Schensul, S. L., Verma, R. K., & Nastasi, B. K. (2004). Responding to men’s sexual concerns: Research and intervention in slum communities in Mumbai, India. International Journal of Men’s Health, 3, 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 3–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bonnie K. Nastasi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nastasi, B.K., Hitchcock, J. Challenges of Evaluating Multilevel Interventions. Am J Community Psychol 43, 360–376 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-009-9239-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-009-9239-7

Keywords

Navigation