Abstract
Peer delivered, social oriented HIV prevention intervention designs are increasingly popular for addressing broader contexts of health risk beyond a focus on individual factors. Such interventions have the potential to affect multiple social levels of risk and change, including at the individual, network, and community levels, and reflect social ecological principles of interaction across social levels over time. The iterative and feedback dynamic generated by this multi-level effect increases the likelihood for sustained health improvement initiated by those trained to deliver the peer intervention. The Risk Avoidance Partnership (RAP), conducted with heroin and cocaine/crack users in Hartford, Connecticut, exemplified this intervention design and illustrated the multi-level effect on drug users’ risk and harm reduction at the individual level, the social network level, and the larger community level. Implications of the RAP program for designing effective prevention programs and for analyzing long-term change to reduce HIV transmission among high-risk groups are discussed from this ecological and multi-level intervention perspective.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Study of High Risk Drug Use Settings for HIV Prevention, Project 3 of the Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS (CIRA) program project (P01 MH/DA56826) was conducted in Hartford from 1997–2000 with funds from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Institute of Mental Health.
References
Altman, D. G. (1995). Sustaining interventions in community systems: On the relationship between researchers and communities. Health Psychology, 14(6), 526–536.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory and exercise of control over HIV infection. In R. J. DiClemente & J. L. Peterson (Eds.), Preventing AIDS: Theories and methods of behavioral interventions (pp. 25–59). New York: Plenum Press.
Barnett, T. (1997). Keeping the S-curve in mind-sustainability. AIDS/STD Health Promotion Exchange, 3, 1–3.
Blankenship, K. M., Bray, S. J., & Merson, M. H. (2000). Structural interventions in public health. AIDS, 14(Suppl 1), S11–S21.
Blankenship, K. M., Friedman, S. R., Dworkin, S. L., & Mantell, J. E. (2006). Structural interventions: Concepts, challenges and opportunities for research. Journal of Urban Health, 83(1), 59–72.
Broadhead, R. S., Heckathorn, D. D., Weakliem, D. L., Anthony, D. L., Madray, H., Mills, R. J., et al. (1998). Harnessing peer networks as an instrument for AIDS prevention: Results from a peer-driven intervention. Public Health Reports, 113(Suppl 1), 42–57.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brown, E. R. (1991). Community action for health promotion: A strategy to empower individuals and communities. International Journal of Health Services, 21, 441–456.
Convey, M., Dickson-Gomez, J., Weeks, M. R., & Li, J. (2009). Altruism as motivation for retention of active drug using peer educators: The risk avoidance partnership. Qualitative Health Research (in review).
Dickson-Gomez, J., Weeks, M. R., Martinez, M., & Convey, M. (2006). Times and places: Process evaluation of a peer-led HIV prevention intervention. Substance Use and Misuse, 41(5), 669–690.
Dickson-Gomez, J., Weeks, M. R., Martinez, M., & Radda, K. (2004). Reciprocity and exploitation: Social dynamics in private drug use sites. Journal of Drug Issues, 34(4), 913–932.
DiClemente, R. J., Crosby, R. A., & Wingood, G. M. (2005). Community HIV prevention interventions: Theoretical and methodological considerations. In E. J. Trickett & W. Pequegnat (Eds.), Community interventions and AIDS (pp. 222–248). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, K. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary edition). New York, NY: The Continuum International Publishing Group, Inc.
Friedman, S. R., Curtis, R., Neaigus, A., Jose, B., & Des Jarlais, D. C. (1999). Social networks, drug injectors’ lives, and HIV/AIDS. New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum Publishers.
Fuller, C. M., Galea, S., Caceres, W., Blaney, S., Sisco, S., & Vlahov, D. (2007). Multilevel community-based intervention to increase access to sterile syringes among injection drug users through pharmacy sales in New York City. American Journal of Public Health, 97(1), 117–124.
Gollub, E. L., & Metzger, D. (1999). Community-level HIV intervention work for women means restructuring society and culture [comment]. American Journal of Public Health, 89(11), 1762–1763.
Grace, V. (1991). The marketing of empowerment and the construction of the health consumer: A critique of health promotion. International Journal of Health Services, 21, 329–343.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Israel, B. A., Eng, E., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Satcher, D. (Eds.). (2005). Methods in community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Jana, S., Basu, I., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., & Newman, P. A. (2004). The Sonagachi project: A sustainable community intervention program. AIDS Education and Prevention, 16(5), 405–414.
Kirby, M. W., Braucht, G. N., Brown, E., Krane, S., McCann, M., & VanDeMark, N. (1999). Dyadic case management as a strategy for prevention of homelessness among chronically debilitated men and women with alcohol and drug dependence. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 17, 53–71.
Labonte, R. (1994). Health promotion and empowerment: Reflections on professional practice. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2), 253–268.
Latkin, C. A. (1998). Outreach in natural settings: The use of peer leaders for HIV prevention among injecting drug users’ networks. Public Health Reports, 113(Suppl 1), 151–159.
Lurie, P., Reingold, A. L., Bowser, B., Chen, D., Foley, J., Guydish, J., et al. (1993). The public health impact of needle exchange programs in the United States and abroad. California: School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley.
Maguire, L. (1983). Understanding social networks. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Manhart, L. E., & Holmes, K. K. (2005). Randomized controlled trials of individual-level, population-level, and multilevel interventions for preventing sexually transmitted infections: What has worked? Journal of Infectious Diseases, 191(1), 1.
Marsden, P. V., & Lin, N. (Eds.). (1982). Social structure and network analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
McCarty, D., LaPrade, J., & Botticelli, M. (1996). Substance abuse treatment and HIV services: Massachusetts’ policies and programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 13, 429–438.
McIntyre, L. (1992). The evolution of health promotion. Probe, 26, 15–22.
McLeroy, K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15(4), 351–377.
Minkler, M. (1989). Health education, health promotion and the open society: An historical perspective. Health Education Quarterly, 16(1), 17–30.
Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (Eds.). (2003). Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mitchell, J. C. (1969). The concept and use of social networks. In J. C. Mitchell (Ed.), Social networks in urban situations: Analyses of personal relationships in central African towns. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Mosher, J. (1999). Alcohol policy and the young adult: Establishing priorities, building partnerships, overcoming barriers. Addiction, 94, 357–369.
Neaigus, A., Friedman, S. R., Curtis, R., Des Jarlais, D. C., Furst, R. T., Jose, B., et al. (1994). The relevance of drug injectors’ social and risk networks for understanding and preventing HIV infection. Social Science and Medicine, 38(1), 67–78.
Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., & Latane, B. (1990). From private attitude to public opinion—a dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review, 97(3), 362–376.
Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C. A., & Evers, K. E. (1996). The transtheoretical model of stages of change. In K. Glanz, F. Marcus Lewis, & B. K. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice (pp. 60–84). San Francisco, CA: Mossey-Bass.
Ramirez-Valles, J. (2002). The protective effects of community involvement for HIV risk behavior: A conceptual framework. Health Education Research, 17(4), 389–403.
Rapkin, B. D., & Trickett, E. J. (2005). Comprehensive dynamic trial designs for behavioral prevention research with communities: Overcoming inadequacies of the randomized controlled trial paradigm. In E. J. Trickett & W. Pequegnat (Eds.), Community interventions and AIDS. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Rhodes, T., & Hartnoll, R. (1996). AIDS, drugs and prevention: Perspectives on individual and community action. London: Routledge.
Rhodes, T., Stimson, G. V., & Quirk, A. (1996). Sex, drugs, intervention, and research: From the individual to the social. Substance Use and Misuse, 31(3), 375–407.
Robertson, A., & Minkler, M. (1994). New health promotion movement: A critical examination. Health Education Quarterly, 21(3), 295–312.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Rotheram-Borus, M. J., & Duan, N. (2003). Next generation of preventive interventions. Journal of American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(5), 518–526.
Schensul, J. J. (2005). Sustainability in HIV prevention research. In E. J. Trickett & W. Pequegnat (Eds.), Community interventions and AIDS (pp. 176–195). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Schensul, S. L., Verma, R. K., & Nastasi, B. K. (2004). Responding to men’s sexual concerns: Research and intervention in slum communities in Mumbai, India. International Journal of Men’s Health, 3(3), 197–220.
Treno, A. J., & Holder, H. D. (1997). Community mobilization, organizing and media advocacy: A discussion of methodological issues. Evaluation Review, 21(2), 166–190.
Trickett, E. J. (2002). Context, culture, and collaboration in AIDS interventions: Ecological ideas for enhancing community impact. Journal of Primary Prevention, 23(2), 157–174.
Trickett, E. J. (2005). Community interventions and HIV/AIDS: Affecting the community context. In E. J. Trickett & W. Pequegnat (Eds.), Community interventions and AIDS (pp. 3–27). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Trickett, E. J., & Pequegnat, W. (Eds.). (2005). Community interventions and AIDS. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wasserman, S., & Klovdahl, A. S. (1994). Social networks, drug abuse and HIV transmission. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Weeks, M. R., Clair, S., Borgatti, S. P., Radda, K., & Schensul, J. J. (2002). Social networks of drug users in high-risk sites: Finding the connections. AIDS and Behavior, 6(2), 193–206.
Weeks, M. R., Clair, S., Singer, M., Radda, K., Schensul, J. J., Wilson, D. S., et al. (2001). High-risk drug use sites, meaning and practice: Implications for AIDS prevention. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 781–808.
Weeks, M. R., Convey, M., Martinez, M., Dickson-Gomez, J., Woods, O., Ortiz, C., et al. (2004). Risk avoidance partnership: A training curriculum for peer health advocates to prevent HIV and other drug related risks and harm. Hartford, CT: Institute for Community Research.
Weeks, M. R., Dickson-Gomez, J., Mosack, K. E., Convey, M., Martinez, M., & Clair, S. (2006). The risk avoidance partnership: Training active drug users as peer health advocates. Journal of Drug Issues, Summer, 36(3), 541–570.
Weeks, M. R., Li, J., Clair, S., Borgatti, S. P., Dickson-Gomez, J., Convey, M., et al. (2007, March). Risk reduction effects of Peer Health Advocates on a drug user social network: Outcomes of a peer-delivered intervention program. Paper presented at the Society for Applied Anthropology meetings, Tampa, FL.
Weeks, M. R., Li, J., Dickson-Gomez, J., Coman, E., Convey, M., Martinez, M., et al. (2009). Outcomes of a peer HIV prevention program with injection drug and crack users: The risk avoidance partnership. Substance Use & Misuse, 44(2), 253–281.
WHO. (1984). Report of the working group on the concept and principles of health promotion. Copenhagen: World Health Organization.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, grant #R01 DA13356. RAP is an affiliated study of the Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS (P30 MH62294).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weeks, M.R., Convey, M., Dickson-Gomez, J. et al. Changing Drug Users’ Risk Environments: Peer Health Advocates as Multi-level Community Change Agents. Am J Community Psychol 43, 330–344 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-009-9234-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-009-9234-z