Skip to main content
Log in

Lessons learned in systems change initiatives: benchmarks and indicators

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Measuring progress toward systems change, sustainable efforts that address root causes of an issue by changing policies and practices, is a difficult task for communities, evaluators, and foundations. Tracking and documenting changes in resources, power, policy, sustainable funding, structured relationships and roles, and underlying values require multi-level analyses. Systems change analysts must consider at least four “strata” at once: (1) events and trends, (2) patterns of interaction, (3) context and cultural or social models, and (4) the systems themselves. In this paper we provide a brief overview of systems change; a discussion of collaboratives as one “engine” of social change; a discussion of benchmarks and indicators of collaboratives focused on systems change; and suggestions for further research. The analysis draws upon several analytic frameworks described in the literature. We illustrate these concepts with examples from six systems change initiatives funded by The California Endowment. The need for further research is outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1993). Benchmarking. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 6(6), 581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, R. R. (1975). Health care politics: Ideological and interest group barriers to reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, D. G. (1995). Sustaining interventions in community systems: On the relationships between researchers and communities. Health Psychology, 14, 526–536.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. D., Bell, J., Colmenar, R., Flournoy, R., McGehee, M., & Rubin, V., et al. (2002). Reducing health disparities through a focus on communities. Oakland, CA: PolicyLink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, A., Stokols, D., Green, L. W., Leischow, S., Holmes, B., & Buchholz, K. (2003). An integrative framework for community partnering to translate theory into effective health promotion strategy. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(2), 168–176.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, H. L. (1976). Expanding health care horizons: From a general systems concept of health to a national health policy. San Francisco: Third Party Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, H. L. (1981). Planning for health: Development and application of social change theory (2nd ed.). New York: Human Sciences Press.

  • Brindis, C. D., & Wunsch, B. (1996). Finding common ground: Developing linkages between school-linked/school-based health programs and managed care health plans. Sacramento, CA: The Foundation Consortium for School-Linked Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfoss, F. D. (2004). The coalition technical assistance and training framework: Helping community coalitions help themselves. Health Promotion Practice, 5(2), 118–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfoss, F. D., Goodman, R. M., & Wandersman, A. (1993). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Education Research, 8(3), 315–330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfoss, F. D., Goodman, R. M., & Wandersman, A. (1996). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: Factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning. Health Education Quarterly, 23(1), 65–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfoss, F. D., & Kegler, M. C. (2002). Toward a comprehensive understanding of community coalitions: Moving from practice to theory. In R. J. DiClemente, R. Crosby, & M. C. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: Strategies for improving public health (pp. 157–193). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24(4), 404–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2002). Physical activity evaluation handbook. Retrieved June 30, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/physical/handbook/pdf/handbook.pdf

  • Churchman, C. W. (1971). The design of inquiring systems. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1979). The systems approach and its enemies. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayson, Z. (2006). Personal communication.

  • Davis, R., & Cohen, L. (2003). Health for all: California’s strategic approach to eliminating health disparities. Oakland, CA: Prevention Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunet, D. O., & Butterfoss, F. D. (2005). State plan index: A tool for assessing the quality of state public health plans. Prevention of Chronic Disease, 2(2), A15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, S. (2005). Our model of practice: Building capacity for community and systems change. Retrieved June 30, 2005, from http://ctb.ku.edu/tools/en/sub_section_tools_1002.htm

  • The Finance Project. (2002). Sustaining comprehensive community initiatives: Key elements for success. Retrieved June 30, 2005, from http://www.financeproject.org/Publications/sustaining.pdf

  • Foster-Fishman, P., Van Egeren, L., & Yang, H. (2005). Using a systems change approach to evaluate comprehensive community change initiatives. Paper presented at the American Evaluation Association and Canadian Evaluation Association Meetings. Toronto, Canada, October 24–30, 2005

  • Friedman, M. (1997). A guide to developing and using performance measures in results-based budgeting. Retrieved June 4, 2005, from http://www.financeproject.org/Publications/measures.html

  • Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. W., & Ottoson, J. M. (1999). Community and population health. Boston: WCB/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiff, D., Proscio, T., & Wilkins, C. (2003). Laying a new foundation: Changing the systems that create and sustain supportive housing. New York: Corporation for Supportive Housing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, M. (1999). Guide to sustainable community indicators (2nd ed.). North Andover: QLF/Atlantic Center for the Environment.

  • Healthy Cities. (2005). Retrieved July 19, 2005, from http://www.healthycities.org

  • Institute of Medicine. (2002). Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessel, F. S., Rosenfield, P. L., & Anderson, N. B. (Eds.), (2003). Expanding the boundaries of health and social science: Case studies in interdisciplinary innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplines, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, J. S., Philliber, S., Brindis, C. D., Kamin, S. L., Chadwick, A. E., & Revels, M. L., et al. (2005). Coalitions models: Lessons learned from the CDC’s community coalition partnership programs for the prevention of teen pregnancy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, S20–S30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuter, M. W., Lezin, N. A., Kreuter, M. W., & Green, L. W. (2003). Community health promotion ideas that work (2nd ed.). Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

  • Kubisch, A., Auspos, P., Brown, P., Chaskin, R., Fulbright-Anderson, K., & Hamilton, R. (2002). Voices from the field II: Reflections on comprehensive community change. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, C. K., & Mahoney, C. A. (2003). A framework for evaluating comprehensive community initiatives. Health Promotion Practice, 4(1), 31–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, R. D., & Weiss, E. S. (2003). Broadening participation in community problem solving: A multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. Journal of Urban Health, 80(1), 14–47; discussion 48–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, R. D., Weiss, E. S., & Miller, R. (2001a). Partnership synergy: A practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. Milbank Quarterly, 79(2), 179–205, III–IV.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, R. D., Weiss, E. S., & Miller, R. (2001b). Promoting collaborations that improve health. Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice, 13(2), 163–172 (CCPH Special Section).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, L., & Hawe, P. (2005). Ecological perspectives in health research. Journal of the Epidemiology of Community Health, 59(1), 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships. (2005). Community health status assessment core indicator lists. Retrieved June 4, 2005, from http://mapp.naccho.org/chsa/ChsaIndicatorListing.asp

  • Nicola, R. (2005). Turning Point’s national excellence collaboratives: Assessing a new model of policy and system capacity development. Journal of Public Health Management Practice, 11(2), 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychologist, 51(3), 390–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C., & Evers, K. (2002). The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In K. Glanz, B. Rimer, & F. Lewis (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice (3rd ed., pp. 99–120). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., & Feldstein, L. M. (2003). Better together: Restoring the American Community. Simon and Schuster: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

  • Ross, J. (2004). Ways of approaching research qualitative designs, quantitative designs. Retrieved June 2005 from http:///www.fortunecity.com/greenfield/gr.22ly/432/rra2.htm

  • Rossi, P., Lipsey, M., & Freeman, H. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

  • Samuel, S., & Stone-Francisco. S. (2006). Personal communication.

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D., Harvey, R., Gress, J., Fuqua, J., & Phillips, K. (2005). In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration: Lessons learned and implications for active living research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2S2), 202–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Supovitz, J., & Taylor, B. S. (2005). Systemic education evaluation: evaluating the impact of systemwide reform in education. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(2), 204–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syme, S. L. (2000). Community participation, empowerment, and health: Development of a wellness guide for California. In M. Schneider Jamner & D. Stokols (Eds.), Promoting human wellness: New frontiers for research, practice, and policy (pp. 78–98). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, V., Chesir-Teran, D., Becker-Klein, R., Chan, M. L., Duran, V., & Roberts, A., et al. (2002). Promotion of social change: A conceptual framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(3), 401–427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). W. K. Kellogg logic model development guide. Battle Creek, MI: W. K. Kellogg Foundation.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Rebecca Dorman for editorial and research assistance and the evaluators for the Initiatives cited, including Sarah Samuels, Zoe Clayson, and Michael Cousineau. This project was supported in part by a grant received from The California Endowment. The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments of the editors of this special issue and two anonymous reviewers of earlier drafts of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Kreger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kreger, M., Brindis, C.D., Manuel, D.M. et al. Lessons learned in systems change initiatives: benchmarks and indicators. Am J Community Psychol 39, 301–320 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9108-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9108-1

Keywords

Navigation