Abstract
Community science has a rich tradition of using theories and research designs that are consistent with its core value of contextualism. However, a survey of empirical articles published in the American Journal of Community Psychology shows that community scientists utilize a narrow range of statistical tools that are not well suited to assess contextual data. Multilevel modeling, geographic information systems (GIS), social network analysis, and cluster analysis are recommended as useful tools to address contextual questions in community science. An argument for increased methodological consilience is presented, where community scientists are encouraged to adopt statistical methodology that is capable of modeling a greater proportion of the data than is typical with traditional methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, C., Piazza, M., Mekos, D., & Valente, T. (2001). Peers, schools and adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 22–30.
Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Best, A., Moor, G., Holmes, B., Clark, P. I., Bruce, T., Leischow, S., Bucholz, K., & Krajnak, J. (2003). Health promotion dissemination and systems thinking: Towards an integrative model. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27, S206–S216.
Bybee, D. I., & Sullivan, C. M. (2002). The process through which an advocacy intervention resulted in positive change for battered women over time. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 103–132.
Carver, S. (2001): Participation and geographic information: A position paper. ESF-NSF Workshop on Access to Geographic Information and Participatory Approaches using Geographic Information. Spoleto, December 2001.
Cleveland, W. (1993). Visualizing data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.
Cohen, S., Underwood, L., & Gottlieb, B. H. (2000). Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists. New York, Oxford University Press
Coulton, C., Korbin, J., & Su, M. (1999). Neighborhoods and child maltreatment: A multi-level study of resources and controls. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 1019–1040.
Degenne, A., & Forsé, M. (2004). Introducing social networks. London: Sage.
Duncan, C., Jones, K., & Moon, G. (1998). Context, composition and heterogeneity: Using multilevel models in health research. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 97–117.
Felton, B. J., & Shinn, M. (1992). Social integration and social support: Moving social support beyond the individual level. Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 103–115.
Fleishman, J. A., Sherbourne, C. D., Cleary, P. D., Wu, A. W., Crystal, S., & Hays, R. D. (2003). Patterns of coping among persons with HIV infection: Configurations, correlates, and change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 187–204.
Foster-Fishman, P. G., Salem, D. A., Allen, N. A., & Fahrbach, K. (1999). Ecological factors impacting provider attitudes towards service delivery reform. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 785–816.
Foster-Fishman, P. G., Salem, D. A., Allen, N. A., & Fahrbach, K. (2001). Facilitating interorganizational collaboration: The contributions of interorganizational alliances. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 875–905.
Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver, Canada: Empirical Press.
Goldstein, A. O., Peterson, A. B., Ribisl, K. M., Steckler, A., Linnan, L., McGloin, T., & Patterson, C. (2003). Passage of 100% tobacco-free school policies in 14 North Carolina school districts. Journal of School Health, 73, 293–299.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
Haining, R. (2003). Spatial data analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hedeker, D., McMahon, S. D., Jason, L. A., & Salina, D. (1994). Analysis of clustered data in community psychology: With an example from a worksite smoking cessation project. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 595–615.
Hirsch, B. J., Mickus, M., & Boerger, R. (2002). Ties to influential adults among black and white adolescents: Culture, social class, and family networks. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 289–304.
Hoaglin, D. C., Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. W. (1983). Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis. New York: Wiley.
Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kelly, J. G. (2002). The spirit of community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 43–64.
Kelly, J. G. (2003). Science and community psychology: Social norms for pluralistic inquiry. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 213–217.
Kivimäki, M., Vahtera, J., Elovainio, M., Pentti, J., & Virtanen, M. (2003). Human costs of organizational downsizing: Comparing health trends between leavers and stayers. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 57–68.
Krauss, M. J., Mueller, N. H., & Luke, D. A. (2004) Interorganizational relationships within state tobacco control networks: A social network analysis. Preventing Chronic Disease, 1, [serial online]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2004/oct/04_0041.htm.
Kuhn, R., & Culhane, D. P. (1998). Applying cluster analysis to test a typology of homelessness by pattern of shelter utilization: Results from the analysis of administrative data. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 207–232.
Lin, N. (2000). Social capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luke, D. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Luke, D. A., & Krauss, M. (2004). Where there’s smoke there’s money: Tobacco industry campaign contributions and U.S. Congressional voting. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27, 363–372.
Luke, D. A., Esmundo, E., & Bloom, Y. (2000). Smoke signs: Patterns of tobacco billboard advertising in a metropolitan region. Tobacco Control, 9, 16–23.
Mankowski, E., Humphreys, K., & Moos, R. H. (2001). Individual and contextual predictors of involvement in twelve step self-help groups after substance abuse treatment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 537–563.
Mark, D. M., Chrisman, N., Frank, A. U., McHaffie, P. H., & Pickles, J. (2004). The GIS history project. Retrieved February 2004, from http://www.geog.buffalo.edu/ncgia/gishist/bar_harbor.html.
Mintz, B., & Schwartz, M. (1981). Interlocking directorates and interest group formation. American Sociological Review, 46, 851–869.
Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. (2001). Toward higher levels of analysis: Progress and promise in research on social and cultural dimensions of health. NIH Publication No. 21-5020. Available online at: http://obssr.od.nih.gov/news/publications.html.
Rapkin, B., & Luke, D. A. (1993). Cluster analysis in community research: Epistemology and practice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 247–277.
Revenson, T. A., D’Augelli, A. R., French, S. E., Hughes, D., Livert, D., Seidman, E., Shinn, M., & Yoshikawa, H. (Eds.). (2002). Ecological Research to Promote Social Change: Methodological Advances from Community Psychology. New York: Plenum.
Rothenberg, R. B., Potterat, J. J., Woodhouse, D. E., Muth, S. Q., Darrow, W. W., & Klovdahl, A. S. (1998). Social network dynamics and HIV transmission. AIDS, 12, 1529–1536.
Salem, D. A., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Goodkind, J. R. (2002). Adoption of innovation in collective advocacy organizations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 681–710.
Sarason, S. B. (2003). The obligations of the moral-scientific stance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 209–211.
SCRA. (2004). The SCRA mission. Retrieved February 2004, from http://www.apa.org/divisions/div27/goals.html.
Shinn, M., & Rapkin, B. D. (2000). Cross-level research without cross-ups in community psychology. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 669–693). New York: Kluwer Academic.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
Stokes, J. P. (1983). Predicting satisfaction with social support from social network structure. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 141–152.
Tausig, M. (1987). Detecting “cracks” in mental health service systems: Application of network analytic techniques. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 337–351.
Thagard, P. (1988). Computational Philosophies of Science. A Bradford Book. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Trutko, J., & Barnow, B. (2003). Core performance indicators for homeless-serving programs administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Final Report. Available online: http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/homelessness/perf-ind03.
Tseng, V., Chesir-Teran, D., Becker-Klein, R., Chan, M. L., Duran, V., Roberts, A., & Bardoliwalla, N. (2002). Promotion of social change: A conceptual framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 401–428.
Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CN: Graphics Press.
Valente, T. W. (1995). Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Cresskill: Hampton.
Wasco, S. M., Campbell, R., & Clark, M. (2002). A multiple case study of rape victim advocates’ self-care routines: The influence of organizational context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 731–760.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wicker, A. W. (1992). Making sense of environments. In W. B. Walsh & K. H. Craik (Eds.), Person-environment psychology: Models and perspectives (pp. 157–192). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wieczorek, W. F., & Hanson, C.E. (1997). New modeling methods: Geographic information systems and spatial analysis. Alcohol Health and Research World, 21, 331–339.
Zapert, K., Snow, D. L., & Tebes, J. K. (2003). Patterns of substance use in early through late adolescence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 835–852.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luke, D.A. Getting the Big Picture in Community Science: Methods That Capture Context. Am J Community Psychol 35, 185–200 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-3397-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-3397-z