Skip to main content
Log in

Crime, Social Capital, and Community Participation

  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Social disorganization at the neighborhood and community levels has been consistently linked to various forms of criminal activity. However, a very much smaller body of literature addresses the effects of crime on community organizations. In some studies, crime appears to energize communities while in others, crime leads to withdrawal from community life. Using department of health crime victimization data and interviews with 2,985 low-income inner city residents living in 487 multi-family dwellings, a multi-level model examined the relationships among crime victimization, social organization, and participation in neighborhood organizations. Social organization at the individual and building levels was measured using recent formulations of social capital theory. Findings regarding crime suggested more signs of a chilling effect on participation than of an energizing effect, especially at the building level. Social capital at the building level was more strongly and consistently related to participation in community organizations than was crime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berkowitz, B. (2000). Community and neighborhood organization. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 331–358). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, A. J. (1995). Housing New York City: 1993. New York: City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education(pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, X. de S. (1997). Social capital and the cities: Advice to change agents. National Civic Review, 86, 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, X. de S. (1998). Brown kids in white suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 177–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursik, Robert, J., Jr. (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 26, 519–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornhauser, R. (1978). Social sources of delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreft, I. G. G., De Leeuw, J., & Aiken, L. (1995). The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchic linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, J., & Saegert, S. (1990). From abandonment to hope: Community households in Harlem. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I. (2000). Making a difference: The social ecology of social transformation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 25–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. D., Hughey, J., & Speer, W. (2002). Community psychology perspectives on social capital theory and community development practice. Journal of the Community Development Society, 33, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portnoy, K. E., & Berry, J. M. (1997). Mobilizing minority communities: Social capital and participation in urban neighborhoods. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 632–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon & Shuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/examples of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 121–144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S. (1993). What ‘s wrong with empowerment? American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 279–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saegert, S. (1989). Unlikely leaders, extreme circumstances: Older Black women building community households. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 295–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saegert, S. (1993). Survey of residents of currently and previously city-owned buildings in the Bronx. In M. Cotton (Ed.), Housing in the balance: Seeking a comprehensive policy for city-owned housing. New York City: Task Force on City Owned Housing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saegert, S., & Winkel, G. H. (1996). Paths to community empowerment: Organizing at home, American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 517–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saegert, S., & Winkel, G. H. (1997). Social capital formation in low-income housing. New York: City University of New York Graduate Center, Housing Environments Research Group of the Center for Human Environments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saegert, S., & Winkel, G. H. (1998). Social capital and the revitalization of New York City’s distressed inner-city housing. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 17–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saegert, S., Winkel, G., & Swartz, C. (2002). A prospective study of social capital and crime in low income housing. Housing Policy Debate, 13, 186–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (1988). Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multilevel systemic model. American Sociological Review, 53, 766–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (1991). Linking the micro-and macrolevel dimensions of community social organization. Social Forces, 70, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (1999). What Community supplies. In Ronald Fergusen & William Dickens (Eds.), Urban problems and community development. Washington: Brookings Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2001). Crime and public safety: Insights from community-level perspectives on social capital. In S. Saegert, P. J. Thompson & M. Warren (Eds.), Social capital and poor communities: Building and using social assets to combat poverty. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. J. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Morenhoff, J., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, P. W., & J. Hughey (1995). Community organizing: An ecological route to empowerment and power. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 729–748.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, P. W., Hughey, J., Gensheimer, L. K., & Adams-Leavitt, W. (1995). Organizing for power: A comparative case study. Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Ralph B. (1996). Neighborhood responses to disorder and local attachments: The systemic model of attachment, social disorganization, and neighborhood use value. Sociological Forum, 11, 41–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Ralph B. (1997). Social order and disorder of street blocks and neighborhoods: Ecology, microecology, and the systemic model of social disorganization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 113–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (2000). Citizen participation. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 247–272). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. R., Thompson, J. P., & Saegert, S. (2001). Social capital and poor communities: A framework for analysis. In S. Saegert, J. P. Thompson, & M. R. Warren (Eds.), Building and using social capital in poor communities (pp. 1–30). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkel, G., & Saegert, S. Innercity residents’ desires to move or stay: Contributions of lifecycle stage, housing quality, management, and social context. Journal of Environmental Psychology,Submitted for publication.

  • Wuthnow, R. (2002). The changing character of social capital in the United States. In E. Cox & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society(pp. 59–102). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A., & Perkins, D. D. (Eds.) (1995). Special Issue: Empowerment Theory, Research, and Application. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5).

  • Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–64). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Saegert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saegert, S., Winkel, G. Crime, Social Capital, and Community Participation. Am J Community Pschol 34, 219–233 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-004-7416-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-004-7416-2

Navigation