Skip to main content
Log in

Zero-day attack detection: a systematic literature review

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the continuous increase in cyberattacks over the past few decades, the quest to develop a comprehensive, robust, and effective intrusion detection system (IDS) in the research community has gained traction. Many of the recently proposed solutions lack a holistic IDS approach due to explicitly relying on attack signature repositories, outdated datasets or the lack of considering zero-day (unknown) attacks while developing, training, or testing the machine learning (ML) or deep learning (DL)-based models. Overlooking these factors makes the proposed IDS less robust or practical in real-time environments. On the other hand, detecting zero-day attacks is a challenging subject, despite the many solutions proposed over the past many years. One of the goals of this systematic literature review (SLR) is to provide a research asset to future researchers on various methodologies, techniques, ML and DL algorithms that researchers used for the detection of zero-day attacks. The extensive literature review on the recent publications reveals exciting future research trends and challenges in this particular field. With all the advances in technology, the availability of large datasets, and the strong processing capabilities of DL algorithms, detecting a completely new or unknown attack remains an open research area. This SLR is an effort towards completing the gap in providing a single repository of finding ML and DL-based tools and techniques used by researchers for the detection of zero-day attacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rasheed Ahmad.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: list of included and excluded studies

Table 14 presents the list of papers included and excluded in this research review. The columns “QA1–QA6” show the quality assessment score after the quality criteria identified in Sect. 5.2.4 are applied. Results are an aggregated answer to the six QA scores. The last column reflects “I-Included” and “E-Excluded” studies from this review based on QA results. Studies with over 50% (> 3) are included in this SLR; otherwise, they were excluded. It is important to mention here that any study not answering QA1 (i.e., Does the study address zero-day attack detection?) defeats the purpose of this SLR so that it will be excluded from further analysis.

Table 14 Quality assessment criteria evaluation

Appendix 2: data extraction form and details

Table 15 presents the details of unknown attack detection research papers included in this study.

Table 15 Data extraction form and details

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmad, R., Alsmadi, I., Alhamdani, W. et al. Zero-day attack detection: a systematic literature review. Artif Intell Rev 56, 10733–10811 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10437-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10437-z

Keywords

Navigation