Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Barriers and Facilitators of HIV Care Engagement: Results of a Qualitative Study in St. Petersburg, Russia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Russia has a large HIV epidemic, but medical care engagement is low. Eighty HIV-positive persons in St. Petersburg completed in-depth interviews to identify barriers and facilitators of medical HIV care engagement. The most commonly-reported barriers involved difficulties accessing care providers, dissatisfaction with the quality of services, and negative attitudes of provider staff. Other barriers included not having illness symptoms, life stresses, low value placed on health, internalized stigma and wanting to hide one’s HIV status, fears of learning about one’s true health status, and substance abuse. Care facilitators were feeling responsible for one’s health and one’s family, care-related support from other HIV-positive persons, and the onset of health decline and fear of death. Substance use remission facilitated care engagement, as did good communication from providers and trust in one’s doctor. Interventions are needed in Russia to address HIV care infrastructural barriers and integrate HIV, substance abuse, care, and psychosocial services.

Resumen

Rusia experimenta una importante epidemia de VIH, pero tiene baja retención de las personas VIH positivas en la atención médica. Ochenta personas viviendo con VIH en San Petersburgo completaron entrevistas en profundidad con el fin de identificar barreras y facilitadores en cuanto a estar bajo atención médica del VIH. Las barreras más comúnmente reportadas fueron dificultades en el acceso a proveedores de salud, insatisfacción con la calidad de los servicios de salud, y actitudes negativas de los proveedores de salud. Otras barreras fueron no tener síntomas de enfermedad, experimentar otros estresores vitales, tener una baja valoración de la propia salud, experimentar estigma internalizado y necesitad de esconder el estatus VIH positivo, tener miedo a conocer el propio estado de salud, y usar sustancias. Los facilitadores de mantenerse bajo cuidado médico fueron sentirse responsable por la propia salud y la de la familia, recibir el apoyo de otras personas VIH positivas, y sentir el comienzo de la declinación de la salud y el miedo a la muerte. Además de la buena comunicación con los proveedores de salud y de tener un médico de confianza, la reducción del uso de sustancias facilitó la retención en el cuidado médico. En Rusia, se necesitan intervenciones que tengan en cuenta las barreras de infraestructura en la atención del VIH e integren los servicios de VIH con los psicosociales y de abuso de sustancias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:493–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rodger A, Bruun T, Cambiano V, et al. for the PARTNER Study Group. HIV transmission risk through condomless sex if HIV + partner on suppressive ART: PARTNER Study [abstract LB-153]. Abstracts from the 2014 conference on retroviruses and opportunistic infections. Top Antivir Med. 2014;22(e-1).

  3. Dieffenbach CW, Fauci AS. Universal voluntary testing and treatment for prevention of HIV transmission. JAMA. 2009;301:2380–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gardner EM, McLees MP, Steiner JF, Del Rio C, Burman WJ. The spectrum of engagement in HIV care and its relevance to test-and-treat strategies for prevention of HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:793–800.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Philbin MM, Tanner AE, DuVal A, et al. Factors affecting linkage to care and engagement in care for newly-diagnosed HIV-positive adolescents within fifteen adolescent medicine clinics in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2014;189:1501–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gardner LI, Metsch LR, Anderson-Mahoney P, et al. Efficacy of a brief case management intervention to link recently diagnosed HIV-infected persons to care. AIDS. 2005;19:423–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Raymond A, Hill A, Pozniak A. Large disparities in HIV treatment cascades between eight European and high-income countries—analysis of break points. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17(Suppl 3):19507.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. UNAIDS. Treatment 2015. Geneva, Switzerland: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, 2015. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/JC2484_treatment-2015_en_1.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2015.

  9. Russian Federal AIDS Center. Information on HIV Infection in Russian Federation (as of 31 of December, 2014) [in Russian]. http://www.hivrussia.org/files/spravkaHIV2014.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2015.

  10. Pokrovskaya A, Popova A, Ladnaya N, Yurin O. The cascade of HIV care in Russia, 2011-2013. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17(Suppl 3):19506.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. UNAIDS. Together we will end AIDS. 2012. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/epidemiology/2012/JC2296_UNAIDS_TogetherReport_2012_en.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2015.

  12. St. Petersburg AIDS Center. HIV in Saint Petersburg. AIDS Sex Health. 2013; 4:21. http://www.aidsjournal.ru/pdf/txt_2013_04.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2015.

  13. Pokrovskiy V. HIV epidemic in Russia and neighbouring countries. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17(Suppl 3):19502.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhatia R, Hartman C, Kallen MA, Graham J, Giordano TP. Persons newly diagnosed with HIV infection are at high risk for depression and poor linkage to care: results from the Steps Study. AIDS Behav. 2011;15:1161–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bauman LJ, Braunstein S, Calderon Y, et al. Barriers and facilitators of linkage to HIV primary care in New York City. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;64(Suppl 1):S20–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mayer KH. Introduction: linkage, engagement, and retention in HIV care: essential for optimal individual- and community-level outcomes in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(Suppl 2):S205–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Magnus M, Jones K, Phillips G, et al. Characteristics associated with retention among African American and Latino adolescent HIV-positive men: results from the outreach, care, and prevention to engage HIV-seropositive young MSM of color special project of national significance initiative. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53:529–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haley DF, Lucas J, Golin CE, for the HPTN 064 Study Team, et al. Retention strategies and factors associated with missed visits among low income women at increased risk of HIV acquisition in the US (HPTN 064). AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2014;28:206–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sprague C, Simon SE. Understanding HIV care delays in the US South and the role of the social-level in HIV care engagement/retention: a qualitative study. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tedaldi EM, Richardson JT, Debes R, et al. Retention in care within 1 year of initial HIV care visit in a multisite US cohort: who’s in and who’s out? J Int Assoc of Provid AIDS Care. 2014;13:232–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nunn A, Cornwall A, Fu J, Bazerman L, Loewenthal H, Beckwith C. Linking HIV-positive jail inmates to treatment, care, and social services after release: results from a qualitative assessment of the COMPASS Program. J Urban Health. 2010;87:954–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Giordano TP, Hartman C, Gifford AL, Backus LI, Morgan RO. Predictors of retention in HIV care among a national cohort of US veterans. HIV Clin Trials. 2009;10:299–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tripathi A, Youmans E, Gibson JJ, Duffus WA. The impact of retention in early HIV medical care on viro-immunological parameters and survival: a statewide study. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2011;27:751–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Torian LV, Xia Q, Wiewel EW. Retention in care and viral suppression among persons living with HIV/AIDS in New York City, 2006–2010. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:e24–9. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302080.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Grabmeier-Pfistershammer K, Rieger A, Schröck T, Schlag M. Economic burden of late presentation in HIV disease in Austria: a comparison of the initial costs imposed by advanced HIV disease vs. non-late presentation. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013;125:402–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fagan JL, Beer L, Garland P, et al. The influence of perceptions of HIV infection, care, and identity on care entry. AIDS Care. 2012;24:737–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McCoy SI. HIV testing and linkage to care in North Carolina: early diagnosis, late diagnosis and delayed presentation to care. [Doctoral dissertation]. Chapel Hill: HIV ATN LTC dissertation database; 2002.

  28. Morales-Aleman MM, Sutton MY. Hispanics/Latinos and the HIV continuum of care in the Southern USA: a qualitative review of the literature, 2002–2013. AIDS Care. 2014;26:1592–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gardner LI, Giordano TP, Marks G, et al. Enhanced personal contact with HIV patients improves retention in primary care: a randomized trial in 6 US HIV clinics. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:725–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Udeagu CC, Webster TR, Bocour A, Michel P, Shepard CW. Lost or just not following up: public health effort to re-engage HIV-infected persons lost to follow-up into HIV medical care. AIDS. 2013;27:2271–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Aidala AA, Lee G, Abramson DM, Messeri P, Siegler A. Housing need, housing assistance, and connection to medical care. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(Suppl 2):S101–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cunningham CO, Buck J, Shaw F, Seigel LS, Heo M, Agins BD. Factors associated with returning to HIV care after a gap in care in New York State. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;66:419–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kelly JD, Hartman C, Graham J, Kallen MA, Giordano TP. Social support as a predictor of early diagnosis, linkage, retention, and adherence to HIV care: results from the steps study. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2014;25:405–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 2nd ed. Walnut Creek, CA: Sage; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Spradley JP. Participant observation. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hall J, Stevens PE. Rigor in feminist research. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1991;13:16–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sandelowski M. The problem of rigor in qualitative research. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1986;8:27–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Amirkhanian YA, Kelly JA, Kuznetsova AV, DiFranceisco WJ, Musatov VB, Pirogov DG. People with HIV in HAART-era Russia: transmission risk behavior prevalence, risk predictors, and psychosocial distress. AIDS Behav. 2010;15:767–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. World Health Organization. Guideline on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; September, 2015. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/186275/1/9789241509565_eng.pdf. Accessed October 12, 2015.

  40. Philbin MM, Tanner AE, Duval A, Ellen J, Kapogiannis B, Fortenberry JD. Linking HIV-positive adolescents to care in 15 different clinics across the United States: creating solutions to address structural barriers for linkage to care. AIDS Care. 2014;26:12–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Latkin C, Weeks MR, Glasman L, Galletly C, Albarracin D. A dynamic social systems model for considering structural factors in HIV prevention and detection. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(Suppl 2):222–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants R01-MH098729, R21-MH102193, P30-MH52776 from the US National Institute of Mental Health and by Grant 13-06-91440 from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. The authors extend their appreciation to Laura Glasman, Maria Donskaya, Dmitry Mescheryakov, Dmitry Pirogov, Rudolph Amirkhanian, and Nikolay Chaika.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuri A. Amirkhanian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuznetsova, A.V., Meylakhs, A.Y., Amirkhanian, Y.A. et al. Barriers and Facilitators of HIV Care Engagement: Results of a Qualitative Study in St. Petersburg, Russia. AIDS Behav 20, 2433–2443 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1282-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1282-9

Keywords

Navigation